Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Obesity Surgery 9/2020

01-09-2020 | Sleeve Gastrectomy | Original Contributions

Reoperation Incidence and Severity Within 6 Months After Bariatric Surgery: a Propensity-Matched Study from Nationwide Data

Authors: Laurent Brunaud, Cecile Payet, Stephanie Polazzi, Florence Bihain, Didier Quilliot, Jean-Christophe Lifante, Antoine Duclos

Published in: Obesity Surgery | Issue 9/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Data about incidence and severity of reoperations up to 6 months after bariatric surgery are currently limited. The aim of this cohort study was to evaluate the incidence and severity of reoperations after initial bariatric surgical procedures and to compare this between the 3 most frequent current surgical procedures (sleeve, gastric bypass, gastric banding).

Study Design

Nationwide observational cohort study using data from French Hospital Information System (2013–2015) to evaluate incidence and severity of reoperations within 6 months after bariatric surgery. Hazard ratios (HR) of longitudinal comparison between historical propensity-matched cohorts were estimated from a Fine and Gray’s model using competing risk of death.

Results

Cumulative reoperation rates increased from postoperative day-30 to day-180. Consequently, 31.1 to 90.0% of procedures would have been missed if the reoperation rate was based solely on a 30-day follow-up. Reoperation rate at 6 months was significantly higher after gastric bypass than after sleeve (HR 0.64; IC 95% [0.53–0.77]) and corresponded to moderate-risk reoperations (HR 0.65; IC 95% [0.53–0.78]). Reoperation rate at 6 months was significantly higher after gastric banding than after sleeve (HR 0.08; IC 95% [0.07–0.09]) and corresponded to moderate-risk reoperations (HR 0.08; IC 95% [0.07–0.10]).

