Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 8/2018

01-08-2018 | Original Article

Worldwide Experience with Erosion of the Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation Device

Authors: Evan T. Alicuben, Reginald C. W. Bell, Blair A. Jobe, F. P. Buckley III, C. Daniel Smith, Casey J. Graybeal, John C. Lipham

Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Issue 8/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The magnetic sphincter augmentation device continues to become a more common antireflux surgical option with low complication rates. Erosion into the esophagus is an important complication to recognize and is reported to occur at very low incidences (0.1–0.15%). Characterization of this complication remains limited. We aim to describe the worldwide experience with erosion of the magnetic sphincter augmentation device including presentation, techniques for removal, and possible risk factors.

Materials and Methods

We reviewed data obtained from the device manufacturer Torax Medical, Inc., as well as the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database. The study period was from February 2007 through July 2017 and included all devices placed worldwide.

Results

In total, 9453 devices were placed and there were 29 reported cases of erosions. The median time to presentation of an erosion was 26 months with most occurring between 1 and 4 years after placement. The risk of erosion was 0.3% at 4 years after device implantation. Most patients experienced new-onset dysphagia prompting evaluation. Devices were successfully removed in all patients most commonly via an endoscopic removal of the eroded portion followed by a delayed laparoscopic removal of the remaining beads. At a median follow-up of 58 days post-removal, there were no complications and 24 patients have returned to baseline. Four patients reported ongoing mild dysphagia.

Conclusions

Erosion of the LINX device is an important but rare complication to recognize that has been safely managed via minimally invasive approaches without long-term consequences.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Reynolds JL, Zehetner J, Bildzukewicz N, Katkhouda N, Dandekar G, Lipham JC. Magnetic sphincter augmentation with the LINX device for gastroesophageal reflux disease after U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval. Am Surg. 2014;80(10):1034–8.PubMed Reynolds JL, Zehetner J, Bildzukewicz N, Katkhouda N, Dandekar G, Lipham JC. Magnetic sphincter augmentation with the LINX device for gastroesophageal reflux disease after U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval. Am Surg. 2014;80(10):1034–8.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Maxwell-Armstrong CA, Steele RJ, Amar SS, Evans D, Morris DL, Foster GE et al. Long-term results of the Angelchik prosthesis for gastro-oesophageal reflux. Br J Surg. 1997; 84(6):862–4.CrossRefPubMed Maxwell-Armstrong CA, Steele RJ, Amar SS, Evans D, Morris DL, Foster GE et al. Long-term results of the Angelchik prosthesis for gastro-oesophageal reflux. Br J Surg. 1997; 84(6):862–4.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Worldwide Experience with Erosion of the Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation Device
Authors
Evan T. Alicuben
Reginald C. W. Bell
Blair A. Jobe
F. P. Buckley III
C. Daniel Smith
Casey J. Graybeal
John C. Lipham
Publication date
01-08-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Issue 8/2018
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Electronic ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-018-3775-0

Other articles of this Issue 8/2018

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 8/2018 Go to the issue