Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 2/2009

01-06-2009 | Case Report

Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty for the management of pelvi–ureteric junction obstruction in horseshoe kidneys: initial experience

Authors: Chuku-Dima Spencer, Krish Sairam, Ben Challacombe, Declan Murphy, Prokar Dasgupta

Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Issue 2/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Minimally invasive dismembered pyeloplasty has become the gold-standard treatment for symptomatic pelvi–ureteric junction obstruction (PUJO) in recent years. A small proportion of patients with PUJO have horseshoe kidneys. We present two cases of robot-assisted pyeloplasty in horseshoe kidneys and describe the technical modifications for success in these cases. Two patients, aged 28 and 35 years, were diagnosed with symptomatic PUJO in horseshoe kidneys. Both had a robotic-assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty using the da Vinci® surgical system (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Three-dimensional computed tomography (CT) reconstructions were performed pre-operatively to plan surgery. The transperitoneal ports were placed more caudally than usual for improved access to the PUJ. The isthmus was not divided in either case. The procedures took 190 and 90 min, respectively, with minimal blood loss and no post-operative complications. Patients were discharged on post-operative day 2 following catheter and drain removal. Follow-up diuretic renograms showed no residual obstruction and patients were symptomatically better. Our initial experience suggests that RALP is a safe and feasible option for the treatment of PUJO in horseshoe kidneys with good short-term outcomes. These are challenging cases and robust pre-operative planning combined with technical modifications has been beneficial to our success. The enhanced suturing possible with the da Vinci® surgical system facilitates these procedures.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Yohannes P, Smith AD (2002) The endourological management of complications associated with horseshoe kidney. J Urol 168(1):5–8PubMedCrossRef Yohannes P, Smith AD (2002) The endourological management of complications associated with horseshoe kidney. J Urol 168(1):5–8PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference O’ Reilly PH, Brooman PJ, Mak S et al (2001) The long-term results of Anderson–Hynes pyeloplasty. BJU Int 87(4):287–289CrossRef O’ Reilly PH, Brooman PJ, Mak S et al (2001) The long-term results of Anderson–Hynes pyeloplasty. BJU Int 87(4):287–289CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Moon DA, El-Shazly MA, Chang CM et al (2006) Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: evolution of a new gold standard. Urology 67(5):932–936PubMedCrossRef Moon DA, El-Shazly MA, Chang CM et al (2006) Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: evolution of a new gold standard. Urology 67(5):932–936PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Jarrett TW, Chan DY, Charambura TC et al (2002) Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: the first 100 cases. J Urol 167(3):1253–1256PubMedCrossRef Jarrett TW, Chan DY, Charambura TC et al (2002) Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: the first 100 cases. J Urol 167(3):1253–1256PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Murphy D, Challacombe B, Elhage O et al (2008) Robotically assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty. BJU Int 102:136–151PubMedCrossRef Murphy D, Challacombe B, Elhage O et al (2008) Robotically assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty. BJU Int 102:136–151PubMedCrossRef
6.
7.
go back to reference Thiel DD, Winfield HN (2007) Robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Minerva Urol Nefrol 59(2):167–177PubMed Thiel DD, Winfield HN (2007) Robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Minerva Urol Nefrol 59(2):167–177PubMed
8.
go back to reference Link R, Bhayani S, Kavoussi L (2006) A prospective comparison of robotic and laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Ann Surg 243(4):486–491PubMedCrossRef Link R, Bhayani S, Kavoussi L (2006) A prospective comparison of robotic and laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Ann Surg 243(4):486–491PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Bove P, Ong A, Rha K et al (2004) Laparoscopic management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in patients with upper urinary tract anomalies. J Urol 172(2):77–79CrossRef Bove P, Ong A, Rha K et al (2004) Laparoscopic management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in patients with upper urinary tract anomalies. J Urol 172(2):77–79CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Shah KK, Louie M, Thaly RK et al (2007) Robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a review of current status. Int J Med Robot 3:35–40PubMed Shah KK, Louie M, Thaly RK et al (2007) Robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a review of current status. Int J Med Robot 3:35–40PubMed
11.
go back to reference Mufarrij PW, Woods M, Shah OD et al (2008) Robotic dismembered pyeloplasty: a 6-year, multi-institutional experience. J Urol 180(4):1391–1396PubMedCrossRef Mufarrij PW, Woods M, Shah OD et al (2008) Robotic dismembered pyeloplasty: a 6-year, multi-institutional experience. J Urol 180(4):1391–1396PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Schwentner C, Pelzer A, Neururer R et al (2007) Robotic Anderson–Hynes pyeloplasty: 5 year experience of one centre. BJU Int 100(4):880–885PubMedCrossRef Schwentner C, Pelzer A, Neururer R et al (2007) Robotic Anderson–Hynes pyeloplasty: 5 year experience of one centre. BJU Int 100(4):880–885PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Chammas M, Feuillu B, Coissard A et al (2006) Laparoscopic robotic-assisted management of pelvi–ureteric junction obstruction in patients with horseshoe kidneys: technique and 1-year follow-up. BJU Int 97(3):579–583PubMedCrossRef Chammas M, Feuillu B, Coissard A et al (2006) Laparoscopic robotic-assisted management of pelvi–ureteric junction obstruction in patients with horseshoe kidneys: technique and 1-year follow-up. BJU Int 97(3):579–583PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty for the management of pelvi–ureteric junction obstruction in horseshoe kidneys: initial experience
Authors
Chuku-Dima Spencer
Krish Sairam
Ben Challacombe
Declan Murphy
Prokar Dasgupta
Publication date
01-06-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Issue 2/2009
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-009-0142-x

Other articles of this Issue 2/2009

Journal of Robotic Surgery 2/2009 Go to the issue