Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Osteoporosis 1-2/2013

01-12-2013 | Original Article

FRAX-based intervention and assessment thresholds for osteoporosis in Romania

Authors: Daniel Grigorie, Alina Sucaliuc, Helena Johansson, John A. Kanis, Eugene McCloskey

Published in: Archives of Osteoporosis | Issue 1-2/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Summary

We compared the utility of the current Romanian guidelines that recommend treatment in women with a T-score ≤−2.5 SD with a FRAX-based intervention threshold equivalent to women with a prior fragility fracture. Whereas the FRAX-based intervention threshold identified women at high fracture probability, the T-score threshold was less sensitive and decreased markedly with age.

Purpose

FRAX® algorithm has been calibrated for Romania, but guidance is needed on how to apply fracture probabilities to clinical practice.

Methods

The age-specific 10-year probabilities of a major osteoporotic fracture were calculated at two potential intervention thresholds. The first comprised the age-specific fracture probabilities associated with a femoral neck T-score of −2.5 SD, in line with Romanian guidelines. The second approach determined age-specific fracture probabilities that were equivalent to a woman with a prior fragility fracture, without bone mineral density (BMD). The parsimonious use of BMD was additionally explored by the computation of upper and lower assessment thresholds for BMD testing.

Results

When a BMD T-score ≤−2.5 SD was used as an intervention threshold, FRAX probabilities in women aged 50 years were twofold higher than in women of the same age with an average BMD. The increase in risk associated with the BMD threshold decreased progressively with age such that, at the age of 80 years or more, a T-score of −2.5 SD was protective. The 10-year probability of a major osteoporotic fracture by age, equivalent to women with a previous fracture, rose from 5.3 % at the age of 50 years to 13 % at the age of 80 years and identified women at increased risk at all ages.

