Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Osteoporosis 1/2023

01-12-2023 | Osteoporosis | Review Article

Bracing and taping interventions for individuals with vertebral fragility fractures: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials with GRADE assessment

Authors: Kimberly H. Peckett, Matteo Ponzano, Alex Steinke, Lora M. Giangregorio

Published in: Archives of Osteoporosis | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Summary

This systematic review analyzes the effects of bracing and taping after osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Spinal orthose may have positive effects on pain, but the evidence is of very low certainty. Clinical judgment is recommended when prescribing spinal orthoses.

Purpose

To examine the effects of bracing and taping interventions on pain, physical functioning, health-related quality of life, back extensor strength, kyphosis curvature, and adverse events in individuals with vertebral fragility fractures.

Methods

Four databases were searched from inception up to January 2022. We included randomized controlled trials testing the effect of bracing or taping interventions compared with a non-intervention control in adults ≥ 45 years with vertebral fragility fractures. Narrative syntheses were presented for all the outcomes. We assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool and the certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation.

Results

Three studies were included. Soft bracing interventions exhibited inconsistent effects on pain. One study showed no difference between groups, and another study should a decrease in pain in the soft bracing group compared to the control group. Rigid bracing interventions did not have a significant change in pain between the control and intervention groups. One study demonstrated a decrease in pain at rest (VAS: − 10.8 ± 19.3) and during movement (VAS: − 20.9 ± 29.8) after a taping intervention. The other outcomes were not consistent across studies.

Conclusions

Spinal orthoses may improve pain in people with vertebral fractures; however, we cannot draw definitive conclusions on the efficacy or harms of bracing or taping due to the very low certainty evidence and the small number of studies. Effects on other outcomes are uncertain.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference NIH. National Institutes of Health (NIH) (2001) Consensus development panel on osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. JAMA 285(6):785–795CrossRef NIH. National Institutes of Health (NIH) (2001) Consensus development panel on osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. JAMA 285(6):785–795CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Ponzano M, Tibert N, Brien S, Funnell, L, Gibbs, JC, Keller, H, Laprade, J, Morin, SN, Papaioannou, A, Weston, Z, Wideman, TH, Giangregorio, LM. International consensus on the non-pharmacological management of osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Osteoporos Int., under review. Accessed 14 Feb 2022 Ponzano M, Tibert N, Brien S, Funnell, L, Gibbs, JC, Keller, H, Laprade, J, Morin, SN, Papaioannou, A, Weston, Z, Wideman, TH, Giangregorio, LM. International consensus on the non-pharmacological management of osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Osteoporos Int., under review. Accessed 14 Feb 2022
29.
go back to reference Rodrigues IB, Ponzano M, Hosseini Z et al (2021) The effect of impact exercise (alone or multicomponent intervention) on health-related outcomes in individuals at risk of fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Sport Med 51(6):1273–1292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-021-01432-xCrossRef Rodrigues IB, Ponzano M, Hosseini Z et al (2021) The effect of impact exercise (alone or multicomponent intervention) on health-related outcomes in individuals at risk of fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Sport Med 51(6):1273–1292. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s40279-021-01432-xCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Higgins JPT, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG. Assessing risk of bias in a randomized trial. In: Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.2. Published 2021. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/. Accessed 1 March 2022 Higgins JPT, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG. Assessing risk of bias in a randomized trial. In: Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.2. Published 2021. https://​training.​cochrane.​org/​handbook/​. Accessed 1 March 2022
31.
go back to reference Schünemann HJ, Higgins JPT, Vist GE, et al. Chapter 14: Completing “Summary of Findings” tables and grading the certainty of evidence. In: Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al. (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.1. Published 2020. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/. Accessed 1 March 2022 Schünemann HJ, Higgins JPT, Vist GE, et al. Chapter 14: Completing “Summary of Findings” tables and grading the certainty of evidence. In: Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al. (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.1. Published 2020. https://​training.​cochrane.​org/​handbook/​. Accessed 1 March 2022
33.
go back to reference Giangregorio LM, Ponzano M. Letter to the editor on “Effects of two newly developed spinal orthoses on trunk muscle strength, posture, and quality-of-life in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: a randomized trial.” Am J Phys Med Rehabil. Published online 2022. Giangregorio LM, Ponzano M. Letter to the editor on “Effects of two newly developed spinal orthoses on trunk muscle strength, posture, and quality-of-life in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: a randomized trial.” Am J Phys Med Rehabil. Published online 2022.
34.
go back to reference Kim HJ, Yi JM, Cho HG et al (2014) Comparative study of the treatment outcomes of osteoporotic compression fractures without neurologic injury using a rigid brace, a soft brace, and no brace: a prospective randomized controlled non-inferiority trial. J Bone Jt Surg - Am 96(23):1959–1966. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.N.00187CrossRef Kim HJ, Yi JM, Cho HG et al (2014) Comparative study of the treatment outcomes of osteoporotic compression fractures without neurologic injury using a rigid brace, a soft brace, and no brace: a prospective randomized controlled non-inferiority trial. J Bone Jt Surg - Am 96(23):1959–1966. https://​doi.​org/​10.​2106/​JBJS.​N.​00187CrossRef
45.
go back to reference von Gumppenberg S, Claudi B (1989) Conservative fracture treatment of the cervical spine with halo fixation. Aktuelle Traumatol 19(2):57–60 von Gumppenberg S, Claudi B (1989) Conservative fracture treatment of the cervical spine with halo fixation. Aktuelle Traumatol 19(2):57–60
46.
go back to reference von Gumppenberg S, Vieweg J, Claudi B, Harms J (1991) Primary management of fresh injuries of the thoracic and lumbar vertebrae. Aktuelle Traumatol 21(6):265–273 von Gumppenberg S, Vieweg J, Claudi B, Harms J (1991) Primary management of fresh injuries of the thoracic and lumbar vertebrae. Aktuelle Traumatol 21(6):265–273
Metadata
Title
Bracing and taping interventions for individuals with vertebral fragility fractures: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials with GRADE assessment
Authors
Kimberly H. Peckett
Matteo Ponzano
Alex Steinke
Lora M. Giangregorio
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Archives of Osteoporosis / Issue 1/2023
Print ISSN: 1862-3522
Electronic ISSN: 1862-3514
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-023-01224-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

Archives of Osteoporosis 1/2023 Go to the issue