Skip to main content
Top
Published in: HAND 1/2013

01-03-2013 | Surgery Articles

Decreasing the pain of finger block injection: level II evidence

Authors: Nicolas D. Hamelin, Hugo St-Amand, Donald H. Lalonde, Patrick G. Harris, Jean-Paul Brutus

Published in: HAND | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

There is level II evidence that volunteers prefer the single subcutaneous injection in the midline of the proximal phalanx with lidocaine and epinephrine (SIMPLE) finger block over the classic two dorsal injection block technique. The purpose of this study was to possibly further decrease the pain of digital block injection by examining the effect of the duration of injection on the pain felt by volunteers receiving the SIMPLE block at two different injection rates.

Methods

Forty healthy blinded volunteers were injected 2 mL of lidocaine 1 % and epinephrine 1/100,000 in the digital palmar crease of both long fingers, one at a time. Two different rates of injection were used: 8 and 60 s. Pain scores were measured using a visual analogue scale and the volunteers were asked which of injection techniques they preferred.

Results

The visual analogue scale results revealed less pain with the slow injection (p < 0.001). Thirty three out of 40 volunteers preferred the slow injection rate. No difference could be attributed to sex of participants or to the first hand injected.

Conclusion

Blinded volunteers preferred digital blocks injected over 60 s to the more rapid 8 s. Decreasing the pain of injection only takes a minute of our valuable time for finger blocks.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Braun H, Harris ML. Operation on the extremities. In Local anesthesia: its scientific basis and practical use, 2nd American edition from the 6th revised German edition. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger; 1914. p. 367. Braun H, Harris ML. Operation on the extremities. In Local anesthesia: its scientific basis and practical use, 2nd American edition from the 6th revised German edition. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger; 1914. p. 367.
2.
go back to reference Brutus JP, Baeten Y, Chahidi N, et al. Single injection digital block: comparison between three techniques. Chir Main. 2002;21(3):182–7.PubMedCrossRef Brutus JP, Baeten Y, Chahidi N, et al. Single injection digital block: comparison between three techniques. Chir Main. 2002;21(3):182–7.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Cepeda MS, Tzortzopoulou A, Thackrey M, et al. Adjusting the pH of lidocaine for reducing pain on injection. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010;8(12): Art. No.: CD006581. Cepeda MS, Tzortzopoulou A, Thackrey M, et al. Adjusting the pH of lidocaine for reducing pain on injection. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010;8(12): Art. No.: CD006581.
4.
go back to reference Cummings AJ, Tisol WB, Meyer LE. Modified transthecal digital block versus traditional digital block for anesthesia of the finger. J Hand Surg Am. 2004;29(1):44–8.PubMedCrossRef Cummings AJ, Tisol WB, Meyer LE. Modified transthecal digital block versus traditional digital block for anesthesia of the finger. J Hand Surg Am. 2004;29(1):44–8.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Denkler K. A comprehensive review of epinephrine in the finger: to do or not to do. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108(1):114–24.PubMedCrossRef Denkler K. A comprehensive review of epinephrine in the finger: to do or not to do. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108(1):114–24.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Fitzcharles-Bowe C, Denkler KA, Lalonde DH. Finger injection with high-dose (1:1000) epinephrine: does it cause finger necrosis and should it be treated? Hand. 2007;2:5–11.PubMedCrossRef Fitzcharles-Bowe C, Denkler KA, Lalonde DH. Finger injection with high-dose (1:1000) epinephrine: does it cause finger necrosis and should it be treated? Hand. 2007;2:5–11.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Hogan ME, Vaart S, Perampaladas K, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of warming local anesthetics on injection pain. Ann Emerg Med. 2011;8(1):86–98.CrossRef Hogan ME, Vaart S, Perampaladas K, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of warming local anesthetics on injection pain. Ann Emerg Med. 2011;8(1):86–98.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hung VS, Bodavula VK, Dubin NH. Digital anaesthesia: comparison of the efficacy and pain associated with three digital nerve block techniques. J Hand Surg Br. 2005;30(6):581–4.PubMedCrossRef Hung VS, Bodavula VK, Dubin NH. Digital anaesthesia: comparison of the efficacy and pain associated with three digital nerve block techniques. J Hand Surg Br. 2005;30(6):581–4.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Keramidas EG, Rodopoulou SG, Tsoutsos D, et al. Comparison of transthecal digital block and traditional digital block for anesthesia of the finger. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114(5):1131–4.PubMed Keramidas EG, Rodopoulou SG, Tsoutsos D, et al. Comparison of transthecal digital block and traditional digital block for anesthesia of the finger. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114(5):1131–4.