Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 3/2016

01-09-2016 | Original Article

Examining clinical outcomes utilizing low-pressure pneumoperitoneum during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy

Authors: Cody R. Christensen, Thomas K. Maatman, Thomas J. Maatman, Tony T. Tran

Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Issue 3/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

The objective of the study was to assess the safety and clinical outcomes of performing RARP utilizing LPP 12 mmHg with locally confined adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Utilizing the Metro Health RALP database registry and the Michigan Urological Clinic records, we retrospectively reviewed the records of consecutive RALPs performed between December 2012 and March 2015 by a single robotic surgeon. 100 patients underwent RARP utilizing 15 mmHg of standard pressure pneumoperitoneum (SPP) and 100 patients underwent RALP utilizing 12 mmHg lower pressure pneumoperitoneum (LPP). Intraoperative parameters reviewed included operative time (OT) and blood loss (BL). Postoperative parameters reviewed included length of hospital stay (LOS), postoperative ileus, fistulas, urinary retention and hematoma formation. Surgical outcomes reviewed included pathological stage and combined Gleason score. Patient age, BMI, mean combined Gleason score and pathological stage were similar in both groups. Mean OT for the LPP group was 105.49 (66–166) and for the standard pressure pneumoperitoneum (SPP) group 111.31 (61–231) min. The length of stay in both groups was similar, averaging 1.53 (1–6) days for the LPP group and 1.57 (1–6) days for the SPP group. The LPP group had a lower postop ileus rate of 4 vs 8 % in the SPP group, but they were not statistically different. Likewise, the positive margin rate, readmission rate, hematoma rate, retention rate and urinary fistula rate were similar and not statistically different for both groups. Pneumoperitoneum of 12 mmHg is noninferior to 15 mmHg during RARP and does not alter the clinical outcomes.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Patel VR, Sivaraman A (2012) Current status of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: progress is inevitable. Oncology 26:616–619PubMed Patel VR, Sivaraman A (2012) Current status of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: progress is inevitable. Oncology 26:616–619PubMed
2.
go back to reference Neudecker J, Sauerland S, Nengebauer F, Bergamaschi R, Bonjer HJ, Cuschieri A (2002) The European association for surgery clinical practice guideline on the pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 16:1121–1143CrossRefPubMed Neudecker J, Sauerland S, Nengebauer F, Bergamaschi R, Bonjer HJ, Cuschieri A (2002) The European association for surgery clinical practice guideline on the pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 16:1121–1143CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Mertens zur Borg IR, Lim A, Verbrugge SJ, Jzermans IJ, Klein J (2004) Effect of intraabdominal pressure elevation and positioning on hemodynamic responses during carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a prospective controlled clinical study. Surg Endosc 18(6):919–923CrossRefPubMed Mertens zur Borg IR, Lim A, Verbrugge SJ, Jzermans IJ, Klein J (2004) Effect of intraabdominal pressure elevation and positioning on hemodynamic responses during carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a prospective controlled clinical study. Surg Endosc 18(6):919–923CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference McDougall EM (1994) Laparoscopic pneumoperitoneum: impact of body habitus. J Laparoendosc Surg 4(6):385–391CrossRefPubMed McDougall EM (1994) Laparoscopic pneumoperitoneum: impact of body habitus. J Laparoendosc Surg 4(6):385–391CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Sarli L, Costi R, Sansebastiano G, Trivelli M, Roncoroni L (2000) Prospective randomized trial of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum for reduction of shoulder-tip pain following laparoscopy. Br J Surg 87(9):1161–1165CrossRefPubMed Sarli L, Costi R, Sansebastiano G, Trivelli M, Roncoroni L (2000) Prospective randomized trial of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum for reduction of shoulder-tip pain following laparoscopy. Br J Surg 87(9):1161–1165CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Hua J, Gong J, Yao L, Zhou B, Song Z (2014) Low-pressure versus standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg 208(1):143–150CrossRefPubMed Hua J, Gong J, Yao L, Zhou B, Song Z (2014) Low-pressure versus standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg 208(1):143–150CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Windsor MA, Bonham MJ, Rumball M (1997) Splanchnic mucosal ischemia: an unrecognized consequence of routine pneumoperitoneum. Surg Laparosc Endosc 7:480–482CrossRefPubMed Windsor MA, Bonham MJ, Rumball M (1997) Splanchnic mucosal ischemia: an unrecognized consequence of routine pneumoperitoneum. Surg Laparosc Endosc 7:480–482CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Schilling MK, Redaelli C, Krähenbuhl L, Signer C, Büchler MW (1997) Splanchnic microcirculatory changes during CO2 laparoscopy. J Am Coll Surg 184:378–382PubMed Schilling MK, Redaelli C, Krähenbuhl L, Signer C, Büchler MW (1997) Splanchnic microcirculatory changes during CO2 laparoscopy. J Am Coll Surg 184:378–382PubMed
10.
go back to reference Taura P, Lopez A, Lacy AM, Anglada T, Beltran J, Fernandez-Cruz L, Targarona E, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Marin JL (1998) Prolonged pneumoperitoneum at 15 mmHg causes lactic acidosis. Surg Endosc 12(3):198–201CrossRefPubMed Taura P, Lopez A, Lacy AM, Anglada T, Beltran J, Fernandez-Cruz L, Targarona E, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Marin JL (1998) Prolonged pneumoperitoneum at 15 mmHg causes lactic acidosis. Surg Endosc 12(3):198–201CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Examining clinical outcomes utilizing low-pressure pneumoperitoneum during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy
Authors
Cody R. Christensen
Thomas K. Maatman
Thomas J. Maatman
Tony T. Tran
Publication date
01-09-2016
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Issue 3/2016
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-016-0570-3

Other articles of this Issue 3/2016

Journal of Robotic Surgery 3/2016 Go to the issue