Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 3/2018

01-03-2018 | Editorial

Benign Tumors of the Pancreas—Radical Surgery Versus Parenchyma-Sparing Local Resection—the Challenge Facing Surgeons

Author: Hans G. Beger

Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Issue 3/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Pancreaticoduodenectomy and left-sided pancreatectomy are the surgical treatment standards for tumors of the pancreas. Surgeons, who are requested to treat patients with benign tumors, using standard oncological resections, face the challenge of sacrificing pancreatic and extra-pancreatic tissue. Tumor enucleation, pancreatic middle segment resection and local, duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resections are surgical procedures increasingly used as alternative treatment modalities compared to classical pancreatic resections. Use of local resection procedures for cystic neoplasms and neuro-endocrine tumors of the pancreas (panNETs) is associated with an improvement of procedure-related morbidity, when compared to classical Whipple OP (PD) and left-sided pancreatectomy (LP). The procedure-related advantages are a 90-day mortality below 1% and a low level of POPF B+C rates. Most importantly, the long-term benefits of the use of local surgical procedures are the preservation of the endocrine and exocrine pancreatic functions. PD performed for benign tumors on preoperative normo-glycemic patients is followed by the postoperative development of new onset of diabetes mellitus (NODM) in 4 to 24% of patients, measured by fasting blood glucose and/or oral/intravenous glucose tolerance test, according to the criteria of the international consensus guidelines. Persistence of new diabetes mellitus during the long-term follow-up after PD for benign tumors is observed in 14.5% of cases and after surgery for malignant tumors in 15.5%. Pancreatic exocrine insufficiency after PD is found in the long-term follow-up for benign tumors in 25% and for malignant tumors in 49%. Following LP, 14–31% of patients experience postoperatively NODM; many of the patients subsequently change to insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). The decision-making for cystic neoplasms and panNETs of the pancreas should be guided by the low surgical risk and the preservation of pancreatic metabolic functions when undergoing a limited, local, tissue-sparing procedure.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Birkmeyer JD, Finlayson SR, Tosteson AN, Sharp SM, Warshaw AL, Fisher ES. Effect of hospital volume on in-hospital mortality with pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surgery 1999;125:250–256CrossRefPubMed Birkmeyer JD, Finlayson SR, Tosteson AN, Sharp SM, Warshaw AL, Fisher ES. Effect of hospital volume on in-hospital mortality with pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surgery 1999;125:250–256CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Dudekula A, Munigala S, Zureikat AH, Yadav D. Operative Trends for Pancreatic Diseases in the USA: Analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 1998-2011.J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;20:803–811CrossRefPubMed Dudekula A, Munigala S, Zureikat AH, Yadav D. Operative Trends for Pancreatic Diseases in the USA: Analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 1998-2011.J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;20:803–811CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Trede M, Schwall G, Saeger HD. Survival after pancreatoduodenectomy. 118 consecutive resections without an operative mortality. Ann Surg 1990;211:447–458.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Trede M, Schwall G, Saeger HD. Survival after pancreatoduodenectomy. 118 consecutive resections without an operative mortality. Ann Surg 1990;211:447–458.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Beger HG, Gansauge F, Schwarz M, Poch B. Pancreatic head resection: the risk for local and systemic complications in 1315 patients—a monoinstitutional experience. Am J Surg 2007;194:S16-S19.CrossRef Beger HG, Gansauge F, Schwarz M, Poch B. Pancreatic head resection: the risk for local and systemic complications in 1315 patients—a monoinstitutional experience. Am J Surg 2007;194:S16-S19.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Cameron JL, He J. Two thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. Journal of the Am Coll Surg. 2015; 220:530–536.CrossRef Cameron JL, He J. Two thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. Journal of the Am Coll Surg. 2015; 220:530–536.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Are C, Afuh C, Ravipati L, et al. Preoperative nomogram to predict risk of perioperative mortality following pancreatic resections for malignancy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13:2152–2162.CrossRefPubMed Are C, Afuh C, Ravipati L, et al. Preoperative nomogram to predict risk of perioperative mortality following pancreatic resections for malignancy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13:2152–2162.