Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Osteoporosis 1/2015

01-12-2015 | Original Article

Validation of a modified FRAX® tool for improving outpatient efficiency—part of the “Catch Before a Fall” initiative

Authors: Simon Parker, Maria Ciaccio, Erica Cook, Graham Davenport, Alun Cooper, Simon Grange, Peter Smitham

Published in: Archives of Osteoporosis | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Summary

We have validated our touch-screen-modified FRAX® tool against the traditional healthcare professional-led questionnaire, demonstrating strong concordance between doctor- and patient-derived results. We will use this in outpatient clinics and general practice to increase our capture rate of at-risk patients, making valuable use of otherwise wasted patient waiting times.

Introduction

Outpatient clinics offer an opportunity to collect valuable health information from a captive population. We have previously developed a modified fracture risk assessment (FRAX®) tool, enabling patients to self-assess their osteoporotic fracture risk in a touch-screen computer format and demonstrated its acceptability with patients. We aim to validate the accuracy of our tool against the traditional questionnaire.

Methods

Fifty patients over 50 years of age within the fracture clinic independently completed a paper equivalent of our touch-screen-modified FRAX® questionnaire. Responses were analysed against the traditional healthcare professional (HCP)-led questionnaire which was carried out afterwards. Correlation was assessed by sensitivity, specificity, Cohen’s kappa statistic and Fisher’s exact test for each potential FRAX® outcome of “treat”, “measure BMD” and “lifestyle advice”.

Results

Age range was 51–98 years. The FRAX® tool was completed by 88 % of patients; six patients lacked confidence in estimating either their height or weight. Following question adjustment according to patient response and feedback, our tool achieved >95 % sensitivity and specificity for the “treat” and “lifestyle advice” groups, and 79 % sensitivity and 100 % specificity in the “measure BMD” group. Cohen’s kappa value ranged from 0.823 to 0.995 across all groups, demonstrating “very good” agreement for all. Fisher’s exact test demonstrated significant concordance between doctor and patient decisions.

Discussion

Our modified tool provides a simple, accurate and reliable method for patients to self-report their own FRAX® score outside the clinical contact period, thus releasing the HCP from the time required to complete the questionnaire and potentially increasing our capture rate of at-risk patients.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Huang XM (1994) Patient attitude towards waiting in an outpatient clinic and its applications. Health Serv Manag Res: Off J Assoc Univ Prog Health Admin / HSMC, AUPHA 7(1):2–8 Huang XM (1994) Patient attitude towards waiting in an outpatient clinic and its applications. Health Serv Manag Res: Off J Assoc Univ Prog Health Admin / HSMC, AUPHA 7(1):2–8
3.
go back to reference Rabar S, Lau R, O’Flynn N et al (2012) Risk assessment of fragility fractures: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ 345, e3698PubMedCrossRef Rabar S, Lau R, O’Flynn N et al (2012) Risk assessment of fragility fractures: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ 345, e3698PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310PubMedCrossRef Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Dunnill MGS, Pounder RE (2004) Medical outpatients: changes that can benefit patients. ClinMed 4:45–49 Dunnill MGS, Pounder RE (2004) Medical outpatients: changes that can benefit patients. ClinMed 4:45–49
10.
go back to reference Velikova G, Wright P, Smith AB et al (2001) Self-Reported Quality of Life of Individual Cancer Patients: Concordance of Results With Disease Course and Medical Records. J Clin Oncol 19:2064–2073PubMed Velikova G, Wright P, Smith AB et al (2001) Self-Reported Quality of Life of Individual Cancer Patients: Concordance of Results With Disease Course and Medical Records. J Clin Oncol 19:2064–2073PubMed
11.
go back to reference Velikova G, Wright EP, Smith AB et al (1999) Automated collection of quality-of-life data: a comparison of paper and computer touch-screen questionnaires. J Clin Oncol 17:998–1007PubMed Velikova G, Wright EP, Smith AB et al (1999) Automated collection of quality-of-life data: a comparison of paper and computer touch-screen questionnaires. J Clin Oncol 17:998–1007PubMed
12.
go back to reference Buxton J, White M, Osoba D (1998) Patients’ experiences using a computerized program with a touch-sensitive video monitor for the assessment of health-related quality of life. Qual Life Res 7:513–519PubMedCrossRef Buxton J, White M, Osoba D (1998) Patients’ experiences using a computerized program with a touch-sensitive video monitor for the assessment of health-related quality of life. Qual Life Res 7:513–519PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Validation of a modified FRAX® tool for improving outpatient efficiency—part of the “Catch Before a Fall” initiative
Authors
Simon Parker
Maria Ciaccio
Erica Cook
Graham Davenport
Alun Cooper
Simon Grange
Peter Smitham
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Archives of Osteoporosis / Issue 1/2015
Print ISSN: 1862-3522
Electronic ISSN: 1862-3514
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-015-0230-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Archives of Osteoporosis 1/2015 Go to the issue