Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 6/2018

01-06-2018 | Original Article

Predictors of Short-Term Readmission After Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Authors: Rajesh Ramanathan, Travis Mason, Luke G. Wolfe, Brian J. Kaplan

Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Issue 6/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Readmissions are a common complication after pancreaticoduodenectomy and are increasingly being used as a performance metric affecting quality assessment, public reporting, and reimbursement. This study aims to identify general and pancreatectomy-specific factors contributing to 30-day readmission after pancreaticoduodenectomy, and determine the additive value of incorporating pancreatectomy-specific factors into a large national dataset.

Methods

Prospective American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (ACS-NSQIP) data were retrospectively analyzed for patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) between 2011 and 2015. Additionally, a subset of patients with pancreatectomy-targeted data between 2014 and 2015 were analyzed.

Results

Outcomes of 18,440 pancreaticoduodenectomies were analyzed, and found to have an 18.7% overall readmission rate. Multivariable modeling with pancreatectomy-specific variables increased the predictive value of the model (area under receiver operator characteristic 0.66 to 0.73). Statistically significant independent contributors to readmission included renal insufficiency, sepsis, septic shock, organ space infection, dehiscence, venous thromboembolism, pancreatic fistula, delayed gastric emptying, need for percutaneous drainage, and reoperation.

Conclusions

Large registry analyses of pancreatectomy outcomes are markedly improved by the incorporation of granular procedure-specific data. These data emphasize the need for prevention and careful management of perioperative infectious complications, fluid management, thromboprophylaxis, and pancreatic fistulae.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Sohn TA, et al. Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: pathology, complications, and outcomes. Ann Surg. 1997;226(3):248–57; discussion 257-60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Sohn TA, et al. Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: pathology, complications, and outcomes. Ann Surg. 1997;226(3):248–57; discussion 257-60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Newhook TE, LaPar DJ, Lindberg JM, Bauer TW, Adams RB, Zaydfudim VM. Morbidity and mortality of pancreaticoduodenectomy for benign and premalignant pancreatic neoplasms. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015;19(6):1072–1077.CrossRefPubMed Newhook TE, LaPar DJ, Lindberg JM, Bauer TW, Adams RB, Zaydfudim VM. Morbidity and mortality of pancreaticoduodenectomy for benign and premalignant pancreatic neoplasms. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015;19(6):1072–1077.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Fong Y, Sun RL, Jarnagin W, Blumgart LH. An analysis of 412 cases of hepatocellular carcinoma at a western center. Ann Surg. 1999;229(6):790–9; discussion 799-800.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fong Y, Sun RL, Jarnagin W, Blumgart LH. An analysis of 412 cases of hepatocellular carcinoma at a western center. Ann Surg. 1999;229(6):790–9; discussion 799-800.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Ahmad SA, Edwards MJ, Sutton JM, et al. Factors influencing readmission after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a multi-institutional study of 1302 patients. Ann Surg. 2012;256(3):529–537.CrossRefPubMed Ahmad SA, Edwards MJ, Sutton JM, et al. Factors influencing readmission after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a multi-institutional study of 1302 patients. Ann Surg. 2012;256(3):529–537.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Gawlas I, Sethi M, Winner M, et al. Readmission after pancreatic resection is not an appropriate measure of quality. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(6):1781–1787.CrossRefPubMed Gawlas I, Sethi M, Winner M, et al. Readmission after pancreatic resection is not an appropriate measure of quality. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(6):1781–1787.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Medicaid Program. Payment adjustment for provider-preventable conditions including health care-acquired conditions.. 2011;Vol. 76, No. 108. Medicaid Program. Payment adjustment for provider-preventable conditions including health care-acquired conditions.. 2011;Vol. 76, No. 108.
11.
go back to reference Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. AHRQ quality indicators: Guide to patient safety indicators. 2003(March). Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. AHRQ quality indicators: Guide to patient safety indicators. 2003(March).
12.
go back to reference Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS. Medicare program; changes to the hospital inpatient prospective payment systems and fiscal year 2008 rates. Fed Regist. 2007;72(162):47129–48175. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS. Medicare program; changes to the hospital inpatient prospective payment systems and fiscal year 2008 rates. Fed Regist. 2007;72(162):47129–48175.
13.
go back to reference Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS. Hospital-acquired condition reduction program fiscal year 2017 fact sheet. 2017. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS. Hospital-acquired condition reduction program fiscal year 2017 fact sheet. 2017.
