Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Obesity Surgery 4/2012

01-04-2012 | Clinical Research

Reporting Results After Bariatric Surgery: Reproducibility of Predicted Body Mass Index

Authors: Wilson Salgado Júnior, Camila Scalassara Campos, Carla Barbosa Nonino

Published in: Obesity Surgery | Issue 4/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

There is a controversy about the best way to report results after bariatric surgery. Several indices have been proposed over the years such as percentage of total weight loss (%TWL), percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL), and percentage of excess body mass index loss (%EBMIL). More recently, it has been suggested to individualize the body mass index (BMI) goal to be achieved by the patients (predicted BMI—PBMI). The objective was to assess the reproducibility of this PBMI in our service.

Methods

In this retrospective study, we assessed the %TWL, %EWL, %EBMIL (with expected BMI of 25 kg/m2), and %EBMIL (with PBMI) over 4 years of observation in two groups of patients: BMI <50 kg/m2 and BMI ≥50 kg/m2.

Results

The medical records of 403 patients were studied. From 18 to 42 months after surgery, %TWL was higher in the superobese group, whereas %EWL was similar for the two groups. %EBMIL was higher in less obese patients up to 24 months and similar thereafter. In contrast, %EBMIL with PBMI was greater in the superobese group, although it never reached the 100% goal.

Conclusions

We conclude that %EBMIL results according to PBMI were not reproducible in our institution. There is a need to elaborate a new easy-to-obtain and reproducible index.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Committee on Standards for Reporting Results, American Society for Bariatric Surgery. Standards for reporting results. Obes Surg. 1994;4:56–65.CrossRef Committee on Standards for Reporting Results, American Society for Bariatric Surgery. Standards for reporting results. Obes Surg. 1994;4:56–65.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference 1983 Metropolitan height and weight tables. New York: Metropolitan Life Foundation. Statistical Bulletin 1983;64(1):2–9. 1983 Metropolitan height and weight tables. New York: Metropolitan Life Foundation. Statistical Bulletin 1983;64(1):2–9.
5.
go back to reference Deitel M, Shahi B. Morbid obesity: selection of patients for surgery. J Am Coll Nutr. 1992;11:457–62.PubMed Deitel M, Shahi B. Morbid obesity: selection of patients for surgery. J Am Coll Nutr. 1992;11:457–62.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Baltasar A, Perez N, Serra C, et al. Weight loss reporting: predicted body mass index after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2011;21:367–72.PubMedCrossRef Baltasar A, Perez N, Serra C, et al. Weight loss reporting: predicted body mass index after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2011;21:367–72.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Deitel M, Greenstein RJ. Recommendations for reporting weight loss. Editorial. Obes Surg. 2003;13:159–60.PubMedCrossRef Deitel M, Greenstein RJ. Recommendations for reporting weight loss. Editorial. Obes Surg. 2003;13:159–60.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Reporting Results After Bariatric Surgery: Reproducibility of Predicted Body Mass Index
Authors
Wilson Salgado Júnior
Camila Scalassara Campos
Carla Barbosa Nonino
Publication date
01-04-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Obesity Surgery / Issue 4/2012
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Electronic ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-011-0480-4

Other articles of this Issue 4/2012

Obesity Surgery 4/2012 Go to the issue