Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 10/2007

01-10-2007

Altered Esophageal Motility and Gastroesophageal Barrier in Patients with Jejunal Interposition After Distal Esophageal Resection for Early Stage Adenocarcinoma

Authors: Georg R. Linke, Jan Borovicka, Radu Tutuian, Rene Warschkow, Andreas Zerz, Jochen Lange, Michael Zünd

Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Issue 10/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Limited resection of the esophagogastric junction has been proven to be safe and oncologically radical in patients with early esophageal cancer. Reconstruction with interposition of isoperistaltic jejunal loop (Merendino procedure) is supposed to prevent gastroesophageal reflux and therefore the recurrence of intestinal metaplasia at the anastomosis. The aim of this study was to assess the frequency of acid and nonacid refluxes after Merendino procedure using multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (MII-pH) monitoring.

Patients and Methods

Between 2002 and 2005, 12 patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma underwent limited resection and jejunal interposition. Ten patients agreed to undergo a Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale assessment, upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy, esophageal manometry, and combined 24-h MII-pH monitoring more than 10 months postoperatively.

Results

Postoperatively, 4 (40%) patients reported belching without heartburn or acid regurgitation, 3 of them having a positive symptom index during 24-h MII-pH monitoring. Upper GI endoscopy revealed no inflammation, metaplasia, or stenosis at the esophagojejunal anastomosis. Esophageal manometry showed ineffective esophageal motility in four of ten patients. Combined 24-h MII-pH monitoring revealed normal distal esophageal acid exposure (% time pH < 4: 0.1% [0–1.5]), normal number of acid reflux episodes (3 [0–11]) but a high number of nonacid reflux episodes (82 [33–184]). Overall, eight patients revealed an abnormal number of nonacid reflux episodes.

