Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 4/2014

01-12-2014 | Original Article

Surgical suturing training with virtual reality simulation versus dry lab practice: an evaluation of performance improvement, content, and face validity

Authors: Michael J. Amirian, Samuel M. Lindner, Edouard J. Trabulsi, Costas D. Lallas

Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Issue 4/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of virtual reality (VR) simulation versus dry lab suturing practice at improving suturing performance in robotic surgery. Nineteen novice participants with no prior robotic suturing experience were randomized to two groups, VR simulation and dry lab, which consisted of inanimate training on a da Vinci Si surgical system. Each group underwent baseline suturing evaluation, then trained on the Simbionix™ Suturing Module (SSM) or undertook suturing practice using the da Vinci Surgical System in a dry lab. Final suturing performance was evaluated using the objective suture scoring method. Participants in the VR simulation group were surveyed to assess the face and content validity of the SSM. Both groups experienced significant improvement after training (VR simulation group p = 0.0078; dry lab group p = 0.0039). There was no significant difference in improvement between the two groups after undergoing training with either SSM or in the dry lab. Improvements in composite timing scores were 123 and 172 in the VR simulation and dry lab test groups, respectively (p = 0.36). Face validation varied with respect to the category assessed, but participants confirmed content validity of the SSM in all categories. In this sample of novice operators, there was no significant advantage in training with VR simulation using the SSM over dry lab training in improving suturing performance. Users of the SSM found it useful and relevant as a training tool for improving suturing performance.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Raman JD, Dong S, Levinson A et al (2007) Robotic radical prostatectomy: operative technique, outcomes, and learning curve. JSLS 11:1PubMedCentralPubMed Raman JD, Dong S, Levinson A et al (2007) Robotic radical prostatectomy: operative technique, outcomes, and learning curve. JSLS 11:1PubMedCentralPubMed
2.
go back to reference Ou YC, Yang CR, Wang J et al (2011) The learning curve for reducing complications of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy by a single surgeon. BJU Int 108(3):420–425PubMedCrossRef Ou YC, Yang CR, Wang J et al (2011) The learning curve for reducing complications of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy by a single surgeon. BJU Int 108(3):420–425PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Steinberg PL, Merguerian PA, Bihrle W III et al (2008) The cost of learning robotic-assisted prostatectomy. Urology 72:1068–1072PubMedCrossRef Steinberg PL, Merguerian PA, Bihrle W III et al (2008) The cost of learning robotic-assisted prostatectomy. Urology 72:1068–1072PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Arikatla VS, Ahn W, Sankaranarayanan G, De S (2013) Towards virtual FLS: development of a peg transfer simulator. Int J Med Robot. doi:10.1002/rcs.1534 Arikatla VS, Ahn W, Sankaranarayanan G, De S (2013) Towards virtual FLS: development of a peg transfer simulator. Int J Med Robot. doi:10.​1002/​rcs.​1534
6.
go back to reference Stegemann AP, Ahmed K, Syed JR et al (2013) Fundamental skills of robotic surgery: a multi-institutional randomized controlled trial for validation of a simulation-based curriculum. Urology 81(4):767–774PubMedCrossRef Stegemann AP, Ahmed K, Syed JR et al (2013) Fundamental skills of robotic surgery: a multi-institutional randomized controlled trial for validation of a simulation-based curriculum. Urology 81(4):767–774PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kelly DC, Margules AC, Kundavaram CR et al (2012) Face, content, and construct validation of the da Vinci Skills Simulator. Urology 79(5):1068–1072PubMedCrossRef Kelly DC, Margules AC, Kundavaram CR et al (2012) Face, content, and construct validation of the da Vinci Skills Simulator. Urology 79(5):1068–1072PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Lerner MA, Ayalew M, Peine WJ, Sundaram CP (2010) Does training on a virtual reality robotic simulator improve performance on the da Vinci surgical system? J Endourol 24(3):467–472PubMedCrossRef Lerner MA, Ayalew M, Peine WJ, Sundaram CP (2010) Does training on a virtual reality robotic simulator improve performance on the da Vinci surgical system? J Endourol 24(3):467–472PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Derossis AM, Fried GM, Abrahamowicz M et al (1998) Development of a model for training and evaluation of laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg 175(6):482–487PubMedCrossRef Derossis AM, Fried GM, Abrahamowicz M et al (1998) Development of a model for training and evaluation of laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg 175(6):482–487PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ritter EM, Scott DJ (2007) Design of a proficiency-based skills training curriculum for the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery. Surg Innov 14(2):107–112PubMedCrossRef Ritter EM, Scott DJ (2007) Design of a proficiency-based skills training curriculum for the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery. Surg Innov 14(2):107–112PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Dauster B, Steinberg AP, Vassiliou MC et al (2005) Validity of the MISTELS simulator for laparoscopy training in urology. J Endourol 19(5):541–545PubMedCrossRef Dauster B, Steinberg AP, Vassiliou MC et al (2005) Validity of the MISTELS simulator for laparoscopy training in urology. J Endourol 19(5):541–545PubMedCrossRef
13.
Metadata
Title
Surgical suturing training with virtual reality simulation versus dry lab practice: an evaluation of performance improvement, content, and face validity
Authors
Michael J. Amirian
Samuel M. Lindner
Edouard J. Trabulsi
Costas D. Lallas
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Issue 4/2014
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-014-0475-y

Other articles of this Issue 4/2014

Journal of Robotic Surgery 4/2014 Go to the issue