Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 4/2009

01-04-2009 | Original article

Is Gum Chewing Useful for Ileus After Elective Colorectal Surgery? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

Authors: Wenceslao Vásquez, Adrián V. Hernández, Jose Luis Garcia-Sabrido

Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Issue 4/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The evaluation of the usefulness of gum chewing for postoperative ileus has given inconclusive results. We evaluated the efficacy of gum chewing in the treatment of ileus after elective colorectal surgery.

Materials and Methods

We performed a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing the effect of gum chewing+standard treatment vs. standard treatment on ileus after colorectal surgery. MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Controlled Trial Register, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched until August 2008. Primary outcomes were time to first flatus, time to first passage of feces, and length of hospital stay. The mean difference (MD) in hours was calculated with the random effects model to assess the effect of gum chewing on the outcomes.

Results

Six trials including 244 patients were analyzed. Time to first flatus was significantly reduced with gum chewing+standard treatment compared to standard treatment alone (MD −14 h, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] −23.5 to −4.6). Time to first passage of feces was significantly reduced (MD −25 h, 95%CI −42.3 to −7.7), but the length of hospital stay was only marginally reduced (MD −26.2 h, 95%CI −57.5 to 5.2) with gum chewing.

Conclusion

In patients with ileus after colonic surgery, gum chewing in addition to standard treatment significantly reduces the time to first flatus and the time to first passage of feces when compared to standard treatment alone. There is also a trend to reduce the length of hospital stay. Gum chewing should be added to the standard treatment of these patients.
Literature
1.
6.
go back to reference Chen JH, Hsieh CB, Chao PC et al. Effect of water-soluble contrast in colorectal surgery: a prospective randomized trial. World J Gastroenterol 2005;11:2802–2805.PubMed Chen JH, Hsieh CB, Chao PC et al. Effect of water-soluble contrast in colorectal surgery: a prospective randomized trial. World J Gastroenterol 2005;11:2802–2805.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Hirayama I, Suzuki M, Ide M, Asao T, Kuwano H. Gum-chewing stimulates bowel motility after surgery for colorectal cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 2006;53:206–208.PubMed Hirayama I, Suzuki M, Ide M, Asao T, Kuwano H. Gum-chewing stimulates bowel motility after surgery for colorectal cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 2006;53:206–208.PubMed
13.
16.
go back to reference Clarke M, Oxman AD. Cochrane Reviewers Handbook 4.2.6 (updated software, updated September 2006). The Cochrane Library, Issue 1. Oxford. 2007. Clarke M, Oxman AD. Cochrane Reviewers Handbook 4.2.6 (updated software, updated September 2006). The Cochrane Library, Issue 1. Oxford. 2007.
18.
go back to reference Mc Fadden DW, Zinner MI. Manifestations of gastrointestinal disease. In Schwartz SI, ed. Principles of Surgery. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994. Mc Fadden DW, Zinner MI. Manifestations of gastrointestinal disease. In Schwartz SI, ed. Principles of Surgery. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994.
19.
go back to reference Helton WS, Fisichella PM. Intestinal obstruction. In American College of Surgeons ACS Surgery Principles and Practice. New York: WebMD, 2005. Helton WS, Fisichella PM. Intestinal obstruction. In American College of Surgeons ACS Surgery Principles and Practice. New York: WebMD, 2005.
22.
go back to reference Jørgensen H, Wetterslev J, Møiniche S, Dahl JB. Epidural local anaesthetics versus opioid-based analgesic regimens for postoperative gastrointestinal paralysis, PONV and pain after abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001; Issue 1, Art. No. CD001893. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001893. Jørgensen H, Wetterslev J, Møiniche S, Dahl JB. Epidural local anaesthetics versus opioid-based analgesic regimens for postoperative gastrointestinal paralysis, PONV and pain after abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001; Issue 1, Art. No. CD001893. doi:10.​1002/​14651858.​CD001893.
23.
go back to reference Hudcova J, McNicol E, Quah C, Lau J, Carr DB. Patient controlled opioid analgesia versus conventional opioid analgesia for postoperative pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; Issue 4, Art. No. CD003348. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003348.pub2. Hudcova J, McNicol E, Quah C, Lau J, Carr DB. Patient controlled opioid analgesia versus conventional opioid analgesia for postoperative pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; Issue 4, Art. No. CD003348. doi:10.​1002/​14651858.​CD003348.​pub2.
