Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 8/2008

01-08-2008 | original article

Improved Reflux Monitoring in the Acute Gastroesophageal Reflux Porcine Model Using Esophageal Multichannel Intraluminal Impedance Measurement

Authors: Beat Peter Müller-Stich, Arianeb Mehrabi, Hannes Götz Kenngott, Zhoobin Mood, Hamidreza Funouni, Michael Andreas Reiter, Georg Richard Linke, Ulf Hinz, Carsten Nils Gutt, Jörg Köninger

Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Issue 8/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Acute animal models are needed to obtain further insights into the mechanism of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Existing acute models use imprecise methods to detect reflux. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the potential of esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance measurement (MII) to improve the quality of results of acute reflux porcine models.

Materials and Methods

MII was used in ten pigs to monitor gastroesophageal reflux. Measurements were obtained (A) before and (B) after mobilization of the esophagus and (C) after myotomy. The results were compared to those obtained when reflux was monitored by esophageal drainage of intragastrically infused blue solution (DBS).

Results

The times to first appearance of reflux were 67% (A), 86% (B), and 57% (C) of those by DBS when detected by MII; p < 0.05. The respective values for intragastric pressures needed to provoke reflux were 46%, 76%, and 66%; p < 0.05. Although the lower esophageal sphincter pressure decreased by 69% after (B) the intragastric pressure needed to provoke reflux increased by 140%; p < 0.05.

Conclusions

MII improves the detection of reflux in the acute reflux porcine model. The finding that after sole mobilization of the esophagus the intragastric pressure needed to provoke reflux was increased although the finding that the pressure of the lower esophageal sphincter was decreased needs further investigation.
Literature
3.
go back to reference O’Sullivan GC, DeMeester TR, Joelsson BE, et al. Interaction of lower esophageal sphincter pressure and length of sphincter in the abdomen as determinants of gastroesophageal competence. Am J Surg 1982;143:40–47. Medline DOI 10.1016/0002-9610(82)90127-1.PubMedCrossRef O’Sullivan GC, DeMeester TR, Joelsson BE, et al. Interaction of lower esophageal sphincter pressure and length of sphincter in the abdomen as determinants of gastroesophageal competence. Am J Surg 1982;143:40–47. Medline DOI 10.​1016/​0002-9610(82)90127-1.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Dodds WJ, Dent J, Hogan WJ, et al. Mechanisms of gastroesophageal reflux in patients with reflux esophagitis. N Engl J Med 1982;307:1547–1552. Medline.PubMed Dodds WJ, Dent J, Hogan WJ, et al. Mechanisms of gastroesophageal reflux in patients with reflux esophagitis. N Engl J Med 1982;307:1547–1552. Medline.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Elton C, Uppal R, Moore D, et al. Partial cardiomyectomy—an animal model of gastro-oesophageal reflux. Int J Surg Investig 1999;1:81–85. Medline.PubMed Elton C, Uppal R, Moore D, et al. Partial cardiomyectomy—an animal model of gastro-oesophageal reflux. Int J Surg Investig 1999;1:81–85. Medline.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Kadirkamanathan SS, Yazaki E, Evans DF, et al. An ambulant porcine model of acid reflux used to evaluate endoscopic gastroplasty. Gut 1999;44:782–788. Medline.PubMedCrossRef Kadirkamanathan SS, Yazaki E, Evans DF, et al. An ambulant porcine model of acid reflux used to evaluate endoscopic gastroplasty. Gut 1999;44:782–788. Medline.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Watson DI, Mathew G, Pike GK, et al. Comparison of anterior, posterior and total fundoplication using a viscera model. Dis Esophagus 1997;10:110–114. Medline.PubMed Watson DI, Mathew G, Pike GK, et al. Comparison of anterior, posterior and total fundoplication using a viscera model. Dis Esophagus 1997;10:110–114. Medline.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Mainie I, Tutuian R, Agrawal A, et al. Combined multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring to select patients with persistent gastro-oesophageal reflux for laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Br J Surg 2006;93:1483–1487. Medline DOI 10.1002/bjs.5493.PubMedCrossRef Mainie I, Tutuian R, Agrawal A, et al. Combined multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring to select patients with persistent gastro-oesophageal reflux for laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Br J Surg 2006;93:1483–1487. Medline DOI 10.​1002/​bjs.​5493.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Schopf BW, Blair G, Dong S, et al. A porcine model of gastroesophageal reflux. J Invest Surg 1997;10:105–114. Medline.PubMedCrossRef Schopf BW, Blair G, Dong S, et al. A porcine model of gastroesophageal reflux. J Invest Surg 1997;10:105–114. Medline.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Ates O, Hakguder G, Olguner M, et al. The contribution of elevated gastric pressure to prevention of gastroesophageal reflux in several different antireflux procedures. Dig Dis Sci 2005;50:2129–2133. Medline DOI 10.1007/s10620-005-3019-5.PubMedCrossRef Ates O, Hakguder G, Olguner M, et al. The contribution of elevated gastric pressure to prevention of gastroesophageal reflux in several different antireflux procedures. Dig Dis Sci 2005;50:2129–2133. Medline DOI 10.​1007/​s10620-005-3019-5.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Allison PR. Reflux esophagitis, sliding hiatus hernia and the anatomy of repair. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1951;92:419–431. Medline.PubMed Allison PR. Reflux esophagitis, sliding hiatus hernia and the anatomy of repair. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1951;92:419–431. Medline.PubMed
20.
Metadata
Title
Improved Reflux Monitoring in the Acute Gastroesophageal Reflux Porcine Model Using Esophageal Multichannel Intraluminal Impedance Measurement
Authors
Beat Peter Müller-Stich
Arianeb Mehrabi
Hannes Götz Kenngott
Zhoobin Mood
Hamidreza Funouni
Michael Andreas Reiter
Georg Richard Linke
Ulf Hinz
Carsten Nils Gutt
Jörg Köninger
Publication date
01-08-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Issue 8/2008
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Electronic ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-008-0547-2

Other articles of this Issue 8/2008

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 8/2008 Go to the issue