Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 1/2014

01-03-2014 | Original Research

Market Liberalism in Health Care: A Dysfunctional View of Respecting “Consumer” Autonomy

Author: Michael A. Kekewich

Published in: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

The unfortunately vast history of paternalism in both medicine and clinical research has resulted in perpetually increasing respect for patient autonomy and free choice in Western health care systems. Beginning with the negative right to informed consent, the principle of respect for autonomy has for many patients evolved into a positive right to request treatments and expect accommodation. This evolution of patient autonomy has mirrored a more general social attitude of market liberalism where increasing numbers of patients have come to embody the role of the “consumer.” This paper explores this transformation and critiques the current way in which respect for patient autonomy is put into practice. Ultimately, this paper concludes that the consumer view of patient autonomy is dysfunctional. Moreover, this paper argues that, based on the inherent goals of medicine, some form of paternalism is required in any meaningfully therapeutic relationship.
Literature
go back to reference Agledahl, K.M., R. Førde, and A. Wifstad. 2011. Choice is not the issue. The misrepresentation of healthcare in bioethical discourse. Journal of Medical Ethics 37(4): 212–215.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Agledahl, K.M., R. Førde, and A. Wifstad. 2011. Choice is not the issue. The misrepresentation of healthcare in bioethical discourse. Journal of Medical Ethics 37(4): 212–215.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
go back to reference American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. 2008. Surgery and patient choice. ACOG Committee Opinion 395(January): 1–5. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. 2008. Surgery and patient choice. ACOG Committee Opinion 395(January): 1–5.
go back to reference Beauchamp, T.L. 1995. Principlism and its alleged competitors. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 5(3): 181–198.PubMedCrossRef Beauchamp, T.L. 1995. Principlism and its alleged competitors. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 5(3): 181–198.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Beauchamp, T.L., and J.F. Childress. 2009. Principles of biomedical ethics, 6th edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Beauchamp, T.L., and J.F. Childress. 2009. Principles of biomedical ethics, 6th edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Calnan, M. 2010. Consumerism and the provision of health care. British Journal of Healthcare Management 16(1): 609–611. Calnan, M. 2010. Consumerism and the provision of health care. British Journal of Healthcare Management 16(1): 609–611.
go back to reference Cowart, D., and R. Burt. 1998. Confronting death: Who chooses, who controls? A dialogue between Dax Cowart and Robert Burt. The Hastings Center Report 28(1): 14–24.PubMedCrossRef Cowart, D., and R. Burt. 1998. Confronting death: Who chooses, who controls? A dialogue between Dax Cowart and Robert Burt. The Hastings Center Report 28(1): 14–24.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Diem, S.J., J.D. Lantos, and J.A. Tulsky. 1996. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation on television: Miracles and misinformation. The New England Journal of Medicine 334(24): 1578–1582.PubMedCrossRef Diem, S.J., J.D. Lantos, and J.A. Tulsky. 1996. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation on television: Miracles and misinformation. The New England Journal of Medicine 334(24): 1578–1582.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Elwyn, G., D. Frosch, R. Thomson, et al. 2012. Shared decision making: A model for clinical practice. Journal of General Internal Medicine 27(10): 1361–1367.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Elwyn, G., D. Frosch, R. Thomson, et al. 2012. Shared decision making: A model for clinical practice. Journal of General Internal Medicine 27(10): 1361–1367.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Gillion, R. 2003. Ethics needs principles—four can encompass the rest—and respect for autonomy should be “first among equals. Journal of Medical Ethics 29(5): 307–312.CrossRef Gillion, R. 2003. Ethics needs principles—four can encompass the rest—and respect for autonomy should be “first among equals. Journal of Medical Ethics 29(5): 307–312.CrossRef
