Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 1/2015

01-03-2015 | Original Article

Robotic technology results in faster and more robust surgical skill acquisition than traditional laparoscopy

Authors: Lee J. Moore, Mark R. Wilson, Elizabeth Waine, Rich S. W. Masters, John S. McGrath, Samuel J. Vine

Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Technical surgical skills are said to be acquired quicker on a robotic rather than laparoscopic platform. However, research examining this proposition is scarce. Thus, this study aimed to compare the performance and learning curves of novices acquiring skills using a robotic or laparoscopic system, and to examine if any learning advantages were maintained over time and transferred to more difficult and stressful tasks. Forty novice participants were randomly assigned to either a robotic- or laparoscopic-trained group. Following one baseline trial on a ball pick-and-drop task, participants performed 50 learning trials. Participants then completed an immediate retention trial and a transfer trial on a two-instrument rope-threading task. One month later, participants performed a delayed retention trial and a stressful multi-tasking trial. The results revealed that the robotic-trained group completed the ball pick-and-drop task more quickly and accurately than the laparoscopic-trained group across baseline, immediate retention, and delayed retention trials. Furthermore, the robotic-trained group displayed a shorter learning curve for accuracy. The robotic-trained group also performed the more complex rope-threading and stressful multi-tasking transfer trials better. Finally, in the multi-tasking trial, the robotic-trained group made fewer tone counting errors. The results highlight the benefits of using robotic technology for the acquisition of technical surgical skills.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Dulan G, Rege RV, Hogg DC, Gilbery-Fisher KM, Arain NA, Tesfay ST, Scott DJ (2012) Proficiency-based training for robotic surgery: construct validity workload and expert levels for nine inanimate exercises. Surg Endosc 26:1516–1521. doi:10.1007/s00464-011-2102-6 CrossRefPubMed Dulan G, Rege RV, Hogg DC, Gilbery-Fisher KM, Arain NA, Tesfay ST, Scott DJ (2012) Proficiency-based training for robotic surgery: construct validity workload and expert levels for nine inanimate exercises. Surg Endosc 26:1516–1521. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-011-2102-6 CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Sumi Y, Dhumane PW, Komeda K, Dallemagne B, Kuroda D, Marescaux J (2013) Learning curves in expert and non-expert laparoscopic surgeons for robotic suturing with the da Vinci® surgical system. J Robotic Surg 7:29–34. doi:10.1007/s11701-012-0336-5 CrossRef Sumi Y, Dhumane PW, Komeda K, Dallemagne B, Kuroda D, Marescaux J (2013) Learning curves in expert and non-expert laparoscopic surgeons for robotic suturing with the da Vinci® surgical system. J Robotic Surg 7:29–34. doi:10.​1007/​s11701-012-0336-5 CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hernandez JD, Bann SD, Munz Y, Moorthy K, Datta V, Martin S et al (2004) Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the learning curve of a simulated surgical task on the da Vinci system. Surg Endosc 18:372–378. doi:10.1007/s00464-003-9047-3 CrossRefPubMed Hernandez JD, Bann SD, Munz Y, Moorthy K, Datta V, Martin S et al (2004) Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the learning curve of a simulated surgical task on the da Vinci system. Surg Endosc 18:372–378. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-003-9047-3 CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Heemskerk J, van Gemert WG, de Vries J, Greve JW, Bouvy ND (2007) Learning curves of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery: an experimental study evaluating skill acquisition of robot-assisted laparoscopic tasks compared with conventional laparoscopic tasks in experienced users. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 17:171–174. doi:10.1097/SLE.0b013e31805b8346 CrossRefPubMed Heemskerk J, van Gemert WG, de Vries J, Greve JW, Bouvy ND (2007) Learning curves of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery: an experimental study evaluating skill acquisition of robot-assisted laparoscopic tasks compared with conventional laparoscopic tasks in experienced users. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 17:171–174. doi:10.​1097/​SLE.​0b013e31805b8346​ CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Stefanidis D, Wang F, KorndorfferJr JR, Dunne JB, Scott DJ (2010) Robotic assistance improves intracorporeal suturing performance and safety in the operating room while decreasing operator workload. Surg Endosc 24:377–382. doi:10.1007/s00464-009-0578-0 CrossRefPubMed Stefanidis D, Wang F, KorndorfferJr JR, Dunne JB, Scott DJ (2010) Robotic assistance improves intracorporeal suturing performance and safety in the operating room while decreasing operator workload. Surg Endosc 24:377–382. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-009-0578-0 CrossRefPubMed
16.
20.
go back to reference Fitts PM, Posner MI (1967) Human performance. Belmont, CA Fitts PM, Posner MI (1967) Human performance. Belmont, CA
21.
go back to reference Dimitrios S, William WH, James RKJ, Sarah M, Daniel RS (2010) Initial laparoscopic basic skills training shortens the learning curve of laparoscopic suturing and is cost-effective. J Am Coll Surg 210:436–440CrossRef Dimitrios S, William WH, James RKJ, Sarah M, Daniel RS (2010) Initial laparoscopic basic skills training shortens the learning curve of laparoscopic suturing and is cost-effective. J Am Coll Surg 210:436–440CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Healey AN, Sevdalis N, Vincent CA (2006) Measuring intraoperativeinterference from distraction and interruption observed in the operating theatre. Ergonomics 49:589–604CrossRefPubMed Healey AN, Sevdalis N, Vincent CA (2006) Measuring intraoperativeinterference from distraction and interruption observed in the operating theatre. Ergonomics 49:589–604CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Robotic technology results in faster and more robust surgical skill acquisition than traditional laparoscopy
Authors
Lee J. Moore
Mark R. Wilson
Elizabeth Waine
Rich S. W. Masters
John S. McGrath
Samuel J. Vine
Publication date
01-03-2015
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Issue 1/2015
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-014-0493-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Journal of Robotic Surgery 1/2015 Go to the issue