Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 5/2020

Open Access 01-10-2020 | Heart Surgery | Brief Communication

Cardiothoracic robotic assisted surgery in times of COVID-19

Authors: Jef Van den Eynde, Senne De Groote, Robin Van Lerberghe, Raf Van den Eynde, Wouter Oosterlinck

Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Issue 5/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic poses an immense threat to healthcare systems worldwide. At a time when elective surgeries are being suspended and questions are being raised about how the remaining procedures on COVID-19 positive patients can be performed safely, it is important to consider the potential role of robotic assisted surgery within the current pandemic. Recently, several robotic assisted surgery societies have issued their recommendations. To date, however, no specific recommendations are available for cardiothoracic robotic assisted surgery in COVID-19 positive patients. Here, we discuss the potential risks, benefits, and preventive measures that need to be taken into account when considering robotic assisted surgery for cardiothoracic indications in patients with confirmed COVID-19. It is suggested that robotic assisted surgery might have various advantages such as early recovery after surgery, shorter hospital stay, and reduced loss of blood and fluids as well as smaller incisions. However, electrosurgical and ultrasonic devices, as well as CO2 insufflation should be managed with caution to prevent the risk of aerosolization of viral particles.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Kimmig R, Verheijen RHM, Rudnicki M (2020) Robot assisted surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic, especially for gynecological cancer: a statement of the Society of European Robotic Gynaecological Surgery (SERGS). J Gynecol Oncol 31(3):1–7CrossRef Kimmig R, Verheijen RHM, Rudnicki M (2020) Robot assisted surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic, especially for gynecological cancer: a statement of the Society of European Robotic Gynaecological Surgery (SERGS). J Gynecol Oncol 31(3):1–7CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Angioli R, Terranova C, Plotti F, Cafà EV, Gennari P, Ricciardi R et al (2015) Influence of pneumoperitoneum pressure on surgical field during robotic and laparoscopic surgery: a comparative study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 291:865–868CrossRef Angioli R, Terranova C, Plotti F, Cafà EV, Gennari P, Ricciardi R et al (2015) Influence of pneumoperitoneum pressure on surgical field during robotic and laparoscopic surgery: a comparative study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 291:865–868CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Bernstein W, Walker A (2015) Anesthetic issues for robotic cardiac surgery. Ann Card Anaesth 18(1):58–68CrossRef Bernstein W, Walker A (2015) Anesthetic issues for robotic cardiac surgery. Ann Card Anaesth 18(1):58–68CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Lohser J, Slinger P (2015) Lung injury after one-lung ventilation: a review of the pathophysiologic mechanisms affecting the ventilated and the collapsed lung. Anesth Analg 121(2):302–318CrossRef Lohser J, Slinger P (2015) Lung injury after one-lung ventilation: a review of the pathophysiologic mechanisms affecting the ventilated and the collapsed lung. Anesth Analg 121(2):302–318CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Cardiothoracic robotic assisted surgery in times of COVID-19
Authors
Jef Van den Eynde
Senne De Groote
Robin Van Lerberghe
Raf Van den Eynde
Wouter Oosterlinck
Publication date
01-10-2020
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Issue 5/2020
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-020-01090-7

Other articles of this Issue 5/2020

Journal of Robotic Surgery 5/2020 Go to the issue