Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 4/2016

01-12-2016 | Original Article

Efficacy and cost of robotic hepatectomy: is the robot cost-prohibitive?

Authors: Jonathan G. Sham, Morgan K. Richards, Y. David Seo, Venu G. Pillarisetty, Raymond S. Yeung, James O. Park

Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Issue 4/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Robotic technology is being utilized in multiple hepatobiliary procedures, including hepatic resections. The benefits of minimally invasive surgical approaches have been well documented; however, there is some concern that robotic liver surgery may be prohibitively costly and therefore should be limited on this basis. A single-institution, retrospective cohort study was performed of robotic and open liver resections performed for benign and malignant pathologies. Clinical and cost outcomes were analyzed using adjusted generalized linear regression models. Clinical and cost data for 71 robotic (RH) and 88 open (OH) hepatectomies were analyzed. Operative time was significantly longer in the RH group (303 vs. 253 min; p = 0.004). Length of stay was more than 2 days shorter in the RH group (4.2 vs. 6.5 days; p < 0.001). RH perioperative costs were higher ($6026 vs. $5479; p = 0.047); however, postoperative costs were significantly lower, resulting in lower total hospital direct costs compared with OH controls ($14,754 vs. $18,998; p = 0.001). Robotic assistance is safe and effective while performing major and minor liver resections. Despite increased perioperative costs, overall RH direct costs are not greater than OH, the current standard of care.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Heemskerk J, van Gemert WG, Greve JW, Bouvy ND (2007) Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: a comparative retrospective study on costs and time consumption. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 17(1):1–4CrossRefPubMed Heemskerk J, van Gemert WG, Greve JW, Bouvy ND (2007) Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: a comparative retrospective study on costs and time consumption. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 17(1):1–4CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Heemskerk J, de Hoog DE, van Gemert WG, Baeten CG, Greve JW, Bouvy ND (2007) Robot-assisted vs. conventional laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a comparative study on costs and time. Dis Colon Rectum 50(11):1825–1830CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Heemskerk J, de Hoog DE, van Gemert WG, Baeten CG, Greve JW, Bouvy ND (2007) Robot-assisted vs. conventional laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a comparative study on costs and time. Dis Colon Rectum 50(11):1825–1830CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Wright JD, Kostolias A, Ananth CV, Burke WM, Tergas AI, Prendergast E et al (2014) Comparative effectiveness of robotically assisted compared with laparoscopic adnexal surgery for benign gynecologic disease. Obstet Gynecol 124(5):886–896CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wright JD, Kostolias A, Ananth CV, Burke WM, Tergas AI, Prendergast E et al (2014) Comparative effectiveness of robotically assisted compared with laparoscopic adnexal surgery for benign gynecologic disease. Obstet Gynecol 124(5):886–896CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Wright JD, Ananth CV, Lewin SN, Burke WM, Lu YS, Neugut AI et al (2013) Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease. JAMA 309(7):689–698CrossRefPubMed Wright JD, Ananth CV, Lewin SN, Burke WM, Lu YS, Neugut AI et al (2013) Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease. JAMA 309(7):689–698CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Polignano FM, Quyn AJ, de Figueiredo RS, Henderson NA, Kulli C, Tait IS (2008) Laparoscopic versus open liver segmentectomy: prospective, case-matched, intention-to-treat analysis of clinical outcomes and cost effectiveness. Surg Endosc 22(12):2564–2570CrossRefPubMed Polignano FM, Quyn AJ, de Figueiredo RS, Henderson NA, Kulli C, Tait IS (2008) Laparoscopic versus open liver segmentectomy: prospective, case-matched, intention-to-treat analysis of clinical outcomes and cost effectiveness. Surg Endosc 22(12):2564–2570CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Dagher I, Di Giuro G, Dubrez J, Lainas P, Smadja C, Franco D (2009) Laparoscopic versus open right hepatectomy: a comparative study. Am J Surg 198(2):173–177CrossRefPubMed Dagher I, Di Giuro G, Dubrez J, Lainas P, Smadja C, Franco D (2009) Laparoscopic versus open right hepatectomy: a comparative study. Am J Surg 198(2):173–177CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Abu Hilal M, Di Fabio F, Teng MJ, Lykoudis P, Primrose JN, Pearce NW (2011) Single-centre comparative study of laparoscopic versus open right hepatectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 15(5):818–823CrossRefPubMed Abu Hilal M, Di Fabio F, Teng MJ, Lykoudis P, Primrose JN, Pearce NW (2011) Single-centre comparative study of laparoscopic versus open right hepatectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 15(5):818–823CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA (2009) World review of laparoscopic liver resection-2,804 patients. Ann Surg 