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Schneider EB, Ejaz A, Spolverato G. et al. Hospital volume and patient outcomes in hepato-pancreatico-biliary surgery: is assessing differences in mortality enough?. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18:2105–2115.CrossRefPubMed Schneider EB, Ejaz A, Spolverato G. et al. Hospital volume and patient outcomes in hepato-pancreatico-biliary surgery: is assessing differences in mortality enough?. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18:2105–2115.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Keck T, Wellner UF, Bahra M, et al. Pancreatogastrostomy versus pancreatojejunostomy for RECOnstruction after PANCreatoduodenectomy (RECOPANC, DRKS 00000767): perioperative and long-term results of a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2016;263: 440–449CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Keck T, Wellner UF, Bahra M, et al. Pancreatogastrostomy versus pancreatojejunostomy for RECOnstruction after PANCreatoduodenectomy (RECOPANC, DRKS 00000767): perioperative and long-term results of a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2016;263: 440–449CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Venkat R, Edil BH, Schulick RD, Lidor AO, Makary MA, Wolfgang CL. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is associated with significantly less overall morbidity compared to the open technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2012;255:1048–59CrossRefPubMed Venkat R, Edil BH, Schulick RD, Lidor AO, Makary MA, Wolfgang CL. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is associated with significantly less overall morbidity compared to the open technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2012;255:1048–59CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Vijan SS, Ahmed KA, Harmsen WS, Que FG, Reid-Lombardo KM, Nagorney DM, Donohue JH, Farnell MB, Kendrick ML.Laparoscopic vs open distal pancreatectomy: a single-institution comparative study. Arch Surg 2010;145:616–621CrossRefPubMed Vijan SS, Ahmed KA, Harmsen WS, Que FG, Reid-Lombardo KM, Nagorney DM, Donohue JH, Farnell MB, Kendrick ML.Laparoscopic vs open distal pancreatectomy: a single-institution comparative study. Arch Surg 2010;145:616–621CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Jilesen AP, van Eijck CH, In't Hof KH, van Dieren S, Gouma DJ, van Dijkum EJ. Postoperative Complications, In-Hospital Mortality and 5-Year Survival After Surgical Resection for Patients with a Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor: A Systematic Review. World J Surg. 2016;40:729–48. .CrossRefPubMed Jilesen AP, van Eijck CH, In't Hof KH, van Dieren S, Gouma DJ, van Dijkum EJ. Postoperative Complications, In-Hospital Mortality and 5-Year Survival After Surgical Resection for Patients with a Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor: A Systematic Review. World J Surg. 2016;40:729–48. .CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Nakamura M, Nakashima H. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and pancreatoduodenectomy: is it worthwhile? A meta-analysis of laparoscopic pancreatectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2013;20:421–428.CrossRefPubMed Nakamura M, Nakashima H. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and pancreatoduodenectomy: is it worthwhile? A meta-analysis of laparoscopic pancreatectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2013;20:421–428.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Jin T, Altaf K, Xiong JJ, −Huang W, Javed MA, Mai G. et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy. HPB 2012;14(11):711–724CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jin T, Altaf K, Xiong JJ, −Huang W, Javed MA, Mai G. et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy. HPB 2012;14(11):711–724CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Daouadi M, Zureikat AH, Zenati MS, Choudry H, Tsung A, et al. Robot-assisted minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy is superior to the laparoscopic technique. Ann Surg. 2013;257:128–132CrossRefPubMed Daouadi M, Zureikat AH, Zenati MS, Choudry H, Tsung A, et al. Robot-assisted minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy is superior to the laparoscopic technique. Ann Surg. 2013;257:128–132CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Schmidt CM. Is surgical intervention for cystic neoplasms of the pancreas being underutilized? J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18:184–6.CrossRefPubMed Schmidt CM. Is surgical intervention for cystic neoplasms of the pancreas being underutilized? J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18:184–6.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Finkelstein P, Sharma R, Picado O, Gadde R, Stuart H et al. Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (panNETs): Analysis of Overall Survival of Nonsurgical Management Versus Surgical Resection. J Gastrointest Surg 2017;21:855-866 Aug 23 online Finkelstein P, Sharma R, Picado O, Gadde R, Stuart H et al. Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (panNETs): Analysis of Overall Survival of Nonsurgical Management Versus Surgical Resection. J Gastrointest Surg 2017;21:855-866 Aug 23 online
19.
