Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 4/2021

Open Access 01-08-2021 | Prostate Cancer | Original Article

Patient reported outcome measures concerning urinary incontinence after robot assisted radical prostatectomy: development and validation of an online prediction model using clinical parameters, lower urinary tract symptoms and surgical experience

Authors: Eelco R. P. Collette, Sjoerd O. Klaver, Birgit I. Lissenberg-Witte, Dies van den Ouden, Reindert J. A. van Moorselaar, André N. Vis

Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Issue 4/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

The prediction of post-prostatectomy incontinence (PPI) after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) depends on multiple clinical, anatomical and surgical factors. There are only few risk formulas, tables or nomograms predicting PPI that may assist clinicians and their patients in adequate risk counseling on postoperative side-effects. Prospective data collection of 1814 patients who underwent RARP between 2009 and 2017 was done. Pre-operative parameters were age, body mass index (BMI), prostate volume, the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, severity of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS), type of planned nerve-sparing surgery and surgical experience. The continence status was reported using Patient Reported Outcome Measurements (PROMs) using the validated pad-use questionnaire EPIC26. Continence was defined as either the use of zero pads or one safety pad. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of PPI within one year after RARP. An online prediction tool was developed and validated. The median follow-up was 36 months (range 12–108). The response rate was high at 85.2%. A total of 85% (1537/1814) of patients was continent on follow-up. One-year continence rate was 80.1% (95% CI 78.3–81.9%) (1453/1814) and increased to 87.4% (95% CI 85.4–89.4%) after 5 years. On multivariable analysis, severity of LUTS (OR = 0.56 p = 0.004), higher age (OR = 0.73 p = 0.049), extend of nerve-sparing surgery (OR = 0.60 p = 0.001) and surgeon experience (OR = 1.48 p = 0.025) were significant independent predictors for PPI. The online prediction model performed well in predicting continence status with poor discrimination and good calibration. An intuitive online tool was developed to predict PPI after RARP that may assist clinicians and their patients in counseling of treatment.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mottet N et al (2017) EAU-ESTRO-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. Eur Urol 71:618CrossRef Mottet N et al (2017) EAU-ESTRO-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. Eur Urol 71:618CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen RC et al (2012) Systematic review and metaanalysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 62:405–417CrossRef Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen RC et al (2012) Systematic review and metaanalysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 62:405–417CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Heesakkers J, Farag F, Bauer R et al (2017) Pathophysiology and contributing factors in postprostatectomy incontinence: a review. Eur Urol 71:936–944CrossRef Heesakkers J, Farag F, Bauer R et al (2017) Pathophysiology and contributing factors in postprostatectomy incontinence: a review. Eur Urol 71:936–944CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ficarra V, Sooriakumaran P, Novara G et al (2012) Systematic review of methods for reporting combined outcomes after radical prostatectomy and proposal of a novel system: the survival, continence, and potency (SCP) classification. Eur Urol 61(3):541–548CrossRef Ficarra V, Sooriakumaran P, Novara G et al (2012) Systematic review of methods for reporting combined outcomes after radical prostatectomy and proposal of a novel system: the survival, continence, and potency (SCP) classification. Eur Urol 61(3):541–548CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Walz J, Epstein JI, Ganzer R et al (2016) A critical analysis of the current knowledge of surgical anatomy of the prostate related to optimisation of cancer control and preservation of continence and erection in candidates for radical prostatectomy: an update. Eur Urol 70(2):301–311CrossRef Walz J, Epstein JI, Ganzer R et al (2016) A critical analysis of the current knowledge of surgical anatomy of the prostate related to optimisation of cancer control and preservation of continence and erection in candidates for radical prostatectomy: an update. Eur Urol 70(2):301–311CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Matsushita K, Kent MT, Vickers AJ et al (2015) Preoperative predictive model of recovery of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 