Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2/2014

01-02-2014 | 2013 SSAT Quick Shot Presentation

Planned Delay of Oral Intake After Esophagectomy Reduces the Cervical Anastomotic Leak Rate and Hospital Length of Stay

Authors: John S. Bolton, William C. Conway, Abbas E. Abbas

Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Issue 2/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Cervical anastomotic leak rates are high after esophagectomy. We examined the effect of a purposeful delay in institution of oral diet after esophagectomy on the leak rate and hospital length of stay. A retrospective analysis of 120 patients submitted to esophagectomy with cervical esophagogastric anastomosis was conducted. Eighty-seven resumed diet within 7 days of surgery (early eaters), and 33 had delayed diet until a mean of 12 days after surgery (late eaters). Mean age was 62.3 years; 98 patients were male. One hundred one resections were for cancer, and 49 % of cancer patients received neoadjuvant therapy. The overall leak rate was 17.5 %, and hospital length of stay was 10.9 days. Anastomotic leak rate was 3 % for late eaters versus 23 % for early eaters (OR of 9.57, p = 0.010). Hospital length of stay was 6 days for late eaters versus 11.8 days for early eaters (p < 0.001). Anastomotic leak was significantly associated with increased length of stay (p < 0.001), adding an average of 7.6 days to hospital stay. Respiratory complications (p < 0.001) and delayed gastric emptying (p = 0.014) were also independent predictors of increased length of stay, but early eater status was not. Delayed resumption of oral diet after esophagectomy significantly reduces cervical anastomotic leak rate and avoids the increased length of stay associated with leak.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Price TN, Nichols FC, Harmsen WS, Allen MS, Cassivi SD, Wigle DA, Shen KR, Deschamps C. A comprehensive review of anastomotic technique in 432 esophagectomies. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;95:1154–61PubMedCrossRef Price TN, Nichols FC, Harmsen WS, Allen MS, Cassivi SD, Wigle DA, Shen KR, Deschamps C. A comprehensive review of anastomotic technique in 432 esophagectomies. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;95:1154–61PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Cooke DT, Lin GC, Lau CL, Zhang L, Si M, Lee J, Chang AC, Pickens A, Orringer MB. Analysis of cervical esophagogastric anastomotic leaks after transhiatal esophagectomy: risk factors, presentation, and detection. Ann Thorac Surg 2009;88:177–85PubMedCrossRef Cooke DT, Lin GC, Lau CL, Zhang L, Si M, Lee J, Chang AC, Pickens A, Orringer MB. Analysis of cervical esophagogastric anastomotic leaks after transhiatal esophagectomy: risk factors, presentation, and detection. Ann Thorac Surg 2009;88:177–85PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Saluja SS, Ray S, Pal S, Sanyal S, Agrawal N, Dash NR, Sahni P, Chattopadhyay TK. Randomized trial comparing side-to-side stapled and hand-sewn esophagogastric anastomosis in neck. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16:1287–95.PubMedCrossRef Saluja SS, Ray S, Pal S, Sanyal S, Agrawal N, Dash NR, Sahni P, Chattopadhyay TK. Randomized trial comparing side-to-side stapled and hand-sewn esophagogastric anastomosis in neck. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16:1287–95.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Larburu Etxaniz S, Gonzales Reyna J, Elorza Orúe JL, Asensio Gallego JI, Diez del Val I, Eizaguirre Letamendia E, Mar Medina B. Cervical anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: diagnosis and management. Cir Esp. 2013;91:31–7.PubMedCrossRef Larburu Etxaniz S, Gonzales Reyna J, Elorza Orúe JL, Asensio Gallego JI, Diez del Val I, Eizaguirre Letamendia E, Mar Medina B. Cervical anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: diagnosis and management. Cir Esp. 2013;91:31–7.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Hsu HH, Chen JS, Huang PM, Lee JM, Lee YC. Comparison of manual and mechanical cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004;25:1097–101.PubMedCrossRef Hsu HH, Chen JS, Huang PM, Lee JM, Lee YC. Comparison of manual and mechanical cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004;25:1097–101.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Pines G, Buyeviz V, Machlenkin S, Klein Y, Laor A, Kashtan H. The use of circular stapler for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy: surgical technique and early postoperative outcome. Dis Esophagus. 2009;22:274–8.PubMedCrossRef Pines G, Buyeviz V, Machlenkin S, Klein Y, Laor A, Kashtan H. The use of circular stapler for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy: surgical technique and early postoperative outcome. Dis Esophagus. 2009;22:274–8.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Honda M, Kuriyama A, Noma H, Nunobe S, Furukawa TA. Hand-sewn versus mechanical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2013;257:238–48.PubMedCrossRef Honda M, Kuriyama A, Noma H, Nunobe S, Furukawa TA. Hand-sewn versus mechanical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2013;257:238–48.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Nederlof N, Tilanus HW, Tran TC, Hop WC, Wijnhoven BP, de Jonge J. End-to-end versus end-to-side esophagogastrostomy after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective randomized study. Ann Surg. 2011;254:226–33.PubMedCrossRef Nederlof N, Tilanus HW, Tran TC, Hop WC, Wijnhoven BP, de Jonge J. End-to-end versus end-to-side esophagogastrostomy after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective randomized study. Ann Surg. 2011;254:226–33.