Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 2/2011

01-06-2011 | Original Article

Setting up robotic surgery in gynaecology: the experience of the Strasbourg teaching hospital

Authors: N. Sananès, O. Garbin, M. Hummel, C. Youssef, R. Vizitiu, D. Lemaho, D. Rottenberg, P. Diemunsch, A. Wattiez

Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Issue 2/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Teleoperated surgical robots could provide a genuine breakthrough in laparoscopy and it is for this reason that the development of robot-assisted laparoscopy is one of the priorities of the Strasbourg University Hospitals’ strategic plan. The hospitals purchased a da Vinci S® robot in June 2006 and Strasbourg has, in IRCAD, one of the few robotic surgery training centres in the world. Our experience has, however, revealed the difficulties involved in setting up robotic surgery, the first of which are organizational issues. This prospective work was carried out between December 2007 and September 2008, primarily to examine the possibility of setting up robotic surgery on a regular basis for gynaecological surgical procedures at the Strasbourg University Hospitals. We maintained a “logbook” in which we prospectively noted all the resources implemented in setting up the robotic surgery service. The project was divided into two phases: the preparatory phase up until the first hysterectomy and then the second phase with the organization of subsequent hysterectomies. The first surgical procedure took 5 months to organize, and followed 25 interviews, 10 meetings, 53 telephone conversations and 48 e-mails with a total of 40 correspondents. The project was presented to seven separate groups, including the hospital medical commission, the gynaecology unit committee and the surgical staff. Fifteen members of the medical and paramedical team attended a two-day training course. Preparing the gynaecology department for robotic surgery required freeing up 8.5 days of “physician time” and 12.5 days of “nurse time”. In the following five months, we performed five hysterectomies. Preparation for each procedure involved on average 5 interviews, 19 telephone conversations and 11 e-mails. The biggest obstacle was obtaining an operating slot, as on average it required 18 days, four telephone calls and four e-mails to be assigned a slot in the operating theatre schedule, which is prepared on average 28 days in advance. It is extremely important for organising robotic surgery and assembling the surgical teams to have a series of operating slots allocated a sufficiently long time in advance. Considerable benefits would be had by setting up a team of anaesthetists and especially perioperative nurses dedicated to robotic surgery.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Payne TN, Dauterive FR (2008) A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 15(3):286–291PubMedCrossRef Payne TN, Dauterive FR (2008) A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 15(3):286–291PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Degueldre M, Vandromme J, Huong PT, Cadière GB (2000) Robotically assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal reanastomosis: a feasability study. Fertil Steril 74(5):1020–1023PubMedCrossRef Degueldre M, Vandromme J, Huong PT, Cadière GB (2000) Robotically assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal reanastomosis: a feasability study. Fertil Steril 74(5):1020–1023PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Advincula AP, Xu X, Goudeau S, Ransom SB (2007) Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical outcomes and immediate costs. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 14(6):698–705PubMedCrossRef Advincula AP, Xu X, Goudeau S, Ransom SB (2007) Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical outcomes and immediate costs. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 14(6):698–705PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Elliott DS, Krambeck AE, Chow GK (2006) Long-term results of robotic assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of high grade vaginal vault prolapse. J Urol 176(2):655–659PubMedCrossRef Elliott DS, Krambeck AE, Chow GK (2006) Long-term results of robotic assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of high grade vaginal vault prolapse. J Urol 176(2):655–659PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Magrina JF, Kho RM, Weaver AL, Montero RP, Magtibay PM (2008) Robotic radical hysterectomy: comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol 109(1):86–91PubMedCrossRef Magrina JF, Kho RM, Weaver AL, Montero RP, Magtibay PM (2008) Robotic radical hysterectomy: comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol 109(1):86–91PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Marescaux J, Leroy J, Gagner M, Rubino F, Mutter D, Vix M, Butner SE, Smith MK (2001) Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery. Nature 413(6854):379–380PubMedCrossRef Marescaux J, Leroy J, Gagner M, Rubino F, Mutter D, Vix M, Butner SE, Smith MK (2001) Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery. Nature 413(6854):379–380PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Pitter MC, Anderson P, Blisset A, Pemberton N (2008) Robotic-assisted gynaecological surgery–establishing training criteria; minimizing operative time and blood loss. Int J Med Robotics Comput Assist Surg 4:114–120CrossRef Pitter MC, Anderson P, Blisset A, Pemberton N (2008) Robotic-assisted gynaecological surgery–establishing training criteria; minimizing operative time and blood loss. Int J Med Robotics Comput Assist Surg 4:114–120CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Braumann C, Jacobi CA, Menenakos C, Ismail M, Rueckert JC, Mueller JM (2008) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic and thoracoscopic surgery with the da Vinci system: a 4-year experience in a single institution. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 18(3):260–266PubMedCrossRef Braumann C, Jacobi CA, Menenakos C, Ismail M, Rueckert JC, Mueller JM (2008) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic and thoracoscopic surgery with the da Vinci system: a 4-year experience in a single institution. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 18(3):260–266PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Ali MR, Rasmussen JJ (2008) Switching robotic surgical systems does not impact surgical performance. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 18(1):32–36PubMedCrossRef Ali MR, Rasmussen JJ (2008) Switching robotic surgical systems does not impact surgical performance. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 18(1):32–36PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Setting up robotic surgery in gynaecology: the experience of the Strasbourg teaching hospital
Authors
N. Sananès
O. Garbin
M. Hummel
C. Youssef
R. Vizitiu
D. Lemaho
D. Rottenberg
P. Diemunsch
A. Wattiez
Publication date
01-06-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Issue 2/2011
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-010-0231-x

Other articles of this Issue 2/2011

Journal of Robotic Surgery 2/2011 Go to the issue