116:577–583CrossRef Matsushita K, Kent MT, Vickers AJ et al (2015) Preoperative predictive model of recovery of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 116:577–583CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Pompe RS, Tian Z, Preisser F et al (2017) Short- and long-term functional outcomes and quality of life after radical prostatectomy: patient-reported outcomes from a tertiary high-volume center. Eur Urol Focus 3(6):615–620CrossRef Pompe RS, Tian Z, Preisser F et al (2017) Short- and long-term functional outcomes and quality of life after radical prostatectomy: patient-reported outcomes from a tertiary high-volume center. Eur Urol Focus 3(6):615–620CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Collette E, Kliffen M, van den Ouden D et al (2013) Perioperatieve, oncologische en functionele leercurves van robotgeassisteerde laparoscopische radicale prostatectomie (RALP) in een hoogvolumeziekenhuis. Tijdschrift voor Urologie 3:190CrossRef Collette E, Kliffen M, van den Ouden D et al (2013) Perioperatieve, oncologische en functionele leercurves van robotgeassisteerde laparoscopische radicale prostatectomie (RALP) in een hoogvolumeziekenhuis. Tijdschrift voor Urologie 3:190CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Vis AN, van der Poel HG, Ruiter AEC et al (2019) Posterior, anterior, and periurethral surgical reconstruction of urinary continence mechanisms in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a description and video compilation of commonly performed surgical techniques. Eur Urol 76(6):814–822CrossRef Vis AN, van der Poel HG, Ruiter AEC et al (2019) Posterior, anterior, and periurethral surgical reconstruction of urinary continence mechanisms in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a description and video compilation of commonly performed surgical techniques. Eur Urol 76(6):814–822CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Jeong SJ, Yeon JS, Lee JK et al (2014) Development and validation of nomograms to predict the recovery of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy: comparisons between immediate, early, and late continence. World J Urol 32(2):437–444CrossRef Jeong SJ, Yeon JS, Lee JK et al (2014) Development and validation of nomograms to predict the recovery of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy: comparisons between immediate, early, and late continence. World J Urol 32(2):437–444CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Abdollah F, Sun M, Suardi N et al (2012) Prediction of functional outcomes after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: results of conditional survival analyses. Eur Urol 62(1):42–52CrossRef Abdollah F, Sun M, Suardi N et al (2012) Prediction of functional outcomes after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: results of conditional survival analyses. Eur Urol 62(1):42–52CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Barnoiu OS, Baron Lopez F, Garcia Galisteo E et al (2013) Comprehensive prediction model of urinary incontinence 1 year following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Urol Int 90(1):31–35CrossRef Barnoiu OS, Baron Lopez F, Garcia Galisteo E et al (2013) Comprehensive prediction model of urinary incontinence 1 year following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Urol Int 90(1):31–35CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Trinh QD, Bjartell A, Freedland SJ et al (2013) A systematic review of the volume outcome relationship for radical prostatectomy. Eur urol 64:786–798CrossRef Trinh QD, Bjartell A, Freedland SJ et al (2013) A systematic review of the volume outcome relationship for radical prostatectomy. Eur urol 64:786–798CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Wilt TJ, Shamliyan TA, Taylor BC et al (2008) Association between hospital and surgeon radical prostatectomy volume and patient outcomes: a systematic review. J Urol 180(3):820–828CrossRef Wilt TJ, Shamliyan TA, Taylor BC et al (2008) Association between hospital and surgeon radical prostatectomy volume and patient outcomes: a systematic review. J Urol 180(3):820–828CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Patient reported outcome measures concerning urinary incontinence after robot assisted radical prostatectomy: development and validation of an online prediction model using clinical parameters, lower urinary tract symptoms and surgical experience
Authors
Eelco R. P. Collette
Sjoerd O. Klaver
Birgit I. Lissenberg-Witte
Dies van den Ouden
Reindert J. A. van Moorselaar
André N. Vis
Publication date
01-08-2021
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Issue 4/2021
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-020-01145-9

Other articles of this Issue 4/2021

Journal of Robotic Surgery 4/2021 Go to the issue