Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 9/2010

01-09-2010 | Original Article

Quo Vadis STARR? A Prospective Long-Term Follow-Up of Stapled Transanal Rectal Resection for Obstructed Defecation Syndrome

Authors: Oliver Zehler, Yogesh K. Vashist, Dean Bogoevski, Maximillian Bockhorn, Emre F. Yekebas, Jakob R. Izbicki, Asad Kutup

Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Issue 9/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Functional and clinical long-term outcome after stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) in patients with an isolated symptomatic rectocele are investigated. Short-term results after 1 year are comparable with the functional outcome even after 5 years. Eighty per cent of the patients were still satisfied. STARR is an alternative procedure to the conventional surgical approaches for patients with an obstructed defecation syndrome and rectocele. Several studies have reported short-term outcome after STARR, but long-term results are still missing. The objective of this study was to evaluate long-term clinical outcome after STARR with a follow-up of 5 years.

Materials and Methods

Twenty patients with only an isolated symptomatic rectocele due to obstructed defecation syndrome were subjected to STARR. Functional and clinical outcome was assessed by Outlet Obstruction Syndrome score (OOS score), Wexner score (WS), and Symptome Severity score (SSS score). Data were prospectively collected over 7 years.

Results

The perioperative morbidity after STARR accounted for 20% (n = 4). One patient was subjected to reoperation due to perforation, two postoperative bleedings occurred, and one patient developed an increasing local granulomatous reaction at the stapler line. The median follow-up accounted for 66 months (range 60–84). Sixteen patients (80%) were satisfied with the functional outcome. The median OOS, SSS and WS score improved significantly already after 1 year in these patients and remained stable at 5-year follow-up. In contrast, four patients were classified as treatment failures since the OOS score and the SSS score showed no improvement. At 5-year follow-up, these patients remained symptomatic without improvement in OOS and SSS scores.

