Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 1/2018

01-03-2018 | Letter to the Editor

Salvage robotic prostatectomy and high risk disease: what else can we do?

Authors: S. S. Goonewardene, D. Cahill

Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Excerpt

Salvage robotic radical prostatectomy (SRALP) is known for managing more high risk disease. This is a treatment option for biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer [1]. Failure of non-surgical primary treatment for localized disease has rates ranging from 20 to 60 % [2]. This is an uncommonly performed procedure, due to the technical challenges involved [1]. SRALP is associated with high complication rates for rectal injury, urinary leak anastomotic stricture and incontinence [3]. This leads to distorted anatomy and difficulty with tissue-planes [3]. As a result, more extensive dissection is required. This leads to a higher rate of complications. Given the advances within robotics, this next question should robotic surgery be considered for high risk prostate cancer and what are the technical tips? …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Wetherell D, Bolton D, Kavanagh L, Perera M (2013) Current role of salvage robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. World J Urol 31(3):463–469CrossRefPubMed Wetherell D, Bolton D, Kavanagh L, Perera M (2013) Current role of salvage robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. World J Urol 31(3):463–469CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Eldred-Evans D, Sturch P, Cahill D, Dasgupta P, Challacombe B, Popert R (2013) Salvage robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: challenges and solutions. Urology 1:S170 Eldred-Evans D, Sturch P, Cahill D, Dasgupta P, Challacombe B, Popert R (2013) Salvage robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: challenges and solutions. Urology 1:S170
4.
go back to reference Diaz M, Peabody JO, Kapoor V, Sammon J, Rogers CG, Stricker H et al (2015) Oncologic outcomes at 10 years following robotic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 67(6):1168–1176CrossRefPubMed Diaz M, Peabody JO, Kapoor V, Sammon J, Rogers CG, Stricker H et al (2015) Oncologic outcomes at 10 years following robotic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 67(6):1168–1176CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Goldstraw MA, Challacombe BJ, Patil K, Amoroso P, Dasgupta P, Kirby RS (2012) Overcoming the challenges of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 15(1):1–7CrossRefPubMed Goldstraw MA, Challacombe BJ, Patil K, Amoroso P, Dasgupta P, Kirby RS (2012) Overcoming the challenges of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 15(1):1–7CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Eandi JA, Link BA, Nelson RA, Josephson DY, Lau C, Kawachi MH et al (2010) Robotic assisted laparoscopic salvage prostatectomy for radiation resistant prostate cancer. J Urol 183(1):133–137CrossRefPubMed Eandi JA, Link BA, Nelson RA, Josephson DY, Lau C, Kawachi MH et al (2010) Robotic assisted laparoscopic salvage prostatectomy for radiation resistant prostate cancer. J Urol 183(1):133–137CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Ou YC, Yang CK, Chang KS, Wang J, Hung SW, Tung MC et al (2014) The surgical learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: experience of a single surgeon with 500 cases in Taiwan, China. Asian J Androl 16(5):728–734CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ou YC, Yang CK, Chang KS, Wang J, Hung SW, Tung MC et al (2014) The surgical learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: experience of a single surgeon with 500 cases in Taiwan, China. Asian J Androl 16(5):728–734CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Murphy D (2012) State of the art lecture 9-the contemporary role of surgery in the management of high-risk prostate cancer. Int J Urol 19:229CrossRef Murphy D (2012) State of the art lecture 9-the contemporary role of surgery in the management of high-risk prostate cancer. Int J Urol 19:229CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Rocco B, Cozzi G, Spinelli MG, Grasso A, Varisco D, Coelho RF et al (2012) Current status of salvage robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for radiorecurrent prostate cancer. Curr Urol Rep 13(3):195–201CrossRefPubMed Rocco B, Cozzi G, Spinelli MG, Grasso A, Varisco D, Coelho RF et al (2012) Current status of salvage robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for radiorecurrent prostate cancer. Curr Urol Rep 13(3):195–201CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Strope SA, Coelho M, Wood DP, Hollenbeck BK (2010) Robot-assisted salvage prostatectomy: evaluation of initial patient-reported outcomes. J Endourol 24(3):425–427CrossRefPubMed Strope SA, Coelho M, Wood DP, Hollenbeck BK (2010) Robot-assisted salvage prostatectomy: evaluation of initial patient-reported outcomes. J Endourol 24(3):425–427CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Pokala N, Huynh DL, Henderson AA, Johans C (2016) Survival outcomes in men undergoing radical prostatectomy after primary radiation treatment for adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Clin Genitourin Cancer 14(3):218–225CrossRefPubMed Pokala N, Huynh DL, Henderson AA, Johans C (2016) Survival outcomes in men undergoing radical prostatectomy after primary radiation treatment for adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Clin Genitourin Cancer 14(3):218–225CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Salvage robotic prostatectomy and high risk disease: what else can we do?
Authors
S. S. Goonewardene
D. Cahill
Publication date
01-03-2018
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Issue 1/2018
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-016-0628-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Journal of Robotic Surgery 1/2018 Go to the issue