Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Osteoporosis 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Original Article

Epidemiology of fractures in Armenia: development of a country-specific FRAX model and comparison to its surrogate

Authors: O. Lesnyak, S. Sahakyan, A. Zakroyeva, J. P. Bilezikian, N. Hutchings, V. Babalyan, R. Galstyan, A. Lebedev, H. Johansson, N. C. Harvey, E. McCloskey, John A. Kanis

Published in: Archives of Osteoporosis | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Summary

Fracture probabilities derived from the surrogate FRAX model for Armenia were compared to those from the model based on regional estimates of the incidence of hip fracture. Disparities between the surrogate and authentic FRAX models indicate the importance of developing country-specific FRAX models. Despite large differences between models, differences in the rank order of fracture probabilities were minimal.

Objective

Armenia has relied on a surrogate FRAX model based on the fracture epidemiology of Romania. This paper describes the epidemiology of fragility fractures in Armenia used to create an Armenia-specific FRAX model with an aim of comparing this new model with the surrogate model.

Methods

We carried out a population-based study in two regions of Armenia (Ararat and Vayots Dzor representing approximately 11% of the country’s population). We aimed to identify all low-energy fractures: retrospectively from hospital registers in 2011–2012 and prospectively in 2013 with the inclusion of primary care sources.

Results

The differences in incidence between the surveys with and without data from primary care suggested that 44% of patients sustaining a hip fracture did not receive specialized medical care. A similar proportion of forearm and humeral fractures did not come to hospital attention (48 and 49%, respectively). Only 57.7% of patients sustaining a hip fracture were hospitalized. In 2013, hip fracture incidence at the age of 50 years or more was 201/100,000 for women and 136/100,000 for men, and age- and sex-specific rates were incorporated into the new “authentic” FRAX model for Armenia. Compared to the surrogate model, the authentic model gave lower 10-year fracture probabilities in men and women aged less than 70 years but substantially higher above this age. Notwithstanding, there were very close correlations in fracture probabilities between the surrogate and authentic models (> 0.99) so that the revisions had little impact on the rank order of risk.