250(5):831–841CrossRefPubMed Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA (2009) World review of laparoscopic liver resection-2,804 patients. Ann Surg 250(5):831–841CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA, O’Rourke N, Iannitti D, Dagher I et al (2009) The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: the Louisville Statement, 2008. Ann Surg 250(5):825–830CrossRefPubMed Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA, O’Rourke N, Iannitti D, Dagher I et al (2009) The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: the Louisville Statement, 2008. Ann Surg 250(5):825–830CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Buell JF, Kaneko H, Han HS et al (2015) Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka. Ann Surg 261(4):619–629PubMed Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Buell JF, Kaneko H, Han HS et al (2015) Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka. Ann Surg 261(4):619–629PubMed
12.
go back to reference Vigano L, Laurent A, Tayar C, Tomatis M, Ponti A, Cherqui D (2009) The learning curve in laparoscopic liver resection: improved feasibility and reproducibility. Ann Surg 250(5):772–782CrossRefPubMed Vigano L, Laurent A, Tayar C, Tomatis M, Ponti A, Cherqui D (2009) The learning curve in laparoscopic liver resection: improved feasibility and reproducibility. Ann Surg 250(5):772–782CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Kluger MD, Vigano L, Barroso R, Cherqui D (2013) The learning curve in laparoscopic major liver resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 20(2):131–136CrossRefPubMed Kluger MD, Vigano L, Barroso R, Cherqui D (2013) The learning curve in laparoscopic major liver resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 20(2):131–136CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Cai X, Li Z, Zhang Y, Yu H, Liang X, Jin R et al (2014) Laparoscopic liver resection and the learning curve: a 14-year, single-center experience. Surg Endosc 28(4):1334–1341CrossRefPubMed Cai X, Li Z, Zhang Y, Yu H, Liang X, Jin R et al (2014) Laparoscopic liver resection and the learning curve: a 14-year, single-center experience. Surg Endosc 28(4):1334–1341CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Leddy L, Lendva T, Satava R (2010) Robotic surgery: applications and cost effectiveness. Open Access Surg 3:99–107CrossRef Leddy L, Lendva T, Satava R (2010) Robotic surgery: applications and cost effectiveness. Open Access Surg 3:99–107CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Ji WB, Wang HG, Zhao ZM, Duan WD, Lu F, Dong JH (2011) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic anatomic hepatectomy in China: initial experience. Ann Surg 253(2):342–348CrossRefPubMed Ji WB, Wang HG, Zhao ZM, Duan WD, Lu F, Dong JH (2011) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic anatomic hepatectomy in China: initial experience. Ann Surg 253(2):342–348CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Giulianotti PC, Sbrana F, Coratti A, Bianco FM, Addeo P, Buchs NC et al (2011) Totally robotic right hepatectomy: surgical technique and outcomes. Arch Surg 146(7):844–850CrossRefPubMed Giulianotti PC, Sbrana F, Coratti A, Bianco FM, Addeo P, Buchs NC et al (2011) Totally robotic right hepatectomy: surgical technique and outcomes. Arch Surg 146(7):844–850CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Sbrana F, Addeo P, Bianco FM, Buchs NC et al (2011) Robotic liver surgery: results for 70 resections. Surgery 149(1):29–39CrossRefPubMed Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Sbrana F, Addeo P, Bianco FM, Buchs NC et al (2011) Robotic liver surgery: results for 70 resections. Surgery 149(1):29–39CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Park BJ, Flores RM (2008) Cost comparison of robotic, video-assisted thoracic surgery and thoracotomy approaches to pulmonary lobectomy. Thorac Surg Clin 18(3):297–300CrossRefPubMed Park BJ, Flores RM (2008) Cost comparison of robotic, video-assisted thoracic surgery and thoracotomy approaches to pulmonary lobectomy. Thorac Surg Clin 18(3):297–300CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Morgan JA, Thornton BA, Peacock JC, Hollingsworth KW, Smith CR, Oz MC et al (2005) Does robotic technology make minimally invasive cardiac surgery too expensive? A hospital cost analysis of robotic and conventional techniques. J Cardiac Surg 20(3):246–251CrossRef Morgan JA, Thornton BA, Peacock JC, Hollingsworth KW, Smith CR, Oz MC et al (2005) Does robotic technology make minimally invasive cardiac surgery too expensive? A hospital cost analysis of robotic and conventional techniques. J Cardiac Surg 20(3):246–251CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Martin AD, Nunez RN, Castle EP (2011) Robot-assisted radical cystectomy versus open radical cystectomy: a complete cost analysis. Urology 77(3):621–625CrossRefPubMed Martin AD, Nunez RN, Castle EP (2011) Robot-assisted radical cystectomy versus open radical cystectomy: a complete cost analysis. Urology 77(3):621–625CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Hohwu L, Borre M, Ehlers L, Venborg Pedersen K (2011) A short-term cost-effectiveness study comparing robot-assisted laparoscopic and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. J Med Econ 14(4):403–409CrossRefPubMed Hohwu