Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 2/2018

01-06-2018 | Editorial

Re: Time to consider integration of a formal robotic-assisted surgical training program

Authors: Noah E. Canvasser, Jeffrey Gahan, Igor Sorokin

Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Issue 2/2018

Login to get access

Excerpt

In the second Journal of Robotic Surgery (JORS) TwitterTM journal club, we discussed Vetter and colleague’s manuscript regarding survey results of robotic surgical training for obstetric and gynecology residents in the United States [1]. In this study, 177 residents completed a 31-item questionnaire that covered a range of topics surrounding robotic training. Surprisingly, over 30% of respondents did not need to complete a robotics training course prior to working on the console, and 50% did not have formal evaluations during their robotic training, When asked what area of robotic training was most and least useful, 50% thought that the dual console was the most useful and 50% thought that online modules were least useful. Personal time was often stated as a major limitation to robotic training, given most residents are not allotted robotic training time during a normal workweek. Discussion ensued (see supplementary Table 1). …
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Metadata
Title
Re: Time to consider integration of a formal robotic-assisted surgical training program
Authors
Noah E. Canvasser
Jeffrey Gahan
Igor Sorokin
Publication date
01-06-2018
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Issue 2/2018
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-018-0794-5

Other articles of this Issue 2/2018

Journal of Robotic Surgery 2/2018 Go to the issue