Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Obesity Surgery 9/2018

01-09-2018 | Original Contributions

Revisional Bariatric Surgery for Weight Regain and Refractory Complications in a Single MBSAQIP Accredited Center: What Are We Dealing with?

Authors: Jeffrey Qiu, Peter W. Lundberg, T. Javier Birriel, Leonardo Claros, Jill Stoltzfus, Maher El Chaar

Published in: Obesity Surgery | Issue 9/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Revisional surgery is the fastest growing area in bariatric surgery, constituting 13.6% of all procedures performed as of 2015. This reflects a rising need to treat adverse sequelae of primary bariatric procedures. Despite the increase in revisions, their safety and efficacy remain controversial. The objective of this study is to review the experience of revisional bariatric surgery in our center and the relevant literature to date.

Methods

We performed an IRB-approved review of prospectively collected data from all patients undergoing revisional bariatric surgery between 2012 and 2015. Due to patient heterogeneity, we divided subjects into two groups: patients who underwent surgery for weight regain (WR) and those who underwent surgery to address refractory complications (RC) related to their primary bariatric procedure. Demographics, indications, and outcomes of each group were compared using Fisher’s exact test, Mann-Whitney rank sums, and chi-square tests. We also divided WR patients based on their primary index procedure and analyzed them separately.

Results

We performed a total of 84 procedures over 4 years. Forty-three patients (53.6%) underwent surgery for WR and 41 (46.4%) for RC. The variety and distribution of primary bariatric procedures were gastric band (40%), gastric bypass (35.4%), sleeve gastrectomy (22%), and vertical banded gastroplasty (3.7%). The indications for revisional surgery due to RC included gastroesophageal reflux disease, internal hernia, gastro-gastric fistula, marginal ulcer, excess weight loss, and pain. Overall complication rate was 14.3% (three early, nine late); there was one leak. Five patients required a reoperation (5.9%; two early, three late). Excess weight loss varied from 31.5–79.1% 12 months after revision.

