Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 1/2019

Open Access 01-02-2019 | Review Article

Systematic review of operative outcomes of robotic surgical procedures performed with endoscopic linear staplers or robotic staplers

Authors: Mario Gutierrez, Richard Ditto, Sanjoy Roy

Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

A comprehensive review of operative outcomes of robotic surgical procedures performed with the da Vinci robotic system using either endoscopic linear staplers (ELS) or robotic staplers is not available in the published literature. We conducted a literature search to identify publications of robotic surgical procedures in all specialties performed with either ELS or robotic staplers. Twenty-nine manuscripts and six abstracts with relevant information on operative outcomes published from January 2011 to September 2017 were identified. Given the relatively recent market release of robotic staplers in 2014, comparative perioperative clinical outcomes data on the performance of ELS vs. robotic staplers in robotic surgery is very sparse in the published literature. Only three comparative studies of surgeries with the da Vinci robotic system plus ELS vs. da Vinci plus robotic staplers were identified; two in robotic colorectal surgery and the other in robotic gastric bypass surgery. These comparative studies illustrate some nuances in device design and usability, which may impact outcomes and cost, and therefore may be important to consider when selecting the appropriate stapling technologies/technique for different robotic surgeries. Comparative perioperative data on the use of ELS vs. robotic staplers in robotic surgery is scarce (three studies), and current literature identifies both types of devices as safe and effective. Given the longer clinical history of ELS and its relatively more robust evidence base, there may be trade-offs to consider before switching to robotic staplers in certain robotic procedures. However, this literature review may serve as an initial reference for future research.
Literature
8.
go back to reference Holzmacher JL, Luka S, Aziz M, Amdur RL, Agarwal S, Obias V (2017) The use of robotic and laparoscopic surgical stapling devices during minimally invasive colon and rectal surgery: a comparison. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Techn 27:151–155CrossRef Holzmacher JL, Luka S, Aziz M, Amdur RL, Agarwal S, Obias V (2017) The use of robotic and laparoscopic surgical stapling devices during minimally invasive colon and rectal surgery: a comparison. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Techn 27:151–155CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Atasoy D, Aytac E, Ozben V, Bayraktar O, Bayraktar IE, Aghayeva A et al (2018) Robotic versus laparoscopic stapler use for rectal transection in robotic surgery for cancer. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 28(5):501–505CrossRef Atasoy D, Aytac E, Ozben V, Bayraktar O, Bayraktar IE, Aghayeva A et al (2018) Robotic versus laparoscopic stapler use for rectal transection in robotic surgery for cancer. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 28(5):501–505CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Smeenk RM, van’t Hof G, Elsten E, Feskens PGBM (2016) The results of 100 robotic versus 100 laparoscopic gastric bypass procedures: a single high volume centre experience. Obes Surg 26:1266–1273CrossRefPubMed Smeenk RM, van’t Hof G, Elsten E, Feskens PGBM (2016) The results of 100 robotic versus 100 laparoscopic gastric bypass procedures: a single high volume centre experience. Obes Surg 26:1266–1273CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Myers SR, McGuirl J, Wang J (2013) Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic gastric bypass: comparison of short-term outcomes. Obes Surg 23:467–473CrossRefPubMed Myers SR, McGuirl J, Wang J (2013) Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic gastric bypass: comparison of short-term outcomes. Obes Surg 23:467–473CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Kosanovic R, Romero RJ, Donkor C (2015) A comparative retrospective study of robotic sleeve gastrectomy vs robotic gastric bypass. Int J Med Robot 11:275–283CrossRefPubMed Kosanovic R, Romero RJ, Donkor C (2015) A comparative retrospective study of robotic sleeve gastrectomy vs robotic gastric bypass. Int J Med Robot 11:275–283CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Ijah RF, Bhatia P, Kaltan S, Khetan M, John S, Bindal V, Ali A (2014) Sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity: robotic vs standard laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy methods. World J Laparosc Surg 7:1–6CrossRef Ijah RF, Bhatia P, Kaltan S, Khetan M, John S, Bindal V, Ali A (2014) Sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity: robotic vs standard laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy methods. World J Laparosc Surg 7:1–6CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Vilallonga R, Fort JM, Caubet E, Gonzalez O, Armengol M (2013) Robotic sleeve gastrectomy versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a comparative study with 200 