Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 10/2008

01-10-2008 | ssat plenary presentation

Evolving Management of Colonoscopic Perforations

Authors: Dimitrios V. Avgerinos, Omar H. Llaguna, Andrew Y. Lo, I. Michael Leitman

Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Issue 10/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Perforations of the large bowel during diagnostic or therapeutic colonoscopy are a rare but significant complication. Their treatment has evolved over the last decade, but there are still no specific guidelines for their optimal management.

Materials and Methods

Retrospective review of 105,786 consecutive colonoscopies performed in a 21-year period allowed assessment of the medical records in all patients treated at our institution for colonoscopic perforation.

Results

Thirty-five patients suffered perforation (perforation rate 0.033%) during colonoscopy from January 1986 to October 2007 (14 men, 21 women; mean age 69.4 years). Twenty-four of the perforations occurred during diagnostic colonoscopy, whereas 11 during therapeutic colonoscopy. Twenty-three (66%) of the patients underwent operative treatment and 12 (34%) were managed nonoperatively. The average length of stay was 15.2 days, and there was one death (2.9% 30-day mortality rate) among the patients.

Conclusions

Perforations from diagnostic colonoscopy usually are large enough to warrant surgical management, whereas perforations from therapeutic colonoscopy usually are small, leading to successful nonoperative treatment. Over the last decade, the surgical treatment of colonoscopic perforations has evolved, as there has been a trend that favors primary repair versus bowel resection with successful outcome. Careful observation and clinical care adherent to strict guidelines for patients treated nonoperatively is appropriate in order to minimize morbidity and mortality and identify early those who may benefit from operation. Each treatment, however, has to be individualized according to the patients’ comorbidities and clinical status, as well as the specific conditions during the colonoscopy that lead to the perforation.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Lo AY, Beaton HL. Selective management of colonoscopic perforations. J Am Coll Surg 1994;179:333–337.PubMed Lo AY, Beaton HL. Selective management of colonoscopic perforations. J Am Coll Surg 1994;179:333–337.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Baillie J. Complications of endoscopy. Endoscopy 1994;26:185–203.PubMed Baillie J. Complications of endoscopy. Endoscopy 1994;26:185–203.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Misra T, Lalor E, Fedorak RN. Endoscopic perforation rates at a Canadian university teaching hospital. Can J Gastroenterol 2004;18:221–226.PubMed Misra T, Lalor E, Fedorak RN. Endoscopic perforation rates at a Canadian university teaching hospital. Can J Gastroenterol 2004;18:221–226.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Ghazi A, Grossman M. Complications of colonoscopy and polypectomy. Surg Clin North Am. 1982;62:889–896.PubMed Ghazi A, Grossman M. Complications of colonoscopy and polypectomy. Surg Clin North Am. 1982;62:889–896.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Evolving Management of Colonoscopic Perforations
Authors
Dimitrios V. Avgerinos
Omar H. Llaguna
Andrew Y. Lo
I. Michael Leitman
Publication date
01-10-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Issue 10/2008
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Electronic ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-008-0631-7

Other articles of this Issue 10/2008

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 10/2008 Go to the issue