go back to reference Ferrara MJ, Lohse C, Kudva YC, Farnell MB, Que FG, Reid-Lombardo KM, Donohue JH, Nagorney DM, Chari ST, Vege SS, Kendrick ML. Immediate post-resection diabetes mellitus after pancreaticoduodenectomy: incidence and risk factors. HPB 2013;15:170–174CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ferrara MJ, Lohse C, Kudva YC, Farnell MB, Que FG, Reid-Lombardo KM, Donohue JH, Nagorney DM, Chari ST, Vege SS, Kendrick ML. Immediate post-resection diabetes mellitus after pancreaticoduodenectomy: incidence and risk factors. HPB 2013;15:170–174CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Seiler CA, Wagner M, Bachmann T, Redaelli CA, Schmied B, Uhl W, Friess H, Büchler MW. Randomized clinical trial of pylorus-preserving duodenopancreatectomy versus classical Whipple resection-long term results. Br J Surg 2005;92:547–56CrossRefPubMed Seiler CA, Wagner M, Bachmann T, Redaelli CA, Schmied B, Uhl W, Friess H, Büchler MW. Randomized clinical trial of pylorus-preserving duodenopancreatectomy versus classical Whipple resection-long term results. Br J Surg 2005;92:547–56CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Leal JN, Kingham TP, D'Angelica MI, DeMatteo RP, Jarnagin WR, Kalin MF, Allen PJ. Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms and the Risk of Diabetes Mellitus in Patients Undergoing Resection Versus Observation. J Gastrointest Surg 2015;19:1974–1981.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Leal JN, Kingham TP, D'Angelica MI, DeMatteo RP, Jarnagin WR, Kalin MF, Allen PJ. Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms and the Risk of Diabetes Mellitus in Patients Undergoing Resection Versus Observation. J Gastrointest Surg 2015;19:1974–1981.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference De Bruijn KM, van Eijck CH. New-onset diabetes after distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review. Ann Surg 2015;261:854–61.CrossRefPubMed De Bruijn KM, van Eijck CH. New-onset diabetes after distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review. Ann Surg 2015;261:854–61.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Kang, J. S., Jang, J. Y., Kang, M. J., Kim, E., Jung, W., Chang, J.et al. Endocrine Function Impairment After Distal Pancreatectomy: Incidence and Related Factors. World J Surg 2016; 40:440–446.CrossRefPubMed Kang, J. S., Jang, J. Y., Kang, M. J., Kim, E., Jung, W., Chang, J.et al. Endocrine Function Impairment After Distal Pancreatectomy: Incidence and Related Factors. World J Surg 2016; 40:440–446.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Kumar AF, Gruessner RW, Seaquist ER. Risk of glucose intolerance and diabetes in hemipancreatectomized donors selected for normal preoperative glucose metabolism. Diabetes Care 2008;31:1639–1643.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kumar AF, Gruessner RW, Seaquist ER. Risk of glucose intolerance and diabetes in hemipancreatectomized donors selected for normal preoperative glucose metabolism. Diabetes Care 2008;31:1639–1643.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Kendall DM, Sutherland DE, Najarian JS, Goetz FC, Robertson RP. Effects of hemipancreatectomy on insulin secretion and glucose tolerance in healthy humans. N Engl J Med. 1990;322:898–903CrossRefPubMed Kendall DM, Sutherland DE, Najarian JS, Goetz FC, Robertson RP. Effects of hemipancreatectomy on insulin secretion and glucose tolerance in healthy humans. N Engl J Med. 1990;322:898–903CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Ohtsuka T, Kono H, Tanabe R, Nagayoshi Y, Mori Y, et. al. Follow-up study after resection of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas; special references to the multifocal lesions and development of ductal carcinoma in the remnant pancreas. Am J Surg. 2012;204:44–8. Ohtsuka T, Kono H, Tanabe R, Nagayoshi Y, Mori Y, et. al. Follow-up study after resection of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas; special references to the multifocal lesions and development of ductal carcinoma in the remnant pancreas. Am J Surg. 2012;204:44–8.
