Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 1/2014

01-03-2014 | Original Article

Standardized surgical technique and dedicated operating room environment can reduce the operative time during robotic-assisted surgery for pelvic floor disorders

Authors: Surendra Mantoo, Jerome Rigaud, Sophie Naulet, Paul-Antoine Lehur, Guillaume Meurette

Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Robotic-assisted surgery for pelvic floor disorders (PFD) meets the accepted standards for laparoscopic surgery. The aim of this study was to describe the technique and the impact of this standardized surgical technique and dedicated operating teams on the operative time for robotic-assisted laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (RALVMR). Data from a prospective database were extracted for all patients who underwent RALVMR between January 2008 and May 2012 for multi-compartment PFD. Patient pre-, intra- and early postoperative data were analysed. To evaluate the impact of both the surgical technique and operating room team on operative time over successive years, we divided the total operation time (TOT) into robot set-up time (RST) and surgeon console time (SCT) including disembarking robotic arms and closure of wounds. A total of 51 patients (3 male) with a mean age of 61.1 [±11, standard deviation (SD)] years were included for analysis. There were no major complications or deaths. Median TOT fell significantly by 23 % from 2008 (270 min) to 2012 (179 min) (p < 0.0001). The largest reduction (>60 %) was seen in RST, from 55 (SD ±3) to 21 (SD ±2) min (p < 0.0001). Similarly, SCT was reduced by 36 % from 216 (SD ±12) to 138 (SD ±8) min (p < 0.0001). Decreased operative time and efficiency were facilitated by a devoted, well-trained and consistent team. A standardized surgical technique for PFD helps to reduce the duration of the surgical procedure.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Hazey JW, Melvin WS (2004) Robot-assisted general surgery. Semin Laparosc Surg 11(2):107–112PubMed Hazey JW, Melvin WS (2004) Robot-assisted general surgery. Semin Laparosc Surg 11(2):107–112PubMed
3.
go back to reference Reza M, Maeso S, Blasco JA, Andradas E (2010) Meta-analysis of observational studies on the safety and effectiveness of robotic gynaecological surgery. Br J Surg 97(12):1772–1783PubMedCrossRef Reza M, Maeso S, Blasco JA, Andradas E (2010) Meta-analysis of observational studies on the safety and effectiveness of robotic gynaecological surgery. Br J Surg 97(12):1772–1783PubMedCrossRef
4.
5.
go back to reference Ayav A, Bresler L, Hubert J, Brunaud L, Boissel P (2005) Robotic assisted pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Surg Endosc 19:1200–1203PubMedCrossRef Ayav A, Bresler L, Hubert J, Brunaud L, Boissel P (2005) Robotic assisted pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Surg Endosc 19:1200–1203PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Delaney CP, Lynch AC, Senagore AJ, Fazio VW (2003) Comparison of robotically performed and traditional laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 46(12):1633–1639PubMedCrossRef Delaney CP, Lynch AC, Senagore AJ, Fazio VW (2003) Comparison of robotically performed and traditional laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 46(12):1633–1639PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Wong MT, Meurette G, Rigaud J, Regenet N, Lehur PA (2011) Robotic versus laparoscopic rectopexy for complex rectocele: a prospective comparison of short-term outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum 54(3):342–346PubMedCrossRef Wong MT, Meurette G, Rigaud J, Regenet N, Lehur PA (2011) Robotic versus laparoscopic rectopexy for complex rectocele: a prospective comparison of short-term outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum 54(3):342–346PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference D’Hoore A, Cadoni R, Penninckx F (2004) Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for total rectal prolapse: long-term outcome. Br J Surg 91:1500–1505PubMedCrossRef D’Hoore A, Cadoni R, Penninckx F (2004) Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for total rectal prolapse: long-term outcome. Br J Surg 91:1500–1505PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kim JY, Kim NK, Lee KY, Hur H, Min BS, Kim JH (2012) A comparative study of voiding and sexual function after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus robotic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 19:2485–2493PubMedCrossRef Kim JY, Kim NK, Lee KY, Hur H, Min BS, Kim JH (2012) A comparative study of voiding and sexual function after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus robotic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 19:2485–2493PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Geller EJ, Parnell BA, Dunivan GC (2011) Pelvic floor function before and after robotic sacrocolpopexy: one-year outcomes. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 18(3):322–327PubMedCrossRef Geller EJ, Parnell BA, Dunivan GC (2011) Pelvic floor function before and after robotic sacrocolpopexy: one-year outcomes. