Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 1/2018

01-03-2018 | Original Article

3D-printed soft-tissue physical models of renal malignancies for individualized surgical simulation: a feasibility study

Authors: Michael M. Maddox, Allison Feibus, James Liu, Julie Wang, Raju Thomas, Jonathan L. Silberstein

Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

To construct patient-specific physical three-dimensional (3D) models of renal units with materials that approximates the properties of renal tissue to allow pre-operative and robotic training surgical simulation, 3D physical kidney models were created (3DSystems, Rock Hill, SC) using computerized tomography to segment structures of interest (parenchyma, vasculature, collection system, and tumor). Images were converted to a 3D surface mesh file for fabrication using a multi-jet 3D printer. A novel construction technique was employed to approximate normal renal tissue texture, printers selectively deposited photopolymer material forming the outer shell of the kidney, and subsequently, an agarose gel solution was injected into the inner cavity recreating the spongier renal parenchyma. We constructed seven models of renal units with suspected malignancies. Partial nephrectomy and renorrhaphy were performed on each of the replicas. Subsequently all patients successfully underwent robotic partial nephrectomy. Average tumor diameter was 4.4 cm, warm ischemia time was 25 min, RENAL nephrometry score was 7.4, and surgical margins were negative. A comparison was made between the seven cases and the Tulane Urology prospectively maintained robotic partial nephrectomy database. Patients with surgical models had larger tumors, higher nephrometry score, longer warm ischemic time, fewer positive surgical margins, shorter hospitalization, and fewer post-operative complications; however, the only significant finding was lower estimated blood loss (186 cc vs 236; p = 0.01). In this feasibility study, pre-operative resectable physical 3D models can be constructed and used as patient-specific surgical simulation tools; further study will need to demonstrate if this results in improvement of surgical outcomes and robotic simulation education.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Atug F, Castle EP, Woods M et al (2006) Robotics in urologic surgery: an evolving new technology. Int J Urol 13:857–863 CrossRefPubMed Atug F, Castle EP, Woods M et al (2006) Robotics in urologic surgery: an evolving new technology. Int J Urol 13:857–863 CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Rashid HH, Leung YM, Rashid MJ et al (2006) Robotic surgical education: a systematic approach to training urology resident to perform robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 68:75–79CrossRef Rashid HH, Leung YM, Rashid MJ et al (2006) Robotic surgical education: a systematic approach to training urology resident to perform robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 68:75–79CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Grover S, Tan GY, Srivastava A et al (2010) Residency training program paradigms for teaching robotic surgical skills in urology residents. Curr Urol Rep 11:87–92CrossRefPubMed Grover S, Tan GY, Srivastava A et al (2010) Residency training program paradigms for teaching robotic surgical skills in urology residents. Curr Urol Rep 11:87–92CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Schreuder HW, Wolswijk R, Zweemer RP et al (2012) Training and learning robotic surgery, time for a more structured approach: a systematic review. BJOG 119:137–149CrossRefPubMed Schreuder HW, Wolswijk R, Zweemer RP et al (2012) Training and learning robotic surgery, time for a more structured approach: a systematic review. BJOG 119:137–149CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Mehra P, Miner J, D’Innocenzo R et al (2011) Use of 3-d stereolithographic models in oral and maxillofacial surgery. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 10:6–13CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mehra P, Miner J, D’Innocenzo R et al (2011) Use of 3-d stereolithographic models in oral and maxillofacial surgery. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 10:6–13CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Starosolski Z, Kan JH, Rosenfeld SD et al (2014) Application of 3-D printing (rapid prototyping) for creating physical models of pediatric orthopedic disorders. Pediatr Radiol 44:216–221CrossRefPubMed Starosolski Z, Kan JH, Rosenfeld SD et al (2014) Application of 3-D printing (rapid prototyping) for creating physical models of pediatric orthopedic disorders. Pediatr Radiol 44:216–221CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Silberstein JL, Maddox MM, Dorsey P et al (2014) Physical models of renal malignancies using standard cross-sectional imaging and 3-dimensional printers: a pilot study. Urology 84:268–272CrossRefPubMed Silberstein JL, Maddox MM, Dorsey P et al (2014) Physical models of renal malignancies using standard cross-sectional imaging and 3-dimensional printers: a pilot study. Urology 84:268–272CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Cheung CL, Looi