14.
go back to reference Ramanathan R, Leavell P, Stockslager G, Mays C, Harvey D, Duane TM. Validity of agency for healthcare research and quality patient safety indicators at an academic medical center. Am Surg. 2013;79(6):578–582.PubMed Ramanathan R, Leavell P, Stockslager G, Mays C, Harvey D, Duane TM. Validity of agency for healthcare research and quality patient safety indicators at an academic medical center. Am Surg. 2013;79(6):578–582.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Duane TM, Ramanathan R, Leavell P, Mays C, Ober J. CAUTIs and CLABSIs: do physicians REALLY know what they are? Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2016;17(1):13–16.CrossRefPubMed Duane TM, Ramanathan R, Leavell P, Mays C, Ober J. CAUTIs and CLABSIs: do physicians REALLY know what they are? Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2016;17(1):13–16.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Duane TM, Ramanathan R, Leavell P, Mays C, Harvey D. Concurrent surgical patient safety indicator evaluation results in more accurate reporting and reimbursement. Am Surg. 2014;80(8):776–777.PubMed Duane TM, Ramanathan R, Leavell P, Mays C, Harvey D. Concurrent surgical patient safety indicator evaluation results in more accurate reporting and reimbursement. Am Surg. 2014;80(8):776–777.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Ramanathan R, Leavell P, Stockslager G, Mays C, Harvey D, Duane TM. Validity of ICD-9-CM screening for sepsis in surgical mortalities. Surgical infections. 2014(in press). Ramanathan R, Leavell P, Stockslager G, Mays C, Harvey D, Duane TM. Validity of ICD-9-CM screening for sepsis in surgical mortalities. Surgical infections. 2014(in press).
18.
go back to reference Rosen AK, Itani KM, Cevasco M, et al. Validating the patient safety indicators in the veterans health administration: do they accurately identify true safety events? Med Care. 2012;50(1):74–85.CrossRefPubMed Rosen AK, Itani KM, Cevasco M, et al. Validating the patient safety indicators in the veterans health administration: do they accurately identify true safety events? Med Care. 2012;50(1):74–85.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Kaafarani HM, Borzecki AM, Itani KM, et al. Validity of selected patient safety indicators: opportunities and concerns. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;212(6):924–934.CrossRefPubMed Kaafarani HM, Borzecki AM, Itani KM, et al. Validity of selected patient safety indicators: opportunities and concerns. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;212(6):924–934.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Ramanathan R, Leavell P, Wolfe LG, Duane TM. Agency for healthcare research and quality patient safety indicators and mortality in surgical patients. Am Surg. 2014;80(8):801–804.PubMed Ramanathan R, Leavell P, Wolfe LG, Duane TM. Agency for healthcare research and quality patient safety indicators and mortality in surgical patients. Am Surg. 2014;80(8):801–804.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Ramanathan R, Leavell P, Mays C, Duane TM. Impact of sepsis on surgical outcomes. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2015;16(4):405–409.CrossRefPubMed Ramanathan R, Leavell P, Mays C, Duane TM. Impact of sepsis on surgical outcomes. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2015;16(4):405–409.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Sellers MM, Merkow RP, Halverson A, et al. Validation of new readmission data in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;216(3):420–427.CrossRefPubMed Sellers MM, Merkow RP, Halverson A, et al. Validation of new readmission data in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;216(3):420–427.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Fong ZV, Ferrone CR, Thayer SP, et al. Understanding hospital readmissions after pancreaticoduodenectomy: can we prevent them?: a 10-year contemporary experience with 1,173 patients at the massachusetts general hospital. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18(1):137–44; discussion 144-5.CrossRefPubMed Fong ZV, Ferrone CR, Thayer SP, et al. Understanding hospital readmissions after pancreaticoduodenectomy: can we prevent them?: a 10-year contemporary experience with 1,173 patients at the massachusetts general hospital. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18(1):137–44; discussion 144-5.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Kastenberg ZJ, Morton JM, Visser BC, Norton JA, Poultsides GA. Hospital readmission after a pancreaticoduodenectomy: an emerging quality metric? HPB (Oxford). 2013;15(2):142–148.CrossRef Kastenberg ZJ, Morton JM, Visser BC, Norton JA, Poultsides GA. Hospital readmission after a pancreaticoduodenectomy: an emerging quality metric? HPB (Oxford). 2013;15(2):142–148.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Kent TS, Sachs TE, Callery MP, Vollmer CM,Jr. Readmission after major pancreatic resection: a necessary evil? J Am Coll Surg. 2011;213(4):515–523.CrossRefPubMed Kent TS, Sachs TE, Callery MP, Vollmer CM,Jr. Readmission after major pancreatic resection: a necessary evil? J Am Coll Surg. 2011;213(4):515–523.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Yermilov I, Bentrem D, Sekeris E, et al. Readmissions following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreas cancer: a population-based appraisal. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(3):554–561.CrossRefPubMed Yermilov I, Bentrem D, Sekeris E, et al. Readmissions following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreas cancer: a population-based appraisal. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(3):554–561.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Reddy DM, Townsend CM,Jr, Kuo YF, Freeman JL, Goodwin JS, Riall TS. Readmission after pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer in Medicare patients. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13(11):1963–74; discussion 1974-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Reddy DM, Townsend CM,Jr, Kuo YF, Freeman JL, Goodwin JS, Riall TS. Readmission after pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer in Medicare patients. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13(11):1963–74; discussion 1974-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Emick DM, Riall TS, Cameron JL, et al. Hospital readmission after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006;10(9):1243–52; discussion 1252-3.CrossRefPubMed Emick DM, Riall TS, Cameron JL, et al. Hospital readmission after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006;10(9):1243–52; discussion 1252-3.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Epelboym I, Gawlas I, Lee JA, Schrope B, Chabot JA, Allendorf JD. Limitations of ACS-NSQIP in reporting complications for patients undergoing pancreatectomy: underscoring the need for a pancreatectomy-specific module. World J Surg. 2014;38(6):1461–1467.CrossRefPubMed Epelboym I, Gawlas I, Lee JA, Schrope B, Chabot JA, Allendorf JD. Limitations of ACS-NSQIP in reporting complications for patients undergoing pancreatectomy: underscoring the need for a pancreatectomy-specific module. World J Surg. 2014;38(6):1461–1467.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Grewal SS, McClaine RJ, Schmulewitz N, et al. Factors associated with recidivism following pancreaticoduodenectomy. HPB (Oxford). 2011;13(12):869–875.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Grewal SS, McClaine RJ, Schmulewitz N, et al. Factors associated with recidivism following pancreaticoduodenectomy. HPB (Oxford). 2011;13(12):869–875.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
go back to reference Cocoros NM, Klompas M. Ventilator-associated events and their prevention. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2016;14(5):43. Cocoros NM, Klompas M. Ventilator-associated events and their prevention. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2016;14(5):43.
32.
go back to reference Passaro L, Harbarth S, Landelle C. Prevention of hospital-acquired pneumonia in non-ventilated adult patients: a narrative review. BMJ Open. 2014;25(4):e006065. Passaro L, Harbarth S, Landelle C. Prevention of hospital-acquired pneumonia in non-ventilated adult patients: a narrative review. BMJ Open. 2014;25(4):e006065.
33.
go back to reference Herzer KR, Niessen L, Constenla DO, Ward WJ Jr, Pronovost PJ. Cost-effectiveness of a quality improvement programme to reduce central line-associated bloodstream infections in intensive care units in the USA. Pancreatology. 2017;17(5):805–813.CrossRef Herzer KR, Niessen L, Constenla DO, Ward WJ Jr, Pronovost PJ. Cost-effectiveness of a quality improvement programme to reduce central line-associated bloodstream infections in intensive care units in the USA. Pancreatology. 2017;17(5):805–813.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Alexander JW, Solomkin JS, Edwards MJ. Updated recommendations for control of surgical site infections. Ann Surg. 2011;253(6):1082–1093.CrossRefPubMed Alexander JW, Solomkin JS, Edwards MJ. Updated recommendations for control of surgical site infections. Ann Surg. 2011;253(6):1082–1093.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Holubar SD, Hedrick T, Gupta R, et al. American society for enhanced recovery (ASER) and perioperative quality initiative (POQI) joint consensus statement on prevention of postoperative infection within an enhanced recovery pathway for elective colorectal surgery. Perioper Med (Lond). 2017;6:4-017-0059-2. eCollection 2017. Holubar SD, Hedrick T, Gupta R, et al. American society for enhanced recovery (ASER) and perioperative quality initiative (POQI) joint consensus statement on prevention of postoperative infection within an enhanced recovery pathway for elective colorectal surgery. Perioper Med (Lond). 2017;6:4-017-0059-2. eCollection 2017.
36.
go back to reference Causey MW, Maykel JA, Hatch Q, Miller S, Steele SR. Identifying risk factors for renal failure and myocardial infarction following colorectal surgery. J Surg Res. 2011;170(1):32–37.CrossRefPubMed Causey MW, Maykel JA, Hatch Q, Miller S, Steele SR. Identifying risk factors for renal failure and myocardial infarction following colorectal surgery. J Surg Res. 2011;170(1):32–37.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Ramanathan R, Gu Z, Limkemann AJ, et al. Association between interruptions in chemical prophylaxis and VTE formation. Am Surg. 2015;81(7):732–737.PubMed Ramanathan R, Gu Z, Limkemann AJ, et al. Association between interruptions in chemical prophylaxis and VTE formation. Am Surg. 2015;81(7):732–737.PubMed
38.
