Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Obesity Surgery 5/2008

01-05-2008 | Research Article

Physical Activity Predicts Weight Loss Following Gastric Bypass Surgery: Findings from a Support Group Survey

Authors: Garry Welch, Cheryl Wesolowski, Bernadette Piepul, Jay Kuhn, John Romanelli, Jane Garb

Published in: Obesity Surgery | Issue 5/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Patient adherence to recommended eating and physical activity behaviors is considered important to weight loss outcomes following gastric bypass surgery, but there has been little systematic research in this area to investigate behavioral predictors of weight loss.

Method

We developed a measure of postsurgical behaviors, the bariatric surgery self-management questionnaire (BSSQ). A survey was conducted of 200 patients attending postsurgical support groups (mean time since surgery 14 months, mean age 40 years, 85% female, presurgical weight 150 kg). Patients completed the BSSQ and measures of treatment regimen distress, perceived benefits of weight loss, and weight-related physical symptoms.

Results

Mean BSSQ adherence was in the 70% range, with subscale scores varying considerably. Distress levels associated with the new lifestyle were consistently low (≈20%) and perceived benefits of weight loss were high early on and maintained consistently (70–90%). A final predictive model showed premorbid weight, time since surgery, and BSSQ physical activity subscale were significant predictors of weight loss, accounting for 73% of variance.

Conclusions

Physical activity adherence was the sole significant behavioral predictor of weight loss, although maladaptive dietary habits and patient selection issues were identified for future research. It will be important to replicate the current study in prospective, longitudinal studies with representative patient cohorts. A challenge for researchers will be to develop novel, intensive recruiting and retention strategies to allow closer examination of these issues.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Wing R, Marinilli Pinto A, Niemeier H. Maintenance: the ultimate goal. In: Apovian CM, Lenders CM, editors. A clinical guide for management of overweight and obese children and adults. London: CRC Press; 2007. Wing R, Marinilli Pinto A, Niemeier H. Maintenance: the ultimate goal. In: Apovian CM, Lenders CM, editors. A clinical guide for management of overweight and obese children and adults. London: CRC Press; 2007.
2.
go back to reference Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, et al. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004;292:1724–37.PubMedCrossRef Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, et al. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004;292:1724–37.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Andrews G, LeMont D, Myers S. Caring for the surgical weight loss patient. Sierra Madre: Wheat Field Publishers; 2003. Andrews G, LeMont D, Myers S. Caring for the surgical weight loss patient. Sierra Madre: Wheat Field Publishers; 2003.
4.
go back to reference McMahon M, Sarr M, Clark M, et al. Clinical management after bariatric surgery: value of a multidisciplinary team. Mayo Clin Proc. 2006;81:S34–45.PubMed McMahon M, Sarr M, Clark M, et al. Clinical management after bariatric surgery: value of a multidisciplinary team. Mayo Clin Proc. 2006;81:S34–45.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Colles S, Dixon J. Night eating syndrome: impact on bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2006;16:811–20.PubMedCrossRef Colles S, Dixon J. Night eating syndrome: impact on bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2006;16:811–20.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Elkins G, Whitfield P, Marcus J. Non-compliance with behavioral recommendations following bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2005;15. Elkins G, Whitfield P, Marcus J. Non-compliance with behavioral recommendations following bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2005;15.
8.
go back to reference Ware J, Kosinski M. SF-36 Physical and mental health summary scales: a manual for users of version 1. Lincoln: Quality Metric; 2001. Ware J, Kosinski M. SF-36 Physical and mental health summary scales: a manual for users of version 1. Lincoln: Quality Metric; 2001.
9.
go back to reference Patrick D, Bushnell D, Rothman M. Performance of two self-report measures for evaluating obesity and weight loss. Obes Res. 2004;12:48–57.PubMedCrossRef Patrick D, Bushnell D, Rothman M. Performance of two self-report measures for evaluating obesity and weight loss. Obes Res. 2004;12:48–57.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Cronbach L. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16:297–334.CrossRef Cronbach L. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16:297–334.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Streiner D, Norman G. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1989. Streiner D, Norman G. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1989.
12.
go back to reference Kincaid J, Fishburne R, Rogers R. Derivation of new readability formulas (Automated Readability Index, Fog Count and Flesch Reading Ease Formula) for Navy enlisted personnel. Memphis: Naval Technical Training, U. S. Naval Air Station; 1975. Kincaid J, Fishburne R, Rogers R. Derivation of new readability formulas (Automated Readability Index, Fog Count and Flesch Reading Ease Formula) for Navy enlisted personnel. Memphis: Naval Technical Training, U. S. Naval Air Station; 1975.
13.
go back to reference Snedecor G, Cochran W. Multiple linear regression. Statistical methods. 8th ed. Ames: Iowa State University Press; 1989. Snedecor G, Cochran W. Multiple linear regression. Statistical methods. 8th ed. Ames: Iowa State University Press; 1989.
14.
go back to reference SPSS. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. 10.0 version. Chicago: SPSS; 1999. SPSS. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. 10.0 version. Chicago: SPSS; 1999.
15.
go back to reference Kuczmarski M, Kuczmarski R, Najjar M. Effects of age on validity of self-reported height, weight, and body mass index: findings from the Third National Health and Nurtition Examination Survey 1988–1994. J Am Diet Assoc. 2001;101:28–34.PubMedCrossRef Kuczmarski M, Kuczmarski R, Najjar M. Effects of age on validity of self-reported height, weight, and body mass index: findings from the Third National Health and Nurtition Examination Survey 1988–1994. J Am Diet Assoc. 2001;101:28–34.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Nyholm M, Gullberg B, Merio J. The validity of obesity based on self-reported weight and height: implications for populations studies. Obesity. 2007;15:197–208.PubMedCrossRef Nyholm M, Gullberg B, Merio J. The validity of obesity based on self-reported weight and height: implications for populations studies. Obesity. 2007;15:197–208.PubMedCrossRef
18.
19.
go back to reference Christou N, Look D, Maclean L. Weight gain after short and long term limb gastric bypass in patients followed for longer than 10 years. Ann Surg. 2006;244:734–40.PubMedCrossRef Christou N, Look D, Maclean L. Weight gain after short and long term limb gastric bypass in patients followed for longer than 10 years. Ann Surg. 2006;244:734–40.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Metadata
Title
Physical Activity Predicts Weight Loss Following Gastric Bypass Surgery: Findings from a Support Group Survey
Authors
Garry Welch
Cheryl Wesolowski
Bernadette Piepul
Jay Kuhn
John Romanelli
Jane Garb
Publication date
01-05-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Obesity Surgery / Issue 5/2008
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Electronic ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-007-9269-x

Other articles of this Issue 5/2008

Obesity Surgery 5/2008 Go to the issue

Reply

Reply