Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 1/2017

01-03-2017 | Original Article

Predictive factors and oncological outcomes of persistently elevated prostate-specific antigen in patients following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

Authors: Anup Kumar, Srinivas Samavedi, Vladimir Mouraviev, Anthony S. Bates, Rafael F. Coelho, Bernardo Rocco, Vipul R. Patel

Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Our aim was to evaluate factors associated with persistently elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and biochemical recurrence following robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). The study population (N = 5300) consisted of consecutive patients who underwent RARP for localized prostate cancer by a single surgeon (VP) from January 2008 through July 2013. A query of our Institutional Review Board-approved registry identified 162 men with persistently elevated PSA (group A), defined as PSA level ≥0.1 ng/ml at 6 weeks after surgery, who were compared with rest of the cohort group having undetectable PSA, group B (<0.1 ng/ml). A univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the significant association between various variables and the following: (1) persistently elevated PSA, (2) BCR (PSA value ≥0.2 ng/ml) on follow-up in the persistent PSA group. On multivariate analysis, only the following parameters were significantly associated with persistent PSA after RARP—preoperative [PSA >10 ng/ml (p = 0.01), Gleason Score ≥8 (p = 0.001) and clinical stage(p = 0.001)]; postoperative [pathologic stage (p = 0.001), extraprostatic extension (EPE, p = 0.01), lymph node positivity (p = 0.001), positive surgical margin (PSM, p = 0.02), Gleason score (p = 0.01) and tumor volume percent (p < 0.001)]. The mean follow-up was 38.1 months. The BCR was significantly higher in group A as compared to group B(52.47 vs 7.9 %) respectively; p = 0.01). The mean time to BCR was significantly lesser in group A as compared to group B(8.9 vs 21.1 months respectively; p = 0.01). The BCR-free survival rates at 1 year and 3 years were significantly lower statistically in the persistent PSA group in comparison to other groups (69.7 vs 97.3 % and 48.5 vs 92.1 %, respectively; p = 0.01). On multivariate logistic regression analysis in patients with persistent PSA on follow-up, preoperative PSA >10 ng/ml, postoperative Gleason score ≥8, postoperative stage ≥pT3, positive pelvic lymph nodes, PSM >3 mm and post-RARP PSA doubling time (DT) <10 months (p < 0.001) were significantly associated with BCR. In patients after RARP, factors associated with aggressive disease (high preoperative PSA, Gleason score ≥8, stage ≥T3, PSM, high tumor volume percent and EPE) predict PSA persistence. Although these patients with persistent PSA after RARP are more likely to have BCR and that too earlier than those patients with undetectable PSA after RARP, a significant proportion of these patients (47.53 %) remain free of BCR. This subset of patients is associated with these favorable parameters (preoperative PSA <10 ng/ml, post-RARP PSA DT ≥10 months, postoperative Gleason score <8, pathologic stage <pT3, PSM <3 mm and no lymph node involvement), thus potentially not requiring any adjuvant treatment.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jani AB, Johnstone PA, Liauw SL, Master VA, Brawley OW (2008) Age and grade trends in prostate cancer (1974–2003): a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results registry analysis. Am J Clin Oncol 31:375–378CrossRefPubMed Jani AB, Johnstone PA, Liauw SL, Master VA, Brawley OW (2008) Age and grade trends in prostate cancer (1974–2003): a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results registry analysis. Am J Clin Oncol 31:375–378CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Minino AM, Smith BL (2001) Deaths: preliminary data for 2000. Natl Vital Stat Rep 49:1–40 Minino AM, Smith BL (2001) Deaths: preliminary data for 2000. Natl Vital Stat Rep 49:1–40
4.
