Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 11/2007

01-11-2007

Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis: Definitive or Detrimental?

Authors: Sandeepa Musunuru, Herbert Chen, Layton F. Rikkers, Sharon M. Weber

Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Issue 11/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

Utilization of computed tomography (CT) scans in patients with presumed appendicitis was evaluated at a single institution to determine the sensitivity of this diagnostic test and its effect on clinical outcome.

Methods

Adult patients (age > 17 years) with appendicitis were identified from hospital records. Findings at surgery, including the incidence of perforation, were correlated with imaging results.

Results

During a 3-year period, 411 patients underwent appendectomy for presumed acute appendicitis at our institution. Of these patients, 256 (62%) underwent preoperative CT, and the remaining 155 (38%) patients did not have imaging before the surgery. The time interval between arrival in the emergency room to time in the operating room was longer for patients who had preoperative imaging (8.2 ± 0.3 h) compared to those who did not (5.1 ± 0.2 h, p < 0.001). Moreover, this possible delay in intervention was associated with a higher rate of appendiceal perforation in the CT group (17 versus 8%, p = 0.017).

Conclusions

Preoperative CT scanning in patients with presumed appendicitis should be used selectively as widespread utilization may adversely affect outcomes. The potential negative impact of CT imaging includes a delay in operative intervention and a potentially higher perforation rate.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Antevil JL, Rivera L, Langenberg BJ, Hahm G, Favata MA, Brown CVR. Computed tomography-based clinical diagnostic pathway for acute appendicitis: Prospective validation. J Am Coll Surgeon 2006;203:849–856.CrossRef Antevil JL, Rivera L, Langenberg BJ, Hahm G, Favata MA, Brown CVR. Computed tomography-based clinical diagnostic pathway for acute appendicitis: Prospective validation. J Am Coll Surgeon 2006;203:849–856.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bendeck SE, Nino-Murcia M, Berry GJ, Jeffery RB. Imaging for suspected appendicitis: negative appendectomy and perforation rates. Radiology 2002;225:131–136.PubMedCrossRef Bendeck SE, Nino-Murcia M, Berry GJ, Jeffery RB. Imaging for suspected appendicitis: negative appendectomy and perforation rates. Radiology 2002;225:131–136.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Old JA, Dusing RW, Yap W, Dirks J. Imaging for suspected appendicitis. Am Fam Phys 2005;71:71–78. Old JA, Dusing RW, Yap W, Dirks J. Imaging for suspected appendicitis. Am Fam Phys 2005;71:71–78.
4.
go back to reference Bijnen, CL, van den Broek, WT, Bijnen, AB, de Ruiter, P, Gouma, DJ. Implications of removing a normal appendix. Dig Surg 2003;20:215–221.PubMedCrossRef Bijnen, CL, van den Broek, WT, Bijnen, AB, de Ruiter, P, Gouma, DJ. Implications of removing a normal appendix. Dig Surg 2003;20:215–221.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA, Mostafavi AA, McCabe CJ. Effect of computed tomography of the appendix on treatment of patients and use of hospital resource. N Engl J Med 1998;338:141–146.PubMedCrossRef Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA, Mostafavi AA, McCabe CJ. Effect of computed tomography of the appendix on treatment of patients and use of hospital resource. N Engl J Med 1998;338:141–146.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Horton MD, Counter SF, Florence MG, Hart MJ. A prospective trial of computed tomography and ultrasonography for diagnosing appendicitis in the atypical patients. Am J Surg 2000;179:379–381.PubMedCrossRef Horton MD, Counter SF, Florence MG, Hart MJ. A prospective trial of computed tomography and ultrasonography for diagnosing appendicitis in the atypical patients. Am J Surg 2000;179:379–381.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference McGory ML, Zingmond DS, Nanayakkara D, Maggard MA, Ko CY. Negative appendectomy rate: influence of CT scans. Am Surgeon 2005;71:803–808.PubMed McGory ML, Zingmond DS, Nanayakkara D, Maggard MA, Ko CY. Negative appendectomy rate: influence of CT scans. Am Surgeon 2005;71:803–808.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Bickell NA, Aufses AH, Rojas M, Bodian C. How time affects the risk of rupture in appendicitis. J Am Coll Surgeon 2006;202:401–406.CrossRef Bickell NA, Aufses AH, Rojas M, Bodian C. How time affects the risk of rupture in appendicitis. J Am Coll Surgeon 2006;202:401–406.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Ditillo MF, Dziura JD, Rabinovici R. Is it safe to delay appendectomy in adults with acute appendicitis? Ann Surg 2006;244:656–660.PubMedCrossRef Ditillo MF, Dziura JD, Rabinovici R. Is it safe to delay appendectomy in adults with acute appendicitis? Ann Surg 2006;244:656–660.