Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Osteoporosis 1-2/2011

01-12-2011 | Original Article

Femoral neck bone mineral density and 10-year absolute fracture risk in a national representative sample of Bulgarian women aged 50 years and older

Authors: Anna-Maria Borissova, Rasho Rashkov, Mihail Boyanov, Alexander Shinkov, Plamen Popivanov, Natalya Temelkova, Jordan Vlahov, Masha Gavrailova

Published in: Archives of Osteoporosis | Issue 1-2/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Summary

This study explored the epidemiology of osteoporosis in Bulgarian women (>50 years). Of the women included in the study, 16.8% had osteoporosis and 46.5% had osteopenia at the femoral neck. The mean 10-year absolute fracture risk was 13.4 ± 9.2% (major fractures) and 2.8 ± 5.2% (hip fractures). This study is the largest Bulgarian epidemiological osteoporosis trial.

Purpose

The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of the major risk factors for osteoporosis and the 10-year absolute fracture risk in a national representative sample of Bulgarian women aged 50 and older.

Methods

This work is a part of the Bulgarian Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study. The National Statistical Institute selected a national representative epidemiological sample. A questionnaire was used allowing fracture risk calculation according to FRAX. Ten osteoporosis centers throughout the country participated. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured at the femoral neck by dual X-ray absorptiometry. The statistical analysis was performed on a SPSS 13.0 for windows platform.

Results

A total of 1,331 women were included (mean age 63.8 ± 8.3 years), divided into decades. Of them, 16.8% had osteoporosis and 46.5% had low femoral neck BMD. Their mean 10-year absolute fracture risk for major fractures was 13.4 ± 9.2%, and for hip fractures 2.8 ± 5.2%, respectively. The prevalence of some major risk factors for osteoporosis was as follows: height loss > 3 cm—33.1% of all women; family history of hip fractures—4.1%; previous hip fractures—1.9%; previous vertebral fractures—2.3%; all fractures—23.3%; smoking—11.9%.