Conclusion

A substantial proportion of major osteoporotic fractures in Armenia do not come to hospital attention. The disparities between surrogate and authentic FRAX models indicate the importance of developing country-specific FRAX models. Despite large differences between models, differences in the rank order of fracture probabilities were minimal.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kanis JA on behalf of the World Health Organization Scientific Group (2008) Assessment of osteoporosis at the primary healthcare level. Technical report. WHO Collaborating Centre, University of Sheffield, UK. Available at http://www.shef.ac.uk/FRAX/index.htm. Accessed 26 Feb 2012 Kanis JA on behalf of the World Health Organization Scientific Group (2008) Assessment of osteoporosis at the primary healthcare level. Technical report. WHO Collaborating Centre, University of Sheffield, UK. Available at http://​www.​shef.​ac.​uk/​FRAX/​index.​htm. Accessed 26 Feb 2012
2.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, Johansson H, McCloskey EV (2008) FRAX™ and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UK. Osteoporos Int 19:385–397CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, Johansson H, McCloskey EV (2008) FRAX™ and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UK. Osteoporos Int 19:385–397CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Odén A, McCloskey EV, Johansson H, Wahl D, Cooper C, on behalf of the IOF Working Group on Epidemiology and Quality of Life (2012) A systematic review of hip fracture incidence and probability of fracture worldwide. Osteoporos Int 23:2239–2256CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kanis JA, Odén A, McCloskey EV, Johansson H, Wahl D, Cooper C, on behalf of the IOF Working Group on Epidemiology and Quality of Life (2012) A systematic review of hip fracture incidence and probability of fracture worldwide. Osteoporos Int 23:2239–2256CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Cauley JA, El-Hajj Fuleihan G, Arabi A et al (2011) Official positions for FRAX clinical regarding international differences from Joint Official Positions Development Conference of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry and International Osteoporosis Foundation on FRAX. J Clin Densitom 14(3):240e262 Cauley JA, El-Hajj Fuleihan G, Arabi A et al (2011) Official positions for FRAX clinical regarding international differences from Joint Official Positions Development Conference of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry and International Osteoporosis Foundation on FRAX. J Clin Densitom 14(3):240e262
7.
go back to reference Lesnyak O, Ershova O, Belova K et al (2012) Epidemiology of fracture in the Russian Federation and the development of a FRAX model. Arch Osteoporos 7:67–73CrossRefPubMed Lesnyak O, Ershova O, Belova K et al (2012) Epidemiology of fracture in the Russian Federation and the development of a FRAX model. Arch Osteoporos 7:67–73CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O, Jonsson B, de Laet C, Dawson A (2001) The burden of osteoporotic fractures: a method for setting intervention thresholds. Osteoporos Int 12:417–427CrossRefPubMed Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O, Jonsson B, de Laet C, Dawson A (2001) The burden of osteoporotic fractures: a method for setting intervention thresholds. Osteoporos Int 12:417–427CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Hans D, Cooper C, Baim S, The Task Force of the FRAX Initiative et al (2011) Interpretation and use of FRAX in clinical practice. Osteoporos Int 22:395–411 Kanis JA, Hans D, Cooper C, Baim S, The Task Force of the FRAX Initiative et al (2011) Interpretation and use of FRAX in clinical practice. Osteoporos Int 22:395–411
12.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A et al (2000) Long-term risk of osteoporotic fracture in Malmö. Osteoporos Int 11:669–674CrossRefPubMed Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A et al (2000) Long-term risk of osteoporotic fracture in Malmö. Osteoporos Int 11:669–674CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Johansson H, Oden A, Dawson-Hughes B, Melton LJ 3rd, McCloskey EV (2010) The effects of a FRAX((R)) revision for the USA. Osteoporos Int 21:35–40CrossRefPubMed Kanis JA, Johansson H, Oden A, Dawson-Hughes B, Melton LJ 3rd, McCloskey EV (2010) The effects of a FRAX((R)) revision for the USA. Osteoporos Int 21:35–40CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Binkley N, Kiebzak GM, Lewiecki EM et al (2005) Recalculation of the NHANES database SD improves T-score agreement and reduces osteoporosis prevalence. J Bone Miner Res 20:195–201CrossRefPubMed