Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Obesity Surgery 5/2017

01-05-2017 | Original Contributions

Changes in Outcomes, Satiety and Adverse Upper Gastrointestinal Symptoms Following Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding

Authors: Paul R Burton, Geraldine J Ooi, Cheryl Laurie, Margaret Anderson, Katrina Parker, Eldho Paul, Geoff Hebbard, Paul E O’Brien, Wendy A Brown

Published in: Obesity Surgery | Issue 5/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Patient-reported outcomes and perceptions are critical to the overall efficacy and acceptability of a surgical procedure. Outcomes, such as patient satisfaction and perceived success of the surgery and adverse symptoms, have not been described in detail following bariatric surgery. The associations and predictors of patient satisfaction have not been defined. This study aimed to examine long-term outcomes and perceptions after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB).

Methods

We conducted a prospective study of outcomes, satiety and adverse upper gastrointestinal symptoms, as well as quality of life and subjective patient satisfaction in LAGB patients. Data were collected at 3 years (T1) and 8 years post-operatively (T2).

Results

One-hundred and sixty patients completed follow-up at T1 and T2. The average age was 44.0 ± 11.2 years. At T2, the total body weight loss was 17.8 ± 11.9 %. Satisfaction decreased significantly between time points (8.6 ± 1.8 vs 7.2 ± 2.9, p < 0.01), and quality of life reduced slightly across all domains. Hunger scores remained low (3.8 ± 1.8 vs 3.9 ± 1.8, p = 0.61). The dysphagia score did not change significantly (p = 0.54). There was minimal change in frequency of regurgitation, although there was significant increase in patient assessment of how bothered they were by regurgitation. Multivariate analysis identified increased awareness of regurgitation as a principal driver of reduced satisfaction.

