Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Osteoporosis 1/2020

01-12-2020 | Osteoporosis | Original Article

Fracture risk among treatment-naïve postmenopausal women with osteopenia in Greece: results from the “ACROSS” study

Authors: Athanasios D. Anastasilakis, Polyzois Makras

Published in: Archives of Osteoporosis | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Summary

Use of the FRAX (Fracture Risk Assessment Tool) tool to assess fracture risk is the most common practice worldwide. Our findings suggest that in treatment-naïve women with osteopenia treatment would be cost-effective for approximately one-third of the study population and nearly half of the subjects over 75 years, according to the Greek-specific FRAX-based thresholds.

Introduction

When evaluating a patient with low bone mineral density (BMD), fracture risk estimation is of paramount importance. Fracture risk assessment using the FRAX tool is the most common and most studied practice worldwide.

Patients–methods

The primary aim of the “ACROSS” study was to record the 10-year probability of major osteoporotic fractures and hip fractures, using the Greek version of the FRAX tool, in a rather representative population of 230 postmenopausal treatment-naïve women with osteopenia. Secondary aims of the study were to identify (1) the risk for fractures according to age and the years from menopause, (2) the proportion of patients qualifying for treatment according to the Greek cost-effective FRAX thresholds, and (3) the perception of both the patient and the treating physician regarding the estimated fracture risk.

Results

The mean 10-year risk was 10.7% ± 6.6 for major osteoporotic fractures and 3.4% ± 4.2 for hip fractures. For women up to 75 years of age, the 10-year risk for major osteoporotic and hip fractures was 8.8% and 2.1%, respectively, while for women over 75 years, the risk was 15.2% and 6.6%, respectively. Patients generally believed that they had low fracture risk independently of age, while the physicians considered that the risk increases with advancing age.

