Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 5/2014

01-05-2014 | Original Article

Prognostic Significance of Neuroendocrine Differentiation in Colorectal Adenocarcinoma After Radical Operation: a Meta-analysis

Authors: Yu-Jie Zeng, Wei Lai, Lu Liu, Heng Wu, Xing-Xi Luo, Jie Wang, Zhong-Hua Chu

Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Issue 5/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The phenomenon of neuroendocrine differentiation has been observed in colorectal adenocarcinoma. However, the ability of neuroendocrine differentiation to predict the outcome of colorectal adenocarcinoma remains controversial.

Methods

We conducted an extensive search of research studies related to neuroendocrine differentiation using scientific databases, including the PubMed, Embase, OVID, BIOSIS Previews, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (up to July, 2013), according to the established search terms. RevMan version 5.2 statistical program was used to analyze the data. An odds ratio (OR) with a 95 % confidence interval (CI) was used for the dichotomous data.

Results

Eleven studies with a total of 1,587 patients were included. Patients with neuroendocrine differentiation who underwent a radical operation had a lower 5-year survival rate (pooled OR 0.60, 95 % CI 0.37–0.97) compared with those without neuroendocrine differentiation, with evidence of moderate heterogeneity (I 2 = 37 %, p = 0.10). A sensitivity analysis and meta-regression showed that the different classification criteria of neuroendocrine differentiation used in these studies were the main source of heterogeneity. When the strong positive rates of neuroendocrine differentiation indicators between the higher (stage III + IV) and the lower (stage I + II) clinical stages were compared, the pooled OR was 1.84 (703 patients; 95 % CI 0.98–3.43) without evidence of heterogeneity (I 2 = 0 %, p = 0.89). However, comparisons between consecutive stages showed different ORs: stage II vs. I (203 patients; OR = 0.52, 95 % CI 0.17–1.56), stage III vs. II (569 patients; OR = 2.27, 95 % CI 1.03–4.98), and stage IV vs. III (375 patients; OR = 1.81, 95 % CI 1.00–3.29).