Conclusions

Weight loss, satiety and adverse symptoms demonstrated only slight changes between 3 and 8 years post-operatively. Despite this, overall satisfaction and perception of success of the procedure reduced markedly. This appeared mediated by reduced tolerance of adverse symptoms. These data inform follow-up practises aimed at optimizing outcomes.
Literature
1.
go back to reference O’Brien PE, MacDonald L, Anderson M, et al. Long-term outcomes after bariatric surgery: fifteen-year follow-up of adjustable gastric banding and a systematic review of the bariatric surgical literature. Ann Surg. 2013;257(1):87–94.CrossRefPubMed O’Brien PE, MacDonald L, Anderson M, et al. Long-term outcomes after bariatric surgery: fifteen-year follow-up of adjustable gastric banding and a systematic review of the bariatric surgical literature. Ann Surg. 2013;257(1):87–94.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Courcoulas AP, Yanovski SZ, Bonds D, et al. Long-term outcomes of bariatric surgery: a National Institutes of Health symposium. JAMA Surg. 2014;149(12):1323–9.CrossRefPubMed Courcoulas AP, Yanovski SZ, Bonds D, et al. Long-term outcomes of bariatric surgery: a National Institutes of Health symposium. JAMA Surg. 2014;149(12):1323–9.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Mauro M, Taylor V, Wharton S, et al. Barriers to obesity treatment. Eur J Intern Med. 2008;19(3):173–80.CrossRefPubMed Mauro M, Taylor V, Wharton S, et al. Barriers to obesity treatment. Eur J Intern Med. 2008;19(3):173–80.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Vishne TH, Ramadan E, Alper D, et al. Long-term follow-up and factors influencing success of silastic ring vertical gastroplasty. Dig Surg. 2004;21(2):134–40.CrossRefPubMed Vishne TH, Ramadan E, Alper D, et al. Long-term follow-up and factors influencing success of silastic ring vertical gastroplasty. Dig Surg. 2004;21(2):134–40.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Burton PR, Brown W, Laurie C, et al. Outcomes, satiety, and adverse upper gastrointestinal symptoms following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg. 2011;21(5):574–81.CrossRefPubMed Burton PR, Brown W, Laurie C, et al. Outcomes, satiety, and adverse upper gastrointestinal symptoms following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg. 2011;21(5):574–81.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference O’Brien P. The lap-band™ solution: a partnership for weight loss. Carlton, Victoria: Melbourne University Publishing; 2010. O’Brien P. The lap-band™ solution: a partnership for weight loss. Carlton, Victoria: Melbourne University Publishing; 2010.
7.
go back to reference Anvari M, Allen C, Borm A. Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication is a satisfactory alternative to long-term omeprazole therapy. Br J Surg. 1995;82(7):938–42.CrossRefPubMed Anvari M, Allen C, Borm A. Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication is a satisfactory alternative to long-term omeprazole therapy. Br J Surg. 1995;82(7):938–42.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Dakkak M, Bennett JR. A new dysphagia score with objective validation. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1992;14(2):99–100.CrossRefPubMed Dakkak M, Bennett JR. A new dysphagia score with objective validation. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1992;14(2):99–100.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Grande ED, Taylor A (2004) Quality of life in South Australia as measured by the SF-36: population norms for 2002, trends from 1994 to 2002 and impact of chronic diseases and health risk factors on quality of life: population research and outcomes unit. South Australia: Department of Human Services Grande ED, Taylor A (2004) Quality of life in South Australia as measured by the SF-36: population norms for 2002, trends from 1994 to 2002 and impact of chronic diseases and health risk factors on quality of life: population research and outcomes unit. South Australia: Department of Human Services
11.
go back to reference Conceicao E, Mitchell JE, Vaz AR, et al. The presence of maladaptive eating behaviors after bariatric surgery in a cross sectional study: importance of picking or nibbling on weight regain. Eat Behav. 2014;15(4):558–62.CrossRefPubMed Conceicao E, Mitchell JE, Vaz AR, et al. The presence of maladaptive eating behaviors after bariatric surgery in a cross sectional study: importance of picking or nibbling on weight regain. Eat Behav. 2014;15(4):558–62.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Brandao I, Ramalho S, Pinto-Bastos A, et al. Metabolic profile and psychological variables after bariatric surgery: association with weight outcomes. Eat Weight Disord. 2015;20(4):513–8.CrossRefPubMed Brandao I, Ramalho S, Pinto-Bastos A, et al. Metabolic profile and psychological variables after bariatric surgery: association with weight outcomes. Eat Weight Disord. 2015;20(4):513–8.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Odom J, Zalesin KC, Washington TL, et al. Behavioral predictors of weight regain after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2010;20(3):349–56.CrossRefPubMed Odom J, Zalesin KC, Washington TL, et al. Behavioral predictors of weight regain after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2010;20(3):349–56.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Mahony D. Bariatric surgery attrition secondary to psychological barriers. Clin Obes. 2013;3(1–2):32–8.CrossRefPubMed Mahony D. Bariatric surgery attrition secondary to psychological barriers. Clin Obes. 2013;3(1–2):32–8.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Funk LM, Jolles S, Fischer LE, et al. Patient and referring practitioner characteristics associated with the likelihood of undergoing bariatric surgery: a systematic review. JAMA Surg. 2015;150(10):999–1005.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Funk LM, Jolles S, Fischer LE, et al. Patient and referring practitioner characteristics associated with the likelihood of undergoing bariatric surgery: a systematic review. JAMA Surg. 2015;150(10):999–1005.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Changes in Outcomes, Satiety and Adverse Upper Gastrointestinal Symptoms Following Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding
Authors
Paul R Burton
Geraldine J Ooi
Cheryl Laurie
Margaret Anderson
Katrina Parker
Eldho Paul
Geoff Hebbard
Paul E O’Brien
Wendy A Brown
Publication date
01-05-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Obesity Surgery / Issue 5/2017
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Electronic ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2434-3

Other articles of this Issue 5/2017

Obesity Surgery 5/2017 Go to the issue