Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 4/2014

01-04-2014 | Original Article

Impact of Surgeon and Hospital Volume on Mortality, Length of Stay, and Cost of Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Authors: Laura M. Enomoto, Niraj J. Gusani, Peter W. Dillon, Christopher S. Hollenbeak

Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Issue 4/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Improved mortality rates following pancreaticoduodenectomy by high-volume surgeons and hospitals have been well documented, but less is known about the impact of such volumes on length of stay and cost. This study uses data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) National Inpatient Sample (NIS) to examine the effect of surgeon and hospital volume on mortality, length of stay, and cost following pancreaticoduodenectomy while controlling for patient-specific factors.

Methods

Data included 3,137 pancreaticoduodenectomies from the NIS performed between 2004 and 2008. Using logistic regression, the relationship between surgeon volume, hospital volume, and postoperative mortality, length of stay, and cost was estimated while accounting for patient factors.

Results

After controlling for patient characteristics, patients of high-volume surgeons at high-volume hospitals had a significantly lower risk of mortality compared to low-volume surgeons at low-volume hospitals (OR 0.32, p < 0.001). Patients of high-volume surgeons at high-volume hospitals also had a five day shorter length of stay (p < 0.001), as well as significantly lower costs (US$12,275, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The results of this study, which simultaneously accounted for surgeon volume, hospital volume, and potential confounding patient characteristics, suggest that both surgeon and hospital volume have a significant effect on outcomes following pancreaticoduodenectomy, affecting not only mortality rates but also lengths of stay and costs.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Birkmeyer JD, Stukel TA, Siewers AE, et al.: Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 2003;349:2117-2127.PubMedCrossRef Birkmeyer JD, Stukel TA, Siewers AE, et al.: Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 2003;349:2117-2127.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, et al.: Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 2002;346:1128-1137.PubMedCrossRef Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, et al.: Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 2002;346:1128-1137.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Begg CB, Cramer LD, Hoskins WJ, Brennan MF: Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery. JAMA 1998;280:1747-1751.PubMedCrossRef Begg CB, Cramer LD, Hoskins WJ, Brennan MF: Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery. JAMA 1998;280:1747-1751.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Al-Refaie WB, Muluneh B, Zhong W, et al.: Who receives their complex cancer surgery at low-volume hospitals? J Am Coll Surg 2012;214:81-87.PubMedCrossRef Al-Refaie WB, Muluneh B, Zhong W, et al.: Who receives their complex cancer surgery at low-volume hospitals? J Am Coll Surg 2012;214:81-87.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Fong Y, Gonen M, Rubin D, et al.: Long-term survival is superior after resection for cancer in high-volume centers. Ann Surg 2005;242:540-544; discussion 544-547.PubMedCentralPubMed Fong Y, Gonen M, Rubin D, et al.: Long-term survival is superior after resection for cancer in high-volume centers. Ann Surg 2005;242:540-544; discussion 544-547.PubMedCentralPubMed
6.
go back to reference Eppsteiner RW, Csikesz NG, McPhee JT, et al.: Surgeon volume impacts hospital mortality for pancreatic resection. Ann Surg 2009;249:635-640.PubMedCrossRef Eppsteiner RW, Csikesz NG, McPhee JT, et al.: Surgeon volume impacts hospital mortality for pancreatic resection. Ann Surg 2009;249:635-640.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Stitzenberg KB, Meropol NJ: Trends in centralization of cancer surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 2010;17:2824-2831.PubMedCrossRef Stitzenberg KB, Meropol NJ: Trends in centralization of cancer surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 2010;17:2824-2831.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Epstein AJ, Gray BH, Schlesinger M: Racial and ethnic differences in the use of high-volume hospitals and surgeons. Arch Surg 2010;145:179-186.PubMedCrossRef Epstein AJ, Gray BH, Schlesinger M: Racial and ethnic differences in the use of high-volume hospitals and surgeons. Arch Surg 2010;145:179-186.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Liu JH, Zingmond DS, McGory ML, et al.: Disparities in the utilization of high-volume hospitals for complex surgery. JAMA 2006;296:1973-1980.PubMedCrossRef Liu JH, Zingmond DS, McGory ML, et al.: Disparities in the utilization of high-volume hospitals for complex surgery. JAMA 2006;296:1973-1980.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Janssen-Heijnen ML, Maas HA, Houterman S, et al.: Comorbidity in older surgical cancer patients: influence on patient care and outcome. Eur J Cancer 2007;43:2179-2193.PubMedCrossRef Janssen-Heijnen ML, Maas HA, Houterman S, et al.: Comorbidity in older surgical cancer patients: influence on patient care and outcome. Eur J Cancer 2007;43:2179-2193.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference HCUP Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS). InRockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2004 - 2008. HCUP Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS). InRockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2004 - 2008.
