Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 8/2012

01-08-2012 | How I do it

“How I Do It”—Radical Right Colectomy with Side-to-Side Stapled Ileo-Colonic Anastomosis

Authors: M. Hübner, D. W. Larson, B. G. Wolff

Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Issue 8/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background and Objective

Standardization of surgical technique helps to reproduce excellent clinical outcomes, especially in teaching institutions. We aim to describe in detail our established approach for oncological right colectomy.

Technique

The right colon is mobilized in a five-step latero-inferior approach starting off with (1) the terminal ileum, visualizing the duodenum and the head of pancreas. (2) The ascending colon is dissected from the retroperitoneum, and takedown of the hepatic flexure is completed coming retrograde from the transverse colon (3). (4) Transection of the remaining retroperitoneal attachments completes exposure of the duodenum and mobilization of the right colon. (5) Ileocolic vessels are dissected out and divided close to their origin, and the mesocolon is divided.
We then establish intestinal continuity by use of a side-to-side stapled technique. (1) The arms of a linear cutting stapler are inserted via transverse incisions at the anti-mesenteric sides of the terminal ileum and the transverse colon (tenia) and fired. (2) The enterotomy site is closed by removal of the specimen using a second transverse firing of the linear cutting stapler. An important final step is the (3) reinforcement of the anastomotic ends and the crossing of the staple lines; an omental patch and closure of the mesenteric window are optional.