Conclusions

This study is the largest epidemiological osteoporosis trial in Bulgaria to date and allows assumptions about the prevalence of osteoporosis and fractures among women aged 50 and older in our country.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Boyanov M, Popivanov P (2002) Prevalence of low forearm bone density in a Bulgarian female referral population. Osteoporos Int 13:288–295PubMedCrossRef Boyanov M, Popivanov P (2002) Prevalence of low forearm bone density in a Bulgarian female referral population. Osteoporos Int 13:288–295PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Boyanov M (2006) Prevalence of low central bone mineral density in a Bulgarian female referral population: a pilot study. Rheumatol Int 26:523–529PubMedCrossRef Boyanov M (2006) Prevalence of low central bone mineral density in a Bulgarian female referral population: a pilot study. Rheumatol Int 26:523–529PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Borissova A-M, Kovatcheva R, Shinkov A et al (2000) Nutrition, physical activity and harmful habits in middle-aged Bulgarian women. Endokrinologia 5:46–54, article in Bulgarian Borissova A-M, Kovatcheva R, Shinkov A et al (2000) Nutrition, physical activity and harmful habits in middle-aged Bulgarian women. Endokrinologia 5:46–54, article in Bulgarian
5.
go back to reference Slavchev A, Boyanov M (2009) Impact of precision on long-term patient monitoring during osteoporosis treatment. In: O. Dossel and W.C. Schlegel (eds.), WC 2009, IFMBE Proceedings 25, VII, 352–355 Slavchev A, Boyanov M (2009) Impact of precision on long-term patient monitoring during osteoporosis treatment. In: O. Dossel and W.C. Schlegel (eds.), WC 2009, IFMBE Proceedings 25, VII, 352–355
6.
go back to reference The Writing Group for the ISCD Position Development Conference (2004) Technical standardization for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. J Clin Densitom 7:27–36CrossRef The Writing Group for the ISCD Position Development Conference (2004) Technical standardization for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. J Clin Densitom 7:27–36CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Lu Y, Fuerst T, Hui S, Genant HK (2001) Standardization of bone mineral density at femoral neck, trochanter and Ward’s triangle. Osteoporos Int 12:438–444PubMedCrossRef Lu Y, Fuerst T, Hui S, Genant HK (2001) Standardization of bone mineral density at femoral neck, trochanter and Ward’s triangle. Osteoporos Int 12:438–444PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kanis J, Johnell O, Oden A et al (2005) Intervention thresholds for osteoporosis in men and women a study based on data from Sweden. Osteoporos Int 16:6–14PubMedCrossRef Kanis J, Johnell O, Oden A et al (2005) Intervention thresholds for osteoporosis in men and women a study based on data from Sweden. Osteoporos Int 16:6–14PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Häusler B, Gothe H, Göl D et al (2007) Epidemiology, treatment and costs of osteoporosis in Germany—the BoneEVA study. Osteoporos Int 18:77–84CrossRef Häusler B, Gothe H, Göl D et al (2007) Epidemiology, treatment and costs of osteoporosis in Germany—the BoneEVA study. Osteoporos Int 18:77–84CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Looker AC, Melton LJ III, Harris TB, Borrud LG, Shepherd JA (2010) Prevalence and trends in low femur bone density among older US adults: NHANES 2009–2996 compared with NHANES III. J Bone Miner Res 25:64–71PubMedCrossRef Looker AC, Melton LJ III, Harris TB, Borrud LG, Shepherd JA (2010) Prevalence and trends in low femur bone density among older US adults: NHANES 2009–2996 compared with NHANES III. J Bone Miner Res 25:64–71PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Tenenhouse A, Joseph L, Kreiger N et al (2000) Estimation of the prevalence of low bone density in Canadian women and men using a population-specific DXA reference standard: the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos). Osteoporos Int 11:897–904PubMedCrossRef Tenenhouse A, Joseph L, Kreiger N et al (2000) Estimation of the prevalence of low bone density in Canadian women and men using a population-specific DXA reference standard: the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos). Osteoporos Int 11:897–904PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kanterewicz E, Peris P, Puigoriol E (2010) Prevalence of densitometric osteoporosis and osteopenia in Spain. Bone 48:667–669PubMedCrossRef Kanterewicz E, Peris P, Puigoriol E (2010) Prevalence of densitometric osteoporosis and osteopenia in Spain. Bone 48:667–669PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Wendlová J, Pacáková V (2007) Osteoporosis in a female population from Bratislava-age related BMD changes. Wien Med Wochenschr 157:606–610PubMedCrossRef Wendlová J, Pacáková V (2007) Osteoporosis in a female population from Bratislava-age related BMD changes. Wien Med Wochenschr 157:606–610PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Boyanov M, Popivanov P, Genchev G (2001) Risk factors for osteoporosis and forearm bone mineral density. Revmatologia 9:26–32, article in Bulgarian Boyanov M, Popivanov P, Genchev G (2001) Risk factors for osteoporosis and forearm bone mineral density. Revmatologia 9:26–32, article in Bulgarian
16.