25.
26.
go back to reference King PM, Blazeby JM, Ewings P et al. The influence of an enhanced recovery programme on clinical outcomes, cost and quality of life after surgery for colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2007;9:281–282. King PM, Blazeby JM, Ewings P et al. The influence of an enhanced recovery programme on clinical outcomes, cost and quality of life after surgery for colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2007;9:281–282.
28.
go back to reference Soffer EE, Adrian TE. Effect of meal composition and sham feeding on duodenojejunal motility in humans. Dig Dis Sci 1992;37:1009–1014.PubMedCrossRef Soffer EE, Adrian TE. Effect of meal composition and sham feeding on duodenojejunal motility in humans. Dig Dis Sci 1992;37:1009–1014.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Paraskeva PA, Aziz O, Darzi A. Laparoscopy surgery for colon cancer. Surg Clin North Am 2005;85:49–60.PubMedCrossRef Paraskeva PA, Aziz O, Darzi A. Laparoscopy surgery for colon cancer. Surg Clin North Am 2005;85:49–60.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Noel JK, Fahrbach K, Estok R et al. Minimally invasive colorectal resection outcomes: short-term comparisons with open orocedures. J Am Coll Surg 2007;204:291–307.PubMedCrossRef Noel JK, Fahrbach K, Estok R et al. Minimally invasive colorectal resection outcomes: short-term comparisons with open orocedures. J Am Coll Surg 2007;204:291–307.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Braga M, Vignali A, Zuliani W et al. Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery. Cost–benefit analysis in a single-center randomized trial. Ann Surg 2005;242:890–896.PubMedCrossRef Braga M, Vignali A, Zuliani W et al. Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery. Cost–benefit analysis in a single-center randomized trial. Ann Surg 2005;242:890–896.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Lacy AM, García-Valdecasas J, Delgado S et al. Laparoscopy assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomized trial. Lancet 2002;359:2224–2229.PubMedCrossRef Lacy AM, García-Valdecasas J, Delgado S et al. Laparoscopy assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomized trial. Lancet 2002;359:2224–2229.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Zhou T, Wu XT, Zhou YJ, Huang X, Fan W, Li YC. Early removing gastrointestinal decompression and early oral feeding improve patients rehabilitation after colorectostomy. World J Gastroenterol 2006;12:2459–2463.PubMed Zhou T, Wu XT, Zhou YJ, Huang X, Fan W, Li YC. Early removing gastrointestinal decompression and early oral feeding improve patients rehabilitation after colorectostomy. World J Gastroenterol 2006;12:2459–2463.PubMed
35.
go back to reference Miedema BW, Schillie S, Simmons JW, Burgess SV, Liem T, Silver D. Small bowel motility and transit after aortic surgery. J Vasc Surg 2002;36:19–24.PubMedCrossRef Miedema BW, Schillie S, Simmons JW, Burgess SV, Liem T, Silver D. Small bowel motility and transit after aortic surgery. J Vasc Surg 2002;36:19–24.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Satji B. Evaluation of gum chewing on the return of bowel function in cesarean-delivery patients. Obstet Gynecol 2006;107(4Suppl):10S. Satji B. Evaluation of gum chewing on the return of bowel function in cesarean-delivery patients. Obstet Gynecol 2006;107(4Suppl):10S.
37.
go back to reference Chang SS, Baumgartner RG, Wells N, Cookson MS, Smith JR. Causes of increased hospital stay after radical cystectomy in a clinical pathway setting. J Urol 2002;167:208–211.PubMedCrossRef Chang SS, Baumgartner RG, Wells N, Cookson MS, Smith JR. Causes of increased hospital stay after radical cystectomy in a clinical pathway setting. J Urol 2002;167:208–211.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Kouba EJ, Wallen EM, Pruthi RS. Gum chewing stimulates bowel motility in patients undergoing radical cystectomy with urinary diversion. Urology 2007;70:1053–1056.PubMedCrossRef Kouba EJ, Wallen EM, Pruthi RS. Gum chewing stimulates bowel motility in patients undergoing radical cystectomy with urinary diversion. Urology 2007;70:1053–1056.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Is Gum Chewing Useful for Ileus After Elective Colorectal Surgery? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
Authors
Wenceslao Vásquez
Adrián V. Hernández
Jose Luis Garcia-Sabrido
Publication date
01-04-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Issue 4/2009
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Electronic ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-008-0756-8

Other articles of this Issue 4/2009

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 4/2009 Go to the issue