Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Obesity Surgery 9/2011

01-09-2011 | Clinical Research

Is Weight Loss Better Sustained with Long-Limb Gastric Bypass in the Super-Obese?

Authors: Mohammad Sarhan, Jenny J. Choi, Monqidh Al Sawwaf, Ghulam Murtaza, Jorge L. Zelada Getty, Leaque Ahmed

Published in: Obesity Surgery | Issue 9/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

While some studies have shown that long-limb gastric bypass with Roux limb length of 150 to 200 cm can attain better weight loss outcomes in super-obese patients (BMI >50 kg/m2) than the standard limb gastric bypass with Roux limb length of 100 to 150 cm, other studies have not shown similar findings. Additionally, no study has demonstrated the optimal length of the Roux limb that will result in ideal weight loss. The purpose of this study is to compare the long-term weight loss and weight regain of standard limb length (SLL) and long limb length (LLL) gastric bypass in patients with BMI >50 kg/m2.

Methods

A total of 120 patients with BMI >50 kg/m2 underwent either SLL (total bypass length = 200, biliopancreatic limb = 50–80 cm, Roux limb = 120–150 cm) or LLL (total bypass length = 250 biliopancreatic limb = 50–80 cm, Roux limb = 170–200 cm) RYGB. The excess weight loss (EWL), the weight regain, and the rate of complications were measured at 1-, 2-, and 3-year follow-up. Statistical comparisons were performed using t-test.

Results

There was no difference in patient demographics, pre-operative BMI, or comorbidities between the two groups: SLL (n = 55) and LLL (n = 65). In comparing standard- to long-limb cohorts, preoperative BMI was 56.1 ±5.34 vs. 57.5 ± 6.05 kg/m2, respectively. There was no statistical difference in percent EWL at 1, 2, and 3 years between the two groups [55.2 vs. 55 (P = 0.933), 61.5 vs. 60.8 (P = 0.831), and 61.1 vs.60 (P = 0.932)]. There was no difference in percent weight regain between the two groups, 11.2 (SLL) and 5.2 (LLL) (P = 0.13). The rates of complications were similar in the two groups.

