Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 1/2014

01-03-2014 | Original Article

Nerve-sparing robotic radical hysterectomy: our technique

Authors: Shailesh P. Puntambekar, Akhil Lawande, Riddhi Desai, Rahul Kenawadekar, Saurabh Joshi, Geetanjali Agarwal Joshi

Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Robotic surgery is now becoming accepted for treatment of gynaecological malignancies. Nerve preservation during radical hysterectomy is increasingly being offered due to improved post-operative bladder and sexual function. We aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of performing a nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy robotically and to assess the oncological and functional outcomes associated with this surgery. Between August 2011 and January 2013, a total of 12 non-consecutive patients underwent robotic surgery for early stage cervical cancer at our institution. Patients comprising FIGO stage IA2 to IB1 were treated with nerve-sparing robotic radical hysterectomy using a C1 (Querleu–Morrow classification) type technique. The feasibility, operative time, blood loss, oncological outcome and post-operative bladder function were assessed. All the procedures were completed robotically without conversion to laparoscopy or laparotomy. The mean age of the patients was 56 years (range 44–76) and their mean body mass index was 22.6 kg/m2 (range 18.1–26.4). The mean operative time was 156 min (range 120–250); the mean blood loss was 120 ml (50–250). The Foley catheter was removed on the third post-operative day, with full recovery of bladder function in all patients except one who required prolonged catheterisation for 3 weeks. Residual urine was 40 ml (range 30–80). Parametrial margins of 2.5–3 cm, distal vaginal margins of 2–2.5 cm and a mean nodal harvest of 24 (range 18–30) were achieved. The mean hospital stay was 3 days (range 2–6). The median follow-up is 12 months. There is no loco-regional recurrence. All the patients are sexually active. Robotic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy is technically feasible to perform, and is oncologically safe for early stage cervical carcinoma.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Magrina JF, Pawlina W, Kho RM et al (2011) Roboticic nerve sparing radical hysterectomy: feasibility and technique. Gynecol Oncol 121(3):605–609PubMedCrossRef Magrina JF, Pawlina W, Kho RM et al (2011) Roboticic nerve sparing radical hysterectomy: feasibility and technique. Gynecol Oncol 121(3):605–609PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Gil-Ibáñez B, Díaz-Feijoo B, Pérez-Benavente A (2013) Nerve sparing technique in robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy: results. Int J Med Robot. doi:10.1002/rcs.1480 PubMed Gil-Ibáñez B, Díaz-Feijoo B, Pérez-Benavente A (2013) Nerve sparing technique in robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy: results. Int J Med Robot. doi:10.​1002/​rcs.​1480 PubMed
3.
go back to reference Puntambekar SP et al (2010) Preservation of autonomic nerves in laparoscopic total radical hysterectomy. J Lap Endo Adv Surg Tech 20:813–819CrossRef Puntambekar SP et al (2010) Preservation of autonomic nerves in laparoscopic total radical hysterectomy. J Lap Endo Adv Surg Tech 20:813–819CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Puntambekar SP et al (2010) Robotic radical hysterectomy: applying principles of the laparoscopic Pune technique. J Robotic Surg 4:259–264CrossRef Puntambekar SP et al (2010) Robotic radical hysterectomy: applying principles of the laparoscopic Pune technique. J Robotic Surg 4:259–264CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Jauffret C, Lambaudie E, Bannier M et al (2011) Robot-assisted laparoscopy in the management of recurrent pelvic cancer. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 39(12):674–680PubMedCrossRef Jauffret C, Lambaudie E, Bannier M et al (2011) Robot-assisted laparoscopy in the management of recurrent pelvic cancer. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 39(12):674–680PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Marcus H, Nandi D, Darzi A et al. Surgical robotics through a keyhole: from today’s translational barriers to tomorrow’s ‘Disappearing’ robots. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2013 Jan 30 Marcus H, Nandi D, Darzi A et al. Surgical robotics through a keyhole: from today’s translational barriers to tomorrow’s ‘Disappearing’ robots. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2013 Jan 30
7.
go back to reference Liang J-T, Lai H-S, Lee P-H et al. Laparoscopic pelvic autonomic nerve-preserving surgery for sigmoid colon cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2008;15(6):1609–1616 Liang J-T, Lai H-S, Lee P-H et al. Laparoscopic pelvic autonomic nerve-preserving surgery for sigmoid colon cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2008;15(6):1609–1616
8.
go back to reference Puntambekar SP et al (2007) Laparoscopic total radical hysterectomy by the Pune technique: our experience of 248 cases. J Minim Invasiv Gynecol 14:682–689CrossRef Puntambekar SP et al (2007) Laparoscopic total radical hysterectomy by the Pune technique: our experience of 248 cases. J Minim Invasiv Gynecol 14:682–689CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Nerve-sparing robotic radical hysterectomy: our technique
Authors
Shailesh P. Puntambekar
Akhil Lawande
Riddhi Desai
Rahul Kenawadekar
Saurabh Joshi
Geetanjali Agarwal Joshi
Publication date
01-03-2014
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Issue 1/2014
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-013-0422-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

Journal of Robotic Surgery 1/2014 Go to the issue