go back to reference Edwards BK, Noone AM, Mariotto AB et al (2014) Annual Report to the Nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2010, featuring prevalence of comorbidity and impact on survival among persons with lung, colorectal, breast, or prostate cancer. Cancer 120(9):1290–1314CrossRefPubMed Edwards BK, Noone AM, Mariotto AB et al (2014) Annual Report to the Nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2010, featuring prevalence of comorbidity and impact on survival among persons with lung, colorectal, breast, or prostate cancer. Cancer 120(9):1290–1314CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Dorin RP, Daneshmand S, Lassoff MA et al (2012) Long term outcomes of open radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer in the prostate specific antigen era. Urology 79:626–631CrossRefPubMed Dorin RP, Daneshmand S, Lassoff MA et al (2012) Long term outcomes of open radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer in the prostate specific antigen era. Urology 79:626–631CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference D’Amico AV, Whittington R (1998) Malkowicz SBet al.Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA 280:969–974CrossRefPubMed D’Amico AV, Whittington R (1998) Malkowicz SBet al.Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA 280:969–974CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Han M, Partin AW, Pound CR et al (2001) Long term biochemical disease free and cancer specific survival following anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. The 15 years Johns Hopkins experience. Urol Clin North Am 28:555–565CrossRefPubMed Han M, Partin AW, Pound CR et al (2001) Long term biochemical disease free and cancer specific survival following anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. The 15 years Johns Hopkins experience. Urol Clin North Am 28:555–565CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Heidenreich A, Bastian PJ, Bellmunt J et al (2014) EAU guidelines on prostate cancer.Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent-update 2013. Eur Urol 65:124–137CrossRefPubMed Heidenreich A, Bastian PJ, Bellmunt J et al (2014) EAU guidelines on prostate cancer.Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent-update 2013. Eur Urol 65:124–137CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Ficarra V, Cavalleri S, Novara G, Aragona M, Artibani W (2007) Evidence from robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review. Eur Urol 51:45–56CrossRefPubMed Ficarra V, Cavalleri S, Novara G, Aragona M, Artibani W (2007) Evidence from robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review. Eur Urol 51:45–56CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Ficarra V, Borghesi M, Suardi N et al (2013) Long-term evaluation of survival, continence and potency (SCP) outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). BJU Int 112(3):338–345CrossRefPubMed Ficarra V, Borghesi M, Suardi N et al (2013) Long-term evaluation of survival, continence and potency (SCP) outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). BJU Int 112(3):338–345CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Ficarra V, Novara G, Artibani W, Cestari A, Galfano A, Graefen M, Guazzoni G, Guillonneau B, Menon M, Montorsi F, Patel V, Rassweiler J, Van Poppel H (2009) Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol 55:1037–1063CrossRefPubMed Ficarra V, Novara G, Artibani W, Cestari A, Galfano A, Graefen M, Guazzoni G, Guillonneau B, Menon M, Montorsi F, Patel V, Rassweiler J, Van Poppel H (2009) Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol 55:1037–1063CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Coelho RF, Rocco B, Patel MB (2010) Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a critical review of outcomes reported by high-volume centers. J Endourol 24(12):2003–2015CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Coelho RF, Rocco B, Patel MB (2010) Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a critical review of outcomes reported by high-volume centers. J Endourol 24(12):2003–2015CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Sooriakumaran P, Haendler L, Nyberg T et al (2012) Biochemical recurrence after robot assisted radical prostatectomy in a European single centre cohort with a minimum follow up time of 5 years. Eur Urol 62:768–774CrossRefPubMed Sooriakumaran P, Haendler L, Nyberg T et al (2012) Biochemical recurrence after robot assisted radical prostatectomy in a European single centre cohort with a minimum follow up time of 5 years. Eur Urol 62:768–774CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Patel VR, Sivaraman A, Coelho RF et al (2011) Pentafecta: a new concept for reporting outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 59(5):702–707CrossRefPubMed Patel VR, Sivaraman A, Coelho RF et al (2011) Pentafecta: a new concept for reporting outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 59(5):702–707CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Patel VR, Coelho RF, Chauhan S et al (2010) Continence, potency and oncological outcomes after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: early trifecta results of a