Conclusions

According to the Greek-specific FRAX-based thresholds, the administration of osteoporosis treatment would be cost-effective for approximately one-third of the study population and nearly half of the subjects over 75 years. Patients are not fully aware of their fracture risk.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Barrett-Connor E (1995) The economic and human costs of osteoporotic fracture. Am J Med 98:3S–8SCrossRef Barrett-Connor E (1995) The economic and human costs of osteoporotic fracture. Am J Med 98:3S–8SCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Colón-Emeric CS, Saag KG (2006) Osteoporotic fractures in older adults. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 20:695–706CrossRef Colón-Emeric CS, Saag KG (2006) Osteoporotic fractures in older adults. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 20:695–706CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Becker DJ, Kilgore ML, Morrisey MA (2010) The societal burden of osteoporosis. Curr Rheumatol Rep 12:186–191CrossRef Becker DJ, Kilgore ML, Morrisey MA (2010) The societal burden of osteoporosis. Curr Rheumatol Rep 12:186–191CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Melton LJ, Chrischilles EA, Cooper C, Lane AW, Riggs BL (1992) Perspective. How many women have osteoporosis? J Bone Miner Res 7:1005–1010CrossRef Melton LJ, Chrischilles EA, Cooper C, Lane AW, Riggs BL (1992) Perspective. How many women have osteoporosis? J Bone Miner Res 7:1005–1010CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Pasco JA, Seeman E, Henry MJ, Merriman EN, Nicholson GC, Kotowicz MA (2006) The population burden of fractures originates in women with osteopenia, not osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 17:1404–1409CrossRef Pasco JA, Seeman E, Henry MJ, Merriman EN, Nicholson GC, Kotowicz MA (2006) The population burden of fractures originates in women with osteopenia, not osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 17:1404–1409CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O, Johansson H, De Laet C, Brown J et al (2007) The use of clinical risk factors enhances the performance of BMD in the prediction of hip and osteoporotic fractures in men and women. Osteoporos Int 18:1033–1046CrossRef Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O, Johansson H, De Laet C, Brown J et al (2007) The use of clinical risk factors enhances the performance of BMD in the prediction of hip and osteoporotic fractures in men and women. Osteoporos Int 18:1033–1046CrossRef
7.
go back to reference McCloskey EV, Johansson H, Oden A, Kanis JA (2009) From relative risk to absolute fracture risk calculation: the FRAX algorithm. Curr Osteoporos Rep 7:77–83CrossRef McCloskey EV, Johansson H, Oden A, Kanis JA (2009) From relative risk to absolute fracture risk calculation: the FRAX algorithm. Curr Osteoporos Rep 7:77–83CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Makras P, Athanasakis K, Boubouchairopoulou N, Rizou S, Anastasilakis AD, Kyriopoulos J, Lyritis GP (2015) Cost-effective osteoporosis treatment thresholds in Greece. Osteoporos Int 26:1949–1957CrossRef Makras P, Athanasakis K, Boubouchairopoulou N, Rizou S, Anastasilakis AD, Kyriopoulos J, Lyritis GP (2015) Cost-effective osteoporosis treatment thresholds in Greece. Osteoporos Int 26:1949–1957CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Delmas P, Burckhardt P, Cooper C, Torgerson D (1997) Guidelines for diagnosis and management of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 7:390–406CrossRef Kanis JA, Delmas P, Burckhardt P, Cooper C, Torgerson D (1997) Guidelines for diagnosis and management of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 7:390–406CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Nakamura T (2009) Recommendations of FRAX in clinical assessment of osteoporosis indicated in European and US guidelines. Clin Calcium 19:1723–1728PubMed Nakamura T (2009) Recommendations of FRAX in clinical assessment of osteoporosis indicated in European and US guidelines. Clin Calcium 19:1723–1728PubMed
11.
go back to reference Makras P, Anastasilakis AD, Antypas G, Chronopoulos E, Kaskani EG, Matsouka A, Patrikos DK, Stathopoulos KD, Tournis S, Trovas G, Kosmidis C (2019) The 2018 guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in Greece. Arch Osteoporos 14:39CrossRef Makras P, Anastasilakis AD, Antypas G, Chronopoulos E, Kaskani EG, Matsouka A, Patrikos DK, Stathopoulos KD, Tournis S, Trovas G, Kosmidis C (2019) The 2018 guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in Greece. Arch Osteoporos 14:39CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Svedbom A, Hernlund E, Ivergård M, Compston J, Cooper C, Stenmark J et al (2013) Osteoporosis in the European Union: a compendium of country-specific reports. Arch Osteoporos 8:137CrossRef Svedbom A, Hernlund E, Ivergård M, Compston J, Cooper C, Stenmark J et al (2013) Osteoporosis in the European Union: a compendium of country-specific reports. Arch Osteoporos 8:137CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Reid IR, Horne AM, Mihov B, Stewart A, Garratt E, Wong S, Wiessing KR, Bolland MJ, Bastin S, Gamble GD (2018) Fracture prevention with zoledronate in older women with osteopenia. N Engl J Med 379:2407–2416CrossRef Reid IR, Horne AM, Mihov B, Stewart A, Garratt E, Wong S, Wiessing KR, Bolland MJ, Bastin S, Gamble GD (2018) Fracture prevention with zoledronate in older women with osteopenia. N Engl J Med 379:2407–2416CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Johansson H, Azizieh F, Al Ali N, Alessa T, Harvey NC, McCloskey E et al (2017) FRAX- vs. T-score-based intervention thresholds for osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 28:3099–3105CrossRef Johansson H, Azizieh F, Al Ali N, Alessa T, Harvey NC, McCloskey E et al (2017) FRAX- vs. T-score-based intervention thresholds for osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 28:3099–3105CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Makras P, Panagoulia M, Mari A, Rizou S, Lyritis GP (2017) Evaluation of the first fracture liaison service in the Greek healthcare setting. Arch Osteoporos 12:3CrossRef Makras P, Panagoulia M, Mari A, Rizou S, Lyritis GP (2017) Evaluation of the first fracture liaison service in the Greek healthcare setting. Arch Osteoporos 12:3CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Silverman SL, Calderon AD (2010) The utility and limitations of FRAX: a US perspective. Curr Osteoporos Rep 8:192–197CrossRef Silverman SL, Calderon AD (2010) The utility and limitations of FRAX: a US perspective. Curr Osteoporos Rep 8:192–197CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Fracture risk among treatment-naïve postmenopausal women with osteopenia in Greece: results from the “ACROSS” study
Authors
Athanasios D. Anastasilakis
Polyzois Makras
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Archives of Osteoporosis / Issue 1/2020
Print ISSN: 1862-3522
Electronic ISSN: 1862-3514
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-020-00837-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Archives of Osteoporosis 1/2020 Go to the issue