go back to reference Ramanathan R, Lee N, Duane TM, et al. Correlation of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and electronic medical record alerts with incidence among surgical patients. Surgery. 2016;160(5):1202–1210.CrossRefPubMed Ramanathan R, Lee N, Duane TM, et al. Correlation of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and electronic medical record alerts with incidence among surgical patients. Surgery. 2016;160(5):1202–1210.CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Callery MP, Pratt WB, Kent TS, Chaikof EL, Vollmer CM,Jr. A prospectively validated clinical risk score accurately predicts pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;216(1):1–14.CrossRefPubMed Callery MP, Pratt WB, Kent TS, Chaikof EL, Vollmer CM,Jr. A prospectively validated clinical risk score accurately predicts pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;216(1):1–14.CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Pratt WB, Callery MP, Vollmer CM, Jr. Risk prediction for development of pancreatic fistula using the ISGPF classification scheme. World J Surg. 2008;32(3):419–428.CrossRefPubMed Pratt WB, Callery MP, Vollmer CM, Jr. Risk prediction for development of pancreatic fistula using the ISGPF classification scheme. World J Surg. 2008;32(3):419–428.CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Ricci C, Casadei R, Taffurelli G, et al. Is pancreaticogastrostomy safer than pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy? A meta-regression analysis of randomized clinical trials. Biomed Res Int. 2017;(2017):1367238. Ricci C, Casadei R, Taffurelli G, et al. Is pancreaticogastrostomy safer than pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy? A meta-regression analysis of randomized clinical trials. Biomed Res Int. 2017;(2017):1367238.
42.
go back to reference Hong S, Wang H, Yang S, Yang K. External stent versus no stent for pancreaticojejunostomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13(7):1184–6.CrossRef Hong S, Wang H, Yang S, Yang K. External stent versus no stent for pancreaticojejunostomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13(7):1184–6.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Zhao Y, Zhang J, Lan Z, et al. Are internal or external pancreatic duct stents the preferred choice for patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy? a meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;17(8):1516–25.CrossRef Zhao Y, Zhang J, Lan Z, et al. Are internal or external pancreatic duct stents the preferred choice for patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy? a meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;17(8):1516–25.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Schulick RD, Yoshimura K. Stents, glue, etc.: is anything proven to help prevent pancreatic leaks/fistulae? Ann Surg. 2016;264(3):528–37.CrossRef Schulick RD, Yoshimura K. Stents, glue, etc.: is anything proven to help prevent pancreatic leaks/fistulae? Ann Surg. 2016;264(3):528–37.CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Witzigmann H, Diener MK, Kienkötter S, et al. No need for routine drainage after pancreatic head resection: the dual-center, randomized, controlled PANDRA trial (ISRCTN04937707). J Surg Res. 2016;202(2):380–8.CrossRef Witzigmann H, Diener MK, Kienkötter S, et al. No need for routine drainage after pancreatic head resection: the dual-center, randomized, controlled PANDRA trial (ISRCTN04937707). J Surg Res. 2016;202(2):380–8.CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Hanna MM, Gadde R, Allen CJ, et al. Delayed gastric emptying after pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Surg. 2014;38(11):2960–6.CrossRef Hanna MM, Gadde R, Allen CJ, et al. Delayed gastric emptying after pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Surg. 2014;38(11):2960–6.CrossRef
47.
go back to reference Braga M, Pecorelli N, Ariotti R, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery pathway in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg. 2015;102(13):1676–83.CrossRef Braga M, Pecorelli N, Ariotti R, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery pathway in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg. 2015;102(13):1676–83.CrossRef
48.
go back to reference Joliat GR, Labgaa I, Petermann D, et al. Cost-benefit analysis of an enhanced recovery protocol for pancreaticoduodenectomy. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2016;30(4):887–908.CrossRef Joliat GR, Labgaa I, Petermann D, et al. Cost-benefit analysis of an enhanced recovery protocol for pancreaticoduodenectomy. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2016;30(4):887–908.CrossRef
49.
go back to reference McMillan RR, Berger A, Sima CS, et al. Thirty-day mortality underestimates the risk of early death after major resections for thoracic malignancies. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;98(5):1769–74; discussion 1774-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral McMillan RR, Berger A, Sima CS, et al. Thirty-day mortality underestimates the risk of early death after major resections for thoracic malignancies. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;98(5):1769–74; discussion 1774-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Predictors of Short-Term Readmission After Pancreaticoduodenectomy
Authors
Rajesh Ramanathan
Travis Mason
Luke G. Wolfe
Brian J. Kaplan
Publication date
01-06-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Issue 6/2018
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Electronic ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-018-3700-6

Other articles of this Issue 6/2018

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 6/2018 Go to the issue