Conclusion

Intervention thresholds based on BMD alone do not effectively target women at high fracture risk, particularly in the elderly. In contrast, intervention thresholds based on fracture probabilities equivalent to a “fracture threshold” targets women at high fracture risk irrespective of age.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O, Jonsson B, de Laet C, Dawson A (2001) The burden of osteoporotic fractures: a method for setting intervention thresholds. Osteoporos Int 12(5):417–427PubMedCrossRef Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O, Jonsson B, de Laet C, Dawson A (2001) The burden of osteoporotic fractures: a method for setting intervention thresholds. Osteoporos Int 12(5):417–427PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Seeley DG, Browner WS, Nevitt MC, Genant HK, Scott JC, Cummings SR (1991) Which fractures are associated with low appendicular bone mass in elderly women? The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Ann Intern Med 115(11):837–842PubMedCrossRef Seeley DG, Browner WS, Nevitt MC, Genant HK, Scott JC, Cummings SR (1991) Which fractures are associated with low appendicular bone mass in elderly women? The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Ann Intern Med 115(11):837–842PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hernlund E, Svedbom A, Ivergård M, Compston J, Cooper C, Stenmark J et al (2013) Osteoporosis in the European Union: Medical Management, Epidemiology and Economic Burden. A report prepared in collaboration with the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industry Associations (EFPIA). Arch Osteoporos (in press) Hernlund E, Svedbom A, Ivergård M, Compston J, Cooper C, Stenmark J et al (2013) Osteoporosis in the European Union: Medical Management, Epidemiology and Economic Burden. A report prepared in collaboration with the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industry Associations (EFPIA). Arch Osteoporos (in press)
5.
go back to reference World Health Organization (2007) Assessment of osteoporosis at the primary health care level. WHO, Geneva World Health Organization (2007) Assessment of osteoporosis at the primary health care level. WHO, Geneva
6.
go back to reference Marshall D, Johnell O, Wedel H (1996) Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures. BMJ 312(7041):1254–1259PubMedCrossRef Marshall D, Johnell O, Wedel H (1996) Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures. BMJ 312(7041):1254–1259PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Johnell O, Kanis JA, Oden A, Johansson H, De Laet C, Delmas P et al (2005) Predictive value of BMD for hip and other fractures. J Bone Miner Res 20(7):1185–1194PubMedCrossRef Johnell O, Kanis JA, Oden A, Johansson H, De Laet C, Delmas P et al (2005) Predictive value of BMD for hip and other fractures. J Bone Miner Res 20(7):1185–1194PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Johnell O (2005) Requirements for DXA for the management of osteoporosis in Europe. Osteoporos Int 16(3):229–238PubMedCrossRef Kanis JA, Johnell O (2005) Requirements for DXA for the management of osteoporosis in Europe. Osteoporos Int 16(3):229–238PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, Johansson H, McCloskey E (2008) FRAX and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UK. Osteoporos Int 19(4):385–397PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, Johansson H, McCloskey E (2008) FRAX and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UK. Osteoporos Int 19(4):385–397PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Lekamwasam S, Adachi JD, Agnusdei D, Bilezikian J, Boonen S, Borgstrom F et al (2012) A framework for the development of guidelines for the management of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 23(9):2257–2276PubMedCrossRef Lekamwasam S, Adachi JD, Agnusdei D, Bilezikian J, Boonen S, Borgstrom F et al (2012) A framework for the development of guidelines for the management of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 23(9):2257–2276PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kanis JA, McCloskey EV, Johansson H, Cooper C, Rizzoli R, Reginster JY (2013) European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 24(1):23–57PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Kanis JA, McCloskey EV, Johansson H, Cooper C, Rizzoli R, Reginster JY (2013) European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 24(1):23–57PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kanis JA, McCloskey E, Johansson H, Oden A, Leslie WD (2012) FRAX((R)) with and without bone mineral density. Calcif Tissue Int 90(1):1–13PubMedCrossRef Kanis JA, McCloskey E, Johansson H, Oden A, Leslie WD (2012) FRAX((R)) with and without bone mineral density. Calcif Tissue Int 90(1):1–13PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O, Johansson H, De Laet C, Brown J et al (2007) The use of clinical risk factors enhances the performance of BMD in the prediction of hip and osteoporotic fractures in men and women. Osteoporos Int 18(8):1033–1046PubMedCrossRef Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O, Johansson H, De Laet C, Brown J et al (2007) The use of clinical risk factors enhances the performance of BMD in the prediction of hip and osteoporotic fractures in men and women. Osteoporos Int 18(8):1033–1046PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Johansson H, Oden A, Johnell O, Jonsson B, de Laet C, Oglesby A et al (2004) Optimization of BMD measurements to identify high risk groups for treatment—a test analysis. J Bone Miner Res 19(6):906–913PubMedCrossRef Johansson H, Oden A, Johnell O, Jonsson B, de Laet C, Oglesby A et al (2004) Optimization of BMD measurements to identify high risk groups for treatment—a test analysis. J Bone Miner Res 19(6):906–913PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Leslie WD, Majumdar SR, Lix LM, Johansson H, Oden A, McCloskey E et al (2012) High fracture probability with FRAX usually indicates densitometric osteoporosis: implications for clinical practice. Osteoporos Int 23(1):391–397PubMedCrossRef Leslie WD, Majumdar SR, Lix LM, Johansson H, Oden A, McCloskey E et al (2012) High fracture probability with FRAX usually indicates densitometric osteoporosis: implications for clinical practice. Osteoporos Int 23(1):391–397PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kanis JA, McCloskey EV, Johansson H, Strom O, Borgstrom F, Oden A (2008) Case finding for the management of osteoporosis with FRAX–assessment and intervention thresholds for the UK. Osteoporos Int 19(10):1395–1408PubMedCrossRef Kanis JA, McCloskey EV, Johansson H, Strom O, Borgstrom F, Oden A (2008) Case finding for the management of osteoporosis with FRAX–assessment and intervention thresholds for the UK. Osteoporos Int 19(10):1395–1408PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, Jonsson B, De Laet C, Dawson A (2000) Risk of hip fracture according to the World Health Organization criteria for osteopenia and osteoporosis. Bone 27(5):585–590PubMedCrossRef Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, Jonsson B, De Laet C, Dawson A (2000) Risk of hip fracture according to the World Health Organization criteria for osteopenia and osteoporosis. Bone 27(5):585–590PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Johansson H, Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O, McCloskey E (2009) BMD, clinical risk factors, and their combination for hip fracture prevention. Osteoporos Int 20(10):1675–1682PubMedCrossRef Johansson H, Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O, McCloskey E (2009) BMD, clinical risk factors, and their combination for hip fracture prevention. Osteoporos Int 20(10):1675–1682PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
FRAX-based intervention and assessment thresholds for osteoporosis in Romania
Authors
Daniel Grigorie
Alina Sucaliuc
Helena Johansson
John A. Kanis
Eugene McCloskey
Publication date
01-12-2013
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Archives of Osteoporosis / Issue 1-2/2013
Print ISSN: 1862-3522
Electronic ISSN: 1862-3514
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-013-0164-x

Other articles of this Issue 1-2/2013

Archives of Osteoporosis 1-2/2013 Go to the issue