Binkley N, Kiebzak GM, Lewiecki EM et al (2005) Recalculation of the NHANES database SD improves T-score agreement and reduces osteoporosis prevalence. J Bone Miner Res 20:195–201CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Oden A, McCloskey EV, Johansson HD, Wahl A, Cooper C (2012) A systematic review of hip fracture incidence and probability of fracture worldwide. Osteoporos Int 23:2239–2256CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kanis JA, Oden A, McCloskey EV, Johansson HD, Wahl A, Cooper C (2012) A systematic review of hip fracture incidence and probability of fracture worldwide. Osteoporos Int 23:2239–2256CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Indhavivadhana S, Rattanachaiyanont M, Angsuwathana S, Techatraisak K, Tanmahasamut P, Leerasiri P (2016) Validation of osteoporosis risk assessment tools in middle-aged Thai women. Climacteric 24:1–6 Indhavivadhana S, Rattanachaiyanont M, Angsuwathana S, Techatraisak K, Tanmahasamut P, Leerasiri P (2016) Validation of osteoporosis risk assessment tools in middle-aged Thai women. Climacteric 24:1–6
17.
go back to reference Ettinger B, Black DM, Dawson-Hughes B, Pressman AR, Melton LJ 3rd (2010) Updated fracture incidence rates for the US version of FRAX. Osteoporos Int 21:25–33CrossRefPubMed Ettinger B, Black DM, Dawson-Hughes B, Pressman AR, Melton LJ 3rd (2010) Updated fracture incidence rates for the US version of FRAX. Osteoporos Int 21:25–33CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Cheung EY, Bow CH, Cheung CL, Soong C, Yeung S, Loong C, Kung A (2012) Discriminative value of FRAX for fracture prediction in a cohort of Chinese postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 23:871–878CrossRefPubMed Cheung EY, Bow CH, Cheung CL, Soong C, Yeung S, Loong C, Kung A (2012) Discriminative value of FRAX for fracture prediction in a cohort of Chinese postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 23:871–878CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Morosano M, Masoni A, Sánchez A (2005) Incidence of hip fractures in the city of Rosario, Argentina. Osteoporos Int 16:1339–1344CrossRefPubMed Morosano M, Masoni A, Sánchez A (2005) Incidence of hip fractures in the city of Rosario, Argentina. Osteoporos Int 16:1339–1344CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Emaus N, Olsen LR, Ahmed LA et al (2011) Hip fractures in a city in Northern Norway over 15 years: time trends, seasonal variation and mortality: the Harstad Injury Prevention Study. Osteoporos Int 22:2603–2610CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Emaus N, Olsen LR, Ahmed LA et al (2011) Hip fractures in a city in Northern Norway over 15 years: time trends, seasonal variation and mortality: the Harstad Injury Prevention Study. Osteoporos Int 22:2603–2610CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Lippuner K, Johansson H, Kanis JA, Rizzoli R (2009) Remaining lifetime and absolute 10-year probabilities of osteoporotic fracture in Swiss men and women. Osteoporos Int 20:1131–1140CrossRefPubMed Lippuner K, Johansson H, Kanis JA, Rizzoli R (2009) Remaining lifetime and absolute 10-year probabilities of osteoporotic fracture in Swiss men and women. Osteoporos Int 20:1131–1140CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Lippuner K, Johansson H, Kanis JA, Rizzoli R (2010) FRAX assessment of osteoporotic fracture probability in Switzerland. Osteoporos Int 21:381–389CrossRefPubMed Lippuner K, Johansson H, Kanis JA, Rizzoli R (2010) FRAX assessment of osteoporotic fracture probability in Switzerland. Osteoporos Int 21:381–389CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Zerbini CA, Szejnfeld VL, Abergaria BH, McCloskey EV, Johansson H, Kanis JA (2015) Incidence of hip fracture in Brazil and the development of a FRAX model. Arch Osteoporos 10:224CrossRefPubMed Zerbini CA, Szejnfeld VL, Abergaria BH, McCloskey EV, Johansson H, Kanis JA (2015) Incidence of hip fracture in Brazil and the development of a FRAX model. Arch Osteoporos 10:224CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Karacić TP, Kopjar B (2009) Hip fracture incidence in Croatia in patients aged 65 years and more. Lijec Vjesn 131(1–2):9–13PubMed Karacić TP, Kopjar B (2009) Hip fracture incidence in Croatia in patients aged 65 years and more. Lijec Vjesn 131(1–2):9–13PubMed
25.