Conclusion

There is no difference in weight loss or weight regain between the SLL and LLL RYGB. Longer-limb gastric bypass is not required in patients with BMI >50 kg/m2 for them to obtain long-term, sustained weight loss.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004;292:1724–37.PubMedCrossRef Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004;292:1724–37.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference NIH. Gastrointestinal surgery for severe obesity. NIH Consensus Development Conference. Nutrition 1996, 12:397–404. NIH. Gastrointestinal surgery for severe obesity. NIH Consensus Development Conference. Nutrition 1996, 12:397–404.
4.
go back to reference Eisenberg D, Duffy AJ, Bell RL. Update on obesity surgery. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12:3196–203.PubMed Eisenberg D, Duffy AJ, Bell RL. Update on obesity surgery. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12:3196–203.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Ciovica R, Takata M, Vittinghoff E, et al. The impact of Roux limb length on weight loss after gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2008;18:5–10.PubMedCrossRef Ciovica R, Takata M, Vittinghoff E, et al. The impact of Roux limb length on weight loss after gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2008;18:5–10.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Pinheiro JS, Schiavon CA, Pereira PB, et al. Long-long limb Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is more efficacious in treatment of type 2 diabetes and lipid disorders in super-obese patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008;4:521–5.PubMedCrossRef Pinheiro JS, Schiavon CA, Pereira PB, et al. Long-long limb Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is more efficacious in treatment of type 2 diabetes and lipid disorders in super-obese patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008;4:521–5.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Pories WJ, Swanson MS, MacDonald KG, et al. Who would have thought it? An operation proves to be the most effective therapy for adult-onset diabetes mellitus. Ann Surg. 1995;222:339–50.PubMedCrossRef Pories WJ, Swanson MS, MacDonald KG, et al. Who would have thought it? An operation proves to be the most effective therapy for adult-onset diabetes mellitus. Ann Surg. 1995;222:339–50.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Pareja JC, Pilla VF, Callejas-Neto F, et al. Gastric bypass Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy—conversion to distal gastrojejunoileostomy for weight loss failure—experience in 41 patients. Arq Gastroenterol. 2005;42:196–200.PubMedCrossRef Pareja JC, Pilla VF, Callejas-Neto F, et al. Gastric bypass Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy—conversion to distal gastrojejunoileostomy for weight loss failure—experience in 41 patients. Arq Gastroenterol. 2005;42:196–200.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Brolin RE, Kenler HA, Gorman JH, et al. Long-limb gastric bypass in the superobese. A prospective randomized study. Ann Surg. 1992;215:387–95.PubMedCrossRef Brolin RE, Kenler HA, Gorman JH, et al. Long-limb gastric bypass in the superobese. A prospective randomized study. Ann Surg. 1992;215:387–95.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Gleysteen JJ. Five-year outcome with gastric bypass: Roux limb length makes a difference. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009;5:242–7.PubMedCrossRef Gleysteen JJ. Five-year outcome with gastric bypass: Roux limb length makes a difference. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009;5:242–7.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Inabnet WB, Quinn T, Gagner M, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in patients with BMI <50: a prospective randomized trial comparing short and long limb lengths. Obes Surg. 2005;15:51–7.PubMedCrossRef Inabnet WB, Quinn T, Gagner M, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in patients with BMI <50: a prospective randomized trial comparing short and long limb lengths. Obes Surg. 2005;15:51–7.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Christou NV, Look D, Maclean LD. Weight gain after short- and long-limb gastric bypass in patients followed for longer than 10 years. Ann Surg. 2006;244:734–40.PubMedCrossRef Christou NV, Look D, Maclean LD. Weight gain after short- and long-limb gastric bypass in patients followed for longer than 10 years. Ann Surg. 2006;244:734–40.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Choban PS, Flancbaum L. The effect of Roux limb lengths on outcome after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Obes Surg. 2002;12:540–5.PubMedCrossRef Choban PS, Flancbaum L. The effect of Roux limb lengths on outcome after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Obes Surg. 2002;12:540–5.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Feng et al. Effect of standard vs extended Roux limb length on weight loss outcomes after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:1055–60.PubMedCrossRef Feng et al. Effect of standard vs extended Roux limb length on weight loss outcomes after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:1055–60.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Mokdad AH, Marks JS, Stroup DF, et al. Actual causes of death in the United States. JAMA. 2004;291:1238–45.PubMedCrossRef Mokdad AH, Marks JS, Stroup DF, et al. Actual causes of death in the United States. JAMA. 2004;291:1238–45.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference MacLean LD, Rhode BM, Nohr CW. Long- or short-limb gastric bypass? J Gastrointest Surg. 2001;5:525–30.PubMedCrossRef MacLean LD, Rhode BM, Nohr CW. Long- or short-limb gastric bypass? J Gastrointest Surg. 2001;5:525–30.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Lee S, Sahagian KG, Schriver JP. Relationship between varying Roux limb lengths and weight loss in gastric bypass. Curr Surg. 2006;63:259–63.PubMedCrossRef Lee S, Sahagian KG, Schriver JP. Relationship between varying Roux limb lengths and weight loss in gastric bypass. Curr Surg. 2006;63:259–63.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Bruder SJ, Freeman JB, Brazeau-Gravelle P. Lengthening the Roux-Y Limb Increases Weight Loss after Gastric Bypass: a preliminary report. Obes Surg. 1991;1:73–7.PubMedCrossRef Bruder SJ, Freeman JB, Brazeau-Gravelle P. Lengthening the Roux-Y Limb Increases Weight Loss after Gastric Bypass: a preliminary report. Obes Surg. 1991;1:73–7.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Campos GM, Rabl C, Mulligan K, et al. Factors associated with weight loss after gastric bypass. Arch Surg. 2008;143:877–83.PubMedCrossRef Campos GM, Rabl C, Mulligan K, et al. Factors associated with weight loss after gastric bypass. Arch Surg. 2008;143:877–83.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Nelson et al. The malabsorptive very, very long limb Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for super obesity: results in 257 patients. Surgery. 2006;140:517–22.PubMedCrossRef Nelson et al. The malabsorptive very, very long limb Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for super obesity: results in 257 patients. Surgery. 2006;140:517–22.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Guajardo-Salinas GE, Hilmy A, Martinez-Ugarte ML. Predictors of weight loss and effectiveness of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in the morbidly obese Hispano-American population. Obes Surg. 2008;18:1369–75.PubMedCrossRef Guajardo-Salinas GE, Hilmy A, Martinez-Ugarte ML. Predictors of weight loss and effectiveness of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in the morbidly obese Hispano-American population. Obes Surg. 2008;18:1369–75.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Harvin G, DeLegge M, Garrow DA. The impact of race on weight loss after Roux-en Y gastric bypass surgery. Obes Surg. 2008;18:39–42.PubMedCrossRef Harvin G, DeLegge M, Garrow DA. The impact of race on weight loss after Roux-en Y gastric bypass surgery. Obes Surg. 2008;18:39–42.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Capella RF, Capella JF. Ethnicity, type of obesity surgery and weight loss. Obes Surg. 1993;3:375–80.PubMedCrossRef Capella RF, Capella JF. Ethnicity, type of obesity surgery and weight loss. Obes Surg. 1993;3:375–80.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Is Weight Loss Better Sustained with Long-Limb Gastric Bypass in the Super-Obese?
Authors
Mohammad Sarhan
Jenny J. Choi
Monqidh Al Sawwaf
Ghulam Murtaza
Jorge L. Zelada Getty
Leaque Ahmed
Publication date
01-09-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Obesity Surgery / Issue 9/2011
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Electronic ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-011-0402-5

Other articles of this Issue 9/2011

Obesity Surgery 9/2011 Go to the issue