Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 2/2021

01-04-2021 | Original Article

Demonstrating the effectiveness of the fundamentals of robotic surgery (FRS) curriculum on the RobotiX Mentor Virtual Reality Simulation Platform

Authors: John Rhodes Martin, Dimitrios Stefanidis, Ryan P. Dorin, Alvin C. Goh, Richard M. Satava, Jeffrey S. Levy

Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Issue 2/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Fundamentals of robotic surgery (FRS) is a proficiency-based progression curriculum developed by robotic surgery experts from multiple specialty areas to address gaps in existing robotic surgery training curricula. The RobotiX Mentor is a virtual reality training platform for robotic surgery. Our aims were to determine if robotic surgery novices would demonstrate improved technical skills after completing FRS training on the RobotiX Mentor, and to compare the effectiveness of FRS across training platforms. An observational, pre-post design, multi-institutional rater-blinded trial was conducted at two American College of Surgeons Accredited Education Institutes-certified simulation centers. Robotic surgery novices (n = 20) were enrolled and trained to expert-derived benchmarks using FRS on the RobotiX Mentor. Participants’ baseline skill was assessed before (pre-test) and after (post-test) training on an avian tissue model. Tests were video recorded and graded by blinded raters using the Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS) and a 32-criteria psychomotor checklist. Post hoc comparisons were conducted against previously published comparator groups. On paired-samples T tests, participants demonstrated improved performance across all GEARS domains (p < 0.001 to p = 0.01) and for time (p < 0.001) and errors (p = 0.003) as measured by psychometric checklist. By ANOVA, improvement in novices’ skill after FRS training on the RobotiX Mentor was not inferior to improvement reported after FRS training on previously published platforms. Completion of FRS on the RobotiX Mentor resulted in improved robotic surgery skills among novices, proving effectiveness of training. These data provide additional validity evidence for FRS and support use of the RobotiX Mentor for robotic surgery skill acquisition.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Arain NA, Dulan G, Hogg DC, Rege RV, Powers CE, Tesfay ST, Hynan LS, Scott DJ (2012) Comprehensive proficiency-based inanimate training for robotic surgery: reliability, feasibility, and educational benefit. Surg Endosc 26:2740–2745CrossRef Arain NA, Dulan G, Hogg DC, Rege RV, Powers CE, Tesfay ST, Hynan LS, Scott DJ (2012) Comprehensive proficiency-based inanimate training for robotic surgery: reliability, feasibility, and educational benefit. Surg Endosc 26:2740–2745CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Connolly M, Seligman J, Kastenmeier A, Goldblatt M, Gould JC (2014) Validation of a virtual reality-based robotic surgical skills curriculum. Surg Endosc 28:1691–1694CrossRef Connolly M, Seligman J, Kastenmeier A, Goldblatt M, Gould JC (2014) Validation of a virtual reality-based robotic surgical skills curriculum. Surg Endosc 28:1691–1694CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Dulan G, Rege RV, Hogg DC, Gilberg-Fisher KM, Arain NA, Tesfay ST, Scott DJ (2012) Developing a comprehensive, proficiency-based training program for robotic surgery. Surgery 152:477–488CrossRef Dulan G, Rege RV, Hogg DC, Gilberg-Fisher KM, Arain NA, Tesfay ST, Scott DJ (2012) Developing a comprehensive, proficiency-based training program for robotic surgery. Surgery 152:477–488CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Dulan G, Rege RV, Hogg DC, Gilberg-Fisher KM, Arain NA, Tesfay ST, Scott DJ (2012) Proficiency-based training for robotic surgery: construct validity, workload, and expert levels for nine inanimate exercises. Surg Endosc 26:1516–1521CrossRef Dulan G, Rege RV, Hogg DC, Gilberg-Fisher KM, Arain NA, Tesfay ST, Scott DJ (2012) Proficiency-based training for robotic surgery: construct validity, workload, and expert levels for nine inanimate exercises. Surg Endosc 26:1516–1521CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Green