Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Obesity Surgery 6/2019

01-06-2019 | Obesity | Original Contributions

Status of the Field of Bariatric Surgery: a National Survey of China in 2018

Authors: Keyu Yang, Yong Zhou, Mofei Wang, Mingyang Shen, Xiaowei Zhang, Yong Wang

Published in: Obesity Surgery | Issue 6/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Due to the slow development of bariatric surgery in mainland China, we aimed to provide fact-based status reports and recommendations for the development of bariatric surgery in mainland China by investigating the basic context, social environment, and perioperative treatment options of surgeons who perform bariatric surgery.

Study Design

A questionnaire was prepared based on a literature review, consultations with experts and current issues. The three-part questionnaire was sent to medical professionals in the field of bariatric surgery. The results were gathered, and analysis was performed after collecting the data.

Results

In total, 98.5% of respondents were employed at public grade 3 class A hospitals, 70.8% were chief physicians and professors, 53.2% were trained at other institutions before their first bariatric surgery, 65.0% were previously engaged in gastrointestinal surgery, 76.9% were currently engaged in multiple fields of general surgery, 39.5% believed that low self-acceptance was the primary obstacle, 39.0% regarded news media networks as the most valued publicity platform, 48.0% accepted patients less than 16 years old, and 46.0% accepted patients greater than 65 years old. Additionally, 84.6% of respondents addressed comorbidities, 73.4% developed exercise guidance for patients, 81.6% believed that the total hospitalization cost was greater than 50,000 (CNY), 41.5% chose oral purgative for bowel preparation, 40.0% allowed patients to resume oral intake of liquids on the first day after surgery, and 70.7% routinely placed an abdominal drainage tube.