patients. Obes Surg 23:1501–1507CrossRefPubMed Vilallonga R, Fort JM, Caubet E, Gonzalez O, Armengol M (2013) Robotic sleeve gastrectomy versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a comparative study with 200 patients. Obes Surg 23:1501–1507CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Diamantis T, Alexandrou A, Nikiteas N, Giannopoulos A, Papalambros E (2011) Initial experience with robotic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity. Obes Surg 21:1172–1179CrossRefPubMed Diamantis T, Alexandrou A, Nikiteas N, Giannopoulos A, Papalambros E (2011) Initial experience with robotic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity. Obes Surg 21:1172–1179CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Vilallonga R, Fort JM, Caubet E (2015). Robotically assisted single anastomosis duodenoileal bypass after previous sleeve gastrectomy implementing high valuable technology for complex procedures. J Obes 2015:586419CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Vilallonga R, Fort JM, Caubet E (2015). Robotically assisted single anastomosis duodenoileal bypass after previous sleeve gastrectomy implementing high valuable technology for complex procedures. J Obes 2015:586419CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Dogra PN, Regmi SK, Singh P, Bora G, Saini AK, Aggarwal S (2014) Robot-assisted laparoscopic augmentation ileocystoplasty in a tubercular bladder. Urol Ann 6:152–155CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dogra PN, Regmi SK, Singh P, Bora G, Saini AK, Aggarwal S (2014) Robot-assisted laparoscopic augmentation ileocystoplasty in a tubercular bladder. Urol Ann 6:152–155CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Xu Y, Wang H, Ji W, Tang M, Li H, Leng J, Meng X, Dong J (2016) Robotic radical resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: perioperative and long-term outcomes of an initial series. Surg Endosc 30:3060–3070CrossRefPubMed Xu Y, Wang H, Ji W, Tang M, Li H, Leng J, Meng X, Dong J (2016) Robotic radical resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: perioperative and long-term outcomes of an initial series. Surg Endosc 30:3060–3070CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Calin ML, Sadiq A, Arevalo G, Fuentes R, Flanders VL, Gupta N, Nasri B, Singh K (2016) The first case report of robotic multivisceral resection for synchronous liver metastasis from pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor: a case report and literature review. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 26:816–824CrossRefPubMed Calin ML, Sadiq A, Arevalo G, Fuentes R, Flanders VL, Gupta N, Nasri B, Singh K (2016) The first case report of robotic multivisceral resection for synchronous liver metastasis from pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor: a case report and literature review. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 26:816–824CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Morelli L, Guadagni S, Di Franco G, Palmeri M, Caprilli G, D’isidoro C, Pisano R, Marciano E, Moglia A, Di Candio G, Mosca F (2016) Short-term clinical outcomes of robot-assisted intersphincteric resection and low rectal resection with double-stapling technique for cancer: a case-matched study. Int J Colorectal Dis 31:737–739CrossRefPubMed Morelli L, Guadagni S, Di Franco G, Palmeri M, Caprilli G, D’isidoro C, Pisano R, Marciano E, Moglia A, Di Candio G, Mosca F (2016) Short-term clinical outcomes of robot-assisted intersphincteric resection and low rectal resection with double-stapling technique for cancer: a case-matched study. Int J Colorectal Dis 31:737–739CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Bae SU, Jeong WK, Bae OS, Baek SK (2016) Reduced-port robotic anterior resection for left-sided colon cancer using the Da Vinci single-site platform. Int J Med Robot 12:517–523CrossRefPubMed Bae SU, Jeong WK, Bae OS, Baek SK (2016) Reduced-port robotic anterior resection for left-sided colon cancer using the Da Vinci single-site platform. Int J Med Robot 12:517–523CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Morelli L, Perutelli A, Palmeri M (2016) Robot-assisted surgery for the radical treatment of deep infiltrating endometriosis with colorectal involvement: short- and mid-term surgical and functional outcomes. Int J Colorectal Dis 31:643–652CrossRefPubMed Morelli L, Perutelli A, Palmeri M (2016) Robot-assisted surgery for the radical treatment of deep infiltrating endometriosis with colorectal involvement: short- and mid-term surgical and functional outcomes. Int J Colorectal Dis 31:643–652CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Leong QM, Son DN, Cho JS, Amar AH, Kim SH (2012) Robot-assisted low anterior resection for situs inversus totalis: a novel technical approach for an uncommon condition. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 22:e87-e90CrossRef Leong QM, Son DN, Cho JS, Amar AH, Kim SH (2012) Robot-assisted low anterior resection for situs inversus totalis: a novel technical approach for an uncommon condition. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 22:e87-e90CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Trastulli S, Desiderio J, Farinacci F, Ricci F, Listorti C, Cirocchi R, Boselli C, Noya G, Parisi A (2013) Robotic right colectomy for cancer with intracorporeal anastomosis: short-term outcomes from a single institution. Int J Colorectal Dis 28:807–814CrossRefPubMed Trastulli S, Desiderio J, Farinacci F, Ricci F, Listorti C, Cirocchi R, Boselli C, Noya G, Parisi A (2013) Robotic right colectomy for cancer with intracorporeal anastomosis: short-term outcomes from a single institution. Int J Colorectal Dis 28:807–814CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Rinieri P, Peillon C, Salaün M, Mahieu J, Bubenheim M, Baste JM (2016) Perioperative outcomes of video- and robot-assisted segmentectomies. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 24:145–151CrossRefPubMed Rinieri P, Peillon C, Salaün M, Mahieu J, Bubenheim M, Baste JM (2016) Perioperative outcomes of video- and robot-assisted segmentectomies. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 24:145–151CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Giacomoni A, Di Sandro S, Lauterio A (2013) Initial experience with robot-assisted nephrectomy for living-donor kidney transplantation: feasibility and technical notes. Transpl Proc 45:2627–2631CrossRef Giacomoni A, Di Sandro S, Lauterio A (2013) Initial experience with robot-assisted nephrectomy for living-donor kidney transplantation: feasibility and technical notes. Transpl Proc 45:2627–2631CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Liu R, Liu Q, Zhao Z, Tan XL, Gao YX, Zhao GD (2017) Robotic vs. laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a propensity score-match study. J Surg Oncol 116:461–469CrossRefPubMed Liu R, Liu Q, Zhao Z, Tan XL, Gao YX, Zhao GD (2017) Robotic vs. laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a propensity score-match study. J Surg Oncol 116:461–469CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Reche F, Mancini A, Borel AL, Faucheron JL (2016) Totally robotic reversal of omega-loop gastric bypass to normal anatomy. Obes Surg 26:1994–1995CrossRefPubMed Reche F, Mancini A, Borel AL, Faucheron JL (2016) Totally robotic reversal of omega-loop gastric bypass to normal anatomy. Obes Surg 26:1994–1995CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Vasilescu C, Procopiuc L (2012) Robotic surgery of locally advanced gastric cancer: a single-surgeon experience of 41 cases. Chirurgia (Bucur) 107:510–517 Vasilescu C, Procopiuc L (2012) Robotic surgery of locally advanced gastric cancer: a single-surgeon experience of 41 cases. Chirurgia (Bucur) 107:510–517
30.
go back to reference Montalti R, Scuderi V, Patriti A, Vivarelli M, Troisi RI (2016) Robotic versus laparoscopic resections of posterosuperior segments of the liver: a propensity score-matched comparison. Surg Endosc 30:1004–1013CrossRefPubMed Montalti R, Scuderi V, Patriti A, Vivarelli M, Troisi RI (2016) Robotic versus laparoscopic resections of posterosuperior segments of the liver: a propensity score-matched comparison. Surg Endosc 30:1004–1013CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Salloum C, Tayar C, Laurent A, Malek A, Compagnon P, Memeo R, De Angelis N, Pascal G, Azoulay D (2014) Robot-assisted laparoscopic hepatectomy: the henri-mondor experience. In: 11th world congress of the International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary association. Seoul South Korea (abstract) Salloum C, Tayar C, Laurent A, Malek A, Compagnon P, Memeo R, De Angelis N, Pascal G, Azoulay D (2014) Robot-assisted laparoscopic hepatectomy: the henri-mondor experience. In: 11th world congress of the International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary association. Seoul South Korea (abstract)
32.
go back to reference Ahmed J, Nasir M, Flashman K, Khan J, Parvaiz A (2016) Totally robotic rectal resection: an experience of the first 100 consecutive cases. Int J Colorectal Dis 31:869–876CrossRefPubMed Ahmed J, Nasir M, Flashman K, Khan J, Parvaiz A (2016) Totally robotic rectal resection: an experience of the first 100 consecutive cases. Int J Colorectal Dis 31:869–876CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Roviello F, Piagnerelli R, Ferrara F, Scheiterle M, De Franco L, Marrelli D (2015) Robotic single docking total colectomy for ulcerative colitis: first experience with a novel technique. Int J Surg 21:63–67CrossRefPubMed Roviello F, Piagnerelli R, Ferrara F, Scheiterle M, De Franco L, Marrelli D (2015) Robotic single docking total colectomy for ulcerative colitis: first experience with a novel technique. Int J Surg 21:63–67CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Liu N, Risk M, George V, Robb B, Gardner T (2012) Incisionless dual diversions: creation of urostomy and colostomy using the da Vinci robot. Annual meeting of the American Urological Association, AUA. Atlanta, GA United States. J Urol 4(Suppl 1):e356 (abstract) Liu N, Risk M, George V, Robb B, Gardner T (2012) Incisionless dual diversions: creation of urostomy and colostomy using the da Vinci robot. Annual meeting of the American Urological Association, AUA. Atlanta, GA United States. J Urol 4(Suppl 1):e356 (abstract)
35.