Conclusions

The STARR procedure is an effective operation in isolated symptomatic rectoceles with regard to relief of the obstructed defecation syndrome. The short-term improvement after STARR predicts long-term outcome in obstructed defecation syndrome caused by a rectocele.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fucini C. Ronchi O, Elbetti C (2001) Electromyography of the pelvic floor musculature in the assessment of obstructed defecation symptoms. Dis Colon Rectum 44: 1168–1175CrossRefPubMed Fucini C. Ronchi O, Elbetti C (2001) Electromyography of the pelvic floor musculature in the assessment of obstructed defecation symptoms. Dis Colon Rectum 44: 1168–1175CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Mellgren A. Bremmer S, Johannson C et al. (1994) Defecography, results of investigation in 2816 patients. Dis Colon Recum 37: 1133–1141CrossRef Mellgren A. Bremmer S, Johannson C et al. (1994) Defecography, results of investigation in 2816 patients. Dis Colon Recum 37: 1133–1141CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Choi JS, Hwang YH, Salum MR et al. (2001) Outcome and management of patients with large recto-anal intussusception. Am J Gastroenterology 96: 740–744CrossRef Choi JS, Hwang YH, Salum MR et al. (2001) Outcome and management of patients with large recto-anal intussusception. Am J Gastroenterology 96: 740–744CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Lehur PA, Stuto A, Fantoli M et al. (2008) ODS II Study Group. Outcomes of stapled transanal rectal resection vs. biofeedback for the treatment of outlet obstruction associated with rectal intussusception and rectocele: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 51(11):1611–8CrossRefPubMed Lehur PA, Stuto A, Fantoli M et al. (2008) ODS II Study Group. Outcomes of stapled transanal rectal resection vs. biofeedback for the treatment of outlet obstruction associated with rectal intussusception and rectocele: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 51(11):1611–8CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Shorvon PJ, McHugh S, Diament NE et al. (1989) Defecography in normal volunteers: results and implications. Gut 30(12): 1737–49CrossRefPubMed Shorvon PJ, McHugh S, Diament NE et al. (1989) Defecography in normal volunteers: results and implications. Gut 30(12): 1737–49CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Schwandner O, Fürst A (2008) Actual Role of Stapled Transanal Rectal Resection (STARR) for obstructed defecation syndrome. Zentralbl Chir. 133(2):116–22. Review. GermanCrossRefPubMed Schwandner O, Fürst A (2008) Actual Role of Stapled Transanal Rectal Resection (STARR) for obstructed defecation syndrome. Zentralbl Chir. 133(2):116–22. Review. GermanCrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Jayne DG, Schwandner O, Stuto A (2009) Stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defecation syndrome: one-year results of the European STARR Registry. Dis Colon Rectum. 52(7):1205–12; discussion 1212–4.PubMed Jayne DG, Schwandner O, Stuto A (2009) Stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defecation syndrome: one-year results of the European STARR Registry. Dis Colon Rectum. 52(7):1205–12; discussion 1212–4.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Oliveira J, Pfeifer J, Wexner SD (1996) Physiological and clinical outcome of anterior sphincteroplasty. Br J Surg 83: 502–505CrossRefPubMed Oliveira J, Pfeifer J, Wexner SD (1996) Physiological and clinical outcome of anterior sphincteroplasty. Br J Surg 83: 502–505CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Singk H., Cortes E, Reid WM (2003) Evaluation of the fascial technique for surgical repair of isolated posterior vaginal wall prolaps, Obstet Gynecol; 101: 320–324CrossRef Singk H., Cortes E, Reid WM (2003) Evaluation of the fascial technique for surgical repair of isolated posterior vaginal wall prolaps, Obstet Gynecol; 101: 320–324CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Watson SJ, Loder PB, Halligan S et al. (1996) Transperineal repair of symptomatic rectocele with marlex mesh: a clinical, physiological and radiological assessment of treatment. J Am Coll Surg 183: 257–261PubMed Watson SJ, Loder PB, Halligan S et al. (1996) Transperineal repair of symptomatic rectocele with marlex mesh: a clinical, physiological and radiological assessment of treatment. J Am Coll Surg 183: 257–261PubMed
11.