Conclusion

Bariatric surgery has great potential in mainland China, but many inconsistencies exist. This field is still in its infancy, and much work is needed.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas. 8th ed. Brussels, Belgium: International Diabetes Federation;2017. International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas. 8th ed. Brussels, Belgium: International Diabetes Federation;2017.
2.
go back to reference NCD Risk Factor Collaboration. Trends in adult body-mass index in 200 countries from 1975 to 2014: a pooled analysis of 1698 population-based measurement studies with 19· 2 million participants[J]. Lancet. 2016;387(10026):1377–96.CrossRef NCD Risk Factor Collaboration. Trends in adult body-mass index in 200 countries from 1975 to 2014: a pooled analysis of 1698 population-based measurement studies with 19· 2 million participants[J]. Lancet. 2016;387(10026):1377–96.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, et al. IFSO worldwide survey 2016: primary, endoluminal and revisional procedures Obes Surg, 2018:1–12. Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, et al. IFSO worldwide survey 2016: primary, endoluminal and revisional procedures Obes Surg, 2018:1–12.
4.
go back to reference Rubino F, Nathan DM, Eckel RH, et al. Metabolic surgery in the treatment algorithm for type 2 diabetes: a joint statement by international diabetes organizations. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12:1144–62.CrossRef Rubino F, Nathan DM, Eckel RH, et al. Metabolic surgery in the treatment algorithm for type 2 diabetes: a joint statement by international diabetes organizations. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12:1144–62.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Schauer PR, Bhatt DL, Kirwan JP, et al. Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy for diabetes—5-year outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:641–51.CrossRef Schauer PR, Bhatt DL, Kirwan JP, et al. Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy for diabetes—5-year outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:641–51.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, et al. Bariatric surgery worldwide 2013. Obes Surg. 2015;25:1822–32.CrossRef Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, et al. Bariatric surgery worldwide 2013. Obes Surg. 2015;25:1822–32.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg. 2002;183:630–41.CrossRef Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg. 2002;183:630–41.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Blanchet M, Frering V, Gignoux B, et al. Four-year evolution of a Thrombophylaxis protocol in an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program: recent results in 485 patients. Obes Surg. 2018;28:2140–4.CrossRef Blanchet M, Frering V, Gignoux B, et al. Four-year evolution of a Thrombophylaxis protocol in an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program: recent results in 485 patients. Obes Surg. 2018;28:2140–4.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Xi B, Liang Y, He T, et al. Secular trends in the prevalence of general and abdominal obesity among Chinese adults,1993–2009. Obes Rev. 2012;13:287–96.CrossRef Xi B, Liang Y, He T, et al. Secular trends in the prevalence of general and abdominal obesity among Chinese adults,1993–2009. Obes Rev. 2012;13:287–96.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Mathus-Vliegen EMH. The cooperation between endoscopists and surgeons in treating complications of bariatric surgery[J]. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2014;28:703–25.CrossRef Mathus-Vliegen EMH. The cooperation between endoscopists and surgeons in treating complications of bariatric surgery[J]. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2014;28:703–25.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Rebibo L, Maréchal V, De Lameth I, et al. Compliance with a multidisciplinary team meeting’s decision prior to bariatric surgery protects against major postoperative complications. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13:1537–43.CrossRef Rebibo L, Maréchal V, De Lameth I, et al. Compliance with a multidisciplinary team meeting’s decision prior to bariatric surgery protects against major postoperative complications. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13:1537–43.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lazzati A, Katsahian S, Maladry D, et al. Plastic surgery in bariatric patients: a nationwide study of 17,000 patients on the national administrative database. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14:646–51.CrossRef Lazzati A, Katsahian S, Maladry D, et al. Plastic surgery in bariatric patients: a nationwide study of 17,000 patients on the national administrative database. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14:646–51.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Gunnarson GL, Frøyen JK, Sandbu R, et al. Plastic surgery after bariatric surgery. Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening: tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke. 2015;135:1044–9.CrossRef Gunnarson GL, Frøyen JK, Sandbu R, et al. Plastic surgery after bariatric surgery. Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening: tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke. 2015;135:1044–9.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Dakour-Aridi HN, El-Rayess HM, Abou-Abbass H, et al. Safety of concomitant cholecystectomy at the time of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13:934–41.CrossRef Dakour-Aridi HN, El-Rayess HM, Abou-Abbass H, et al. Safety of concomitant cholecystectomy at the time of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13:934–41.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Nuzzo G, Giuliante F, Persiani R. The risk of biliary ductal injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy[J]. J Chir. 2004;141(6):343–53. Nuzzo G, Giuliante F, Persiani R. The risk of biliary ductal injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy[J]. J Chir. 2004;141(6):343–53.
17.
go back to reference Kehlet H. Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth. 1997;78:606–17.CrossRef Kehlet H. Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth. 1997;78:606–17.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Lemanu DP, Singh PP, Berridge K, et al. Randomized clinical trial of enhanced recovery versus standard care after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Br J Surg. 2013;100:482–9.CrossRef Lemanu DP, Singh PP, Berridge K, et al. Randomized clinical trial of enhanced recovery versus standard care after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Br J Surg. 2013;100:482–9.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Mortensen K, Nilsson M, Slim K, et al. Consensus guidelines for enhanced recovery after gastrectomy: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) society recommendations. Br J Surg. 2014;101:1209–29.CrossRef Mortensen K, Nilsson M, Slim K, et al. Consensus guidelines for enhanced recovery after gastrectomy: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) society recommendations. Br J Surg. 2014;101:1209–29.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Thorell A, MacCormick AD, Awad S, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in bariatric surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) society recommendations[J]. World J Surg. 2016;40:2065–83.CrossRef Thorell A, MacCormick AD, Awad S, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in bariatric surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) society recommendations[J]. World J Surg. 2016;40:2065–83.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Status of the Field of Bariatric Surgery: a National Survey of China in 2018
Authors
Keyu Yang
Yong Zhou
Mofei Wang
Mingyang Shen
Xiaowei Zhang
Yong Wang
Publication date
01-06-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Obesity Surgery / Issue 6/2019
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Electronic ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-03792-w

Other articles of this Issue 6/2019

Obesity Surgery 6/2019 Go to the issue