27.
go back to reference Postlewait LM, Ethun CG, McInnis MR, Merchant N, Parikh A, et al. Association of Preoperative Risk Factors With Malignancy in Pancreatic Mucinous Cystic Neoplasms: A Multicenter Study. JAMA Surg. 2017;152:19–25CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Postlewait LM, Ethun CG, McInnis MR, Merchant N, Parikh A, et al. Association of Preoperative Risk Factors With Malignancy in Pancreatic Mucinous Cystic Neoplasms: A Multicenter Study. JAMA Surg. 2017;152:19–25CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Tanaka M, Fernández-del Castillo C, Adsay V, et al. International consensus guidelines 2012 for the management of IPMN and MCN of the pancreas. Pancreatology, 2012;12:183–197CrossRefPubMed Tanaka M, Fernández-del Castillo C, Adsay V, et al. International consensus guidelines 2012 for the management of IPMN and MCN of the pancreas. Pancreatology, 2012;12:183–197CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Salvia R, Malleo G, Marchegiani G, et al. Pancreatic resections for cystic neoplasms: From the surgeon’s presumption to the pathologist’s reality. Surgery 2012;152:S135–142CrossRefPubMed Salvia R, Malleo G, Marchegiani G, et al. Pancreatic resections for cystic neoplasms: From the surgeon’s presumption to the pathologist’s reality. Surgery 2012;152:S135–142CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Zaruba P, Dvořáková T, Zavada F, et al. [Is accurate preoperative assessment of pancreatic cystic lesions possible?]. Rozhledy v chirurgii: mesicnik Ceskoslovenske chirurgicke spolecnosti, 2013;92:708–714 Zaruba P, Dvořáková T, Zavada F, et al. [Is accurate preoperative assessment of pancreatic cystic lesions possible?]. Rozhledy v chirurgii: mesicnik Ceskoslovenske chirurgicke spolecnosti, 2013;92:708–714
31.
go back to reference Donahue TR, Hines OJ, Farrell JJ, et al. Cystic neoplasms of the pancreas: results of 114 cases. Pancreas 2010;39:1271–1276CrossRefPubMed Donahue TR, Hines OJ, Farrell JJ, et al. Cystic neoplasms of the pancreas: results of 114 cases. Pancreas 2010;39:1271–1276CrossRefPubMed
32.
33.
go back to reference Tanaka M, Current best practice and controversies in the follow up of patients with asymptomatic branch duct IPMN of the pancreas. HPB. 2016;18:709–11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tanaka M, Current best practice and controversies in the follow up of patients with asymptomatic branch duct IPMN of the pancreas. HPB. 2016;18:709–11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
go back to reference Sahani DV, Kadavigere R, Saokar A, et al. Cystic Pancreatic Lesions: A Simple Imaging-based Classification System for Guiding Management 1. Radiographics Rev Publ Radiol Soc 2005;25:1471–1484 Sahani DV, Kadavigere R, Saokar A, et al. Cystic Pancreatic Lesions: A Simple Imaging-based Classification System for Guiding Management 1. Radiographics Rev Publ Radiol Soc 2005;25:1471–1484
35.
go back to reference Farrell JJ, Fernández-del Castillo C. Pancreatic cystic neoplasms: management and unanswered questions. Gastroenterology. 2013;144:1303–1315CrossRefPubMed Farrell JJ, Fernández-del Castillo C. Pancreatic cystic neoplasms: management and unanswered questions. Gastroenterology. 2013;144:1303–1315CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Lennon AM, Wolfgang C. Cystic neoplasms of the pancreas. J Gastroentest Surg 2013;17:645–653CrossRef Lennon AM, Wolfgang C. Cystic neoplasms of the pancreas. J Gastroentest Surg 2013;17:645–653CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Kunz PL, Reidy-Lagunes D, Anthony LB, et al. Consensus guidelines for the management and treatment of neuroendocrine tumors. Pancreas 2013; 42:557–577.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kunz PL, Reidy-Lagunes D, Anthony LB, et al. Consensus guidelines for the management and treatment of neuroendocrine tumors. Pancreas 2013; 42:557–577.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
go back to reference Ramage JK, Davies AH, Ardill J, et al. Guidelines for the management of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine (including carcinoid) tumours. Gut. 2005;54 Suppl 4:iv1–16PubMedPubMedCentral Ramage JK, Davies AH, Ardill J, et al. Guidelines for the management of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine (including carcinoid) tumours. Gut. 2005;54 Suppl 4:iv1–16PubMedPubMedCentral
39.
go back to reference Gratian L, Pura J, Dinan M, Roman S, Reed S, Sosa JA. Impact of extent of surgery on survival in patients with small nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in the United States. Ann Surg Oncol 2014;21:3515–21CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gratian L, Pura J, Dinan M, Roman S, Reed S, Sosa JA. Impact of extent of surgery on survival in patients with small nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in the United States. Ann Surg Oncol 2014;21:3515–21CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
40.
go back to reference Halsted WS. Contributions to the surgery of the bile passages, especially of the common bile-duct. The Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, 1899:141; 645–654. Halsted WS. Contributions to the surgery of the bile passages, especially of the common bile-duct. The Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, 1899:141; 645–654.