Conclusion

The suggested standardized five-step lateral-to-medial dissection of the right colon and the three-step side-to-side stapled technique for ileo-colonic anastomosis are easy to learn and to reproduce. Careful adherence to pivotal technical details will help to obtain an optimal oncological outcome and a consistently low leak rate around 2 %.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Masoomi H, Buchberg B, Dang P, et al. Outcomes of Right vs. Left Colectomy for Colon Cancer J Gastrointest Surg 2011: 15; 2023–2028PubMedCrossRef Masoomi H, Buchberg B, Dang P, et al. Outcomes of Right vs. Left Colectomy for Colon Cancer J Gastrointest Surg 2011: 15; 2023–2028PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Lassen K, Soop M, Nygren J, et al. Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Group recommendations Arch Surg 2009: 144; 961–969PubMedCrossRef Lassen K, Soop M, Nygren J, et al. Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Group recommendations Arch Surg 2009: 144; 961–969PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Varadhan KK, Neal KR, Dejong CH, et al. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing major elective open colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Clin Nutr 2010: 29; 434–440PubMedCrossRef Varadhan KK, Neal KR, Dejong CH, et al. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing major elective open colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Clin Nutr 2010: 29; 434–440PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Wind J, Polle SW, Fung Kon Jin PH, et al. Systematic review of enhanced recovery programmes in colonic surgery Br J Surg 2006: 93; 800–809PubMedCrossRef Wind J, Polle SW, Fung Kon Jin PH, et al. Systematic review of enhanced recovery programmes in colonic surgery Br J Surg 2006: 93; 800–809PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Larson DW, Batdorf NJ, Touzios JG, et al. A fast-track recovery protocol improves outcomes in elective laparoscopic colectomy for diverticulitis J Am Coll Surg 2010: 211; 485–489PubMedCrossRef Larson DW, Batdorf NJ, Touzios JG, et al. A fast-track recovery protocol improves outcomes in elective laparoscopic colectomy for diverticulitis J Am Coll Surg 2010: 211; 485–489PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Muller S, Zalunardo MP, Hubner M, et al. A fast-track program reduces complications and length of hospital stay after open colonic surgery Gastroenterology 2009: 136; 842–847PubMedCrossRef Muller S, Zalunardo MP, Hubner M, et al. A fast-track program reduces complications and length of hospital stay after open colonic surgery Gastroenterology 2009: 136; 842–847PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350: 2050–2059CrossRef The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350: 2050–2059CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Cima RR, Pendlimari R, Holubar SD, et al. Utility and short-term outcomes of hand-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a single-institution experience in 1103 patients Dis Colon Rectum 2011: 54; 1076–1081PubMedCrossRef Cima RR, Pendlimari R, Holubar SD, et al. Utility and short-term outcomes of hand-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a single-institution experience in 1103 patients Dis Colon Rectum 2011: 54; 1076–1081PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, et al. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial Lancet 2005: 365; 1718–1726PubMedCrossRef Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, et al. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial Lancet 2005: 365; 1718–1726PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ruggiero R, Sparavigna L, Docimo G, et al. Post-operative peritonitis due to anastomotic dehiscence after colonic resection. Multicentric experience, retrospective analysis of risk factors and review of the literature Annali italiani di chirurgia 2011: 82; 369–375PubMed Ruggiero R, Sparavigna L, Docimo G, et al. Post-operative peritonitis due to anastomotic dehiscence after colonic resection. Multicentric experience, retrospective analysis of risk factors and review of the literature Annali italiani di chirurgia 2011: 82; 369–375PubMed
11.
go back to reference Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, et al. Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial Lancet Oncol 2005: 6; 477–484PubMedCrossRef Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, et al. Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial Lancet Oncol 2005: 6; 477–484PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Li JC, Lo AW, Hon SS, et al. (2012) Institution learning curve of laparoscopic colectomy—a multi-dimensional analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 27(4):527-33PubMedCrossRef Li JC, Lo AW, Hon SS, et al. (2012) Institution learning curve of laparoscopic colectomy—a multi-dimensional analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 27(4):527-33PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Meagher AP, Wolff BG Right hemicolectomy with a linear cutting stapler Dis Colon Rectum 1994: 37; 1043–1045PubMedCrossRef Meagher AP, Wolff BG Right hemicolectomy with a linear cutting stapler Dis Colon Rectum 1994: 37; 1043–1045PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Poon JT, Law WL, Fan JK, et al. Impact of the standardized medial-to-lateral approach on outcome of laparoscopic colorectal resection World journal of surgery 2009: 33; 2177–2182PubMedCrossRef Poon JT, Law WL, Fan JK, et al. Impact of the standardized medial-to-lateral approach on outcome of laparoscopic colorectal resection World journal of surgery 2009: 33; 2177–2182PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Choy PY, Bissett IP, Docherty JG, et al. (2011) Stapled versus handsewn methods for ileocolic anastomoses. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 7(9): CD004320 Choy PY, Bissett IP, Docherty JG, et al. (2011) Stapled versus handsewn methods for ileocolic anastomoses. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 7(9): CD004320
16.
go back to reference Pendlimari R, Holubar SD, Dozois EJ, et al. (2012) Technical Proficiency in Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Colon and Rectal Surgery: Determining How Many Cases Are Required to Achieve Mastery. Arch Surg 147(4):317-22PubMedCrossRef Pendlimari R, Holubar SD, Dozois EJ, et al. (2012) Technical Proficiency in Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Colon and Rectal Surgery: Determining How Many Cases Are Required to Achieve Mastery. Arch Surg 147(4):317-22PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Steichen FM. The use of staplers in anatomical side-to-side and functional end-to-end enteroanastomoses Surgery 1968: 64; 948–953PubMed Steichen FM. The use of staplers in anatomical side-to-side and functional end-to-end enteroanastomoses Surgery 1968: 64; 948–953PubMed
18.
go back to reference Tsikitis VL, Holubar SD, Dozois EJ, et al. Advantages of fast-track recovery after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colon cancer Surgical endoscopy 2010: 24; 1911–1916PubMedCrossRef Tsikitis VL, Holubar SD, Dozois EJ, et al. Advantages of fast-track recovery after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colon cancer Surgical endoscopy 2010: 24; 1911–1916PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Lovely JK, Maxson PM, Jacob AK, et al. (2012) Case-matched series of enhanced versus standard recovery pathway in minimally invasive colorectal surgery Br J Surg 99(1):120-6PubMedCrossRef Lovely JK, Maxson PM, Jacob AK, et al. (2012) Case-matched series of enhanced versus standard recovery pathway in minimally invasive colorectal surgery Br J Surg 99(1):120-6PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
“How I Do It”—Radical Right Colectomy with Side-to-Side Stapled Ileo-Colonic Anastomosis
Authors
M. Hübner
D. W. Larson
B. G. Wolff
Publication date
01-08-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Issue 8/2012
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Electronic ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-012-1909-3

Other articles of this Issue 8/2012

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 8/2012 Go to the issue