Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 11/2016

01-11-2016 | How I do it

An Inexpensive Modified Primary Closure Technique for Class IV (Dirty) Wounds Significantly Decreases Superficial and Deep Surgical Site Infection

Authors: Bradford J. Kim, Thomas A. Aloia

Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Issue 11/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Despite the creation of several programs to decrease the incidence of surgical site infection, it remains a common complication that has a significant impact on patient recovery and medical costs. The following is a description and brief outcome report of a modified primary closure technique used for dirty (Class IV) wounds. There were 14 consecutive patients who had a laparotomy with Class IV wounds treated by a single surgeon (TAA) from 2011 to 2015. All patients had a history of cancer and either showed signs suggestive for an acute abdomen and required an emergent exploratory laparotomy or were found to have purulent intraabdominal infection at the time of elective surgery. The operation and “modified primary closure” technique (subcutaneous wound wicks with stapled skin closure) were performed in every case. The modified primary closure technique was utilized in 14 patients with a Class IV wound. There were no 30-day mortalities or readmissions. Wound wicks were slowly advanced out over a 7-day period, and only one patient required subsequent wound packing of a single-wicked area. There were no superficial or deep surgical site infections, or wound dehiscence during the hospital course, or 30-day postoperative period. The modified primary closure technique is efficient and inexpensive and was effective in a series of 14 patients with wounds classified as dirty.
Literature
1.
go back to reference de Lissovoy G, Fraeman K, Hutchins V, Murphy D, Song D, Vaughn BB. Surgical site infection: incidence and impact on hospital utilization and treatment costs. Am J Infect Control. 2009;37(5):387–397.CrossRefPubMed de Lissovoy G, Fraeman K, Hutchins V, Murphy D, Song D, Vaughn BB. Surgical site infection: incidence and impact on hospital utilization and treatment costs. Am J Infect Control. 2009;37(5):387–397.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Astagneau P, L'Heriteau F, Daniel F, et al. Reducing surgical site infection incidence through a network: results from the French ISO-RAISIN surveillance system. J Hosp Infect. 2009;72(2):127–134.CrossRefPubMed Astagneau P, L'Heriteau F, Daniel F, et al. Reducing surgical site infection incidence through a network: results from the French ISO-RAISIN surveillance system. J Hosp Infect. 2009;72(2):127–134.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Smyth ET, McIlvenny G, Enstone JE, et al. Four country healthcare associated infection prevalence survey 2006: overview of the results. J Hosp Infect. 2008;69(3):230–248.CrossRefPubMed Smyth ET, McIlvenny G, Enstone JE, et al. Four country healthcare associated infection prevalence survey 2006: overview of the results. J Hosp Infect. 2008;69(3):230–248.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Molena D, Mungo B, Stem M, Feinberg RL, Lidor AO. Prevalence, Impact, and Risk Factors for Hospital-Acquired Conditions after Major Surgical Resection for Cancer: A NSQIP Analysis. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2014;19(1):142–151. Molena D, Mungo B, Stem M, Feinberg RL, Lidor AO. Prevalence, Impact, and Risk Factors for Hospital-Acquired Conditions after Major Surgical Resection for Cancer: A NSQIP Analysis. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2014;19(1):142–151.
5.
go back to reference Wick EC, Hobson DB, Bennett JL, et al. Implementation of a surgical comprehensive unit-based safety program to reduce surgical site infections. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;215(2):193–200.CrossRefPubMed Wick EC, Hobson DB, Bennett JL, et al. Implementation of a surgical comprehensive unit-based safety program to reduce surgical site infections. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;215(2):193–200.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Berenguer CM, Ochsner MG, Jr., Lord SA, Senkowski CK. Improving surgical site infections: using National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data to institute Surgical Care Improvement Project protocols in improving surgical outcomes. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;210(5):737–741, 741–743. Berenguer CM, Ochsner MG, Jr., Lord SA, Senkowski CK. Improving surgical site infections: using National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data to institute Surgical Care Improvement Project protocols in improving surgical outcomes. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;210(5):737–741, 741–743.
7.