Conclusion

Patients presenting to our center for revisional surgery do so for either WR or RC, most commonly following gastric banding. Revisional bariatric surgery can be performed with low complication rates and with acceptable 12-month weight loss, though not with the same safety as primary procedures.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ponce J, Demaria EJ, Nguyen NT, et al. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery estimation of bariatric surgery procedures in 2015 and surgeon workforce in the United States. Surg for Obes and Rel Dis. 2016;12(9):1637–9.CrossRef Ponce J, Demaria EJ, Nguyen NT, et al. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery estimation of bariatric surgery procedures in 2015 and surgeon workforce in the United States. Surg for Obes and Rel Dis. 2016;12(9):1637–9.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Rosenthal RJ, Panel ISGE. International sleeve gastrectomy expert panel consensus statement: best practice guidelines based on experience of > 12,000 cases. Surg for Obes and Rel Dis. 2012;8:8–19.CrossRef Rosenthal RJ, Panel ISGE. International sleeve gastrectomy expert panel consensus statement: best practice guidelines based on experience of > 12,000 cases. Surg for Obes and Rel Dis. 2012;8:8–19.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Shimizu H, Annaberdyev S, Motamarry I, et al. Revisional bariatric surgery for unsuccessful weight loss and complications. Obes Surg. 2013;23(11):1766–73.CrossRef Shimizu H, Annaberdyev S, Motamarry I, et al. Revisional bariatric surgery for unsuccessful weight loss and complications. Obes Surg. 2013;23(11):1766–73.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kellogg TA. Revisional bariatric surgery. Surg Clin North Am. 2011;91:1353–71.CrossRef Kellogg TA. Revisional bariatric surgery. Surg Clin North Am. 2011;91:1353–71.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference The American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Revision Task Force, Brethauer SA, Kothari S, Sudan R, Williams B, English WJ, Brengman M, Kurian M, Hutter M, Stegemann L, Kallies K, Nguyen N, Ponce J, Morton JM. Systematic review on reoperative bariatric surgery. Surg for Obes and Rel Dis. 2014 (10):952–972 The American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Revision Task Force, Brethauer SA, Kothari S, Sudan R, Williams B, English WJ, Brengman M, Kurian M, Hutter M, Stegemann L, Kallies K, Nguyen N, Ponce J, Morton JM. Systematic review on reoperative bariatric surgery. Surg for Obes and Rel Dis. 2014 (10):952–972
7.
go back to reference Reoch J, Mottillo S, Shimony A, et al. Safety of laparoscopic vs open bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Surg. 2011 Nov;146(11):1314–22.CrossRef Reoch J, Mottillo S, Shimony A, et al. Safety of laparoscopic vs open bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Surg. 2011 Nov;146(11):1314–22.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Fulton C, Sheppard C, Birch D, et al. A comparison of revisional and primary bariatric surgery. Can J Surg. 2017;60(3):205–11.CrossRef Fulton C, Sheppard C, Birch D, et al. A comparison of revisional and primary bariatric surgery. Can J Surg. 2017;60(3):205–11.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Chaar ME, Stoltzfus J, Claros L, et al. Indications for revisions following 630 consecutive laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy cases: experience in a single accredited center. J of Gastroint Surg. 2016;21(1):12–6.CrossRef Chaar ME, Stoltzfus J, Claros L, et al. Indications for revisions following 630 consecutive laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy cases: experience in a single accredited center. J of Gastroint Surg. 2016;21(1):12–6.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Brethauer SA, Kim J, El Chaar M, Papasavas P, Eisenberg D, Rogers A, Ballem N, Kligman M, Kothari S for the ASMBS clinical issues committee. Standardized outcomes reporting in metabolic and bariatric surgery Surg for Obes and Rel Dis 2015;11:489–506 Brethauer SA, Kim J, El Chaar M, Papasavas P, Eisenberg D, Rogers A, Ballem N, Kligman M, Kothari S for the ASMBS clinical issues committee. Standardized outcomes reporting in metabolic and bariatric surgery Surg for Obes and Rel Dis 2015;11:489–506
11.
go back to reference Abdelgawad M, De Angelis F, Iossa A, et al. Management of complications and outcomes after revisional bariatric surgery: 3-year experience at a bariatric center of excellence. Obes Surg. 2016 Sep;26(9):2144–9.CrossRef Abdelgawad M, De Angelis F, Iossa A, et al. Management of complications and outcomes after revisional bariatric surgery: 3-year experience at a bariatric center of excellence. Obes Surg. 2016 Sep;26(9):2144–9.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Radtka JF, Puleo FJ, Wang L, et al. Revisional bariatric surgery: who, what, where, and when? Surg for Obes and Rel Dis. 2010;6(6):635–42.CrossRef Radtka JF, Puleo FJ, Wang L, et al. Revisional bariatric surgery: who, what, where, and when? Surg for Obes and Rel Dis. 2010;6(6):635–42.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Vij A, Malapan K, Tsai C, et al. Worthy or not? Six-year experience of revisional bariatric surgery from an Asian center of excellence. Surg for Obes and Rel Dis. 2015;11(3):612–20.CrossRef Vij A, Malapan K, Tsai C, et al. Worthy or not? Six-year experience of revisional bariatric surgery from an Asian center of excellence. Surg for Obes and Rel Dis. 2015;11(3):612–20.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference El Chaar M, Stoltzfus J, Lundberg PW. Thirty-day outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: first report based on metabolic and bariatric surgery accreditation and quality improvement program database. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2018; epub ahead of print El Chaar M, Stoltzfus J, Lundberg PW. Thirty-day outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: first report based on metabolic and bariatric surgery accreditation and quality improvement program database. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2018; epub ahead of print
15.
go back to reference Gagner M, Gumbs AA. Gastric banding: conversion to sleeve, bypass, or DS. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:1931–5.CrossRef Gagner M, Gumbs AA. Gastric banding: conversion to sleeve, bypass, or DS. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:1931–5.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Schouten R, van Dielen FM, van Gemert WG, et al. Conversion of vertical banded gastroplasty to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass results in restoration of the positive effect on weight loss and co-morbidities: evaluation of 101 patients. Obes Surg. 2007;17:622–30.CrossRef Schouten R, van Dielen FM, van Gemert WG, et al. Conversion of vertical banded gastroplasty to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass results in restoration of the positive effect on weight loss and co-morbidities: evaluation of 101 patients. Obes Surg. 2007;17:622–30.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Carmeli I, Golomb I, Sadot E, et al. Laparoscopic conversion of sleeve gastrectomy to a biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch or a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass due to weight loss failure: our algorithm. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015 Jan-Feb;11(1):79–85.CrossRef Carmeli I, Golomb I, Sadot E, et al. Laparoscopic conversion of sleeve gastrectomy to a biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch or a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass due to weight loss failure: our algorithm. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015 Jan-Feb;11(1):79–85.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Revisional Bariatric Surgery for Weight Regain and Refractory Complications in a Single MBSAQIP Accredited Center: What Are We Dealing with?
Authors
Jeffrey Qiu
Peter W. Lundberg
T. Javier Birriel
Leonardo Claros
Jill Stoltzfus
Maher El Chaar
Publication date
01-09-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Obesity Surgery / Issue 9/2018
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Electronic ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3245-5

Other articles of this Issue 9/2018

Obesity Surgery 9/2018 Go to the issue