go back to reference Lyritis GP, Rizou S, Galanos A, Makras P (2013) Incidence of hip fractures in Greece during a 30-year period: 1977–2007. Osteoporos Int 24:1579–1585CrossRefPubMed Lyritis GP, Rizou S, Galanos A, Makras P (2013) Incidence of hip fractures in Greece during a 30-year period: 1977–2007. Osteoporos Int 24:1579–1585CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Azagra R, Zwart M, Encabo G et al (2016) Rationale of the Spanish FRAX model in decision-making for predicting osteoporotic fractures: an update of FRIDEX cohort of Spanish women. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 17:262CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Azagra R, Zwart M, Encabo G et al (2016) Rationale of the Spanish FRAX model in decision-making for predicting osteoporotic fractures: an update of FRIDEX cohort of Spanish women. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 17:262CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Czerwinski E, Kanis JA, Osieleniec J et al (2011) Evaluation of FRAX to characterise fracture risk in Poland. Osteoporos Int 22:2507–2512CrossRefPubMed Czerwinski E, Kanis JA, Osieleniec J et al (2011) Evaluation of FRAX to characterise fracture risk in Poland. Osteoporos Int 22:2507–2512CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Czerwiński E, Borowy P, Kumorek A, Amarowicz J, Górkiewicz M, Milert A (2013) Fracture risk prediction in outpatients from Krakow region using FRAX tool versus fracture risk in 11-year follow-up. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 15:617–628CrossRefPubMed Czerwiński E, Borowy P, Kumorek A, Amarowicz J, Górkiewicz M, Milert A (2013) Fracture risk prediction in outpatients from Krakow region using FRAX tool versus fracture risk in 11-year follow-up. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 15:617–628CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Siggeirsdottir K, Aspelund T, Johansson H, Gudmundsson EF, Mogensen B, Jonsson BY, Gudnason V, McCloskey E, Oden A, Sigurdsson G, Kanis JA (2014) The incidence of a first major osteoporotic fracture in Iceland and implications for FRAX. Osteoporos Int 25:2445–2451CrossRefPubMed Siggeirsdottir K, Aspelund T, Johansson H, Gudmundsson EF, Mogensen B, Jonsson BY, Gudnason V, McCloskey E, Oden A, Sigurdsson G, Kanis JA (2014) The incidence of a first major osteoporotic fracture in Iceland and implications for FRAX. Osteoporos Int 25:2445–2451CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Grigorie D, Sucaliuc A, Johansson H, Kanis J, McCloskey E (2013) Incidence of hip fracture in Romania and the development of a Romanian FRAX model. Calcif Tissue Int 92:429–436CrossRefPubMed Grigorie D, Sucaliuc A, Johansson H, Kanis J, McCloskey E (2013) Incidence of hip fracture in Romania and the development of a Romanian FRAX model. Calcif Tissue Int 92:429–436CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Benetou V, Orfanos P, Feskanich D, Michaëlsson K, Pettersson-Kymmer U, Ahmed LA (2015) Education, marital status, and risk of hip fractures in older men and women: the CHANCES project. Osteoporos Int 26:1733–1746CrossRefPubMed Benetou V, Orfanos P, Feskanich D, Michaëlsson K, Pettersson-Kymmer U, Ahmed LA (2015) Education, marital status, and risk of hip fractures in older men and women: the CHANCES project. Osteoporos Int 26:1733–1746CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Cauley JA, Chalhoub D, Kassem AM, Fuleihan G-H (2014) Geographic and ethnic disparities in osteoporotic fractures. Nat Rev Endocrinol 10:338–351CrossRefPubMed Cauley JA, Chalhoub D, Kassem AM, Fuleihan G-H (2014) Geographic and ethnic disparities in osteoporotic fractures. Nat Rev Endocrinol 10:338–351CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Cauley JA, Fuleihan GE-L, Arabi A et al (2011) Official positions for FRAX clinical regarding international differences. J Clin Densit 14:240–262CrossRef Cauley JA, Fuleihan GE-L, Arabi A et al (2011) Official positions for FRAX clinical regarding international differences. J Clin Densit 14:240–262CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Johansson H, Odén A, Lorentzon M et al (2015) Is the Swedish FRAX model appropriate for immigrants to Sweden? Osteoporos Int 26:2617–2622CrossRefPubMed Johansson H, Odén A, Lorentzon M et al (2015) Is the Swedish FRAX model appropriate for immigrants to Sweden? Osteoporos Int 26:2617–2622CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Epidemiology of fractures in Armenia: development of a country-specific FRAX model and comparison to its surrogate
Authors
O. Lesnyak
S. Sahakyan
A. Zakroyeva
J. P. Bilezikian
N. Hutchings
V. Babalyan
R. Galstyan
A. Lebedev
H. Johansson
N. C. Harvey
E. McCloskey
John A. Kanis
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Archives of Osteoporosis / Issue 1/2017
Print ISSN: 1862-3522
Electronic ISSN: 1862-3514
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-017-0392-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Archives of Osteoporosis 1/2017 Go to the issue