go back to reference Hendren S, Fritze D, Banerjee M, et al. Antibiotic choice is independently associated with risk of surgical site infection after colectomy: a population-based cohort study. Ann Surg. 2013;257(3):469–475.CrossRefPubMed Hendren S, Fritze D, Banerjee M, et al. Antibiotic choice is independently associated with risk of surgical site infection after colectomy: a population-based cohort study. Ann Surg. 2013;257(3):469–475.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Kurz A, Sessler, D, Lenhardt R. Perioperative normothermia to reduce the incidence of surgical-wound infection and shorten hospitalization. New England Journal of Medicine. 1996;334(19):1209–1215.CrossRefPubMed Kurz A, Sessler, D, Lenhardt R. Perioperative normothermia to reduce the incidence of surgical-wound infection and shorten hospitalization. New England Journal of Medicine. 1996;334(19):1209–1215.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Culver DH, Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG, Banerjee SN, Edwards JR, Tolson JS, Henderson TS. Surgical wound infection rates by wound class, operative procedure, and patient risk index. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. American Journal of Medicine. 1991;91(3B):152S-157S. Culver DH, Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG, Banerjee SN, Edwards JR, Tolson JS, Henderson TS. Surgical wound infection rates by wound class, operative procedure, and patient risk index. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. American Journal of Medicine. 1991;91(3B):152S-157S.
10.
go back to reference Ortega G, Rhee DS, Papandria DJ, et al. An evaluation of surgical site infections by wound classification system using the ACS-NSQIP. J Surg Res. 2012;174(1):33–38.CrossRefPubMed Ortega G, Rhee DS, Papandria DJ, et al. An evaluation of surgical site infections by wound classification system using the ACS-NSQIP. J Surg Res. 2012;174(1):33–38.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Duttaroy DD JJ, Duttaroy B, Bansal U, Dhameja P, Patel G, Nikhil M. Management Strategy for Dirty Abdominal Incisions: Primary or Delayed Primary Closure? A Randomized Trial. Surgical Infections. 2009;10(2):129–136. Duttaroy DD JJ, Duttaroy B, Bansal U, Dhameja P, Patel G, Nikhil M. Management Strategy for Dirty Abdominal Incisions: Primary or Delayed Primary Closure? A Randomized Trial. Surgical Infections. 2009;10(2):129–136.
13.
go back to reference Fogdestam I, Jensen FT, Nilsson SK. Delayed primary closure. Blood-flow in healing rat skin incisions. Scandinavian Journal of Plastics Reconstructive Surgery 1981;15(2):81–85. Fogdestam I, Jensen FT, Nilsson SK. Delayed primary closure. Blood-flow in healing rat skin incisions. Scandinavian Journal of Plastics Reconstructive Surgery 1981;15(2):81–85.
14.
go back to reference Bhangu A, Singh P, Lundy J, Bowley DM. Systemic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing primary vs delayed primary skin closure in contaminated and dirty abdominal incisions. JAMA Surg. 2013;148(8):779–786.CrossRefPubMed Bhangu A, Singh P, Lundy J, Bowley DM. Systemic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing primary vs delayed primary skin closure in contaminated and dirty abdominal incisions. JAMA Surg. 2013;148(8):779–786.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference McGreal GT, Joy A, Manning B, Kelly JL, O'Donnell JA, Kirwan WW, Redmond HP. Antiseptic Wick: Does It Reduce the Incidence of Wound Infection Following Appendectomy? World Journal of Surgery. 2002;26:631–634. McGreal GT, Joy A, Manning B, Kelly JL, O'Donnell JA, Kirwan WW, Redmond HP. Antiseptic Wick: Does It Reduce the Incidence of Wound Infection Following Appendectomy? World Journal of Surgery. 2002;26:631–634.
16.
go back to reference Kramer S. Effect of povidone-iodine on wound healing: a review. Journal of Vascular Nursing. 1999;17(1):17–23.CrossRefPubMed Kramer S. Effect of povidone-iodine on wound healing: a review. Journal of Vascular Nursing. 1999;17(1):17–23.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Vermeulen H, Westerbos SJ, Ubbink DT. Benefit and harm of iodine in wound care: a systematic review. J Hosp Infect. 2010;76(3):191–199.CrossRefPubMed Vermeulen H, Westerbos SJ, Ubbink DT. Benefit and harm of iodine in wound care: a systematic review. J Hosp Infect. 2010;76(3):191–199.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Lee SK, Schreiber H, Howe K. Using a Full-depth Wound Drainage System to Decrease Wound Infection Rate in the Morbidly Obese. Obesity Surgery. 1991;1:435–438. Lee SK, Schreiber H, Howe K. Using a Full-depth Wound Drainage System to Decrease Wound Infection Rate in the Morbidly Obese. Obesity Surgery. 1991;1:435–438.
Metadata
Title
An Inexpensive Modified Primary Closure Technique for Class IV (Dirty) Wounds Significantly Decreases Superficial and Deep Surgical Site Infection
Authors
Bradford J. Kim
Thomas A. Aloia
Publication date
01-11-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Issue 11/2016
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Electronic ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-016-3161-8

Other articles of this Issue 11/2016

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 11/2016 Go to the issue