high-volume surgeon. BJU Int 106(5):696–702CrossRefPubMed Patel VR, Coelho RF, Chauhan S et al (2010) Continence, potency and oncological outcomes after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: early trifecta results of a high-volume surgeon. BJU Int 106(5):696–702CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Suardi N, Ficarra V, Willemesen P et al (2011) Long term biochemical recurrence rates after robot assisted radical prostatectomy: analysis of a single center series of patients with a minimum follow up of 5 years. Urology 79:133–138CrossRefPubMed Suardi N, Ficarra V, Willemesen P et al (2011) Long term biochemical recurrence rates after robot assisted radical prostatectomy: analysis of a single center series of patients with a minimum follow up of 5 years. Urology 79:133–138CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Menon M, Bhandari M, Gupta N et al (2010) Biochemical recurrence following robot assisted radical prostatectomy: analysis of 1384 patients with a minimum 5 year follow up. Eur Urol 58:838–846CrossRefPubMed Menon M, Bhandari M, Gupta N et al (2010) Biochemical recurrence following robot assisted radical prostatectomy: analysis of 1384 patients with a minimum 5 year follow up. Eur Urol 58:838–846CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Cookson MS, Gunnar Aus, Burnett AL et al (2007) Variation in the definition of biochemical recurrence in patients treated for localized prostate cancer: the American Urological Association prostate guidelines for localized prostate cancer update report and recommendations for a standard in the reporting of surgical outcomes. J Urol 177:540–545CrossRefPubMed Cookson MS, Gunnar Aus, Burnett AL et al (2007) Variation in the definition of biochemical recurrence in patients treated for localized prostate cancer: the American Urological Association prostate guidelines for localized prostate cancer update report and recommendations for a standard in the reporting of surgical outcomes. J Urol 177:540–545CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Moreira DM, Presti JC, Aronson WJ et al (2009) Natural history of persistently elevated prostate specific antigen after radical prostatectomy: results from the SEARCH database. J Urol 182:2250–2256CrossRefPubMed Moreira DM, Presti JC, Aronson WJ et al (2009) Natural history of persistently elevated prostate specific antigen after radical prostatectomy: results from the SEARCH database. J Urol 182:2250–2256CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Pound CR, Partin AW, Eisenberger MA et al (1999) Natural history of progression after PSA elevation following radical prostatectomy. JAMA 281(17):1591–1597CrossRefPubMed Pound CR, Partin AW, Eisenberger MA et al (1999) Natural history of progression after PSA elevation following radical prostatectomy. JAMA 281(17):1591–1597CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Rogers CG, Khan MA, Miller MC et al (2004) Natural history of disease progression in patients who fail to achieve an undetectable prostate specific antigen level after undergoing radical prostatectomy. Cancer 101(11):2549–2556CrossRefPubMed Rogers CG, Khan MA, Miller MC et al (2004) Natural history of disease progression in patients who fail to achieve an undetectable prostate specific antigen level after undergoing radical prostatectomy. Cancer 101(11):2549–2556CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Moreira DM, Presti JC, Aronson WJ et al (2009) Definition and preoperative predictors of persistently elevated prosate specific antigen after radical prostatectomy: results from the SEARCH database. BJUI 105:1541–1547CrossRef Moreira DM, Presti JC, Aronson WJ et al (2009) Definition and preoperative predictors of persistently elevated prosate specific antigen after radical prostatectomy: results from the SEARCH database. BJUI 105:1541–1547CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Audenet F, Seringe E, Drouin SJ et al (2012) Persistently elevated prostate specific antigen at six weeks after radical prostatectomy helps in early identification of patients who are likely to recur. World J Urol 30:239–244CrossRefPubMed Audenet F, Seringe E, Drouin SJ et al (2012) Persistently elevated prostate specific antigen at six weeks after radical prostatectomy helps in early identification of patients who are likely to recur. World J Urol 30:239–244CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference D’Amico AV, Chen MH, Roehl KA et al (2005) Identifying patients at risk for significant versus clinically insignificant postoperative prostate specific antigen failure. J Clin Oncol 23:4975–4979CrossRefPubMed D’Amico AV, Chen MH, Roehl KA et al (2005) Identifying patients at risk for significant versus clinically insignificant postoperative prostate specific antigen failure. J Clin Oncol 23:4975–4979CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Naselli A, Introini C, Andreatta R et al (2009) Prognostic factors of persistently detectable PSA after radical prostatectomy.International. J Urol 16:82–86 Naselli A, Introini C, Andreatta R et al (2009) Prognostic factors of persistently detectable PSA after radical prostatectomy.International. J Urol 16:82–86
26.