go back to reference Patel MN, Aboumohamed A, Hemal A (2015) Does transition from the da Vinci Si to Xi robotic platform impact single-docking technique for robot-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy? BJU Int 116:990–994CrossRefPubMed Patel MN, Aboumohamed A, Hemal A (2015) Does transition from the da Vinci Si to Xi robotic platform impact single-docking technique for robot-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy? BJU Int 116:990–994CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Wit EMK, De Jong J, Acar C, VAN Muilekom E, Tillier C, De Blok W, Poel VANDER. H (2016) Stapling for prostate pedicle management during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Minerva Urol Nefrol 68:429–436PubMed Wit EMK, De Jong J, Acar C, VAN Muilekom E, Tillier C, De Blok W, Poel VANDER. H (2016) Stapling for prostate pedicle management during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Minerva Urol Nefrol 68:429–436PubMed
37.
go back to reference Alper N, Bassiri-Tehrani B, Marks Y, Taggart J, Teixeira MD (2017) The safety and efficacy of the Da Vinci robotic stapler in robotic-assisted bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc 31:S190–S259 (abstract) Alper N, Bassiri-Tehrani B, Marks Y, Taggart J, Teixeira MD (2017) The safety and efficacy of the Da Vinci robotic stapler in robotic-assisted bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc 31:S190–S259 (abstract)
38.
go back to reference Bae SU, Jeong WK, Baek SK (2016) Single-port plus an additional port robotic complete mesocolic excision and intracorporeal anastomosis using a robotic stapler for right-sided colon cancer. Ann Surg Treat Res 91:212–217CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bae SU, Jeong WK, Baek SK (2016) Single-port plus an additional port robotic complete mesocolic excision and intracorporeal anastomosis using a robotic stapler for right-sided colon cancer. Ann Surg Treat Res 91:212–217CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
39.
go back to reference Guadagni S, di Franco G, Palmeri M, Furbetta N, Bianchinni M, Gianardi D, Lucchesi M, Stefanini G, Caprili G, d’Isodoro C, Melfi F, di Candio G, Mosca F, Morelli L (2017) New technologies in robotic rectal resection: da Vinci Xi, Integrated Table Motion, Endowrist Robotic Stapler and indocyanine green fluorescence. Surg Endosc 31:S190–S259 (abstract) Guadagni S, di Franco G, Palmeri M, Furbetta N, Bianchinni M, Gianardi D, Lucchesi M, Stefanini G, Caprili G, d’Isodoro C, Melfi F, di Candio G, Mosca F, Morelli L (2017) New technologies in robotic rectal resection: da Vinci Xi, Integrated Table Motion, Endowrist Robotic Stapler and indocyanine green fluorescence. Surg Endosc 31:S190–S259 (abstract)
40.
go back to reference Mass AY, Zhao LC, Huang WC (2014) Robotic intracorporeal ileal conduit using the intuitive Endowrist one robotic stapler. J Endourol 28(suppl 1):A314 (abstract) Mass AY, Zhao LC, Huang WC (2014) Robotic intracorporeal ileal conduit using the intuitive Endowrist one robotic stapler. J Endourol 28(suppl 1):A314 (abstract)
41.
go back to reference Simone G, Guaglianone S, Minisola F, Ferriero M, Misuraca L, Tuderti G, Romeo G, Gallucci M (2017) Intracorporeal partly stapled Padua ileal bladder using robotic staplers: surgical technique, perioperative and early functional outcomes of a prospective single center series. J Urol 197(suppl):e681 (abstract) Simone G, Guaglianone S, Minisola F, Ferriero M, Misuraca L, Tuderti G, Romeo G, Gallucci M (2017) Intracorporeal partly stapled Padua ileal bladder using robotic staplers: surgical technique, perioperative and early functional outcomes of a prospective single center series. J Urol 197(suppl):e681 (abstract)
42.
go back to reference Benton SA, Riley KA, Harkins GJ (2015) The use of a robotic stapling device for coincidental appendectomy. J Gynecol Surg 31:148–150CrossRef Benton SA, Riley KA, Harkins GJ (2015) The use of a robotic stapling device for coincidental appendectomy. J Gynecol Surg 31:148–150CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Systematic review of operative outcomes of robotic surgical procedures performed with endoscopic linear staplers or robotic staplers
Authors
Mario Gutierrez
Richard Ditto
Sanjoy Roy
Publication date
01-02-2019
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Issue 1/2019
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-018-0822-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Journal of Robotic Surgery 1/2019 Go to the issue