Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 3/2017

01-09-2017 | Original Article

Early clinical experience with the da Vinci Xi Surgical System in general surgery

Authors: Monika E. Hagen, Minoa K. Jung, Frederic Ris, Jassim Fakhro, Nicolas C. Buchs, Leo Buehler, Philippe Morel

Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Issue 3/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

The da Vinci Xi Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) has been released in 2014 to facilitate minimally invasive surgery. Novel features are targeted towards facilitating complex multi-quadrant procedures, but data is scarce so far. Perioperative data of patients who underwent robotic general surgery with the da Vinci Xi system within the first 6 month after installation were collected and analyzed. The gastric bypass procedures performed with the da Vinci Xi Surgical System were compared to an equal amount of the last procedures with the da Vinci Si Surgical System. Thirty-one foregut (28 Roux-en-Y gastric bypasses), 6 colorectal procedures and 1 revisional biliary procedure were performed. The mean operating room (OR) time was 221.8 (±69.0) minutes for gastric bypasses and 306.5 (±48.8) for colorectal procedures with mean docking time of 9.4 (±3.8) minutes. The gastric bypass procedure was transitioned from a hybrid to a fully robotic approach. In comparison to the last 28 gastric bypass procedures performed with the da Vinci Si Surgical System, the OR time was comparable (226.9 versus 230.6 min, p = 0.8094), but the docking time significantly longer with the da Vinci Xi Surgical System (8.5 versus 6.1 min, p = 0.0415). All colorectal procedures were performed with a single robotic docking. No intraoperative and two postoperative complications occurred. The da Vinci Xi might facilitate single-setups of totally robotic gastric bypass and colorectal surgeries. However, further comparable research is needed to clearly determine the significance of this latest version of the da Vinci Surgical System.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hagen ME, Inan I, Pugin F, Morel P (2007) The da Vinci surgical system in digestive surgery. Rev Med Suisse 3:1622–1626PubMed Hagen ME, Inan I, Pugin F, Morel P (2007) The da Vinci surgical system in digestive surgery. Rev Med Suisse 3:1622–1626PubMed
2.
3.
go back to reference Satava RM (2003) Robotic surgery: from past to future—a personal journey. Surg Clin N Am 83:1491–1500CrossRefPubMed Satava RM (2003) Robotic surgery: from past to future—a personal journey. Surg Clin N Am 83:1491–1500CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Buchs NC, Bucher P, Pugin F, Hagen ME, Morel P (2010) Robot-assisted oncologic resection for large gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a preliminary case series. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 20:411–415CrossRefPubMed Buchs NC, Bucher P, Pugin F, Hagen ME, Morel P (2010) Robot-assisted oncologic resection for large gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a preliminary case series. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 20:411–415CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Hagen ME, Pugin F, Chassot G et al (2012) Reducing cost of surgery by avoiding complications: the model of robotic Roux-en-Y gastric Bypass. Obes Surg 22(1):52–61CrossRefPubMed Hagen ME, Pugin F, Chassot G et al (2012) Reducing cost of surgery by avoiding complications: the model of robotic Roux-en-Y gastric Bypass. Obes Surg 22(1):52–61CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Buchs NC, Hagen ME, Pugin F et al (2012) Intra-operative fluorescent cholangiography using indocyanin green during robotic single site cholecystectomy. Int J Med Robot 8:436–440CrossRefPubMed Buchs NC, Hagen ME, Pugin F et al (2012) Intra-operative fluorescent cholangiography using indocyanin green during robotic single site cholecystectomy. Int J Med Robot 8:436–440CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Buchs NC, Pugin F, Volonte F, Hagen ME, Morel P, Ris F (2013) Robotic transanal endoscopic microsurgery: technical details for the lateral approach. Dis Colon Rectum 56:1194–1198CrossRefPubMed Buchs NC, Pugin F, Volonte F, Hagen ME, Morel P, Ris F (2013) Robotic transanal endoscopic microsurgery: technical details for the lateral approach. Dis Colon Rectum 56:1194–1198CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Trinh QD, Sammon J, Sun M et al (2012) Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open radical prostatectomy: results from the nationwide inpatient sample. Eur Urol 61:679–685CrossRefPubMed Trinh QD, Sammon J, Sun M et al (2012) Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open radical prostatectomy: results from the nationwide inpatient sample. Eur Urol 61:679–685CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Gandaglia G, Sammon JD, Chang SL et al (2014) Comparative effectiveness of robot-assisted and open radical prostatectomy in the postdissemination era. J Clin Oncol 32:1419–1426CrossRefPubMed Gandaglia G, Sammon JD, Chang SL et al (2014) Comparative effectiveness of robot-assisted and open radical prostatectomy in the postdissemination era. J Clin Oncol 32:1419–1426CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Ficarra V, Novara G, Ahlering TE et al (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting potency rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 62:418–430CrossRefPubMed Ficarra V, Novara G, Ahlering TE et al (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting potency rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 62:418–430CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Ficarra V, Sooriakumaran P, Novara G et al (2012) Systematic review of methods for reporting combined outcomes after radical prostatectomy and proposal of a novel system: the survival, continence, and potency (SCP) classification. Eur Urol 61:541–548CrossRefPubMed Ficarra V, Sooriakumaran P, Novara G et al (2012) Systematic review of methods for reporting combined outcomes after radical prostatectomy and proposal of a novel system: the survival, continence, and potency (SCP) classification. Eur Urol 61:541–548CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Novara G, Ficarra V, Mocellin S et al (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting oncologic outcome after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 62:382–404CrossRefPubMed Novara G, Ficarra V, Mocellin S et al (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting oncologic outcome after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 62:382–404CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Jung M, Morel P, Buehler L, Buchs NC, Hagen ME (2015) Robotic general surgery: current practice, evidence, and perspective. Langenbecks Arch Surg 400:283–292CrossRefPubMed Jung M, Morel P, Buehler L, Buchs NC, Hagen ME (2015) Robotic general surgery: current practice, evidence, and perspective. Langenbecks Arch Surg 400:283–292CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Iranmanesh P, Morel P, Wagner OJ, Inan I, Pugin F, Hagen ME (2010) Set-up and docking of the da Vinci surgical system: prospective analysis of initial experience. Int J Med Robot 6:57–60PubMed Iranmanesh P, Morel P, Wagner OJ, Inan I, Pugin F, Hagen ME (2010) Set-up and docking of the da Vinci surgical system: prospective analysis of initial experience. Int J Med Robot 6:57–60PubMed
18.
go back to reference Iranmanesh P, Morel P, Buchs NC et al (2013) Docking of the da Vinci Si Surgical System® with single-site technology. Int J Med Robot 9:12–16CrossRefPubMed Iranmanesh P, Morel P, Buchs NC et al (2013) Docking of the da Vinci Si Surgical System® with single-site technology. Int J Med Robot 9:12–16CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Early clinical experience with the da Vinci Xi Surgical System in general surgery
Authors
Monika E. Hagen
Minoa K. Jung
Frederic Ris
Jassim Fakhro
Nicolas C. Buchs
Leo Buehler
Philippe Morel
Publication date
01-09-2017
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-016-0662-0

Other articles of this Issue 3/2017

Journal of Robotic Surgery 3/2017 Go to the issue