T, Lendvay TS et al (2014) Use of 3-dimensional printing technology and silicone modeling in surgical simulation: development and face validation in pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Surg Educ 71(5):762–767CrossRefPubMed Cheung CL, Looi T, Lendvay TS et al (2014) Use of 3-dimensional printing technology and silicone modeling in surgical simulation: development and face validation in pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Surg Educ 71(5):762–767CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Zhang Y, Ge HW, Li NC et al (2016) Evaluation of three-dimensional printing for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy of renal tumors: a preliminary report. World J Urol 34(4):533–537CrossRefPubMed Zhang Y, Ge HW, Li NC et al (2016) Evaluation of three-dimensional printing for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy of renal tumors: a preliminary report. World J Urol 34(4):533–537CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Petros F, Sukumar S, Haber G-P et al (2012) Multi-institutional analysis of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for renal tumors > 4 cm versus ≤4 cm in 445 consecutive patients. J Endourol 26:642–646CrossRefPubMed Petros F, Sukumar S, Haber G-P et al (2012) Multi-institutional analysis of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for renal tumors > 4 cm versus ≤4 cm in 445 consecutive patients. J Endourol 26:642–646CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Dworkin DL, Brenner BM (2004) Brenner and Rector's: the kidney, 7th edn. Elsevier, Philadelphia, PA Dworkin DL, Brenner BM (2004) Brenner and Rector's: the kidney, 7th edn. Elsevier, Philadelphia, PA
14.
go back to reference Thompson RH, Lane BR, Lohse CM et al (2010) Every minute counts when the renal hilum is clamped during partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol 58(3):340–345CrossRefPubMed Thompson RH, Lane BR, Lohse CM et al (2010) Every minute counts when the renal hilum is clamped during partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol 58(3):340–345CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Liss MA, McDougall EM (2013) Robotic surgical simulation. Cancer J 111(2):124–129CrossRef Liss MA, McDougall EM (2013) Robotic surgical simulation. Cancer J 111(2):124–129CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Hung AJ, Zehnder P, Patil MB et al (2011) Face, content and construct validity of a novel robotic surgery simulator. J Urol 186:1019–1024CrossRefPubMed Hung AJ, Zehnder P, Patil MB et al (2011) Face, content and construct validity of a novel robotic surgery simulator. J Urol 186:1019–1024CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Korets R, Mues AC, Graversen JA et al (2011) Validating the use of the Mimic dV-trainer for robotic surgery skill acquisition among urology residents. Urology 78:1326–1330CrossRefPubMed Korets R, Mues AC, Graversen JA et al (2011) Validating the use of the Mimic dV-trainer for robotic surgery skill acquisition among urology residents. Urology 78:1326–1330CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Seixas-Mikelus SA, Kesavadas T, Srimathveeravalli G et al (2010) Face validation of a novel robotic surgical simulator. Urology 76:357–360CrossRefPubMed Seixas-Mikelus SA, Kesavadas T, Srimathveeravalli G et al (2010) Face validation of a novel robotic surgical simulator. Urology 76:357–360CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Kumar A, Smith R, Patel VR (2015) Current status of robotic simulators in acquisition of robotic surgical skills. Curr Opin Urol 25(2):168–174CrossRefPubMed Kumar A, Smith R, Patel VR (2015) Current status of robotic simulators in acquisition of robotic surgical skills. Curr Opin Urol 25(2):168–174CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Hung AJ, Shah SH, Dalag L et al (2015) Development and validation of a novel robotic procedure-specific simulation platform: partial nephrectomy. J Urol 194(2):520–526CrossRefPubMed Hung AJ, Shah SH, Dalag L et al (2015) Development and validation of a novel robotic procedure-specific simulation platform: partial nephrectomy. J Urol 194(2):520–526CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Knoedler M, Feibus A, Lange A et al (2015) Individualized physical 3-dimensional kidney tumor models constructed from 3-dimensional printers result in improved trainee anatomic understanding. Urology 85(6):1257–1262CrossRefPubMed Knoedler M, Feibus A, Lange A et al (2015) Individualized physical 3-dimensional kidney tumor models constructed from 3-dimensional printers result in improved trainee anatomic understanding. Urology 85(6):1257–1262CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
3D-printed soft-tissue physical models of renal malignancies for individualized surgical simulation: a feasibility study
Authors
Michael M. Maddox
Allison Feibus
James Liu
Julie Wang
Raju Thomas
Jonathan L. Silberstein
Publication date
01-03-2018
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Issue 1/2018
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-017-0680-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Journal of Robotic Surgery 1/2018 Go to the issue