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lee, SL, Walsh, AJ, Ho, HS. Computed tomography and ultrasonography do not improve and may delay the diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis. Arch Surg 2001;136:556–562.PubMedCrossRef Lee, SL, Walsh, AJ, Ho, HS. Computed tomography and ultrasonography do not improve and may delay the diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis. Arch Surg 2001;136:556–562.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hong, JJ, Cohn, SM, Ekeh, AP, Newman, M, Salama, M, Leblang, SD. A prospective randomized study of clinical assessment versus computed tomography for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Surg Infect 2004;5:223–224.CrossRef Hong, JJ, Cohn, SM, Ekeh, AP, Newman, M, Salama, M, Leblang, SD. A prospective randomized study of clinical assessment versus computed tomography for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Surg Infect 2004;5:223–224.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Fuchs JR, Schlamberg JS, Shortsleeve MJ, Schuler JG. Impact of abdominal CT imaging on the management of appendicitis: an update. J Surg Res 2002;106:131–136.PubMedCrossRef Fuchs JR, Schlamberg JS, Shortsleeve MJ, Schuler JG. Impact of abdominal CT imaging on the management of appendicitis: an update. J Surg Res 2002;106:131–136.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Menes TS, Aufses AH, Rojas M, Bickell NA. Increased use of computed tomography does not harm patients with acute appendicitis. Am Surgeon 2006;4:326–329. Menes TS, Aufses AH, Rojas M, Bickell NA. Increased use of computed tomography does not harm patients with acute appendicitis. Am Surgeon 2006;4:326–329.
14.
go back to reference Mittal VK, Goliath J, Sabir M, Patel R, Richards BF, Alkalay I, ReMine S, Edwards M. Advantages of focused helical computed tomographic scanning with rectal contrast only vs triple contrast in the diagnosis of clinically uncertain acute appendicitis. Arch Surg 2004;139:495–500.PubMedCrossRef Mittal VK, Goliath J, Sabir M, Patel R, Richards BF, Alkalay I, ReMine S, Edwards M. Advantages of focused helical computed tomographic scanning with rectal contrast only vs triple contrast in the diagnosis of clinically uncertain acute appendicitis. Arch Surg 2004;139:495–500.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Walker S, Haun W, Clark J, McMillin K, Zeren F, Gilland T. The value of limited computed tomography with rectal contrast in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Am J Surg 2000;180:450–455.PubMedCrossRef Walker S, Haun W, Clark J, McMillin K, Zeren F, Gilland T. The value of limited computed tomography with rectal contrast in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Am J Surg 2000;180:450–455.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Torbati SS, Guss DA. Impact of helical computed tomography on the outcomes of emergency department patients with suspected appendicitis. Acad Emerg Med 2003;10:823–829.PubMedCrossRef Torbati SS, Guss DA. Impact of helical computed tomography on the outcomes of emergency department patients with suspected appendicitis. Acad Emerg Med 2003;10:823–829.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Hershko DD, Sroka G, Bahouth H, Ghersin E, Mahajna A, Krausz MM. The role of selective computed tomography in the diagnosis and management of suspected acute appendicitis. Am Surgeon 2002;68:1003–1007.PubMed Hershko DD, Sroka G, Bahouth H, Ghersin E, Mahajna A, Krausz MM. The role of selective computed tomography in the diagnosis and management of suspected acute appendicitis. Am Surgeon 2002;68:1003–1007.PubMed
18.
go back to reference in’t Hof KH, van Lankeren W, Krestin GP, Bonjer HJ, Lange JF, Becking WB, Kazemier G. Surgical validation of unenhanced helical computed tomography in acute appendicitis. Br J Surg 2004;91:1641–1645.PubMedCrossRef in’t Hof KH, van Lankeren W, Krestin GP, Bonjer HJ, Lange JF, Becking WB, Kazemier G. Surgical validation of unenhanced helical computed tomography in acute appendicitis. Br J Surg 2004;91:1641–1645.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Fuchs, JR, Schlamberg, JS, Shortsleeve, MJ, Schuler, JG. Impact of abdominal CT imaging on the management of appendicitis: an update. J Surg Res 2002;106:131–136.PubMedCrossRef Fuchs, JR, Schlamberg, JS, Shortsleeve, MJ, Schuler, JG. Impact of abdominal CT imaging on the management of appendicitis: an update. J Surg Res 2002;106:131–136.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis: Definitive or Detrimental?
Authors
Sandeepa Musunuru
Herbert Chen
Layton F. Rikkers
Sharon M. Weber
Publication date
01-11-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Issue 11/2007
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Electronic ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-007-0268-y

Other articles of this Issue 11/2007

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 11/2007 Go to the issue