Conclusion

The limited resection with jejunal interposition for early esophageal cancer is efficient in controlling acid but not nonacid reflux. While the clinical relevance of nonacid reflux in the recurrence of Barrett’s esophagus is currently unknown, endoscopic surveillance should be considered in these patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Stein HJ, von Rahden BH, Feith M. Surgery for early stage esophageal adenocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol 2005;92:210–217.PubMedCrossRef Stein HJ, von Rahden BH, Feith M. Surgery for early stage esophageal adenocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol 2005;92:210–217.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference May A, Gossner L, Pech O, Fritz A, Gunter E, Mayer G, Muller H, Seitz G, Vieth M, Stolte M, Ell C. Local endoscopic therapy for intraepithelial high-grade neoplasia and early adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s oesophagus: Acute-phase and intermediate results of a new treatment approach. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2002;14:1085–1091.PubMedCrossRef May A, Gossner L, Pech O, Fritz A, Gunter E, Mayer G, Muller H, Seitz G, Vieth M, Stolte M, Ell C. Local endoscopic therapy for intraepithelial high-grade neoplasia and early adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s oesophagus: Acute-phase and intermediate results of a new treatment approach. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2002;14:1085–1091.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Oberg S, Johansson J, Wenner J, Walther B. Metaplastic columnar mucosa in the cervical esophagus after esophagectomy. Ann Surg 2002;235:338–345.PubMedCrossRef Oberg S, Johansson J, Wenner J, Walther B. Metaplastic columnar mucosa in the cervical esophagus after esophagectomy. Ann Surg 2002;235:338–345.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Stein HJ, Feith M, Mueller J, Werner M, Siewert JR. Limited resection for early adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s esophagus. Ann Surg 2000;232:733–742.PubMedCrossRef Stein HJ, Feith M, Mueller J, Werner M, Siewert JR. Limited resection for early adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s esophagus. Ann Surg 2000;232:733–742.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Moylan JP Jr, Bell JW, Cantrell JR, Merendino KA. The jejunal interposition operation: a follow-up on seventeen patients followed 10 to 17 years. Ann Surg 1970;172:205–211.CrossRef Moylan JP Jr, Bell JW, Cantrell JR, Merendino KA. The jejunal interposition operation: a follow-up on seventeen patients followed 10 to 17 years. Ann Surg 1970;172:205–211.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Gaissert HA, Mathisen DJ, Grillo HC, Malt RA, Wain JC, Moncure AC, Kim JH, Mueller PR, DeAngelis R, Ottinger LW. Short-segment intestinal interposition of the distal esophagus. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993;106:860–866.PubMed Gaissert HA, Mathisen DJ, Grillo HC, Malt RA, Wain JC, Moncure AC, Kim JH, Mueller PR, DeAngelis R, Ottinger LW. Short-segment intestinal interposition of the distal esophagus. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993;106:860–866.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Stier AW, Feith M, Weigel C, Schwaiger M, Heidecke CD, Stein HJ. Scintigraphic evaluation of jejunal interposition after distal esophageal resection for early Barrett’s carcinoma. World J Surg 2003;27:1047–1051.PubMedCrossRef Stier AW, Feith M, Weigel C, Schwaiger M, Heidecke CD, Stein HJ. Scintigraphic evaluation of jejunal interposition after distal esophageal resection for early Barrett’s carcinoma. World J Surg 2003;27:1047–1051.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Gutschow CA, Schroder W, Wolfgarten E, Holscher AH. [Merendino procedure with preservation of the vagus for early carcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction]. Zentralbl Chir 2004;129:276–281.PubMedCrossRef Gutschow CA, Schroder W, Wolfgarten E, Holscher AH. [Merendino procedure with preservation of the vagus for early carcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction]. Zentralbl Chir 2004;129:276–281.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Tutuian R, Castell DO. Multichannel intraluminal impedance: General principles and technical issues. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2005;15:257–264.PubMedCrossRef Tutuian R, Castell DO. Multichannel intraluminal impedance: General principles and technical issues. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2005;15:257–264.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Merendino KA, Dillard DH. The concept of sphincter substitution by an interposed jejunal segment for anatomic and physiologic abnormalities at the esophagogastric junction; with special reference to reflux esophagitis, cardiospasm and esophageal varices. Ann Surg 1955;142:486–506.PubMedCrossRef Merendino KA, Dillard DH. The concept of sphincter substitution by an interposed jejunal segment for anatomic and physiologic abnormalities at the esophagogastric junction; with special reference to reflux esophagitis, cardiospasm and esophageal varices. Ann Surg 1955;142:486–506.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Revicki DA, Wood M, Wiklund I, Crawley J. Reliability and validity of the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Qual Life Res 1998;7:75–83.PubMedCrossRef Revicki DA, Wood M, Wiklund I, Crawley J. Reliability and validity of the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Qual Life Res 1998;7:75–83.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Richter JE, Wu WC, Johns DN, Blackwell JN, Nelson JL III, Castell JA, Castell DO. Esophageal manometry in 95 healthy adult volunteers. Variability of pressures with age and frequency of “abnormal” contractions. Dig Dis Sci 1987;32:583–592.PubMedCrossRef Richter JE, Wu WC, Johns DN, Blackwell JN, Nelson JL III, Castell JA, Castell DO. Esophageal manometry in 95 healthy adult volunteers. Variability of pressures with age and frequency of “abnormal” contractions. Dig Dis Sci 1987;32:583–592.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Shay S, Tutuian R, Sifrim D, Vela M, Wise J, Balaji N, Zhang X, Adhami T, Murray J, Peters J, Castell D. Twenty-four hour ambulatory simultaneous impedance and pH monitoring: a multicenter report of normal values from 60 healthy volunteers. Am J Gastroenterol 2004;99:1037–1043.PubMedCrossRef Shay S, Tutuian R, Sifrim D, Vela M, Wise J, Balaji N, Zhang X, Adhami T, Murray J, Peters J, Castell D. Twenty-four hour ambulatory simultaneous impedance and pH monitoring: a multicenter report of normal values from 60 healthy volunteers. Am J Gastroenterol 2004;99:1037–1043.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Wright C, Cuschieri A. Jejunal interposition for benign esophageal disease. Technical considerations and long-term results. Ann Surg 1987;205:54–60.PubMedCrossRef Wright C, Cuschieri A. Jejunal interposition for benign esophageal disease. Technical considerations and long-term results. Ann Surg 1987;205:54–60.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Schoeman MN, Tippett MD, Akkermans LM, Dent J, Holloway RH. Mechanisms of gastroesophageal reflux in ambulant healthy human subjects. Gastroenterology 1995;108:83–91.PubMedCrossRef Schoeman MN, Tippett MD, Akkermans LM, Dent J, Holloway RH. Mechanisms of gastroesophageal reflux in ambulant healthy human subjects. Gastroenterology 1995;108:83–91.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Wolfsen HC, Hemminger LL, DeVault KR. Recurrent Barrett’s esophagus and adenocarcinoma after esophagectomy. BMC Gastroenterol 2004;4:18.PubMedCrossRef Wolfsen HC, Hemminger LL, DeVault KR. Recurrent Barrett’s esophagus and adenocarcinoma after esophagectomy. BMC Gastroenterol 2004;4:18.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Stein HJ, Feith M, von Rahden BH, Siewert JR. Approach to early Barrett’s cancer. World J Surg 2003;27:1040–1046.PubMedCrossRef Stein HJ, Feith M, von Rahden BH, Siewert JR. Approach to early Barrett’s cancer. World J Surg 2003;27:1040–1046.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Altered Esophageal Motility and Gastroesophageal Barrier in Patients with Jejunal Interposition After Distal Esophageal Resection for Early Stage Adenocarcinoma
Authors
Georg R. Linke
Jan Borovicka
Radu Tutuian
Rene Warschkow
Andreas Zerz
Jochen Lange
Michael Zünd
Publication date
01-10-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Issue 10/2007
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Electronic ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-007-0213-0

Other articles of this Issue 10/2007

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 10/2007 Go to the issue