CA, Chern H, O'Sullivan PS (2018) Current robotic curricula for surgery residents: a need for additional cognitive and psychomotor focus. Am J Surg 215:277–281CrossRef Green CA, Chern H, O'Sullivan PS (2018) Current robotic curricula for surgery residents: a need for additional cognitive and psychomotor focus. Am J Surg 215:277–281CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ahlberg G, Enochsson L, Gallagher AG, Hedman L, Hogman C, McClusky DA 3rd, Ramel S, Smith CD, Arvidsson D (2007) Proficiency-based virtual reality training significantly reduces the error rate for residents during their first 10 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Am J Surg 193:797–804CrossRef Ahlberg G, Enochsson L, Gallagher AG, Hedman L, Hogman C, McClusky DA 3rd, Ramel S, Smith CD, Arvidsson D (2007) Proficiency-based virtual reality training significantly reduces the error rate for residents during their first 10 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Am J Surg 193:797–804CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Angelo RL, Ryu RK, Pedowitz RA, Beach W, Burns J, Dodds J, Field L, Getelman M, Hobgood R, McIntyre L, Gallagher AG (2015) A proficiency-based progression training curriculum coupled with a model simulator results in the acquisition of a superior arthroscopic bankart skill set. Arthroscopy 31:1854–1871CrossRef Angelo RL, Ryu RK, Pedowitz RA, Beach W, Burns J, Dodds J, Field L, Getelman M, Hobgood R, McIntyre L, Gallagher AG (2015) A proficiency-based progression training curriculum coupled with a model simulator results in the acquisition of a superior arthroscopic bankart skill set. Arthroscopy 31:1854–1871CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Cates CU, Lönn L, Gallagher AG (2016) Prospective, randomised and blinded comparison of proficiency-based progression full-physics virtual reality simulator training versus invasive vascular experience for learning carotid artery angiography by very experienced operators. BMJ Simulat TechnolEnhanced Learn 2:1–5CrossRef Cates CU, Lönn L, Gallagher AG (2016) Prospective, randomised and blinded comparison of proficiency-based progression full-physics virtual reality simulator training versus invasive vascular experience for learning carotid artery angiography by very experienced operators. BMJ Simulat TechnolEnhanced Learn 2:1–5CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Gallagher AG (2012) Metric-based simulation training to proficiency in medical education: what it is and how to do it. Ulster Med J 81:107–113PubMedPubMedCentral Gallagher AG (2012) Metric-based simulation training to proficiency in medical education: what it is and how to do it. Ulster Med J 81:107–113PubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Gallagher AG, O’Sullivan GC (2011) Fundamentals of surgical simulation: principles & practice. Springer, New York Gallagher AG, O’Sullivan GC (2011) Fundamentals of surgical simulation: principles & practice. Springer, New York
12.
go back to reference Gallagher AG, Ritter EM, Champion H, Higgins G, Fried MP, Moses G, Smith CD, Satava RM (2005) Virtual reality simulation for the operating room: proficiency-based training as a paradigm shift in surgical skills training. Ann Surg 241:364–372CrossRef Gallagher AG, Ritter EM, Champion H, Higgins G, Fried MP, Moses G, Smith CD, Satava RM (2005) Virtual reality simulation for the operating room: proficiency-based training as a paradigm shift in surgical skills training. Ann Surg 241:364–372CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Stefanidis D (2010) Optimal acquisition and assessment of proficiency on simulators in surgery. Surg Clin N Am 90:475–489CrossRef Stefanidis D (2010) Optimal acquisition and assessment of proficiency on simulators in surgery. Surg Clin N Am 90:475–489CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Zevin B, Levy JS, Satava RM, Grantcharov TP (2012) A consensus-based framework for design, validation, and implementation of simulation-based training curricula in surgery. J Am Coll Surg 215(580–586):e583 Zevin B, Levy JS, Satava RM, Grantcharov TP (2012) A consensus-based framework for design, validation, and implementation of simulation-based training curricula in surgery. J Am Coll Surg 215(580–586):e583
