Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Obesity Surgery 5/2018

01-05-2018 | Video Submission

The 15-cm Roux Limb: a Technical Misadventure

Published in: Obesity Surgery | Issue 5/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Despite effectively treating obesity and its comorbidities, only a fraction of the growing obese population is evaluated for bariatric surgery. Aside from barriers including resources and social support, patients report personal experience with friends and relatives suffering poor outcomes after bariatric surgery. Rates of mortality, leaks, and strictures have decreased over the past 20 years, but few instances of gross surgeon error have been reported in the literature. Our objective is to report and demonstrate the revision of a critically shortened Roux limb in a patient with chronic nausea and dysphagia found to have a 15-cm Roux limb and briefly discuss its implications.

Methods

We performed a successful laparoscopic revision of this patient’s previous Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, with creation of a 125-cm Roux limb.

Results

Total operative time was 87 min, there were no major intraoperative complications, and the post-operative course was unremarkable. At one-month follow-up, the patient reported complete resolution of all prior symptoms. At three-month follow-up, BMI decreased from 37 prior to revision to 31.

Conclusions

Reducing complications and improving quality of care will support the necessary growth of bariatric surgery. Standards set forth by accreditation bodies such as the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) assist in this endeavor, and technical errors, though difficult to evaluate, should be monitored.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Metadata
Title
The 15-cm Roux Limb: a Technical Misadventure
Publication date
01-05-2018
Published in
Obesity Surgery / Issue 5/2018
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Electronic ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3188-x

Other articles of this Issue 5/2018

Obesity Surgery 5/2018 Go to the issue