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Krause RS, Moscati R, Filice M, et al. The effect of injection speed on the pain of lidocaine infiltration. Acad Emerg Med. 1997;4(11):1032–5.PubMedCrossRef Krause RS, Moscati R, Filice M, et al. The effect of injection speed on the pain of lidocaine infiltration. Acad Emerg Med. 1997;4(11):1032–5.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Lalonde D, Bell M, Benoit P, et al. A multicenter prospective study of 3,110 consecutive cases of elective epinephrine use in the fingers and hand: the Dalhousie Project clinical phase. J Hand Surg Am. 2005;30(5):1061–7.PubMedCrossRef Lalonde D, Bell M, Benoit P, et al. A multicenter prospective study of 3,110 consecutive cases of elective epinephrine use in the fingers and hand: the Dalhousie Project clinical phase. J Hand Surg Am. 2005;30(5):1061–7.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Low CK, Vartany A, Engstrom JW, et al. Comparison of transthecal and subcutaneous single-injection digital block techniques. J Hand Surg Am. 1997;22(5):901–5.PubMedCrossRef Low CK, Vartany A, Engstrom JW, et al. Comparison of transthecal and subcutaneous single-injection digital block techniques. J Hand Surg Am. 1997;22(5):901–5.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Low CK, Wong HP, Low YP. Comparison between transthecal and subcutaneous digital blocks. J Hand Surg Br. 1997;22(5):582–4.PubMedCrossRef Low CK, Wong HP, Low YP. Comparison between transthecal and subcutaneous digital blocks. J Hand Surg Br. 1997;22(5):582–4.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Martires K, Malbasa CL, Bordeaux JS. A randomized controlled crossover trial: lidocaine injected at a 90-degree angle causes less pain than lidocaine injected at a 45-degree angle. J Amer Acad Derm. 2011;65(6):1231–3.CrossRef Martires K, Malbasa CL, Bordeaux JS. A randomized controlled crossover trial: lidocaine injected at a 90-degree angle causes less pain than lidocaine injected at a 45-degree angle. J Amer Acad Derm. 2011;65(6):1231–3.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Nodwell T, Lalonde DH. How long does it take phentolamine to reverse adrenaline-induced vasoconstriction in the finger and hand? A prospective randomized blinded study: the Dalhousie project experimental phase. Can J Plast Surg. 2003;11:187. Nodwell T, Lalonde DH. How long does it take phentolamine to reverse adrenaline-induced vasoconstriction in the finger and hand? A prospective randomized blinded study: the Dalhousie project experimental phase. Can J Plast Surg. 2003;11:187.
16.
go back to reference Thomson CJ, Lalonde DH, Denkler KA, et al. A critical look at the evidence for and against elective epinephrine use in the finger. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119:260–6.PubMedCrossRef Thomson CJ, Lalonde DH, Denkler KA, et al. A critical look at the evidence for and against elective epinephrine use in the finger. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119:260–6.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Wheelock ME, LeBlanc M, Chung B, et al. Is it true that injecting palmar finger skin hurts more than dorsal skin? New level 1 evidence. Hand. 2011;6:47–9.PubMedCrossRef Wheelock ME, LeBlanc M, Chung B, et al. Is it true that injecting palmar finger skin hurts more than dorsal skin? New level 1 evidence. Hand. 2011;6:47–9.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Whitworth JM, Kanaa MD, Corbett IP, et al. Influence of injection speed on the effectiveness of incisive/mental nerve block: a randomized, controlled, double-blind study in adult volunteers. J Endod. 2007;33(10):1149–54.PubMedCrossRef Whitworth JM, Kanaa MD, Corbett IP, et al. Influence of injection speed on the effectiveness of incisive/mental nerve block: a randomized, controlled, double-blind study in adult volunteers. J Endod. 2007;33(10):1149–54.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Williams JG, Lalonde DH. Randomized comparison of the single-injection volar subcutaneous block and the two-injection dorsal block for digital anesthesia. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118(5):1195–200.PubMedCrossRef Williams JG, Lalonde DH. Randomized comparison of the single-injection volar subcutaneous block and the two-injection dorsal block for digital anesthesia. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118(5):1195–200.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Yin ZG, Zhang JB, Kan SL, et al. Comparison of traditional digital blocks and single subcutaneous palmar injection blocks at the base of the finger and a meta-analysis of the digital block trials. J Hand Surg Br. 2006;31(5):547–55.PubMedCrossRef Yin ZG, Zhang JB, Kan SL, et al. Comparison of traditional digital blocks and single subcutaneous palmar injection blocks at the base of the finger and a meta-analysis of the digital block trials. J Hand Surg Br. 2006;31(5):547–55.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Decreasing the pain of finger block injection: level II evidence
Authors
Nicolas D. Hamelin
Hugo St-Amand
Donald H. Lalonde
Patrick G. Harris
Jean-Paul Brutus
Publication date
01-03-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
HAND / Issue 1/2013
Print ISSN: 1558-9447
Electronic ISSN: 1558-9455
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-012-9478-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

HAND 1/2013 Go to the issue