15.
go back to reference Satava RM, Stefanidis D, Levy JS, Smith R, Martin JR, Monfared S, Timsina LR, Darzi AW, Moglia A, Brand TC, Dorin RP, Dumon KR, Francone TD, Georgiou E, Goh AC, Marcet JE, Martino MA, Sudan R, Vale J, Gallagher AG (2019) Proving the effectiveness of the fundamentals of robotic surgery (FRS) skills curriculum: a single-blinded, multispecialty, multi-institutional randomized control trial. Ann Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003220 (Publish Ahead of Print)CrossRef Satava RM, Stefanidis D, Levy JS, Smith R, Martin JR, Monfared S, Timsina LR, Darzi AW, Moglia A, Brand TC, Dorin RP, Dumon KR, Francone TD, Georgiou E, Goh AC, Marcet JE, Martino MA, Sudan R, Vale J, Gallagher AG (2019) Proving the effectiveness of the fundamentals of robotic surgery (FRS) skills curriculum: a single-blinded, multispecialty, multi-institutional randomized control trial. Ann Surg. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1097/​SLA.​0000000000003220​ (Publish Ahead of Print)CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Dreyfus SE (2004) The five-stage model of adult skill acquisition. Bull Sci Technol Soc 24:177–181CrossRef Dreyfus SE (2004) The five-stage model of adult skill acquisition. Bull Sci Technol Soc 24:177–181CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Goh AC, Goldfarb DW, Sander JC, Miles BJ, Dunkin BJ (2012) Global evaluative assessment of robotic skills: validation of a clinical assessment tool to measure robotic surgical skills. J Urol 187:247–252CrossRef Goh AC, Goldfarb DW, Sander JC, Miles BJ, Dunkin BJ (2012) Global evaluative assessment of robotic skills: validation of a clinical assessment tool to measure robotic surgical skills. J Urol 187:247–252CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Schommer E, Patel VR, Mouraviev V, Thomas C, Thiel DD (2017) Diffusion of robotic technology into urologic practice has led to improved resident physician robotic skills. J Surg Educ 74:55–60CrossRef Schommer E, Patel VR, Mouraviev V, Thomas C, Thiel DD (2017) Diffusion of robotic technology into urologic practice has led to improved resident physician robotic skills. J Surg Educ 74:55–60CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Bertolo R, Garisto J, Dagenais J, Sagalovich D, Kaouk JH (2018) Single session of robotic human cadaver training: the immediate impact on urology residents in a teaching hospital. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 28:1157–1162CrossRef Bertolo R, Garisto J, Dagenais J, Sagalovich D, Kaouk JH (2018) Single session of robotic human cadaver training: the immediate impact on urology residents in a teaching hospital. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 28:1157–1162CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Tam V, Lutfi W, Novak S, Hamad A, Lee KK, Zureikat AH, Zeh HJ 3rd, Hogg ME (2018) Resident attitudes and compliance towards robotic surgical training. Am J Surg 215:282–287CrossRef Tam V, Lutfi W, Novak S, Hamad A, Lee KK, Zureikat AH, Zeh HJ 3rd, Hogg ME (2018) Resident attitudes and compliance towards robotic surgical training. Am J Surg 215:282–287CrossRef
23.
go back to reference White LW, Kowalewski TM, Dockter RL, Comstock B, Hannaford B, Lendvay TS (2015) Crowd-sourced assessment of technical skill: a valid method for discriminating basic robotic surgery skills. J Endourol 29:1295–1301CrossRef White LW, Kowalewski TM, Dockter RL, Comstock B, Hannaford B, Lendvay TS (2015) Crowd-sourced assessment of technical skill: a valid method for discriminating basic robotic surgery skills. J Endourol 29:1295–1301CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Demonstrating the effectiveness of the fundamentals of robotic surgery (FRS) curriculum on the RobotiX Mentor Virtual Reality Simulation Platform
Authors
John Rhodes Martin
Dimitrios Stefanidis
Ryan P. Dorin
Alvin C. Goh
Richard M. Satava
Jeffrey S. Levy
Publication date
01-04-2021
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Issue 2/2021
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-020-01085-4

Other articles of this Issue 2/2021

Journal of Robotic Surgery 2/2021 Go to the issue