Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 2/2019

01-04-2019 | Review Article

Technical approach of robotic total right hepatic lobectomy: How we do it?

Authors: Iswanto Sucandy, Hamza Durrani, Sharona Ross, Alexander Rosemurgy

Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Issue 2/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Despite advantages of minimally invasive surgery, many hepatobiliary surgeons are hesitant to offer this approach for major hepatic resection due to concerns of difficulty in liver manipulation, bleeding control, and suboptimal oncologic outcomes. The robotic surgical system has revolutionized the way traditional laparoscopic liver resection is undertaken. Limitations of traditional laparoscopy are being resolved by robotic technology. We aimed to describe aspects of minimally invasive liver surgery and our standardized technical approach. We discussed technical aspects of performing robotic total right hepatic lobectomy and described our standardized institutional method. A 79-year-old man with an 11-cm biopsy-proven hepatocellular carcinoma was taken to the operating room for a robotic total right hepatic lobectomy. Past medical and surgical history was consistent with hypertension and diabetes mellitus. Robotic extrahepatic Glissonean pedicle approach was used to gain inflow vascular control. Right hepatic artery and portal vein were individually dissected and isolated prior to division. An intraoperative robotic ultrasound was utilized to guide liver parenchymal transection, securing negative margins. Robotic vessel sealing device was used as the main energy device during the parenchymal transection. Right hepatic vein was transected intrahepatically using a linear stapler. Operative time was 200 min without intraoperative complications. Estimated blood loss was 100 ml. Postsurgical recovery was uneventful and he was discharged home on postoperative day 4. Minimally invasive robotic total right hepatic lobectomy is feasible with excellent perioperative outcomes.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA et al (2009) The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: the Louisville Statement, 2008. Ann Surg 250(5):825–830CrossRefPubMed Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA et al (2009) The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: the Louisville Statement, 2008. Ann Surg 250(5):825–830CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Hibi T, Cherqui D, Geller DA et al (2016) Expanding indications and regional diversity in laparoscopic liver resection unveiled by the International Survey on Technical Aspects of Laparoscopic Liver Resection (INSTALL) study. Surg Endosc 30(7):2975–2983CrossRefPubMed Hibi T, Cherqui D, Geller DA et al (2016) Expanding indications and regional diversity in laparoscopic liver resection unveiled by the International Survey on Technical Aspects of Laparoscopic Liver Resection (INSTALL) study. Surg Endosc 30(7):2975–2983CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Nguyen KT, Marsh JW, Tsung A et al (2011) Comparative benefits of laparoscopic versus open hepatic resection: a critical appraisal. Arch Surg 146(3):348–356CrossRefPubMed Nguyen KT, Marsh JW, Tsung A et al (2011) Comparative benefits of laparoscopic versus open hepatic resection: a critical appraisal. Arch Surg 146(3):348–356CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Croome KP, Yamashita MH (2010) Laparoscopic vs open hepatic resection for benign and malignant tumors: an updated meta-analysis. Arch Surg 145(11):1109–1118CrossRefPubMed Croome KP, Yamashita MH (2010) Laparoscopic vs open hepatic resection for benign and malignant tumors: an updated meta-analysis. Arch Surg 145(11):1109–1118CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Ryska M, Fronek J, Rudis J et al (2006) Manual and robotic laparoscopic liver resection. Two case-reviews. Rozhl Chir 85(10):511–516PubMed Ryska M, Fronek J, Rudis J et al (2006) Manual and robotic laparoscopic liver resection. Two case-reviews. Rozhl Chir 85(10):511–516PubMed
6.
go back to reference Choi GH, Choi SH, Kim SH et al (2012) Robotic liver resection: technique and results of 30 consecutive procedures. Surg Endosc 26(8):2247–2258CrossRefPubMed Choi GH, Choi SH, Kim SH et al (2012) Robotic liver resection: technique and results of 30 consecutive procedures. Surg Endosc 26(8):2247–2258CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Giulianotti PC, Bianco FM, Daskalaki D, Gonzalez-Ciccarelli LF, Kim J, Benedetti E (2016) Robotic liver surgery: technical aspects and review of the literature. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 5(4):311–321CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Giulianotti PC, Bianco FM, Daskalaki D, Gonzalez-Ciccarelli LF, Kim J, Benedetti E (2016) Robotic liver surgery: technical aspects and review of the literature. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 5(4):311–321CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Chandra V, Nehra D, Parent R et al (2010) A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic assisted suturing performance by experts and novices. Surgery 147(6):830–839CrossRefPubMed Chandra V, Nehra D, Parent R et al (2010) A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic assisted suturing performance by experts and novices. Surgery 147(6):830–839CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Tsung A, Geller DA (2015) Reply to letter: “Does the robot provide an advantage over laparoscopic liver resection?” Ann Surg 262(2):e70–e71CrossRef Tsung A, Geller DA (2015) Reply to letter: “Does the robot provide an advantage over laparoscopic liver resection?” Ann Surg 262(2):e70–e71CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Tsung A, Geller DA, Sukato DC et al (2014) Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: a matched comparison. Ann Surg 259(3):549–555CrossRefPubMed Tsung A, Geller DA, Sukato DC et al (2014) Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: a matched comparison. Ann Surg 259(3):549–555CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Beppu T, Wakabayashi G, Hasegawa K et al (2015) Long-term and perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for colorectal liver metastases with propensity score matching: a multi-institutional Japanese study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 22(10):711–720CrossRefPubMed Beppu T, Wakabayashi G, Hasegawa K et al (2015) Long-term and perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for colorectal liver metastases with propensity score matching: a multi-institutional Japanese study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 22(10):711–720CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Jarnagin WR, Gonen M, Fong Y et al (2002) Improvement in perioperative outcome after hepatic resection: analysis of 1,803 consecutive cases over the past decade. Ann Surg 236:397–407CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jarnagin WR, Gonen M, Fong Y et al (2002) Improvement in perioperative outcome after hepatic resection: analysis of 1,803 consecutive cases over the past decade. Ann Surg 236:397–407CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Tranchart H, O’Rourke N, Van Dam R et al (2015) Bleeding control during laparoscopic liver resection: a review of literature. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 22(5):371–378CrossRefPubMed Tranchart H, O’Rourke N, Van Dam R et al (2015) Bleeding control during laparoscopic liver resection: a review of literature. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 22(5):371–378CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Qiu J, Chen S, Chengyou D (2016) A systematic review of robotic-assisted liver resection and meta-analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatic neoplasms. Surg Endosc 30(3):862–875CrossRefPubMed Qiu J, Chen S, Chengyou D (2016) A systematic review of robotic-assisted liver resection and meta-analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatic neoplasms. Surg Endosc 30(3):862–875CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Ocuin LM, Tsung A (2015) Robotic liver resection for malignancy: current status, oncologic outcomes, comparison to laparoscopy, and future applications. J Surg Oncol 112(3):295–301CrossRefPubMed Ocuin LM, Tsung A (2015) Robotic liver resection for malignancy: current status, oncologic outcomes, comparison to laparoscopy, and future applications. J Surg Oncol 112(3):295–301CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Ji WB, Wang HG, Zhao ZM et al (2011) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic anatomic hepatectomy in China: initial experience. Ann Surg 253:342–348CrossRefPubMed Ji WB, Wang HG, Zhao ZM et al (2011) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic anatomic hepatectomy in China: initial experience. Ann Surg 253:342–348CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Lai EC, Yang GP, Tang CN (2013) Robot-assisted laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: short-term outcome. Am J Surg 205(6):697–702CrossRefPubMed Lai EC, Yang GP, Tang CN (2013) Robot-assisted laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: short-term outcome. Am J Surg 205(6):697–702CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Technical approach of robotic total right hepatic lobectomy: How we do it?
Authors
Iswanto Sucandy
Hamza Durrani
Sharona Ross
Alexander Rosemurgy
Publication date
01-04-2019
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Issue 2/2019
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-018-0881-7

Other articles of this Issue 2/2019

Journal of Robotic Surgery 2/2019 Go to the issue