L, Borre M, Ehlers L, Venborg Pedersen K (2011) A short-term cost-effectiveness study comparing robot-assisted laparoscopic and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. J Med Econ 14(4):403–409CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Kaye DR, Mullins JK, Carter HB, Bivalacqua TJ (2015) Robotic surgery in urological oncology: patient care or market share? Nat Rev Urol 12:55–60CrossRefPubMed Kaye DR, Mullins JK, Carter HB, Bivalacqua TJ (2015) Robotic surgery in urological oncology: patient care or market share? Nat Rev Urol 12:55–60CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Castaing D, Vibert E, Ricca L, Azoulay D, Adam R, Gayet B (2009) Oncologic results of laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases in two specialized centers. Ann Surg 250(5):849–855CrossRefPubMed Castaing D, Vibert E, Ricca L, Azoulay D, Adam R, Gayet B (2009) Oncologic results of laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases in two specialized centers. Ann Surg 250(5):849–855CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Dripps RD (1963) New classification of physical status. Anesthesiology 24:111 Dripps RD (1963) New classification of physical status. Anesthesiology 24:111
29.
go back to reference Herron DM, Marohn M, Group S-MRSC (2008) A consensus document on robotic surgery. Surg Endosc 22(2):313–325 (discussion 1–2) CrossRefPubMed Herron DM, Marohn M, Group S-MRSC (2008) A consensus document on robotic surgery. Surg Endosc 22(2):313–325 (discussion 1–2) CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Yu YD, Kim KH, Jung DH, Namkoong JM, Yoon SY, Jung SW et al (2014) Robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection: a comparative study from a single center. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 399(8):1039–1045CrossRef Yu YD, Kim KH, Jung DH, Namkoong JM, Yoon SY, Jung SW et al (2014) Robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection: a comparative study from a single center. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 399(8):1039–1045CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Tsung A, Geller DA, Sukato DC, Sabbaghian S, Tohme S, Steel J et al (2014) Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: a matched comparison. Ann Surg 259(3):549–555CrossRefPubMed Tsung A, Geller DA, Sukato DC, Sabbaghian S, Tohme S, Steel J et al (2014) Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: a matched comparison. Ann Surg 259(3):549–555CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Tranchart H, Ceribelli C, Ferretti S, Dagher I, Patriti A (2014) Traditional versus robot-assisted full laparoscopic liver resection: a matched-pair comparative study. World J Surg 38(11):2904–2909CrossRefPubMed Tranchart H, Ceribelli C, Ferretti S, Dagher I, Patriti A (2014) Traditional versus robot-assisted full laparoscopic liver resection: a matched-pair comparative study. World J Surg 38(11):2904–2909CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Spampinato MG, Coratti A, Bianco L, Caniglia F, Laurenzi A, Puleo F et al (2014) Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic and robot-assisted major hepatectomies: an Italian multi-institutional comparative study. Surg Endosc 28(10):2973–2979CrossRefPubMed Spampinato MG, Coratti A, Bianco L, Caniglia F, Laurenzi A, Puleo F et al (2014) Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic and robot-assisted major hepatectomies: an Italian multi-institutional comparative study. Surg Endosc 28(10):2973–2979CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350(20):2050–2059CrossRef Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350(20):2050–2059CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Cai XJ, Yang J, Yu H, Liang X, Wang YF, Zhu ZY et al (2008) Clinical study of laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for malignant liver tumors. Surg Endosc 22(11):2350–2356CrossRefPubMed Cai XJ, Yang J, Yu H, Liang X, Wang YF, Zhu ZY et al (2008) Clinical study of laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for malignant liver tumors. Surg Endosc 22(11):2350–2356CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Ocuin LM, Tsung A (2015) Robotic liver resection for malignancy: current status, oncologic outcomes, comparison to laparoscopy, and future applications. J Surg Oncol 112(3):295–301CrossRefPubMed Ocuin LM, Tsung A (2015) Robotic liver resection for malignancy: current status, oncologic outcomes, comparison to laparoscopy, and future applications. J Surg Oncol 112(3):295–301CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Barbash GI, Glied SA (2010) New technology and health care costs—the case of robot-assisted surgery. N Engl J Med 363(8):701–704CrossRefPubMed Barbash GI, Glied SA (2010) New technology and health care costs—the case of robot-assisted surgery. N Engl J Med 363(8):701–704CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Efficacy and cost of robotic hepatectomy: is the robot cost-prohibitive?
Authors
Jonathan G. Sham
Morgan K. Richards
Y. David Seo
Venu G. Pillarisetty
Raymond S. Yeung
James O. Park
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Issue 4/2016
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-016-0598-4

Other articles of this Issue 4/2016

Journal of Robotic Surgery 4/2016 Go to the issue