Conclusion

Cumulative incidence of reoperations increased from 30 days to 6 months after sleeve, gastric bypass, or gastric banding and corresponded to moderate-risk surgical procedures. Consequently, 30-day reoperation rate should no longer be considered when evaluating complications and surgical performance after bariatric surgery.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Christou NV, Sampalis JS, Liberman M, et al. Surgery decreases long-term mortality, morbidity, and health care use in morbidly obese patients. Ann Surg. 2004;240:416–23.CrossRef Christou NV, Sampalis JS, Liberman M, et al. Surgery decreases long-term mortality, morbidity, and health care use in morbidly obese patients. Ann Surg. 2004;240:416–23.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Reges O, Greenland P, Dicker D, et al. Association of bariatric surgery using laparoscopic banding, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs usual care obesity management with all-cause mortality. JAMA. 2018;319:279–90.CrossRef Reges O, Greenland P, Dicker D, et al. Association of bariatric surgery using laparoscopic banding, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs usual care obesity management with all-cause mortality. JAMA. 2018;319:279–90.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Stenberg E, Szabo E, Agren G, et al. Early complications after laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery: results from the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry. Ann Surg. 2014;260:1040–7.CrossRef Stenberg E, Szabo E, Agren G, et al. Early complications after laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery: results from the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry. Ann Surg. 2014;260:1040–7.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Brunaud L, Polazzi S, Lifante JC, et al. Health care institutions volume is significantly associated with postoperative outcomes in bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2018;28:923–31.CrossRef Brunaud L, Polazzi S, Lifante JC, et al. Health care institutions volume is significantly associated with postoperative outcomes in bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2018;28:923–31.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Caiazzo R, Baud G, Clement G, et al. Impact of centralized management of bariatric surgery complications on 90-day mortality. Ann Surg. 2018;268:831–7.CrossRef Caiazzo R, Baud G, Clement G, et al. Impact of centralized management of bariatric surgery complications on 90-day mortality. Ann Surg. 2018;268:831–7.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Nguyen NT, Nguyen B, Nguyen VQ, et al. Outcomes of bariatric surgery performed at accredited vs nonaccredited centers. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;215:467–74.CrossRef Nguyen NT, Nguyen B, Nguyen VQ, et al. Outcomes of bariatric surgery performed at accredited vs nonaccredited centers. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;215:467–74.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Dimick JB, Nicholas LH, Ryan AM, et al. Bariatric surgery complications before vs after implementation of a national policy restricting coverage to centers of excellence. JAMA. 2013;309:792–9.CrossRef Dimick JB, Nicholas LH, Ryan AM, et al. Bariatric surgery complications before vs after implementation of a national policy restricting coverage to centers of excellence. JAMA. 2013;309:792–9.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Dimick JB, Osborne NH, Nicholas L, et al. Identifying high-quality bariatric surgery centers: hospital volume or risk-adjusted outcomes? J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209:702–6.CrossRef Dimick JB, Osborne NH, Nicholas L, et al. Identifying high-quality bariatric surgery centers: hospital volume or risk-adjusted outcomes? J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209:702–6.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Finks JF, Osborne NH, Birkmeyer JD. Trends in hospital volume and operative mortality for high-risk surgery. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:2128–37.CrossRef Finks JF, Osborne NH, Birkmeyer JD. Trends in hospital volume and operative mortality for high-risk surgery. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:2128–37.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Fry BT, Scally CP, Thumma JR, et al. Quality improvement in bariatric surgery: the impact of reducing postoperative complications on Medicare payments. Ann Surg. 2018;268:22–7.CrossRef Fry BT, Scally CP, Thumma JR, et al. Quality improvement in bariatric surgery: the impact of reducing postoperative complications on Medicare payments. Ann Surg. 2018;268:22–7.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Markar SR, Penna M, Karthikesalingam A, et al. The impact of hospital and surgeon volume on clinical outcome following bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2012;22:1126–34.CrossRef Markar SR, Penna M, Karthikesalingam A, et al. The impact of hospital and surgeon volume on clinical outcome following bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2012;22:1126–34.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Krell RW, Finks JF, English WJ, et al. Profiling hospitals on bariatric surgery quality: which outcomes are most reliable? J Am Coll Surg. 2014;219:725–34.CrossRef Krell RW, Finks JF, English WJ, et al. Profiling hospitals on bariatric surgery quality: which outcomes are most reliable? J Am Coll Surg. 2014;219:725–34.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Brunaud L, Payet C, Lifante JC, et al. Regarding manuscript “impact of centralized management of bariatric surgery complications on 90-day mortality”. Ann Surg. 2019;270:e47–8.CrossRef Brunaud L, Payet C, Lifante JC, et al. Regarding manuscript “impact of centralized management of bariatric surgery complications on 90-day mortality”. Ann Surg. 2019;270:e47–8.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.CrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Armoiry X, Obadia JF, Pascal L, et al. Comparison of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve implantation in high-risk patients: a nationwide study in France. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;156:1017–25.CrossRef Armoiry X, Obadia JF, Pascal L, et al. Comparison of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve implantation in high-risk patients: a nationwide study in France. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;156:1017–25.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, et al. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care. 2005;43:1130–9.CrossRef Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, et al. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care. 2005;43:1130–9.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Janik MR, Rogula TG, Mustafa RR, et al. Safety of revision sleeve gastrectomy compared to Roux-Y gastric bypass after failed gastric banding: analysis of the MBSAQIP. Ann Surg. 2018;14:1276–82. Janik MR, Rogula TG, Mustafa RR, et al. Safety of revision sleeve gastrectomy compared to Roux-Y gastric bypass after failed gastric banding: analysis of the MBSAQIP. Ann Surg. 2018;14:1276–82.
20.