go back to reference Todorova S, Diankov L (1996) Risk factors and osteoporosis. Rentgenologia Radiologia 1:14–17, article in Bulgarian Todorova S, Diankov L (1996) Risk factors and osteoporosis. Rentgenologia Radiologia 1:14–17, article in Bulgarian
17.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A et al (2004) The risk and burden of vertebral fractures in Sweden. Osteoporos Int 15:20–26PubMedCrossRef Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A et al (2004) The risk and burden of vertebral fractures in Sweden. Osteoporos Int 15:20–26PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Johnell O, De Laet C et al (2004) A meta-analysis of previous fracture and subsequent fracture risk. Bone 35:375–382PubMedCrossRef Kanis JA, Johnell O, De Laet C et al (2004) A meta-analysis of previous fracture and subsequent fracture risk. Bone 35:375–382PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Johannson H, Oden A et al (2004) A family history of fracture and fracture risk: a meta-analysis. Bone 35:1029–1037PubMedCrossRef Kanis JA, Johannson H, Oden A et al (2004) A family history of fracture and fracture risk: a meta-analysis. Bone 35:1029–1037PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference De Laet C, Kanis J, Oden A et al (2005) Body mass index as a predictor of fracture risk: a meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 16:1330–1338PubMedCrossRef De Laet C, Kanis J, Oden A et al (2005) Body mass index as a predictor of fracture risk: a meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 16:1330–1338PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Johansson H, Oden A et al (2005) A meta-analysis of milk intake and fracture risk: low utility for case finding. Osteoporos Int 16:799–804PubMedCrossRef Kanis JA, Johansson H, Oden A et al (2005) A meta-analysis of milk intake and fracture risk: low utility for case finding. Osteoporos Int 16:799–804PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A et al (2005) Smoking and fracture risk: a meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 16:155–162PubMedCrossRef Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A et al (2005) Smoking and fracture risk: a meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 16:155–162PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Johansson H, Johnell O et al (2005) Alcohol intake as a risk factor for fracture. Osteoporos Int 16:737–742PubMedCrossRef Kanis JA, Johansson H, Johnell O et al (2005) Alcohol intake as a risk factor for fracture. Osteoporos Int 16:737–742PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Grgurevic A, Gledovic C, Vujasinovic-Stupar N (2010) Factors associated with postmenopausal osteoporosis: a case–control study of Belgrade women. Women Health 50:475–490PubMedCrossRef Grgurevic A, Gledovic C, Vujasinovic-Stupar N (2010) Factors associated with postmenopausal osteoporosis: a case–control study of Belgrade women. Women Health 50:475–490PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Hashimoto K, Ishitani K, Ohta M (2009) Usefulness of FRAX and future issues in women’s health. Clin Calcium 19:1742–1748PubMed Hashimoto K, Ishitani K, Ohta M (2009) Usefulness of FRAX and future issues in women’s health. Clin Calcium 19:1742–1748PubMed
27.
go back to reference Fraser LA, Langsetmo L, Berger C et al (2010) Fracture prediction and calibration of a Canadian FRAX® tool: a population-based report from CaMos. Osteoporos Int 22:829–837PubMedCrossRef Fraser LA, Langsetmo L, Berger C et al (2010) Fracture prediction and calibration of a Canadian FRAX® tool: a population-based report from CaMos. Osteoporos Int 22:829–837PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Roig-Vilasecca D, Gomez Vaquero C, Hoces Otero C, Nolla JM (2010) Fracture risk calculated with the FRAX index in patients with osteoporosis treated and untreated. Med Clin Barc 134:189–193CrossRef Roig-Vilasecca D, Gomez Vaquero C, Hoces Otero C, Nolla JM (2010) Fracture risk calculated with the FRAX index in patients with osteoporosis treated and untreated. Med Clin Barc 134:189–193CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Hamdy RC, Kiebzak GM (2009) Variance in 10-year fracture risk calculated with and without T-scores in select subgroups of normal and osteoporotic patients. J Clin Densitom 12:158–161PubMedCrossRef Hamdy RC, Kiebzak GM (2009) Variance in 10-year fracture risk calculated with and without T-scores in select subgroups of normal and osteoporotic patients. J Clin Densitom 12:158–161PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Van den Bergh JPW, van Geel TACM, Lems WF, Geusens PP (2010) Assessment of individual fracture risk: FRAX and beyond. Curr Osteoporos Rep 8:131–137PubMedCrossRef Van den Bergh JPW, van Geel TACM, Lems WF, Geusens PP (2010) Assessment of individual fracture risk: FRAX and beyond. Curr Osteoporos Rep 8:131–137PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Femoral neck bone mineral density and 10-year absolute fracture risk in a national representative sample of Bulgarian women aged 50 years and older
Authors
Anna-Maria Borissova
Rasho Rashkov
Mihail Boyanov
Alexander Shinkov
Plamen Popivanov
Natalya Temelkova
Jordan Vlahov
Masha Gavrailova
Publication date
01-12-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Archives of Osteoporosis / Issue 1-2/2011
Print ISSN: 1862-3522
Electronic ISSN: 1862-3514
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-011-0064-x

Other articles of this Issue 1-2/2011

Archives of Osteoporosis 1-2/2011 Go to the issue