Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 1/2019

01-02-2019 | Original Article

Anterior robotic approach in en-bloc sacrectomy: a preliminary experience

Authors: Giacomo Corrado, Carmine Zoccali, Nicola Salducca, Andrea Oddi, Enrico Vizza, Roberto Biagini

Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

En-bloc sacrectomy is a highly demanding surgical procedure necessary to obtain wide margin in sacral tumor. The double approach, anterior and posterior approach, is usually preferred for tumors extending proximally to S3 level where iliac internal vessels are at a higher risk for damage during posterior surgery. It can be justified also in selected cases to decrease the risk of posterior approach as in local recurrence or in patients who already underwent laparotomy. Our intent was to apply robotic-assisted techniques for performing anterior preparatory approach for sacrectomy surgery. Between December 2010 and December 2014, three cases of sacrectomies were performed in a previous robotic-assisted preparatory approach to separate the rectum from the tumor. Dissections were successfully performed in all cases close to the pelvic floor. The surgeon was able to position a Gore-Tex spacer between the anterior tumor surface and the rectum in all cases. The anterior dissections were performed with a perfect control of bleeding. No complications related to the anterior approach were reported. Robot-assisted surgery can be considered a valid and minimally invasive technique which allows a safe anterior dissection of the pelvic structures dividing tumors from surrounding tissues. It allows to place a spacer to protect organs during posterior sacral resection performed on the same day or at a later time. Further experiences are advocated to evaluate its efficiency in sacral tumors of greater size.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Zhang HY, Thongtrangan I, Balabhadra RS et al (2003) Surgical techniques for total sacrectomy and spinopelvic reconstruction. Neurosurg Focus 15(2):E5PubMedCrossRef Zhang HY, Thongtrangan I, Balabhadra RS et al (2003) Surgical techniques for total sacrectomy and spinopelvic reconstruction. Neurosurg Focus 15(2):E5PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Zoccali C, Skoch J, Patel A et al (2015) The surgical eurovascular anatomy relating to partial and complete sacral and sacroiliac resections: a cadaveric, anatomic study. Eur Spine J 24(5):1109–1113CrossRefPubMed Zoccali C, Skoch J, Patel A et al (2015) The surgical eurovascular anatomy relating to partial and complete sacral and sacroiliac resections: a cadaveric, anatomic study. Eur Spine J 24(5):1109–1113CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Zoccali C, Ferrraresi V, Rossi B et al (2015) Intermediate grade vertebral osteosarcoma in a patient affected by a sacral chondrosarcoma and hereditary multiple exostosis. Minerva Med 106(2):115–117PubMed Zoccali C, Ferrraresi V, Rossi B et al (2015) Intermediate grade vertebral osteosarcoma in a patient affected by a sacral chondrosarcoma and hereditary multiple exostosis. Minerva Med 106(2):115–117PubMed
5.
go back to reference World Medical Association Inc (2009) Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. J Indian Med Assoc 107(6):403–405 World Medical Association Inc (2009) Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. J Indian Med Assoc 107(6):403–405
6.
go back to reference Walker JL, Piedmonte MR, Spirtos NM et al (2009) Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2. J Clin Oncol 27(32):5331–5336CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Walker JL, Piedmonte MR, Spirtos NM et al (2009) Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2. J Clin Oncol 27(32):5331–5336CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Ficarra V, Novara G, Ahlering TE et al (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting potency rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 62(3):418–430CrossRefPubMed Ficarra V, Novara G, Ahlering TE et al (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting potency rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 62(3):418–430CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Sert BM, Abeler VM (2006) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (Piver type III) with pelvic node dissection—case report. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 27:531PubMed Sert BM, Abeler VM (2006) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (Piver type III) with pelvic node dissection—case report. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 27:531PubMed
9.
go back to reference Yim GW, Kim YT (2012) Robotic surgery in gynecologic cancer. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 24(1):14–23CrossRefPubMed Yim GW, Kim YT (2012) Robotic surgery in gynecologic cancer. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 24(1):14–23CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Vizza E, Corrado G, Mancini E et al (2015) Laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a case control study. Eur J Surg Oncol 41(1):142–147CrossRefPubMed Vizza E, Corrado G, Mancini E et al (2015) Laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a case control study. Eur J Surg Oncol 41(1):142–147CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Holloway RW, Ahmad S, DeNardis SA et al (2009) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer: analysis of surgical performance. Gynecol Oncol 115:447–452CrossRefPubMed Holloway RW, Ahmad S, DeNardis SA et al (2009) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer: analysis of surgical performance. Gynecol Oncol 115:447–452CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Seamon LG, Fowler JM, Richardson DL et al (2009) A detailed analysis of the learning curve: robotic hysterectomy and pelvicaortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 114:162–167CrossRefPubMed Seamon LG, Fowler JM, Richardson DL et al (2009) A detailed analysis of the learning curve: robotic hysterectomy and pelvicaortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 114:162–167CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Sgarbura O, Vasilescu C (2010) The decisive role of the patient-side surgeon in robotic surgery. Surg Endosc 24:3149–3155CrossRefPubMed Sgarbura O, Vasilescu C (2010) The decisive role of the patient-side surgeon in robotic surgery. Surg Endosc 24:3149–3155CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Wright JD, Burke WM, Wilde ET et al (2012) Comparative effectiveness of robotic versus laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. J Clin Oncol 30:783–791CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wright JD, Burke WM, Wilde ET et al (2012) Comparative effectiveness of robotic versus laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. J Clin Oncol 30:783–791CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Bell MC, Torgerson J, Seshadri-Kreaden U et al (2008) Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques. Gynecol Oncol 111:407–411CrossRefPubMed Bell MC, Torgerson J, Seshadri-Kreaden U et al (2008) Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques. Gynecol Oncol 111:407–411CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Lau S, Vaknin Z, Ramana-Kumar AV, Halliday D et al (2012) Outcomes and cost comparisons after introducing a robotics program for endometrial cancer surgery. Obstet Gynecol 119(4):717–724CrossRefPubMed Lau S, Vaknin Z, Ramana-Kumar AV, Halliday D et al (2012) Outcomes and cost comparisons after introducing a robotics program for endometrial cancer surgery. Obstet Gynecol 119(4):717–724CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Anterior robotic approach in en-bloc sacrectomy: a preliminary experience
Authors
Giacomo Corrado
Carmine Zoccali
Nicola Salducca
Andrea Oddi
Enrico Vizza
Roberto Biagini
Publication date
01-02-2019
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Issue 1/2019
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-018-0807-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Journal of Robotic Surgery 1/2019 Go to the issue