go back to reference Jennings, B. 1998. Autonomy and difference: The travails of liberalism in bioethics. In Bioethics and society: Constructing the ethical enterprise, ed. R. DeVries and J. Subedi, 258–269. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Jennings, B. 1998. Autonomy and difference: The travails of liberalism in bioethics. In Bioethics and society: Constructing the ethical enterprise, ed. R. DeVries and J. Subedi, 258–269. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
go back to reference Kon, A.A. 2010. The shared decision-making continuum. The Journal of the American Medical Association 304(8): 903–904.CrossRef Kon, A.A. 2010. The shared decision-making continuum. The Journal of the American Medical Association 304(8): 903–904.CrossRef
go back to reference Kukla, R. 2005. Conscientious autonomy: Displacing decisions in health care. The Hastings Center Report 35(2): 34–44.PubMedCrossRef Kukla, R. 2005. Conscientious autonomy: Displacing decisions in health care. The Hastings Center Report 35(2): 34–44.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Lantos, J., A.M. Matlock, and D. Wendler. 2011. Clinician integrity and limits to patient autonomy. The Journal of the American Medical Association 305(5): 495–499.CrossRef Lantos, J., A.M. Matlock, and D. Wendler. 2011. Clinician integrity and limits to patient autonomy. The Journal of the American Medical Association 305(5): 495–499.CrossRef
go back to reference Lupton, D. 1997. Consumerism, reflexivity and the medical encounter. Social Science and Medicine 45(3): 373–381.PubMedCrossRef Lupton, D. 1997. Consumerism, reflexivity and the medical encounter. Social Science and Medicine 45(3): 373–381.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Lupton, D., C. Donaldson, and P. Lloyd. 1991. Caveat emptor or blissful ignorance? Patients and the consumerist ethos. Social Science and Medicine 33(5): 559–568.PubMedCrossRef Lupton, D., C. Donaldson, and P. Lloyd. 1991. Caveat emptor or blissful ignorance? Patients and the consumerist ethos. Social Science and Medicine 33(5): 559–568.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Mackenzie, C. 2008. Relational autonomy, normative authority and perfectionism. Journal of Social Philosophy 39(4): 512–533.CrossRef Mackenzie, C. 2008. Relational autonomy, normative authority and perfectionism. Journal of Social Philosophy 39(4): 512–533.CrossRef
go back to reference Milewa, T. 2009. Health care, consumerism and the politics of identity. In The new sociology of the health service, ed. J. Gabe and M. Calnan, 161–176. New York: Routledge. Milewa, T. 2009. Health care, consumerism and the politics of identity. In The new sociology of the health service, ed. J. Gabe and M. Calnan, 161–176. New York: Routledge.
go back to reference Minkoff, H. 2006. The ethics of cesarean section by choice. Seminars in Perinatology 30(5): 309–312.PubMedCrossRef Minkoff, H. 2006. The ethics of cesarean section by choice. Seminars in Perinatology 30(5): 309–312.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Newman, J., and E. Vidler. 2006. Discriminating customers, responsible patients, empowered users: Consumerism and the modernisation of health care. Journal of Social Policy 35(2): 193–209.CrossRef Newman, J., and E. Vidler. 2006. Discriminating customers, responsible patients, empowered users: Consumerism and the modernisation of health care. Journal of Social Policy 35(2): 193–209.CrossRef
go back to reference Orentlicher, D. 1992. The illusion of patient choice in end-of-life decisions. The Journal of the American Medical Association 267(15): 2101–2102.CrossRef Orentlicher, D. 1992. The illusion of patient choice in end-of-life decisions. The Journal of the American Medical Association 267(15): 2101–2102.CrossRef
go back to reference Wolpe, P.R. 1998. The triumph of autonomy in American medical ethics: A sociological view. In Bioethics and society: Constructing the ethical enterprise, ed. R. DeVries and J. Subedi, 38–59. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Wolpe, P.R. 1998. The triumph of autonomy in American medical ethics: A sociological view. In Bioethics and society: Constructing the ethical enterprise, ed. R. DeVries and J. Subedi, 38–59. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Metadata
Title
Market Liberalism in Health Care: A Dysfunctional View of Respecting “Consumer” Autonomy
Author
Michael A. Kekewich
Publication date
01-03-2014
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry / Issue 1/2014
Print ISSN: 1176-7529
Electronic ISSN: 1872-4353
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-013-9492-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 1/2014 Go to the issue