go back to reference Boccasanta P, Rosati R, Venturi M et al (1999) Surgical treatment of complete rectal prolapse: results of abdominal and perineal procedures. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 9: 235–238CrossRef Boccasanta P, Rosati R, Venturi M et al (1999) Surgical treatment of complete rectal prolapse: results of abdominal and perineal procedures. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 9: 235–238CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Liebermann H, Hughes C, Dippolito A (2000) Evaluation and outcome of the Delorme procedure in the treatment of rectal outlet obstruction. Dis Colon Rectum 43: 188–92CrossRef Liebermann H, Hughes C, Dippolito A (2000) Evaluation and outcome of the Delorme procedure in the treatment of rectal outlet obstruction. Dis Colon Rectum 43: 188–92CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Zacharin FR, Hamilton NT (1980) Pulsion Enterocele: long term results of abdominoperineal technique. Obstet Gynecol 2: 141–148 Zacharin FR, Hamilton NT (1980) Pulsion Enterocele: long term results of abdominoperineal technique. Obstet Gynecol 2: 141–148
14.
go back to reference Holmstrom B, Broden G, Dolk A (1986) Results of the Ripstein operation in the treatment of rectal prolapse and internal rectal procidentia. Dis Colon Rectum 29: 845–848CrossRefPubMed Holmstrom B, Broden G, Dolk A (1986) Results of the Ripstein operation in the treatment of rectal prolapse and internal rectal procidentia. Dis Colon Rectum 29: 845–848CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Bruch HP, Herold A, Schiedeck T et al. (1999) Laparoscopic surgery for rectal prolapse and outlet obstruction. Dis Colon Rectum 42: 34; 1189–1195CrossRefPubMed Bruch HP, Herold A, Schiedeck T et al. (1999) Laparoscopic surgery for rectal prolapse and outlet obstruction. Dis Colon Rectum 42: 34; 1189–1195CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Orrom WJ, Bartolo DC, Miller R et al. (1991) Rectopexy is ineffective treatment of obstructed defecation. Dis Colon Rectum 34; 41–46CrossRefPubMed Orrom WJ, Bartolo DC, Miller R et al. (1991) Rectopexy is ineffective treatment of obstructed defecation. Dis Colon Rectum 34; 41–46CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Longo A (2003) Obstructed defecation because of rectal pathologies. Novel surgical treatment: stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR). In Acts of the 14th International Colorectal Disease Symposium. Fort Lauderdale, FL. Longo A (2003) Obstructed defecation because of rectal pathologies. Novel surgical treatment: stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR). In Acts of the 14th International Colorectal Disease Symposium. Fort Lauderdale, FL.
18.
go back to reference Boccasanta P, Venturi M, Stuto A, et al. (2004) Stapled transanal rectal resection for outlet obstruction. Prospective, multicenter trial. Dis Colon Rectum; 47: 1285–1297CrossRefPubMed Boccasanta P, Venturi M, Stuto A, et al. (2004) Stapled transanal rectal resection for outlet obstruction. Prospective, multicenter trial. Dis Colon Rectum; 47: 1285–1297CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Schwandner O, Farke S, Bruch HP (2005) Transanale Stapler Resection des distalen Rectums (STARR) bei Defäkationsobstruktion infolge ventraler Rektocele und rectoanaler Intussuszeption. Viszeralchirurgie, 40; 331–341CrossRef Schwandner O, Farke S, Bruch HP (2005) Transanale Stapler Resection des distalen Rectums (STARR) bei Defäkationsobstruktion infolge ventraler Rektocele und rectoanaler Intussuszeption. Viszeralchirurgie, 40; 331–341CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Ommer A, Albrecht K, Wenger F( 2006) Stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) A new option in the treatment of obstructed defecation syndrome. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg; 391: 32–37CrossRef Ommer A, Albrecht K, Wenger F( 2006) Stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) A new option in the treatment of obstructed defecation syndrome. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg; 391: 32–37CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Petersen S, Hellmich G, Schuster A et al. (2006) Stapled transanal resection under laparoscopic surveillance for rectocele and concomitant enterocele. Dis Colon Rectum, 49, 685–689CrossRefPubMed Petersen S, Hellmich G, Schuster A et al. (2006) Stapled transanal resection under laparoscopic surveillance for rectocele and concomitant enterocele. Dis Colon Rectum, 49, 685–689CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Jane DG, Finan PJ (2005) Stapled transanal resection for obstructed defaecation and evidence-based practice. Br J Surg; 92: 793–94CrossRef Jane DG, Finan PJ (2005) Stapled transanal resection for obstructed defaecation and evidence-based practice. Br J Surg; 92: 793–94CrossRef
23.
go back to reference National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence: interventional procedure guidance: 169 stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defaecation. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2006. Available at: http://www.nice.org.uk. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence: interventional procedure guidance: 169 stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defaecation. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2006. Available at: http://​www.​nice.​org.​uk.