41.
go back to reference Hüttner FJ, Koessler-Ebs J, Hackert T, et al. Meta-analysis of surgical outcome after enucleation versus standard resection for pancreatic neoplasms. Br J Surg 2015;102(9):1026–1036CrossRefPubMed Hüttner FJ, Koessler-Ebs J, Hackert T, et al. Meta-analysis of surgical outcome after enucleation versus standard resection for pancreatic neoplasms. Br J Surg 2015;102(9):1026–1036CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Beger HG, Siech M, Poch B, et al. Limited surgery for benign tumours of the pancreas: a systematic review. World J Surg 2015;39:1557–1566.CrossRefPubMed Beger HG, Siech M, Poch B, et al. Limited surgery for benign tumours of the pancreas: a systematic review. World J Surg 2015;39:1557–1566.CrossRefPubMed
43.
go back to reference Crippa S, Bassi C, Warshaw AL, Falconi M, Partelli S, Thayer SP, et al. Middle pancreatectomy: indications, short- and long-term operative outcomes Ann Surg 2007;246:69–76.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Crippa S, Bassi C, Warshaw AL, Falconi M, Partelli S, Thayer SP, et al. Middle pancreatectomy: indications, short- and long-term operative outcomes Ann Surg 2007;246:69–76.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
44.
go back to reference DiNorcia J, Ahmed L, Lee MK, et al. Better preservation of endocrine function after central versus distal pancreatectomy for mid-gland lesions. Surgery 2010;148:1247–1256;CrossRefPubMed DiNorcia J, Ahmed L, Lee MK, et al. Better preservation of endocrine function after central versus distal pancreatectomy for mid-gland lesions. Surgery 2010;148:1247–1256;CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Beger HG, Gansauge F, Siech M, Schwarz M, Poch B. Duodenum-preserving total pancreatic head resection for cystic neoplastic lesions in the head of the pancreas. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2008;15:149–56.CrossRefPubMed Beger HG, Gansauge F, Siech M, Schwarz M, Poch B. Duodenum-preserving total pancreatic head resection for cystic neoplastic lesions in the head of the pancreas. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2008;15:149–56.CrossRefPubMed
46.
go back to reference Beger HG, Mayer B, Rau BM. Parenchyma-Sparing, Limited Pancreatic Head Resection for Benign Tumors and Low-Risk Periampullary Cancer—a Systematic Review. J Gastrointest Surg 2016;20:206–217.CrossRefPubMed Beger HG, Mayer B, Rau BM. Parenchyma-Sparing, Limited Pancreatic Head Resection for Benign Tumors and Low-Risk Periampullary Cancer—a Systematic Review. J Gastrointest Surg 2016;20:206–217.CrossRefPubMed
47.
go back to reference Beger HG, Nakao A, Mayer B. et al. Duodenum-preserving total and partial pancreatic head resection for benign tumors – Systematic review and meta-analysis. Pancreatology 2015;15:167–178CrossRefPubMed Beger HG, Nakao A, Mayer B. et al. Duodenum-preserving total and partial pancreatic head resection for benign tumors – Systematic review and meta-analysis. Pancreatology 2015;15:167–178CrossRefPubMed
48.
go back to reference Fujii T, Kanda M, Kodera Y, Nagai S, Sahin TT, et al. Comparison of pancreatic head resection with segmental duodenectomy and pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy for benign and low-grade malignant neoplasms of the pancreatic head. Pancreas. 2011;40:1258–1263.CrossRefPubMed Fujii T, Kanda M, Kodera Y, Nagai S, Sahin TT, et al. Comparison of pancreatic head resection with segmental duodenectomy and pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy for benign and low-grade malignant neoplasms of the pancreatic head. Pancreas. 2011;40:1258–1263.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Benign Tumors of the Pancreas—Radical Surgery Versus Parenchyma-Sparing Local Resection—the Challenge Facing Surgeons
Author
Hans G. Beger
Publication date
01-03-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Electronic ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-017-3644-2

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 3/2018 Go to the issue