go back to reference Eisenberg ML, Davies BJ, Cooperberg MR et al (2010) Prognostic implications of an undetectable ultrasensitive prostate specific antigen level after radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 57:622–630CrossRefPubMed Eisenberg ML, Davies BJ, Cooperberg MR et al (2010) Prognostic implications of an undetectable ultrasensitive prostate specific antigen level after radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 57:622–630CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Song DY, Thompson TL, Ramakrishnan V et al (2002) Salvage radiotherapy for rising or persistent PSA after radical prostatectomy. Urology 62(2):281–287CrossRef Song DY, Thompson TL, Ramakrishnan V et al (2002) Salvage radiotherapy for rising or persistent PSA after radical prostatectomy. Urology 62(2):281–287CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Kohl SK, Balaji KC, Smith LM et al (2007) Clinical significance of benign glands at surgical margins in robotic radical prostatectomy specimens. Urology 69(6):1113–1116CrossRef Kohl SK, Balaji KC, Smith LM et al (2007) Clinical significance of benign glands at surgical margins in robotic radical prostatectomy specimens. Urology 69(6):1113–1116CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Shah R, Bassily N, Wei J et al (2000) Benign prostatic glands at surgical margins of radical prosatatectomy specimens: frequency and associated risk factors. Urology 56(5):721–725CrossRefPubMed Shah R, Bassily N, Wei J et al (2000) Benign prostatic glands at surgical margins of radical prosatatectomy specimens: frequency and associated risk factors. Urology 56(5):721–725CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Paul R, Hoppmann M, Randenborgh HV et al (2004) Residual benign prostatic glands at the urethrovesical anastomosis after radical retropubic prostatectomy: prediction and impact on disease outcome. Eur Urol 46:321–326CrossRefPubMed Paul R, Hoppmann M, Randenborgh HV et al (2004) Residual benign prostatic glands at the urethrovesical anastomosis after radical retropubic prostatectomy: prediction and impact on disease outcome. Eur Urol 46:321–326CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Patel VR, Tully AS, Holmes R et al (2005) Robotic radical prostatectomy in the community setting—the learning curve and beyond: initial 200 cases. J Urol 174:269–272CrossRefPubMed Patel VR, Tully AS, Holmes R et al (2005) Robotic radical prostatectomy in the community setting—the learning curve and beyond: initial 200 cases. J Urol 174:269–272CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Ko YH, Coelho RF, Sivaraman A et al (2013) Retrograde versus antegrade nerve sparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: which is better for achieving early functional recovery? Eur Urol 63(1):169–177CrossRefPubMed Ko YH, Coelho RF, Sivaraman A et al (2013) Retrograde versus antegrade nerve sparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: which is better for achieving early functional recovery? Eur Urol 63(1):169–177CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Patel VR, Coelho RF, Palmer KJ et al (2009) Periurethral suspension stitch during robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: description of the technique and continence outcomes. Eur Urol 56:472–478CrossRefPubMed Patel VR, Coelho RF, Palmer KJ et al (2009) Periurethral suspension stitch during robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: description of the technique and continence outcomes. Eur Urol 56:472–478CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Coelho RF, Chauhan S, Orvieto MA et al (2011) Influence of modified posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter on early recovery of continence and anastomotic leakage rates after robot assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 59:72–80CrossRefPubMed Coelho RF, Chauhan S, Orvieto MA et al (2011) Influence of modified posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter on early recovery of continence and anastomotic leakage rates after robot assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 59:72–80CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Yossepowitch O, Briganti A, Eastham JA et al (2014) Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and contemporary update. Eur Urol 65:303–313CrossRefPubMed Yossepowitch O, Briganti A, Eastham JA et al (2014) Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and contemporary update. Eur Urol 65:303–313CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Matsumoto K, Mizuno R, Tanaka N et al (2014) Optimal timing of hormonal therapy for prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Med Oncol 31:45CrossRefPubMed Matsumoto K, Mizuno R, Tanaka N et al (2014) Optimal timing of hormonal therapy for prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Med Oncol 31:45CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Predictive factors and oncological outcomes of persistently elevated prostate-specific antigen in patients following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
Authors
Anup Kumar
Srinivas Samavedi
Vladimir Mouraviev
Anthony S. Bates
Rafael F. Coelho
Bernardo Rocco
Vipul R. Patel
Publication date
01-03-2017
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Issue 1/2017
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-016-0606-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Journal of Robotic Surgery 1/2017 Go to the issue