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kim RH, Takabe K. Methods of esophagogastric anastomoses following esophagectomy for cancer: A systematic review. J Surg Oncol. 2010;101:527–33.PubMedCrossRef Kim RH, Takabe K. Methods of esophagogastric anastomoses following esophagectomy for cancer: A systematic review. J Surg Oncol. 2010;101:527–33.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lerut T, Coosemans W, Decker G, De Leyn P, Nafteux P, Van Raemdonck D. Anastomotic complications after esophagectomy. Dig Surg. 2002;19:92–98.PubMedCrossRef Lerut T, Coosemans W, Decker G, De Leyn P, Nafteux P, Van Raemdonck D. Anastomotic complications after esophagectomy. Dig Surg. 2002;19:92–98.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Law S, Fok M, Chu KM, Wong J. Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for cancer—a prospective randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 1997;226:169–173PubMedCrossRef Law S, Fok M, Chu KM, Wong J. Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for cancer—a prospective randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 1997;226:169–173PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Laterza E, de'Manzoni G, Veraldi GF, Guglielmi A, Tedesco P, Cordiano C. Manual compared with mechanical cervical oesophagogastric anastomosis: a randomised trial. Eur J Surg. 1999;165:1051–1054PubMedCrossRef Laterza E, de'Manzoni G, Veraldi GF, Guglielmi A, Tedesco P, Cordiano C. Manual compared with mechanical cervical oesophagogastric anastomosis: a randomised trial. Eur J Surg. 1999;165:1051–1054PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Luechakiettisak P, Kasetsunthorn S. Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled in esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective randomized study. J Med Assoc Thai. 2008;91:681–685PubMed Luechakiettisak P, Kasetsunthorn S. Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled in esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective randomized study. J Med Assoc Thai. 2008;91:681–685PubMed
14.
go back to reference Aquino JL,Camargo JG, Said MM, Merhi VA, Maclellan KC, Palu BF. Cervical esophagogastric anastomosis evaluation with a mechanical device versus manual suture in patients with advanced megaesophagus. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2009;36:19–23PubMedCrossRef Aquino JL,Camargo JG, Said MM, Merhi VA, Maclellan KC, Palu BF. Cervical esophagogastric anastomosis evaluation with a mechanical device versus manual suture in patients with advanced megaesophagus. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2009;36:19–23PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Orringer MB, Marshall B, Iannettoni MD. Eliminating the cervical esophagogastric anastomotic leak with a side-to-side stapled anastomosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;119:277–88.PubMedCrossRef Orringer MB, Marshall B, Iannettoni MD. Eliminating the cervical esophagogastric anastomotic leak with a side-to-side stapled anastomosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;119:277–88.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kondra J, Ong SR, Clifton J, Evans K, Finley RJ, Yee J. A change in clinical practice: a partially stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis reduces morbidity and improves functional outcome after esophagectomy for cancer. Dis. Esophagus. 2008;21:422–9.PubMedCrossRef Kondra J, Ong SR, Clifton J, Evans K, Finley RJ, Yee J. A change in clinical practice: a partially stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis reduces morbidity and improves functional outcome after esophagectomy for cancer. Dis. Esophagus. 2008;21:422–9.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Singh D, Maley RH, Santucci T, Macherey RS, Bartley S, Weyant RJ, Landreneau RJ. Experience and technique of stapled mechanical cervical esophagogastric anastomosis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;71:419–24.PubMedCrossRef Singh D, Maley RH, Santucci T, Macherey RS, Bartley S, Weyant RJ, Landreneau RJ. Experience and technique of stapled mechanical cervical esophagogastric anastomosis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;71:419–24.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Tomaszek SC, Cassivi SD, Allen MS, Shen KR, Nichols FC 3rd, Deschamps C, Wigle DA. An alternative postoperative pathway reduces length of hospitalisation following oesophagectomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010; 37(4):807–13PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Tomaszek SC, Cassivi SD, Allen MS, Shen KR, Nichols FC 3rd, Deschamps C, Wigle DA. An alternative postoperative pathway reduces length of hospitalisation following oesophagectomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010; 37(4):807–13PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
19.
Metadata
Title
Planned Delay of Oral Intake After Esophagectomy Reduces the Cervical Anastomotic Leak Rate and Hospital Length of Stay
Authors
John S. Bolton
William C. Conway
Abbas E. Abbas
Publication date
01-02-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Issue 2/2014
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Electronic ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-013-2322-2

Other articles of this Issue 2/2014

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2/2014 Go to the issue