12.
go back to reference Birkmeyer JD, Finlayson EV, Birkmeyer CM: Volume standards for high-risk surgical procedures: potential benefits of the Leapfrog initiative. Surgery 2001;130:415-422.PubMedCrossRef Birkmeyer JD, Finlayson EV, Birkmeyer CM: Volume standards for high-risk surgical procedures: potential benefits of the Leapfrog initiative. Surgery 2001;130:415-422.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, et al.: Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care 2005;43:1130-1139.PubMedCrossRef Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, et al.: Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care 2005;43:1130-1139.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Shwartz M, Young DW, Siegrist R: The ratio of costs to charges: how good a basis for estimating costs? Inquiry 1995;32:476-481.PubMed Shwartz M, Young DW, Siegrist R: The ratio of costs to charges: how good a basis for estimating costs? Inquiry 1995;32:476-481.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Schmidt CM, Turrini O, Parikh P, et al.: Effect of hospital volume, surgeon experience, and surgeon volume on patient outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single-institution experience. Arch Surg 2010;145:634-640.PubMedCrossRef Schmidt CM, Turrini O, Parikh P, et al.: Effect of hospital volume, surgeon experience, and surgeon volume on patient outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single-institution experience. Arch Surg 2010;145:634-640.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Ho V, Aloia T: Hospital volume, surgeon volume, and patient costs for cancer surgery. Med Care 2008;46:718-725.PubMedCrossRef Ho V, Aloia T: Hospital volume, surgeon volume, and patient costs for cancer surgery. Med Care 2008;46:718-725.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Teh SH, Diggs BS, Deveney CW, Sheppard BC: Patient and hospital characteristics on the variance of perioperative outcomes for pancreatic resection in the United States: a plea for outcome-based and not volume-based referral guidelines. Arch Surg 2009;144:713-721.PubMedCrossRef Teh SH, Diggs BS, Deveney CW, Sheppard BC: Patient and hospital characteristics on the variance of perioperative outcomes for pancreatic resection in the United States: a plea for outcome-based and not volume-based referral guidelines. Arch Surg 2009;144:713-721.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Glasgow RE, Mulvihill SJ: Hospital volume influences outcome in patients undergoing pancreatic resection for cancer. West J Med 1996;165:294-300.PubMedCentralPubMed Glasgow RE, Mulvihill SJ: Hospital volume influences outcome in patients undergoing pancreatic resection for cancer. West J Med 1996;165:294-300.PubMedCentralPubMed
19.
go back to reference Milstein A, Galvin RS, Delbanco SF, et al.: Improving the safety of health care: the leapfrog initiative. Eff Clin Pract 2000;3:313-316.PubMed Milstein A, Galvin RS, Delbanco SF, et al.: Improving the safety of health care: the leapfrog initiative. Eff Clin Pract 2000;3:313-316.PubMed
20.
21.
go back to reference Gasper WJ, Glidden DV, Jin C, et al.: Has recognition of the relationship between mortality rates and hospital volume for major cancer surgery in California made a difference?: A follow-up analysis of another decade. Ann Surg 2009;250:472-483.PubMed Gasper WJ, Glidden DV, Jin C, et al.: Has recognition of the relationship between mortality rates and hospital volume for major cancer surgery in California made a difference?: A follow-up analysis of another decade. Ann Surg 2009;250:472-483.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Kennedy TJ, Cassera MA, Wolf R, et al.: Surgeon volume versus morbidity and cost in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy in an academic community medical center. J Gastrointest Surg 2010;14:1990-1996.PubMedCrossRef Kennedy TJ, Cassera MA, Wolf R, et al.: Surgeon volume versus morbidity and cost in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy in an academic community medical center. J Gastrointest Surg 2010;14:1990-1996.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Impact of Surgeon and Hospital Volume on Mortality, Length of Stay, and Cost of Pancreaticoduodenectomy
Authors
Laura M. Enomoto
Niraj J. Gusani
Peter W. Dillon
Christopher S. Hollenbeak
Publication date
01-04-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Issue 4/2014
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Electronic ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-013-2422-z

Other articles of this Issue 4/2014

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 4/2014 Go to the issue