go back to reference Bohnen JD, Mavros MN, Ramly EP, et al. Intraoperative adverse events in abdominal surgery: what happens in the operating room does not stay in the operating room. Ann Surg. 2017;265:1119–25.CrossRef Bohnen JD, Mavros MN, Ramly EP, et al. Intraoperative adverse events in abdominal surgery: what happens in the operating room does not stay in the operating room. Ann Surg. 2017;265:1119–25.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Iglehart JK. Prioritizing comparative-effectiveness research--IOM recommendations. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:325–8.CrossRef Iglehart JK. Prioritizing comparative-effectiveness research--IOM recommendations. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:325–8.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika. 1983;70:41–55.CrossRef Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika. 1983;70:41–55.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Austin PC. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivar Behav Res. 2011;46:399–424.CrossRef Austin PC. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivar Behav Res. 2011;46:399–424.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Marrie RA, Dawson NV, Garland A. Quantile regression and restricted cubic splines are useful for exploring relationships between continuous variables. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62:511–7.CrossRef Marrie RA, Dawson NV, Garland A. Quantile regression and restricted cubic splines are useful for exploring relationships between continuous variables. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62:511–7.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Austin PC. Optimal caliper widths for propensity-score matching when estimating differences in means and differences in proportions in observational studies. Pharm Stat. 2011;10:150–61.CrossRef Austin PC. Optimal caliper widths for propensity-score matching when estimating differences in means and differences in proportions in observational studies. Pharm Stat. 2011;10:150–61.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Lazzati A, De Antonio M, Paolino L, et al. Natural history of adjustable gastric banding: lifespan and revisional rate: a nationwide study on administrative data on 53,000 patients. Ann Surg. 2017;265:439–45.CrossRef Lazzati A, De Antonio M, Paolino L, et al. Natural history of adjustable gastric banding: lifespan and revisional rate: a nationwide study on administrative data on 53,000 patients. Ann Surg. 2017;265:439–45.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Debs T, Petrucciani N, Kassir R, et al. Trends of bariatric surgery in France during the last 10 years: analysis of 267,466 procedures from 2005-2014. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12:1602–9.CrossRef Debs T, Petrucciani N, Kassir R, et al. Trends of bariatric surgery in France during the last 10 years: analysis of 267,466 procedures from 2005-2014. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12:1602–9.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Ibrahim AM, Dimick JB. What metrics accurately reflect surgical quality? Annu Rev Med. 2018;69:481–91.CrossRef Ibrahim AM, Dimick JB. What metrics accurately reflect surgical quality? Annu Rev Med. 2018;69:481–91.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Peterli R, Wölnerhanssen BK, Peters T, et al. Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on weight loss in patients with morbid obesity: the SM-BOSS randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;319:255–355.CrossRef Peterli R, Wölnerhanssen BK, Peters T, et al. Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on weight loss in patients with morbid obesity: the SM-BOSS randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;319:255–355.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Salminen P, Helmiö M, Ovaska J, et al. Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on weight loss at 5 years among patients with morbid obesity: the SLEEVEPASS randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;319:241–54.CrossRef Salminen P, Helmiö M, Ovaska J, et al. Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on weight loss at 5 years among patients with morbid obesity: the SLEEVEPASS randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;319:241–54.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Ladak F, Dang JT, Switzer NJ, et al. Rates of reoperation and nonoperative intervention within 30 days of bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019;15:431–40.CrossRef Ladak F, Dang JT, Switzer NJ, et al. Rates of reoperation and nonoperative intervention within 30 days of bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019;15:431–40.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Musella M, Vitiello A. Comment on: rates of reoperation and intervention within 30 days of bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019;15:e9–10.CrossRef Musella M, Vitiello A. Comment on: rates of reoperation and intervention within 30 days of bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019;15:e9–10.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Chaar ME, Lundberg P, Stoltzfus J. Thirty-day outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: first report based on metabolic and bariatric surgery accreditation and quality improvement program database. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14:545–51.CrossRef Chaar ME, Lundberg P, Stoltzfus J. Thirty-day outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: first report based on metabolic and bariatric surgery accreditation and quality improvement program database. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14:545–51.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Osland E, Yunus RM, Khan S, et al. Postoperative early major and minor complications in laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy (LVSG) versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) procedures: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Obes Surg. 2016;26:2273–84.CrossRef Osland E, Yunus RM, Khan S, et al. Postoperative early major and minor complications in laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy (LVSG) versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) procedures: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Obes Surg. 2016;26:2273–84.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Talsma AK, Lingsma HF, Steyerberg EW, et al. The 30-day versus in-hospital and 90-day mortality after esophagectomy as indicators for quality of care. Ann Surg. 2014;260:267–73.CrossRef Talsma AK, Lingsma HF, Steyerberg EW, et al. The 30-day versus in-hospital and 90-day mortality after esophagectomy as indicators for quality of care. Ann Surg. 2014;260:267–73.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Young MT, Gebhart A, Phelan MJ, et al. Use and outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic gastric bypass: analysis of the American College of Surgeons NSQIP. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;220:880–5.CrossRef Young MT, Gebhart A, Phelan MJ, et al. Use and outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic gastric bypass: analysis of the American College of Surgeons NSQIP. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;220:880–5.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Fysekidis M, Catheline JM. Are guidelines for standardized outcome reporting in bariatric surgery responsible for missing the big picture in bariatric surgery related major complications? Ann Surg. 2018;268:e12–e3.CrossRef Fysekidis M, Catheline JM. Are guidelines for standardized outcome reporting in bariatric surgery responsible for missing the big picture in bariatric surgery related major complications? Ann Surg. 2018;268:e12–e3.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Ibrahim AM, Thumma JR, Dimick JB. Reoperation and Medicare expenditures after laparoscopic gastric band surgery. JAMA Surg. 2017;152:835–42.CrossRef Ibrahim AM, Thumma JR, Dimick JB. Reoperation and Medicare expenditures after laparoscopic gastric band surgery. JAMA Surg. 2017;152:835–42.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Payet C, Lifante JC, Carty MJ, et al. Methodological quality of surgical mortality studies using large hospital databases: a systematic review. Ann Surg. 2017;265:1113–8.CrossRef Payet C, Lifante JC, Carty MJ, et al. Methodological quality of surgical mortality studies using large hospital databases: a systematic review. Ann Surg. 2017;265:1113–8.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Reoperation Incidence and Severity Within 6 Months After Bariatric Surgery: a Propensity-Matched Study from Nationwide Data
Authors
Laurent Brunaud
Cecile Payet
Stephanie Polazzi
Florence Bihain
Didier Quilliot
Jean-Christophe Lifante
Antoine Duclos
Publication date
01-09-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Obesity Surgery / Issue 9/2020
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Electronic ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-04570-9

Other articles of this Issue 9/2020

Obesity Surgery 9/2020 Go to the issue