Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 5/2021

01-10-2021 | Diaphragmatic Hernia | Original Article

Comparison of a novel preperitoneal sublay repair with traditional onlay repair of morgagni hernia: a tale of two techniques

Authors: Anna K. Gergen, John H. Frankel, Michael J. Weyant, Akshay Pratap

Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Issue 5/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Morgagni hernia (MH) is a rare diaphragmatic hernia which needs surgical repair. The conventional reconstruction involves reduction of hernia, closure of the defect and placement of an intraperitoneal onlay mesh often using robotic platform for ease of dissection and suturing the mesh (r-IPOM). We propose a novel robotic preperitoneal repair (r-TAPP) of MH in four cases and compare them with conventional r-IPOM technique. Between August 2017 and August 2020 nine patients underwent repair of MH. Five cases underwent repair by r-IPOM (group I). For the other four cases, r-TAPP was used (group II). Among the nine cases, the mean age was 53 years in group I and 55 years in group II, mean defect size was 33 mm in group I and 55 mm in group II. Operative time was longer in group II compared to group I (220 min vs 135 min, p = 0.022). Mean length of hospital stay was 1.3 days in group I compared to group II (4.5 and 4.5 vs 1.3 days, p = 0.03). There was statistically significant difference in reduced post-operative pain and time to return to work in group II compared to group I. There was no difference in complications, 30-day readmissions or recurrence of hernia between the two groups. We conclude that compared to the conventional r-IPOM repair, the r-TAPP technique is associated with less pain, early discharge, and faster return to work, translating into overall cost savings for the hospital.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Pfannschmidt J, Hoffmann H, Dienemann H (2004) Morgagni hernia in adults: results in 7 patients. Scand J Surg 93(1):77–81CrossRef Pfannschmidt J, Hoffmann H, Dienemann H (2004) Morgagni hernia in adults: results in 7 patients. Scand J Surg 93(1):77–81CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Comer TP, Clagett OT (1966) Surgical treatment of hernia of the foramen of Morgagni. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 52(4):461–468CrossRef Comer TP, Clagett OT (1966) Surgical treatment of hernia of the foramen of Morgagni. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 52(4):461–468CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Wei B, Pittman BC (2019) Robotic Morgagni hernia repair: an emerging approach to a congenital defect. J Robot Surg 13(2):309–313CrossRef Wei B, Pittman BC (2019) Robotic Morgagni hernia repair: an emerging approach to a congenital defect. J Robot Surg 13(2):309–313CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Leber GE et al (1998) Long-term complications associated with prosthetic repair of incisional hernias. Arch Surg 133(4):378–382CrossRef Leber GE et al (1998) Long-term complications associated with prosthetic repair of incisional hernias. Arch Surg 133(4):378–382CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Godazandeh G, Mokhtari-esbuie F (2016) Laparoscopic repair of Morgagni Hernia: three-case presentation and the literature. Case Rep Surg 2016:4268539PubMedPubMedCentral Godazandeh G, Mokhtari-esbuie F (2016) Laparoscopic repair of Morgagni Hernia: three-case presentation and the literature. Case Rep Surg 2016:4268539PubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Sherigar JM, Dalal AD, Patel JR (2005) Laparoscopic repair of a Morgagni hernia. J Min Access Surg 1(2):76–78CrossRef Sherigar JM, Dalal AD, Patel JR (2005) Laparoscopic repair of a Morgagni hernia. J Min Access Surg 1(2):76–78CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Azar N et al (2019) Innovative use of mesh bolster for adult Morgagni hernia repair. J Surg Case Rep 2019:7CrossRef Azar N et al (2019) Innovative use of mesh bolster for adult Morgagni hernia repair. J Surg Case Rep 2019:7CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Nguyen T et al (1998) The laparoscopic approach for repair of Morgagni hernias. JSLS J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 2(1):85–88 Nguyen T et al (1998) The laparoscopic approach for repair of Morgagni hernias. JSLS J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 2(1):85–88
9.
go back to reference Kaida T et al (2014) Laparoscopic mesh repair of a Morgagni hernia using the double-crown technique: a case study. Asian J Endosc Surg 7(4):323–326CrossRef Kaida T et al (2014) Laparoscopic mesh repair of a Morgagni hernia using the double-crown technique: a case study. Asian J Endosc Surg 7(4):323–326CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Jakhmola CK, Kumar V (2015) Laparoscopic mesh repair of Morgagni hernia in an octogenarian patient. Med J Armed Forces India 71(1):79–81CrossRef Jakhmola CK, Kumar V (2015) Laparoscopic mesh repair of Morgagni hernia in an octogenarian patient. Med J Armed Forces India 71(1):79–81CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Wassenaar E et al (2010) Mesh-fixation method and pain and quality of life after laparoscopic ventral or incisional hernia repair: a randomized trial of three fixation techniques. Surg Endosc 24(6):1296–1302CrossRef Wassenaar E et al (2010) Mesh-fixation method and pain and quality of life after laparoscopic ventral or incisional hernia repair: a randomized trial of three fixation techniques. Surg Endosc 24(6):1296–1302CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Köckerling F, Schug-Pass C, Bittner R (2018) A word of caution: never use tacks for mesh fixation to the diaphragm! Surg Endosc 32(7):3295–3302CrossRef Köckerling F, Schug-Pass C, Bittner R (2018) A word of caution: never use tacks for mesh fixation to the diaphragm! Surg Endosc 32(7):3295–3302CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Prasad P et al (2011) Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a comparative study of transabdominal preperitoneal versus intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21(6):477–483CrossRef Prasad P et al (2011) Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a comparative study of transabdominal preperitoneal versus intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21(6):477–483CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Rankin A, Kostusiak M, Sokker A (2019) Spigelian hernia: case series and review of the literature. Visc Med 35(2):133–136CrossRef Rankin A, Kostusiak M, Sokker A (2019) Spigelian hernia: case series and review of the literature. Visc Med 35(2):133–136CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Bueno-Lledó J et al (2017) Progrip self-gripping mesh in Rives-Stoppa repair: are there any differences in outcomes versus a retromuscular polypropylene mesh fixed with sutures? A “case series” study. Int J Surg Case Rep 34:60–64CrossRef Bueno-Lledó J et al (2017) Progrip self-gripping mesh in Rives-Stoppa repair: are there any differences in outcomes versus a retromuscular polypropylene mesh fixed with sutures? A “case series” study. Int J Surg Case Rep 34:60–64CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kroese LF et al (2017) Long term results of open complex abdominal wall hernia repair with self-gripping mesh: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg 44:255–259CrossRef Kroese LF et al (2017) Long term results of open complex abdominal wall hernia repair with self-gripping mesh: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg 44:255–259CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Comparison of a novel preperitoneal sublay repair with traditional onlay repair of morgagni hernia: a tale of two techniques
Authors
Anna K. Gergen
John H. Frankel
Michael J. Weyant
Akshay Pratap
Publication date
01-10-2021
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Issue 5/2021
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-020-01178-0

Other articles of this Issue 5/2021

Journal of Robotic Surgery 5/2021 Go to the issue