24.
go back to reference Sielaff M, Scherer R, Gögler et al. (2006) Die STARR operation. Erfahrungen bei 60 Patienten. Coloproctology 28:217–223 Sielaff M, Scherer R, Gögler et al. (2006) Die STARR operation. Erfahrungen bei 60 Patienten. Coloproctology 28:217–223
25.
26.
go back to reference Binda GA, Pescatori M, Romano G (2005) The dark side of double stapled transanal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 47: 1285–1296 Binda GA, Pescatori M, Romano G (2005) The dark side of double stapled transanal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 47: 1285–1296
27.
go back to reference Dodi G, Pietroletti R, Milito G et al (2003) Bleeding, incontinence, pain constipation after STARR transanal double stapling rectotomy for obstructed defecation. Tech Coloproctol 7; 148–153CrossRefPubMed Dodi G, Pietroletti R, Milito G et al (2003) Bleeding, incontinence, pain constipation after STARR transanal double stapling rectotomy for obstructed defecation. Tech Coloproctol 7; 148–153CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Pescatori M, Dodi G, Salafia C et al. (2003) Recto-vaginal fistulae after STARR procedure. Int J Colorectal Dis 20:83–85CrossRef Pescatori M, Dodi G, Salafia C et al. (2003) Recto-vaginal fistulae after STARR procedure. Int J Colorectal Dis 20:83–85CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Bassi R, Rademacher J, Savoia A. (2006) Rectovaginal fistula after STARR procedure complicted by haematoma of the posterior vaginal wall : report of a case. Tech Coloproctol; 10: 361–363CrossRefPubMed Bassi R, Rademacher J, Savoia A. (2006) Rectovaginal fistula after STARR procedure complicted by haematoma of the posterior vaginal wall : report of a case. Tech Coloproctol; 10: 361–363CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Agachan F, Chen T, Pfeifer J et al (1996) A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients. Dis Colon Rectum, 39, 681–685CrossRefPubMed Agachan F, Chen T, Pfeifer J et al (1996) A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients. Dis Colon Rectum, 39, 681–685CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Thompson WG, Irvine EJ, Pare P et al (2002) Functional gastrointestinal disorders in Canada: first population-based survey using Rome II criteria with suggestions for improving the questionnaire. Dig Dis Sci. 47(1):225–35.CrossRefPubMed Thompson WG, Irvine EJ, Pare P et al (2002) Functional gastrointestinal disorders in Canada: first population-based survey using Rome II criteria with suggestions for improving the questionnaire. Dig Dis Sci. 47(1):225–35.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Osterberg A, Graf W, Karlbom U et al. (1996). Evaluation of a questionnaire in the assessment of patients with faecal incontinence and constipation,Scand J Gastroenterol. 31(6):575–80.CrossRefPubMed Osterberg A, Graf W, Karlbom U et al. (1996). Evaluation of a questionnaire in the assessment of patients with faecal incontinence and constipation,Scand J Gastroenterol. 31(6):575–80.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Jorge JM, Wexner SD. (1993) Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36; 77–9CrossRefPubMed Jorge JM, Wexner SD. (1993) Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36; 77–9CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Schwandner O, Stuto A, Jayne D et al. (2008) Decision-making algorithm for the STARR procedure in obstructed defecation syndrome: position statement of the group of STARR Pioneers. Surg Innov. 15(2):105–9. Epub 2008 Apr 9.CrossRefPubMed Schwandner O, Stuto A, Jayne D et al. (2008) Decision-making algorithm for the STARR procedure in obstructed defecation syndrome: position statement of the group of STARR Pioneers. Surg Innov. 15(2):105–9. Epub 2008 Apr 9.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Frascio M, Stabilini C, Ricci B et al. (2008) Stapled transanal rectal resection for outlet obstruction syndrome: results and follow-up. 32(6):1110–5 Frascio M, Stabilini C, Ricci B et al. (2008) Stapled transanal rectal resection for outlet obstruction syndrome: results and follow-up. 32(6):1110–5
Metadata
Title
Quo Vadis STARR? A Prospective Long-Term Follow-Up of Stapled Transanal Rectal Resection for Obstructed Defecation Syndrome
Authors
Oliver Zehler
Yogesh K. Vashist
Dean Bogoevski
Maximillian Bockhorn
Emre F. Yekebas
Jakob R. Izbicki
Asad Kutup
Publication date
01-09-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Issue 9/2010
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Electronic ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-010-1261-4

Other articles of this Issue 9/2010

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 9/2010 Go to the issue

Letter to the Editor

Response: Letter to Editor