Conclusion

The patients with strong positive indicators of neuroendocrine differentiation had a lower 5-year survival rate. The ability to detect neuroendocrine indicators using conventional methods could improve the prognosis judgment of colorectal adenocarcinoma.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Matei D V, Renne G, Pimentel M, Sandri M T, Zorzino L, Botteri E, De Cicco C, Musi G, Brescia A, Mazzoleni F, Tringali V, Detti S, de Cobelli O. Neuroendocrine differentiation in castration-resistant prostate cancer: a systematic diagnostic attempt[J]. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2012, 10(3): 164–173.PubMedCrossRef Matei D V, Renne G, Pimentel M, Sandri M T, Zorzino L, Botteri E, De Cicco C, Musi G, Brescia A, Mazzoleni F, Tringali V, Detti S, de Cobelli O. Neuroendocrine differentiation in castration-resistant prostate cancer: a systematic diagnostic attempt[J]. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2012, 10(3): 164–173.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Cho Y B, Yang S S, Lee W Y, Song S Y, Kim S H, Shin H J, Yun S H, Chun H K. The clinical significance of neuroendocrine differentiation in T3-T4 node-negative colorectal cancer[J]. Int J Surg Pathol. 2010, 18(3): 201–206.PubMedCrossRef Cho Y B, Yang S S, Lee W Y, Song S Y, Kim S H, Shin H J, Yun S H, Chun H K. The clinical significance of neuroendocrine differentiation in T3-T4 node-negative colorectal cancer[J]. Int J Surg Pathol. 2010, 18(3): 201–206.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Travis W D. Lung tumours with neuroendocrine differentiation[J]. Eur J Cancer. 2009, 45 Suppl 1: 251–266.PubMedCrossRef Travis W D. Lung tumours with neuroendocrine differentiation[J]. Eur J Cancer. 2009, 45 Suppl 1: 251–266.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Miremadi A, Pinder S E, Lee A H, Bell J A, Paish E C, Wencyk P, Elston C W, Nicholson R I, Blamey R W, Robertson J F, Ellis I O. Neuroendocrine differentiation and prognosis in breast adenocarcinoma[J]. Histopathology. 2002, 40(3): 215–222.PubMedCrossRef Miremadi A, Pinder S E, Lee A H, Bell J A, Paish E C, Wencyk P, Elston C W, Nicholson R I, Blamey R W, Robertson J F, Ellis I O. Neuroendocrine differentiation and prognosis in breast adenocarcinoma[J]. Histopathology. 2002, 40(3): 215–222.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Staren E D, Gould V E, Jansson D S, Hyser M, Gooch G T, Economou S G. Neuroendocrine differentiation in “poorly differentiated” colon carcinomas[J]. Am Surg. 1990, 56(7): 412–419.PubMed Staren E D, Gould V E, Jansson D S, Hyser M, Gooch G T, Economou S G. Neuroendocrine differentiation in “poorly differentiated” colon carcinomas[J]. Am Surg. 1990, 56(7): 412–419.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Grabowski P, Schindler I, Anagnostopoulos I, Foss H D, Riecken E O, Mansmann U, Stein H, Berger G, Buhr H J, Scherubl H. Neuroendocrine differentiation is a relevant prognostic factor in stage III–IV colorectal cancer[J]. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2001, 13(4): 405–411.PubMedCrossRef Grabowski P, Schindler I, Anagnostopoulos I, Foss H D, Riecken E O, Mansmann U, Stein H, Berger G, Buhr H J, Scherubl H. Neuroendocrine differentiation is a relevant prognostic factor in stage III–IV colorectal cancer[J]. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2001, 13(4): 405–411.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference de Bruine A P, Wiggers T, Beek C, Volovics A, von Meyenfeldt M, Arends J W, Bosman F T. Endocrine cells in colorectal adenocarcinomas: incidence, hormone profile and prognostic relevance[J]. Int J Cancer. 1993, 54(5): 765–771.PubMedCrossRef de Bruine A P, Wiggers T, Beek C, Volovics A, von Meyenfeldt M, Arends J W, Bosman F T. Endocrine cells in colorectal adenocarcinomas: incidence, hormone profile and prognostic relevance[J]. Int J Cancer. 1993, 54(5): 765–771.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Gulubova M, Vlaykova T. Chromogranin A-, serotonin-, synaptophysin- and vascular endothelial growth factor-positive endocrine cells and the prognosis of colorectal cancer: an immunohistochemical and ultrastructural study[J]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008, 23(10): 1574–1585.PubMedCrossRef Gulubova M, Vlaykova T. Chromogranin A-, serotonin-, synaptophysin- and vascular endothelial growth factor-positive endocrine cells and the prognosis of colorectal cancer: an immunohistochemical and ultrastructural study[J]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008, 23(10): 1574–1585.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Grabowski P, Schonfelder J, Ahnert-Hilger G, Foss H D, Stein H, Berger G, Zeitz M, Scherubl H. Heterogeneous expression of neuroendocrine marker proteins in human undifferentiated carcinoma of the colon and rectum[J]. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004, 1014: 270–274.PubMedCrossRef Grabowski P, Schonfelder J, Ahnert-Hilger G, Foss H D, Stein H, Berger G, Zeitz M, Scherubl H. Heterogeneous expression of neuroendocrine marker proteins in human undifferentiated carcinoma of the colon and rectum[J]. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004, 1014: 270–274.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Hamada Y, Oishi A, Shoji T, Takada H, Yamamura M, Hioki K, Yamamoto M. Endocrine cells and prognosis in patients with colorectal carcinoma[J]. Cancer. 1992, 69(11): 2641–2646.PubMedCrossRef Hamada Y, Oishi A, Shoji T, Takada H, Yamamura M, Hioki K, Yamamoto M. Endocrine cells and prognosis in patients with colorectal carcinoma[J]. Cancer. 1992, 69(11): 2641–2646.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Indinnimeo M, Cicchini C, Memeo L, Stazi A, Provenza C, Ricci F, Mingazzini P L. Correlation between chromogranin-A expression and pathological variables in human colon carcinoma[J]. Anticancer Res. 2002, 22(1A): 395–398.PubMed Indinnimeo M, Cicchini C, Memeo L, Stazi A, Provenza C, Ricci F, Mingazzini P L. Correlation between chromogranin-A expression and pathological variables in human colon carcinoma[J]. Anticancer Res. 2002, 22(1A): 395–398.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Shinji S, Naito Z, Ishiwata T, Tanaka N, Furukawa K, Suzuki H, Seya T, Kan H, Tsuruta H, Matsumoto S, Matsuda A, Teranishi N, Ohaki Y, Tajiri T. Neuroendocrine cell differentiation of poorly differentiated colorectal adenocarcinoma correlates with liver metastasis[J]. Int J Oncol. 2006, 29(2): 357–364.PubMed Shinji S, Naito Z, Ishiwata T, Tanaka N, Furukawa K, Suzuki H, Seya T, Kan H, Tsuruta H, Matsumoto S, Matsuda A, Teranishi N, Ohaki Y, Tajiri T. Neuroendocrine cell differentiation of poorly differentiated colorectal adenocarcinoma correlates with liver metastasis[J]. Int J Oncol. 2006, 29(2): 357–364.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Volante M, Marci V, Andrejevic-Blant S, Tavaglione V, Sculli M C, Tampellini M, Papotti M. Increased neuroendocrine cells in resected metastases compared to primary colorectal adenocarcinomas[J]. Virchows Arch. 2010, 457(5): 521–527.PubMedCrossRef Volante M, Marci V, Andrejevic-Blant S, Tavaglione V, Sculli M C, Tampellini M, Papotti M. Increased neuroendocrine cells in resected metastases compared to primary colorectal adenocarcinomas[J]. Virchows Arch. 2010, 457(5): 521–527.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Mori M, Mimori K, Kamakura T, Adachi Y, Ikeda Y, Sugimachi K. Chromogranin positive cells in colorectal carcinoma and transitional mucosa[J]. J Clin Pathol. 1995, 48(8): 754–758.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Mori M, Mimori K, Kamakura T, Adachi Y, Ikeda Y, Sugimachi K. Chromogranin positive cells in colorectal carcinoma and transitional mucosa[J]. J Clin Pathol. 1995, 48(8): 754–758.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Ferrero S, Buffa R, Pruneri G, Siccardi A G, Pelagi M, Lee A K, Coggi G, Bosari S. The prevalence and clinical significance of chromogranin A and secretogranin II immunoreactivity in colorectal adenocarcinomas[J]. Virchows Arch. 1995, 426(6): 587–592.PubMedCrossRef Ferrero S, Buffa R, Pruneri G, Siccardi A G, Pelagi M, Lee A K, Coggi G, Bosari S. The prevalence and clinical significance of chromogranin A and secretogranin II immunoreactivity in colorectal adenocarcinomas[J]. Virchows Arch. 1995, 426(6): 587–592.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Foley E F, Gaffey M J, Frierson H J. The frequency and clinical significance of neuroendocrine cells within stage III adenocarcinomas of the colon[J]. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1998, 122(10): 912–914.PubMed Foley E F, Gaffey M J, Frierson H J. The frequency and clinical significance of neuroendocrine cells within stage III adenocarcinomas of the colon[J]. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1998, 122(10): 912–914.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Lloyd R V, Schroeder G, Bauman M D, Krook J E, Jin L, Goldberg R M, Farr G J. Prevalence and Prognostic Significance of Neuroendocrine Differentiation in Colorectal Carcinomas[J]. Endocr Pathol. 1998, 9(1): 35–42.PubMedCrossRef Lloyd R V, Schroeder G, Bauman M D, Krook J E, Jin L, Goldberg R M, Farr G J. Prevalence and Prognostic Significance of Neuroendocrine Differentiation in Colorectal Carcinomas[J]. Endocr Pathol. 1998, 9(1): 35–42.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Yao G Y, Zhou J L, Lai M D, Chen X Q, Chen P H. Neuroendocrine markers in adenocarcinomas: an investigation of 356 cases[J]. World J Gastroenterol. 2003, 9(4): 858–861.PubMed Yao G Y, Zhou J L, Lai M D, Chen X Q, Chen P H. Neuroendocrine markers in adenocarcinomas: an investigation of 356 cases[J]. World J Gastroenterol. 2003, 9(4): 858–861.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses[J]. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010, 25(9): 603–605.PubMedCrossRef Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses[J]. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010, 25(9): 603–605.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Ospina P A, Nydam D V, Diciccio T J. Technical note: The risk ratio, an alternative to the odds ratio for estimating the association between multiple risk factors and a dichotomous outcome[J]. J Dairy Sci. 2012, 95(5): 2576–2584.PubMedCrossRef Ospina P A, Nydam D V, Diciccio T J. Technical note: The risk ratio, an alternative to the odds ratio for estimating the association between multiple risk factors and a dichotomous outcome[J]. J Dairy Sci. 2012, 95(5): 2576–2584.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Salim A, Mackinnon A, Griffiths K. Sensitivity analysis of intention-to-treat estimates when withdrawals are related to unobserved compliance status[J]. Stat Med. 2008, 27(8): 1164–1179.PubMedCrossRef Salim A, Mackinnon A, Griffiths K. Sensitivity analysis of intention-to-treat estimates when withdrawals are related to unobserved compliance status[J]. Stat Med. 2008, 27(8): 1164–1179.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Sagnak L, Topaloglu H, Ozok U, Ersoy H. Prognostic significance of neuroendocrine differentiation in prostate adenocarcinoma[J]. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2011, 9(2): 73–80.PubMedCrossRef Sagnak L, Topaloglu H, Ozok U, Ersoy H. Prognostic significance of neuroendocrine differentiation in prostate adenocarcinoma[J]. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2011, 9(2): 73–80.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Kloppel G. Classification and pathology of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms[J]. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2011, 18 Suppl 1: S1–S16.PubMedCrossRef Kloppel G. Classification and pathology of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms[J]. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2011, 18 Suppl 1: S1–S16.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Lewin K J. The endocrine cells of the gastrointestinal tract. The normal endocrine cells and their hyperplasias. Part I[J]. Pathol Annu. 1986, 21 Pt 1: 1–27.PubMed Lewin K J. The endocrine cells of the gastrointestinal tract. The normal endocrine cells and their hyperplasias. Part I[J]. Pathol Annu. 1986, 21 Pt 1: 1–27.PubMed
25.
go back to reference Bosman Ft C F H R. WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. 4th edition. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer[Z]. 2010. Bosman Ft C F H R. WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. 4th edition. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer[Z]. 2010.
26.
go back to reference Oberg K, Kvols L, Caplin M, Delle F G, de Herder W, Rindi G, Ruszniewski P, Woltering E A, Wiedenmann B. Consensus report on the use of somatostatin analogs for the management of neuroendocrine tumors of the gastroenteropancreatic system[J]. Ann Oncol. 2004, 15(6): 966–973.PubMedCrossRef Oberg K, Kvols L, Caplin M, Delle F G, de Herder W, Rindi G, Ruszniewski P, Woltering E A, Wiedenmann B. Consensus report on the use of somatostatin analogs for the management of neuroendocrine tumors of the gastroenteropancreatic system[J]. Ann Oncol. 2004, 15(6): 966–973.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Rinke A, Muller H H, Schade-Brittinger C, Klose K J, Barth P, Wied M, Mayer C, Aminossadati B, Pape U F, Blaker M, Harder J, Arnold C, Gress T, Arnold R. Placebo-controlled, double-blind, prospective, randomized study on the effect of octreotide LAR in the control of tumor growth in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine midgut tumors: a report from the PROMID Study Group[J]. J Clin Oncol. 2009, 27(28): 4656–4663.PubMedCrossRef Rinke A, Muller H H, Schade-Brittinger C, Klose K J, Barth P, Wied M, Mayer C, Aminossadati B, Pape U F, Blaker M, Harder J, Arnold C, Gress T, Arnold R. Placebo-controlled, double-blind, prospective, randomized study on the effect of octreotide LAR in the control of tumor growth in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine midgut tumors: a report from the PROMID Study Group[J]. J Clin Oncol. 2009, 27(28): 4656–4663.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Prognostic Significance of Neuroendocrine Differentiation in Colorectal Adenocarcinoma After Radical Operation: a Meta-analysis
Authors
Yu-Jie Zeng
Wei Lai
Lu Liu
Heng Wu
Xing-Xi Luo
Jie Wang
Zhong-Hua Chu
Publication date
01-05-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Issue 5/2014
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Electronic ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-014-2480-x

Other articles of this Issue 5/2014

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 5/2014 Go to the issue