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 18(3):322–327PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Heemskerk J, de Hoog DE, van Gemert WG, Baeten CG, Greve JW, Bouvy ND (2007) Robot-assisted vs. conventional laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a comparative study on costs and time. Dis Colon Rectum 50(11):1825–1830PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Heemskerk J, de Hoog DE, van Gemert WG, Baeten CG, Greve JW, Bouvy ND (2007) Robot-assisted vs. conventional laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a comparative study on costs and time. Dis Colon Rectum 50(11):1825–1830PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference de Hoog DE, Heemskerk J, Nieman FH, van Gemert WG, Baeten CG, Bouvy ND (2009) Recurrence and functional results after open versus conventional laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a case-control study. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:1201–1206PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef de Hoog DE, Heemskerk J, Nieman FH, van Gemert WG, Baeten CG, Bouvy ND (2009) Recurrence and functional results after open versus conventional laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a case-control study. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:1201–1206PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Ahmed K, Ibrahim A, Wang TT, Khan N, Challacombe B, Khan MS, Dasgupta P (2012) Assessing the cost effectiveness of robotics in urological surgery—a systematic review. BJU Int 110(10):1544–1556 Ahmed K, Ibrahim A, Wang TT, Khan N, Challacombe B, Khan MS, Dasgupta P (2012) Assessing the cost effectiveness of robotics in urological surgery—a systematic review. BJU Int 110(10):1544–1556
15.
go back to reference Palmer KJ, Lowe GJ, Coughlin GD, Patil N, Patel VR (2008) Launching a successful robotic surgery program. J Endourol 22(4):819–824PubMedCrossRef Palmer KJ, Lowe GJ, Coughlin GD, Patil N, Patel VR (2008) Launching a successful robotic surgery program. J Endourol 22(4):819–824PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Sim HG, Yip SK, Lau WK, Tan YH, Wong MY, Cheng CW (2006) Team based approach reduces learning curve in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Int J Urol 13:560–564PubMedCrossRef Sim HG, Yip SK, Lau WK, Tan YH, Wong MY, Cheng CW (2006) Team based approach reduces learning curve in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Int J Urol 13:560–564PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Steers WD, LeBeau S, Cardella J, Fulmer B (2004) Establishing a robotics program. Urol Clin North Am 31:773–780PubMedCrossRef Steers WD, LeBeau S, Cardella J, Fulmer B (2004) Establishing a robotics program. Urol Clin North Am 31:773–780PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Akl MN, Long JB, Giles DL, Cornella JL, Pettit PD, Chen AH et al (2009) Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: technique and learning curve. Surg Endosc 23:2390–2394PubMedCrossRef Akl MN, Long JB, Giles DL, Cornella JL, Pettit PD, Chen AH et al (2009) Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: technique and learning curve. Surg Endosc 23:2390–2394PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Maeso S, Reza M, Mayol JA, Blasco JA, Guerra M, Andradas E, Plana MN (2010) Efficacy of the Da Vinci surgical system in abdominal surgery compared with that of laparoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 252(2):254–262PubMedCrossRef Maeso S, Reza M, Mayol JA, Blasco JA, Guerra M, Andradas E, Plana MN (2010) Efficacy of the Da Vinci surgical system in abdominal surgery compared with that of laparoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 252(2):254–262PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Pitter MC, Anderson P, Blissett A, Pemberton N (2008) Robotic-assisted gynaecological surgery-establishing training criteria; minimizing operative time and blood loss. Int J Med Robot 4:114–120PubMedCrossRef Pitter MC, Anderson P, Blissett A, Pemberton N (2008) Robotic-assisted gynaecological surgery-establishing training criteria; minimizing operative time and blood loss. Int J Med Robot 4:114–120PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference McDougall EM, Corica FA, Chou DS, Abdelshehid CS, Uribe CA, Stoliar G et al (2006) Short-term impact of a robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy ‘mini-residency’ experience on postgraduate urologists’ practice patterns. Int J Med Robot 2:70PubMedCrossRef McDougall EM, Corica FA, Chou DS, Abdelshehid CS, Uribe CA, Stoliar G et al (2006) Short-term impact of a robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy ‘mini-residency’ experience on postgraduate urologists’ practice patterns. Int J Med Robot 2:70PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Pulliam SJ, Weinstein MM, Wakamatsu MM (2012) Minimally invasive apical sacropexy: a retrospective review of laparoscopic and robotic operating room experiences. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 18(2):122–126PubMedCrossRef Pulliam SJ, Weinstein MM, Wakamatsu MM (2012) Minimally invasive apical sacropexy: a retrospective review of laparoscopic and robotic operating room experiences. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 18(2):122–126PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Standardized surgical technique and dedicated operating room environment can reduce the operative time during robotic-assisted surgery for pelvic floor disorders
Authors
Surendra Mantoo
Jerome Rigaud
Sophie Naulet
Paul-Antoine Lehur
Guillaume Meurette
Publication date
01-03-2014
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Issue 1/2014
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-013-0411-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

Journal of Robotic Surgery 1/2014 Go to the issue